請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48528完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李永凌 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Feruth H.J. Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡蕙如 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T07:00:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-03-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-03-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-01-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. National Safety Council. Available from: http://www.nsc.org/news_resources/Resources/res_stats_services/Pages/GlossaryofTerms.aspx.
2. G.S Sorock, D.A.L., T.K.Courtney, J.P.Cotnam, M.A.Mittleman, Epidemiology of occupational acute hand injuries: a literature review. Safety Science, 2001. 38: p. 241-256. 3. James P. Keogh, M., Iman Nuwayhid, MD DrPH, Janice L. Gordon, ScM, and M. and Patricia Gucer, The Impact of Occupational Injury on Injured Worker and Family: Outcomes of Upper Extremity Cumulative Trauma Disorders in Maryland Workers. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2000. 38: p. 498-506. 4. O' Sullivan ME, C.J., The economic impact of hand injuries. J Hand Surg [Br], 1993(18B): p. 395-398. 5. Simona Giapaoli, L.F., Francesca Cecchi, Hand-grip strength predicts incident disability in non-disabled older men. Age and Ageing, 1999. 28: p. 283-288. 6. Jane Cox, S.S., John Kramer, Is There a Relationship between Hand Strength and Hand Function? Journal of Hand Therapy, 2006. 19(4): p. 444-445. 7. C. A. ARMSTRONG, J.A.O., A Comparison of Dominant and Non-Dominant Hand Strengths. J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 1999. 24(4): p. 421-425. 8. Connor, P.P.M.P.H., Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. The American journal of occupational therapy, 1989. 43. 9. Isabel Cary, J.A., A Comparison of Dominant and Non-dominant Hand Function in both Right- and Left-Handed Individuals using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP). Hand Therapy, 2003. 8: p. 4-10. 10. Backman C, C.S., Gibson G, Parsons J. , Assessment of hand function: the relationship between pegboard dexterity and applied dexterity. Can J Occup Ther, 1992. 59: p. 208-13. 11. Williams ME, H.N., Earp JL, Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. J Chronic Dis, 1982. 35: p. 115-22. 12. Greenhalgh J, L.A., Brettle AJ, Grant MJ, Reviewing and selecting outcome measures for use in routine practice. J Eval Clin Prac. 4: p. 339-50. 13. An KN, C.E., Askew LJ., Hand strength measurement instruments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. , 1980. 61(8): p. 366-8. 14. Oberg, A.P.R.H.B., INTRA- AND INTER-TESTER RELIABILITY AND REFERENCE VALUES FOR HAND STRENGTH Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2001. 33(1): p. 36-41. 15. S. G. HAIDAR, D.K., R. S. BASSI, Average versus Maximum Grip Strength: Which is more Consistent? J Hand Surg Eur Vol, 2004. 29(1): p. 82-84. 16. Katie E. Y, D.H., A Narrative Review of Dexterity Assessments. J HAND THER, 2009. 22: p. 258-70. 17. Huffaker WH, W.R., Weeks PM, Factors influencing final range of motion in the fingers after fractures of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1979. 63: p. 82-87. 18. Chow SP, P.W., So YC, Luk KDK, Chid KY, Ng KH, A prospective study of 245 open digital fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg [Br], 1991. 16B: p. 137-140. 19. van Oosterom FJT, E.A., Mulder PGH, Hovius SER, Functional outcome after surgical treatment of phalangeal fractures in severely injured hands. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 2005. 39: p. 238-241. 20. Chin G, W.N., Mead M, Gonzalez M., 'Spaghetti wrist' : Management and results. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1998. 102: p. 96-102. 21. Jaquet J-B, L.A., Kalmijn S, Kuypers PDL, Hofman A, Hovius SER., Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: Functional outcome and return to productivity. J Trauma, 2001. 51: p. 687-692. 22. Campbell DA, K.S., The hand injury severity scoring system. J Hand Surg [Br], 1996. 21B: p. 295-298. 23. CHIA-LING LEE, M.-Y.W., JER-HAO CHANG, Prediction of hand function after occupational hand injury by evaluation of initial anatomical severity. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2008. 30(11): p. 848-854. 24. Mink van der Molen AB, E.A., Hovius SER, Outcome of hand trauma: The hand injury severity scoring system (HISS) and subsequent impairment and disability. J Hand Surg [Br], 2003. 28B: p. 295-299. 25. Lafayette, I.L.i.c., Instructions and normative data for MODEL 32020 PURDUE PEGBOARD. 26. Tiffin J, A.E., The Purdue pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol, 1948. 32: p. 234-247. 27. Desrosiers J, H.b.R., Bravo G, Dutil E, The Purdue Pegboard Test: Normative data for people aged 60 and over. Disabil Rehabil, 1995. 17: p. 217-224. 28. Mink van der Molen AB, M.H., Dzwierzynski W, Sanger JR, The hand injury severity scoring system and workers' compensation cases in Wisconsin, USA. J Hand Surg [Br], 1999. 24B: p. 184-186. 29. Saxena P, C.L., Feldber L, Assessment of the severity of hand injuries using 'hand injury severity score', and its correlation with the functional outcome. Int J Care Injured, 2004(35): p. 511-516. 30. Lorie G. Richards PhD, O., Posture effects on grip strength. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1997. 78(10): p. 1154-1156. 31. Mital, A., Effect of body posture and common hand tools on peak torque exertion capabilities. Applied Ergonomics, 1986. 17(2): p. 87-96. 32. T.E. Hillman, Q.M.N., S.T. Hornby, A practical posture for hand grip dynamometry in the clinical setting. Clinical Nutrition, 2005. 24(2): p. 224-228. 33. Fernandez, J.E.D., THE EFFECT OF WRIST POSTURE ON PINCH STRENGTH. INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, (5): p. 748-752. 34. Tadayoshi Watanabe, K.O., Yumiko Kanauchi, The Short-Term Reliability of Grip Strength Measurement and the Effects of Posture and Grip Span. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 2005. 30(3): p. 603-609. 35. Smith, T., S Smith, M Martin, R Henry, S Weeks, A Bryant, Grip Strength in Relation to Overall Strength and Functional Capacity in Very Old and Oldest Old Females2006: The Haworth Press Inc. 63-78. 36. Yasuo, G., T Daisaku, M Nariyuki, S Jun'ya, O Toshihiko, M Masahiko, and M Yoshiyuki, Relationship Between Grip Strength and Surgical Results in Rotator Cuff Tears. Shoulder Joint, 2005. 29(3): p. 559-562. 37. C. C. Plato, J.L.W., A. H. Norris, Bilateral asymmetry in bone measurements of the hand and lateral hand dominance. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1980. 52(1): p. 27-31. 38. Weinick, J., Functional Anatomy in Sports1990, St Louis, Mo. 39. Waldo, B., Grip Strength Testing. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal, 1996 Oct: p. 32-35. 40. HR, L., Levels of application of preventive medicine. 3rd ed. Preventive medicine for the doctor in his community, ed. C.E. Leavell HR1965, New York: McGraw Hill. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48528 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的：手外傷所導致的手功能缺損及其造成之日常生活功能影響無論在台灣或世界其他地區都是一日益嚴重的問題，為了能預測未來手功能不良的傷者，我們進行此一研究，利用HISS (Hand Injury Severity Scoring) 系統試圖預測受傷之後的手功能，包括手力量以及操作靈活度，藉此預測出需要及早介入的傷者並導入復健治療，以減少未來殘障的可能性，幫助傷者重回日常生活功能。
方法：我們選取了台灣某醫學中心自2004年至2008年手外傷開刀住院後半年以上的傷者，首先以電話問卷方式取得其基本資料及詢問參與意願，在取得受試者同意書後，選擇15-60歲，單側手受傷，且語言表達溝通無礙的傷者參與研究。初始手受傷嚴重度以入院時的Hand Injury Severity Scoring system (HISS)為測量工具。手功能部份我們分別測量手握力以及Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT)、Purdue Pegboard (PP)等兩種手操作靈活度測試來代表受傷後手功能。並以logistic regression model來測量較差手功能與HISS分數間的關係，以及HISS component與手功能間的關係。 結果：在校正基本資料（包括年齡、性別、教育程度以及慣用手是否受傷）之後，我們發現一開始HISS分數較低的傷者，在六個月後手握力歸類於較差那組的危險性較大。在手握力的palmar pinch以及palmar grasp測試中，HISS分數列在severe/major的有較高的危險性歸類於較差的那組。而在HISS component中，skeletal這個component與palmar pinch及palmar grasp測試結果相關，以上均達統計學上顯著差異(P<0.05)。而在手操作靈活度的部份，無論MMDT或PP與HISS嚴重度或component均無達到統計學上的顯著差異。 結論：本研究發現HISS嚴重度能夠預測受傷進入穩定期後的手握力，能給予臨床醫療人員及早對這類傷者引入復健治療的指引。但對手操作靈活度這部份的手功能而言，本研究並未發現有顯著關係存在。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose
Hand strength is one of key components in human hand function. To evaluate post-injury hand functions, we conduct this study to assess the predictability of HISS (Hand Injury Severity Scoring) system to hand functions after a period of recovery. Methods In this retrospective study, eighty hand injured subjects were recruited. Hand strength tests measured by dynamometers were performed by subjects in ways of palmar pinch, lateral pinch and palmar grasp. Hand dexterity tests assessed by MMDT and Purdue pegboard tests. The logistic regression models were used to evaluate the risk of poor hand strength/dexterity among the severities represented by HISS scores. Results A negative correlation exists between the differences of the strength of two hands, and the severity shown by HISS system in the poorer half of subjects. The risk to be in poorer half of palmar pinch subtest is significant in severe/major subgroup of HISS severity. The risk to be in poorer half of palmar grasp subtest is significant in severe/major subgroup of HISS severity. The risk to be in poorer half of palmar pinch and palmar grasp subtests is significant in skeletal component of HISS system. No statistical significance is shown between HISS scores and MMDT/Purdue pegboard tests. Conclusions HISS is a descriptive severity scoring system to hand injury and also a useful instrument to predict functional outcome. This study revealed the low HISS scores may predict poor post-injury hand strength after adequate recovery. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T07:00:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97847002-1.pdf: 1160438 bytes, checksum: 999934803f2e6124b3aff9a835d92a5c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………………………………….2
謝辭…………………………………………………………………………………………….3 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………….4 ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………. ……….5 CONTENTS…………………………………………………………………………………...7 LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………………..9 LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………...............10 CHAPTER 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………..11 1.1 Practicum Unit Features and Brief Introduction………………………………….11 1.2 Research Purpose and Research Problem…………………………………………12 CHAPTER 2 Literature Review……………………………………………………………13 2.1 Epidemiology and Social Association of Hand Injury…………………………….13 2.2 Role of Hand Strength in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)………………………13 2.3 Role of Hand Dexterity in Activities of Daily Living (ADL)……………………...14 2.4 Measurement to Hand Strength…………………………………………………….14 2.5 Measurement to Hand Dexterity…………………………………………………...14 2.6 Hand Injury Severity Scoring System……………………………………………..15 CHAPTER 3 Methods………………………………………………………………………16 3.1 Participants………………………………………………………………………….16 3.2 Hand Injury Severity Scoring System……………………………………………..16 3.3 Purdue Pegboard……………………………………………………………………17 3.3.1 The Injury Hand Subtest……………………………………………………..17 3.3.2 The Both Hand Subtests………………………………………………………17 3.3.3 The Assembly Subtests………………………………………………………..18 3.4 Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test………………………………………………..18 3.4.1 Placing Subtests……………………………………………………………...18 3.4.2 Turning Subtests……………………………………………………………..19 3.5 Hand Strength Measurement……………………………………………………...19 3.6 Statistical Analysis………………………………………………………………….20 CHAPTER 4 Results………………………………………………………………………..21 4.1 Demographic data......................................................................................................21 4.2 The HISS System........................................................................................................21 4.3 Correlation between Scores of HISS System and Hand Strength………………..21 4.4 Correlation between HISS System and Hand Function Tests…………………….22 4.5 Correlation between HISS Components and Hand Strength and Functions…....23 CHAPTER 5 Discussions……………………………………………………………………24 CHAPTER 6 Conclusions an Acknowledgement………………………………………….29 RERERENCE………………………………………………………………………………..48 APPENDIX…………………………………………………………………………………..51 Appendix 1 The Hand Injury Severity Scoring system………………………………...51 Appendix 2 The Questionnaires…………………………………………………………53 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 手外傷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 手操作靈活度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 手握力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | HISS | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | HISS | en |
| dc.subject | manual dexterity | en |
| dc.subject | Hand strength | en |
| dc.subject | hand injury | en |
| dc.title | 以Hand Injury Severity Scoring System
預測受傷後之手功能 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Prediction of Hand Function by Hand Injury Severity Scoring System in Hand Injured Patients | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林政宜,張哲豪 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 手外傷,HISS,手握力,手操作靈活度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Hand strength,HISS,hand injury,manual dexterity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 58 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-01-24 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。