請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48461完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 花茂棽(Mau-Sun Hua) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ming-Chun Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊明純 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T06:57:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-02-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-02-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-01-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王雅玲、黃崇謙（2006）。「探討頭部外傷的傷害機轉與醫療資源耗用」。臺北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所，碩士論文。[Wang, Y.L. (2006). The mechanism and medical resources utilization in head injury. Unpublished Master Thesis, School of Health Care Administration.]
行政院衛生署（2010）。「民國九十八年台灣地區死因統計」。行政院衛生署網站 http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/index.htm. [Department of health of executive yuan (2010). 2009 statistics of causes of death in Taiwan. Web site: http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/index.htm.] 花茂棽、張本聖、林克能、楊建銘、盧小蓉、陳心怡（2005）。「魏氏記憶力量表第三版（WMS-III）中文版指導手冊」。台灣台北：中國行為科學社。[Hua, M.S., Chang, B.S., Lin, K.N., Yang, J.M., Lu, S.R., & Chen, S.Y. (2005). Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition (WMS-III) Manual for Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: The Chinese Behavioral Science Corporation.] 高至潔（2009）。「台灣正常中老年人尼爾森修訂版卡片分類測驗之常模研究」。臺灣大學心理研究所，碩士論文。[KaoA C.C. (2009). Normative Study on Nelson’s Modified Card Sorting Test in Healthy Middle Age and Elderly Individuals in Taiwan. Unpublished Master Thesis, School of National Taiwan University.] 陳榮華、陳心怡（2002）。「魏氏成人智力量表第三版（中文版）指導手冊」。台灣台北：中國行為科學社出版。[Chen, Y., & Chen, H. (2002). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III) Manual for Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: The Chinese Behavioral Science Corporation.] 葉在庭、花茂棽、劉珣瑛（2009）猜猜我在想什麼? 中文版心智推理作業的信效度研究及其在老年人的表現初探。「中華心理學刊」，51 (3)，375-395。 [Yeh, Z.T., Hua, M.S., & Liu, S.I. (2009). Guess What I think? The Reliability and Validity of Chinese Theory of Mind Tasks and Performance in the Elderly. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 51 (3), 375-395] 楊啟正、王瑋翰、黃勝堅、花茂棽（2006）。中重度TBI後之神經認知功能障礙。「臨床心理學刊」，3 (2)，68-75。[Yang, C.C., Wang, W.H., Huang, S.J., Hua, M.S. (2006). Neurocognitive deficits in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Psychology, 3 (2), 68-75.] Allport, A. (1985). The historical background of social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.). Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 3rd ed., pp. 1-46). New York: Random House. Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 7, 268–277. Baron-Cohen, S., Campbell, R., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., & Walker, J. (1995). Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 379-398. Bibby, H. & McDonald, S.（2005）. Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 43, 99–114.18 Bigler, E. D. (2001). The lesion(s) in traumatic brain injury: Implications for clinical neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16(2), 95–131. Bird, C. M., Castelli, F., Malik, O., Frith, U., & Husain, M. (2004). The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on ‘Theory of Mind’ and cognition. Brain, 127, 914–928. Blair, R.J.R., & Cipolitti, L. (2000). Impaired social response reversal: A case of ‘acquired sociopathy’. Brain, 123, 1122–1141. Boake, C., McCauley, S.R., Pedroza, C., Pedroza, C., Levin, H.S., Brown, S.A., et al. (2005). Lost productive work time after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury with and without hospitalization. Neurosurgery, 56, 994-1003. Borgaro, S.R., Prigatano, G.P., Kwasnica, C., Rexer, J.L. (2003). Cognitive and affective sequelae in complicated and uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 17,189–198. Brothers, L. (1990). The social brain: A project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts in Neuroscience, 1, 27–61. Brown, M., Dijkers, M., Gordon, WA., Ashman, T., Charatz, H., & Cheng, Z. (2004). Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19, 459–481. Burleigh, SA., Farber, RS., & Gillard, M. (1998). Community integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: long-term findings. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 45–52. Cicerone, K.D. & Azulay, J. (2007). Perceived Self-Efficacy and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 22(5), 257–266. Channon, S., & Crawford, S. (2000). The effects of anterior lesions on performance on a story comprehension test: Left anterior impairment on a theory of mind-type task. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1006–1017. Corrigan, J. (1994). Community integration following traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation, 4, 109–121. Corrigan, J.D., Bogner, J.A., Mysiw, W.J., Clinchot, D., & Fugate, L. (2001). Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16(6), 543–555. Corrigan, JD., & Deming, R. (1995). Psychometric characteristics of the Community Integration Questionnaire: Replication and extension. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10, 41–53. Crosson, B., Barco, P.P., Velozo, C.A., Bolesta, M.M., Cooper, P.V., Werrs, D et al. (1989). Awareness and compensation in postacute head injury rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 4(3), 46-54. Crosson, B., Sartor, K.J., Jenny, A.B., Nabors, N.A., & Moberg, P.J. （1993）. Increased intrusions during verbal recall in traumatic and nontraumatic lesions of the temporal lobe. Neuropsychology, 7, 193–208. Cummings, J.L. (1993). Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. Archives of Neurology, 50 (8), 873–880. Damasio, A.R., Grabowski, T.J., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Ponto, L.L.B., Parvizi, J., et al. (2000). Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. National Neuroscience, 3, 1049–1056. Davidson, R.J., & Irwin, W. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 11–21. Dawson, D.R., & Chipman, M. (1995). The disablement experienced by traumatically brain－injury adult living in the community. Brain Injury, 9, 339-353. DeGuise, E., LeBlanc, J., Feyz, M., Meyer, K., Duplantie, J., Thomas, H., et al. (2008). Long-Term Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The McGill Interdisciplinary Prospective Study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabililation, 23, 294–303. Draper K., Ponsford J., & Schönberger M. (2007). Psychosocial and Emotional Outcomes 10 Years Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabililation, 22, 278–287. Drevets, W.C., & Raichle, M.E. (1998). Reciprocal Suppression of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow during Emotional versus Higher Cognitive Processes: Implications for interaction between Emotion and Cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 353–385. Duffy, JD., & Campbell, JJ. (1994). The regional prefrontal syndromes: theoretical and clinical overview. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 6, 379– 87. Eslinger, P.J., Zappala, G., Chakara, F., & Barrett, A.M. (2007). Cognitive impairments after TBI. In N.D. Franulic, A., Carbonell, C. G., Pinto, P., & Sepulveda, I. (2004). Psychosocial adjustment and employment outcome 2, 5 and 10 years after TBI. Brain Injury, 18(2),119 –129. Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological science, 29, 459–473. Geraci, A., Surian, L., Ferraro, M., & Cantagallo, A. (2010).Theory of Mind in patients with ventromedial or dorsolateral prefrontal lesions following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 24(7–8), 978–987 Groth-Marant, G. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment 4th. John Willey & Sons, Inc. Hall, K.M., Hamilton, B.B., Gordon, W.A., & Zasler, N.D. (1993). Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: disability rating scale, functional independence measure, and functional assessment measure. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 60–74. Hanks,R.A.,Rapport,L.J.,Millis,S.R.,Deshpande,S.A.(1999).Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1030-1037. Hartley, L.L. (1995). Cognitive-communication abilities following brain injury. Singular Publishing Group Inc., San Diego. Heavey, L., Phillips, W., Baron-Cohen, S., & Rutter, M. (2000). The awkward moments test: A naturalistic measure of social understanding in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 225-236. Henry, J. D., Phillips, L. H., Crawford, J. R., Ietswaart, M., Summers F. (2006). Theory of mind following traumatic brain injury: The role of emotion recognition and executive dysfunction. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1623–1628. Hinchliffe, F. J., Murdoch, B. E., & Chenery, H. J. (1998). Towards a conceptualization of language and cognitive impairment in closed-head injury: Use of clinical measures. Brain Injury, 12, 109-132. Hoofien, D., Gilboa, A., Vakil, E., & Donovick, P.J. (2001). Traumatic brain injury 10–20 years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities, and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury, 15, 189–209. Hua, M.S., Chang, S.H., & Chen, S.T. (1997). Factor structure and age effects with an aphasia test battery in normal Taiwanese adults. Neuropsychology, 11, 156-162. Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles , M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A., et al. (2000). Hypersociability in Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 30-46. Koob, G.F., & Bloom, F.E. (1998). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence. Science, 242, 715 –723. Lee, T.M.C., Ip, A.K.Y., Wang, K., Xi, C., Hu, P., Mak, H.KF., et al. (2010). Faux pas deficits in people with medial frontal lesions as related to impaired understanding of a speaker’s mental state. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1670–1676. Levin, H.S. (1995). Neurobehavioral outcome of closed head injury: Implications for clinical trials. Journal of Neurotrauma, 12, 601– 610. Levin, H.S., High, W.M., Goldstein, F.C., & Williams, D.H. (1988). Sustained attention and information processing speed in chronic survivors of severe closed head injury. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 17, 33-40. Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., & Loring, D.W. (2004). Executive functions and motor performance. In M.D., Lezak, D.B., Howieson, & D.W., Loring (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment (pp. 611-646). New York: Oxford University Press. MacPherson, S. E., Phillips, L. H., & Della Sala, S. (2002). Age, executive function and social decision making: A dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging. Psychology & Aging, 17, 598-609. Marshall, J., Pring, T., & Chint, S. (1998). Verbal retrival and sentence production in aphasia. Brain and language, 63(2), 159-183. Martin-Rodrigueza,J.F. & Leon-Carrion, J. (2010). Theory of mind deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1181–1191. Mattson, A.J. & Levin, H.S. (1990). Frontal lobe dysfunction following closed head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 282-291. McColl, M.A., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Minnes, P., Shue, K., Davies, D., & Karlovits, T. (1998). The definition of community integration: Perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury, 12, 15–30. McCrea, M. (2007). Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Postconcussion Syndrome: The New Evidence Base for Diagnosis and Treatment (American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Workshop Series). New York: Oxford University Press. McDonald, S., Bornhofen, C., Shum, D., Long, E., Saunders, C., & Neulinger, K. （2006）. Reliability and validity of The Awareness of Social Inference Test （TASIT）: A clinical test of social perception. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 1529–1542. McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18 (3), 219–238. McDonald, S. & Pearce, S. (1996). Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language, 53, 81–104. Nahum A.M. & Melvin J.W. (2002). Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention. Berlin: Springer. pp. 280–81. Milders, M., Deelman, B., & Berg, I. (1999). Retrieving familiar people′s names in patients with severe closedhead injuries. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 171-185. Milders, M., Ietswaart, M., Crawford, J. R., & Currie, D. (2008). Social behavior following traumatic brain injury and its association with emotion recognition, understanding of intentions, and cognitive flexibility. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 318–326. Miller, BL., Chang, L., Mena, I., Boone, K., & Lesser, IM. (1993). Progressive right frontotemporal degeneration: clinical, neuropsychological and SPECT characteristics. Dementia, 4, 204–13. Mittenberg, W. & Strauman, S. (2000). Diagnosis of mild head injury and the postconcussional syndrome. Journal of Head Trauma and Rehabilitation, 15, 783–791. Muller, F., Simion, A., Reviriego, E., Galera, C., Mazaux, J.M., Barat, M., et al. (2009). Exploring theory of mind after severe traumatic brain injury, 10, 1-12. Nelson, H.E. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex, 12, 313-324. Obonsawin, M.C., Crawford, J.R., Page, J., Chalmers, P., Low, G., & Marsh, P. (1999). Performance on the Modified Card Sorting Test by normal, healthy individuals: relationship to general intellectual ability and demographic variables. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 27-41. O’Connor, C., Colantonio, A., & Polatajko, H. (2005). Long-term symptoms and limitations of activity of people with traumatic brain injury: a ten-year follow-up. Psychological Reports, 97, 169–179. Oliver, J.H., Ponsford, J.L., & Curran, C. (1996). Outcome following traumatic brain injury: Acomparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury, 10, 841–848. Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). ' John thinks that Mary thinks that...'. Attribution of second-order false beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 437-471. Ponsford, J., Draper, K., & Schönberger, M. (2008). Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: Its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 233–242. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Chimpanzee problemsolving: A test for comprehension. Science, 202, 532 –535. Prigatano, GP. (1989). Work, love, and play after brain injury. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 53(5), 414–431. Prigatano, GP. & Schachter, DL. (1991). Awareness of deficit after brain injury: Clinical and theoretical implications. New York: Oxford University Press. Rassovsky, Y., Satz, P., Alfano, M.S., light, R.K., Zaucha, K., McArthur, D.L., & Hovda, D. (2006). Functional Outcome in TBI: Neuropsychological, Emotional, and Behavioral Mediators. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 567–580. Reitan, R.M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology press. Rolls, E. T. (1996). The orbitofrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 351, 1433–1444. Rutterford, N.A. & Wood, R.L. (2006). Evaluating a theory of stress and adjustment when predicting long-term psychosocial outcome after brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 359–367. Salter, K., Foley, N., Jutai, J., Bayley, M., & Teasell, R. (2008). Assessment of community integration following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 22(11), 820-835. Sander, A.M., Clark, A., & Pappadis, M.R.(2010). What Is Community Integration Anyway? Defining Meaning Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25(2), 121–127. Sander, AM., Fuchs, KL., High, WM., Hall, KM., Kreutzer, JS., & Rosenthal, M. (1999). The community integration questionnaire revisited: An assessment of factor structure and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1303–1308. Santoro, J., & Spiers, M. (1994). Social cognitive factors in brain injury—associated personality change. Brain Injury, 8, 265–276. Saxe, R. (2006). Four brain regions for one theory of mind. In J. T. Cacioppo, P. S. Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Tomer, R., Berger, B.G., & Aharon-Peretz J. (2003). Characterization of Empathy Deficits following Prefrontal Brain Damage: The Role of the Right Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 324–337. Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Tomer, R., Berger, B.D., Goldsher, D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Impaired ‘‘Affective Theory of Mind’’ Is Associated with Right Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage. Cognition Behavioal Neurology, 18, 55–67. Snowden, J. S., Gibbons, Z. C., Blackshaw, A., Doubleday, E., Thompson, J., Craufurd, D., et al. (2003). Social cognition in frontotemporal dementia and Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 41, 688–701. Spatt, J., Zebenholzer, K., & Oder, W. (1997). Psychosocial long-term outcome of severe head injury as perceived by patients, relatives, and professionals. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 95, 173–179. Steadman-Pare, D., Colantonio, A., Ratcliff, G., Chase, S., & Vernich, L. (2001). Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16(4), 330–342. Sternberg, R. (1994). In search of the human mind. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Strauss, E., Sherman, E.M.S., Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press. Stone, V.E., Baron-Cohen, S. & Knight, R.T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640-656. Surian, L. & Siegal, M. (2001). Sources of performance on theory of mind tasks in right hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 78, 224–232. Tate, RL., Hodgkinson, A., Veerbangsa, A., & Maggiotto, S. (1999). Measuring psychosocial recovery after traumatic brain injury: psychometric properties of a new scale. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabiliation, 14, 543–557. Teasdale, T.W. & Engberg, A.W. (2005). Subjective well-being and quality of life following traumatic brain injury in adults: A long-term population-based follow-up. Brain Injury, 19(12), 1041 –1048. The Brain Traumatic Foundation. (2003). Guidelines for management and prognosis of severe Traumatic Brain injury, Retrieved June 12, 2005, from the Brain Traumatic Foundation, Web site: http://www2.braintrauma.org/ guidelines/index.php Varley, R., & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology,10, 723–726. Velzen, J.M., van Bennekom, C.A.M., Edelaar, M.J.A., Sluiter, J.K., & Frings-dresen, M.H.W. (2009). Prognostic factors of return to work after acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Brain Injury, 23(5), 385–395. Vollm, B.A., Taylor, A.N., Richardson, P., Corcoran, R., Stirling, J., McKie, S., et al. (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage 29:90–98. Wechsler D. (1975). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, Psychological Corporation, New York. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Third Edition [Manual]. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler memory scale -Third Edition [Manual]. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp. Weddell RA. (1987). Social, functional, and neuropsychological determinants of the psychiatric symptoms of stroke patients receiving rehabilitation and living at home. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabililation Medicine, 19, 93–98.9 Wheeler, M.A., Stuss, D.T., Tulving, E. (1995). Frontal lobe damage produces episodic memory impairment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 525-536. Willer, B. & Corrigan J. (1994). Whatever it takes: a model for communitybased services. Brain Injury, 8(7), 647–659. Willer, B., Linn, R.T., & Allen, K. (1993). Community integration and barriers to integration for individuals with brain injury. In Finlayson, M.A.J.& Garner, S. (Eds.), Brain injury rehabilitation: Clinical considerations (pp. 355–375). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. Williams, D.H., Levin, H.S., & Eisenberg, H.M. (1990). Mild head injury classification. Neurosurgery, 27, 422-428. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128. Wood, R.L. & Rutterford, N.A. (2006a). Demographic and cognitive predictors of long-term psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 350–358. Wood, R.L. & Rutterford, N.A. (2006b). Psychosocial adjustment 17 years after severe brain injury. Journal of Neurological Neurosurgery Psychiatry, 77, 71–73. Wood-Dauphinee, S.L., Opzoomer, M.A., Williams, J.I., Marchand, B., & Spitzer, W.O. (1988). Assessment of global function: The reintegration to normal living index. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 583–590. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48461 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在受傷後多年，許多頭部外傷病人仍有社交問題。探討社交功能之主要影響因子，可作為安排復健計畫之參考，有助於病人未來社交互動，也可以避免對社會造成負擔。過去研究一致支持頭部外傷病人常在失態偵測作業表現不好，與其前額葉損傷有關，影響個體在社會情境中推論他人的想法與情緒。然而，過去研究未探討心智推理能力對於社交功能表現之影響程度，也未比較該能力和執行功能與語文理解智力對於社交功能表現的重要性。
研究受試者為30位輕度與中重度頭部外傷病人與29位正常人，所有病人透過電腦斷層掃描或磁振照影顯示腦部神經病理證據。每位受試者皆進行完整神經心理學測驗與失態偵測作業，而且頭部外傷病人與其家屬頇分別填寫社交功能表現問卷。先透過預備性研究，修訂適合國內使用的社交功能表現問卷並進行信效度研究，然後在正式研究中，使用該問卷評估病人社交功能現況分數與改變分數。 研究結果顯示，比較病人與正常人的社交功能表現，輕度頭部外傷病人與中重度頭部外傷病人表現較差；比較創傷前與目前社交功能表現，輕度頭部外傷病人與中重度頭部外傷病人目前表現較差。迴歸分析結果，語文理解智力分數與失態偵測作業表現是病人自評的社交功能現況分數與改變分數的顯著影響因子，解釋力為51％ ~ 52％；語文理解智力分數是家屬評估的社交功能現況分數與改變分數的顯著影響因子，解釋力為22％ ~ 33％。 依據上述研究結果，頭部外傷病人不論其創傷的嚴重程度皆呈現社交功能的問題，影響這些功能的改變主要源自病人語文理解智力與心智推理能力的受損。有鑑於此，本研究結果建議將這兩項功能評估納入頭部外傷病人的神經心理衡鑑中，以利於安排改善病人社交功能表現之復建計畫。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Poor social functional outcome is common among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) even years after the injury. Exploring the main factors contributing social functional outcome will provide useful information for rehabilitation plans, which would help with patient’s social interaction and reduce possible social cost. Previous results supported that TBI patients had poor performances on the faux pas task. This is probably due to their prefrontal lesions that affect their ability to infer others’ thoughts and feelings in social context. However, previous studies neither explore the effect of theory of mind on social functional outcome, nor compare the importance of theory of mind with executive function and verbal comprehension intelligence.
Thirty mild, moderate and severe TBI patients as well as twenty nine normal controls participated in the present study. All TBI patients’ brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging showed abnormal findings. Each participant received a battery of neuropsychological tests and the faux pas task. TBI patients and their families also completed a social functional outcome questionnaire that had been revised and validated in Taiwan in pilot study. Current score and change score of social function outcome were both measured. The results revealed that both mild TBI patients as well as moderate and severe TBI patients had significantly poor performance on the social functional outcome questionnaire than the control group. Meanwhile, they performed significantly poorer on the social functional outcome than they did at the pre-morbid state. Performance scores of the faux pas task and the verbal comprehension intelligence test were significantly contributory to the patients’ self ratings of the current score and the change score of the social functional outcome questionnaire, accounting for 51％ ~ 52％ of the variance. However, only the verbal comprehension intelligence test significantly contributed to the family measures’ ratings of the current score and the change score of the social functional outcome questionnaire, accounting for 22％ ~ 33％ of the variance. Based on the results, TBI patients had significantly lower frequency of social interaction after injury regardless of the severity resulting from the impairment of verbal comprehension intelligence and theory of mind. It is thus suggested that neuropsychological assessment including the tests of theory of mind and verbal comprehension intelligence could directly link to proper rehabilitation plans to improve patients’ social functions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:57:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R96227211-1.pdf: 1241670 bytes, checksum: d0dc5d37b29d28a3569ddf1a635eeb5e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論………………………………………………………………………01
TBI病人社交功能表現………………………………………………….03 TBI病人心智推理能力與社交功能表現的關聯……………………….07 研究目的與研究問題……………………………………………………10 研究方法…………………………………………………………………13 預備性研究………………………………………………………………13 研究對象…………………………………………………………………18 研究工具…………………………………………………………………19 研究程序…………………………………………………………………21 統計方法…………………………………………………………………22 結果………………………………………………………………………23 TBI病人社交功能表現………………………………………………….23 TBI病人的心智推理能力與認知功能………………………………….24 TBI病人心智推理能力對於社交功能表現之影響…………………….26 討論………………………………………………………………………31 TBI病人社交功能表現………………………………………………….31 TBI病人心智推理能力對於社交功能表現之影響…………………….32 研究限制…………………………………………………………………36 研究貢獻及未來研究方向………………………………………………37 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………39 附錄………………………………………………………………………52 附錄一 社交功能表現問卷…………………………………………….52 附錄二 預備研究之研究參與同意書………………………………….54 附錄三 正式研究之研究參與同意書………………………………….55 附錄四 社區融合問卷翻譯與使用授權……………………………….58 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 失態偵測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 頭度外傷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社交功能表現 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心智推理能力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | traumatic brain injury | en |
| dc.subject | faus pas | en |
| dc.subject | theory of mind | en |
| dc.subject | social functional outcome | en |
| dc.title | 心智推理能力對頭部外傷病人的社交互動頻率之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effects of Theory of Mind on Frequency of Social Interaction in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊啟正(Chi-Cheng Yang),黃勝堅(Sheng-Jean Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 頭度外傷,社交功能表現,心智推理能力,失態偵測, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | traumatic brain injury,social functional outcome,theory of mind,faus pas, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 58 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-01-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.21 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。