請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47992
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 侯文祥 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yung-Li Liao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 廖永豊 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T06:44:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 行政院環保署,2006,水中總溶解固體及懸浮固體檢測方法─103℃∼105℃乾燥,NIEA W210.57A。
2. 行政院農業委員會漁業署年報(2008)。 3. 李端,1997,日本鰻露天養殖池中顆粒之物性解析,國立台灣大學農業工程學研究所碩士論文。 4. 李朝順,2002,擴散管流量解析解的研究,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 5. 李岱衛,2007,利用粒子族群演算法研究多孔放流管之優化設計,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 6. 侯文祥,1994,循環式養鰻系統水環境管理與汙濁固形物通量之關係,中國農業工程學報第四十卷第一期。 7. 侯文祥、王鼎盛,1995,日本鰻池汙濁固形物運動時態,民國84年度農業工程研討會。 8. 侯文祥、陳川林,1996,海水魚養殖場內污染物的生成負荷考察,中國水產月刊第517期。 9. 侯棋粦,2001,以濁度計量化立體式九孔養殖池固形物濃度之研究,國立台灣大學農業工程學研究所碩士論文。 10. 侯文祥,2009,魚塭底池排汙設施及技術之研發,行政院農業委員會漁業署,民國98年度科技計畫研究報告。 11. 翁一銘,2006,海洋放流管之敏感度分析與最佳化設計,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 12. 高正一,2007,創新式蝦池清淤系統之研發,國立台灣大學生物產業機電工程學研究所碩士論文。 13. 陳瑤湖、雷惠民,1991,蝦池底質化學動態之研究,農委會漁業特刊第二十八號,蝦池環境研究與改善研討會論文集,P77-84。 14. 郭平巧,2009,養殖池水車配置數值模擬研究,國立成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文。 15. 張維均,1998,集約立體式九孔養殖池之總氮與固形物收支及物性特徵,國立台灣大學農業工程學研究所碩士論文。 16. 張志偉,2001,擴散管流量解析解,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 17. 張進賢,2002,以序率規劃模式評估汙水處理廠與海洋放流系統之憂畫擴建方案,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 18. 劉富光、林天生,1993,鰻魚循環水養殖技術,鰻魚生產技術研究資料彙編(一),農委會漁業特刊,52: P101-125。 19. 劉文御、黃美瑩、廖一久,1998,草蝦感染細菌性疾病與養殖條件間的關係,水產研究:6(1):1-15。 20. 劉文御,2001,水產養殖環境學,行政院農業委員會水產試驗所專著:001號,P4~5,P27~40,P72~73,P96~97。 21. 蔡正翰,2003,應用遺傳演算法探討海洋放流管之優化方案,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 22. 潘泰斗,2009,低造價間歇式湧升柱之多規格設計與應用研究,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程研究所碩士論文。 23. 賴玨光、楊振明、陳懸弧、賴春福,2004,水產養殖設備及器材手冊增訂版,水產出版社。 24. 山吉信行、北澤大輔、金野祥久、千葉一也,2008,攪拌パドルの影響を考慮に入れた小規模養殖池の流動場シミュレーション,生産研究,60 巻1 号。 25. 荻野珍吉,1986,魚類之營養和飼料(日文),恆星社厚生閣。 26. Avnimelech, Y., Ritvo, G., 2003, Shrimp and fish pond soils: processes and management., Aquac. 220:549-567. 27. Beveridge MCM, 1985, Cage and Pen fish farming, Carrying capacity models and environmental impact, FAO Doc. Tech. Peches.(No. 255), 126pp. 28. Boyd, C.E., Watten, B.J., 1989, Aeration systems in aquaculture, Review In Aquativ Sciences. Vol.1, pp.425-472. 29. Briggs, M.R.P, Funge-Smith, S.J., 1994. A nutrient budget of some intensive marine shrimp ponds in Thailand, Aquacult. Fisheries manage. 25:789-811. 30. Claude E. Boyd, C.W. Wood, Taworn Thunjai, 2002, Aquaculture Pond Bottom Soil Quality Management, Aquaculture Collaborative Research Support Program. 31. Fischer, H.B., List, E.J., Koh, R.C.Y., Imberger, J., and Brooks, N.H., 1979, Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters , Academic Press, Inc., pp.412-441. 32. Idaho Division of Environmental Quality (IDEQ), 1998, Idaho Waste Management Guidelines for Aquaculture Operations, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality, Twin Falls, Idaho. 33. J.R. Ni , Z.S. Li , C. Mendoza , 2002, Vertical profiles of aeolian sand mass flux , Geomorphology 49, 205–218. 34. Jackson, C., Preston, N., Thompson, P. J., Burford, M., 2003. Nitrogen budget and effluent nitrogen components at an intensive shrimp farm. Aquaculture 218, 397-411. 35. Kang, Y.H., Lee, M.O., Choi, S.D., Sin, Y.S., 2004, 2-D hydrodynamic model simulating paddlewheel-driven circulation in rectangular shrimp culture ponds, Aquacultural, Vol.231, pp.163-179. 36. Kuo-Feng Tseng, Kuo-Lin Wu, 2004, The ammonia removal cycle for a submerged biofilter used in a recirculating eel culture system, Aquacultural Engineering 31, 17–30. 37. Lemonnier, h., Brizard, R., 2001, Evolution of pond bottom and production in a semi-intensive shrimp pond. World Aquaculture Society meeting, Florida:366. 38. Peterson, E.L., 1999, Benthic shear stress and sediment condition, Aquac. Eng.21:85-111. 39. Peterson, E.L., Wadhwa, L.C., Harris, J.A., 2001, Arrangement of aerators in an intensive shrimp growout pond having a rectangular shape, Aquac. Eng. 25:51-65. 40. Ricardo Jime´nez-Montealegre, Marc Verdegem, Jorge E. Zamora, Johan Verreth, 2001, Organic matter sedimentation and resuspension in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) ponds during a production cycle, Aquacultural Engineering 26, 1–12. 41. Simon, J.F.S, Briggs, M.R.P, 1998, Nutrient budgets in intensive shrimp ponds:implications for sustainability, Aquac. 164:117-133. 42. Vincent M. Maillard , Gregory D. Boardman , Justin E. Nyland , David D. Kuhn , 2005, Water quality and sludge characterization at raceway-system trout farms, Aquacultural Engineering 33, 271–284. 43. Yuvanatemiya, V., Boyd, C.E., 2006. Physical and chemical changes in aquactulture pond bottom soil resulting from sediment removal, Aquac. Eng. 35:199-205. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47992 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 摘 要
養殖池業者使用各種曝氣方式於池中增氧,卻也一直困擾於底泥沉積物的管理。本研究實測嘉義與宜蘭兩地鰻池的流場造成與堆積物堆積速度實態,且與計算流體力學軟體模擬的流場結果比較,了解養殖池的流場造成法與堆積物分布關係。實測嘉義魚池槳式水車配置造成流場分布與底泥可能沉積位置,可給予改善建議。另針對宜蘭魚池使用之負壓式排污管,設計不同孔口數與孔口大小之六種孔徑比模組,探討孔口週邊的流場分布差異,並分析其吸除流量與文獻提出的負壓式排污建議流量之差異。 研究結果得知,養殖業者在給餌處之流場若為低流速區,需避免餌料沉積,造成飼料浪費及底泥堆積。嘉義鰻池水下60cm水層的流速小於0.17 m/s,水底流速則小於0.14 m/s區間,以水車前方速率為最高,之後遞減;水車後方也呈現遞減情形。 至於負壓式排污管的設計孔徑比以較小者為佳。實測得知管口最大吸除流速之孔徑比為0.38,最小吸除流速之孔徑比為3.04,其流速相差約2.5倍。將最小流速模組之管口自十個減至六個,其孔徑比由3.04變為1.82,管口吸除流速與孔徑比1.74模組相近,得知負壓式排污法之孔徑比為影響其管口吸除流速分布之主要因子。負壓排污管的基本模組中最佳模組為孔徑比為0.62,其管口處流速分布與距離管口遠近之負相關性R2值高達0.994。其排放量為105.1 gpm,與IDEQ(1998)文獻建議值100gpm以上相吻合。由本研究成果,未來可持續探討排水過程的固形物排污效率。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT
When the owners of aquaculture pond use various kinds of aerators to aerate the water, they encounter the difficulties in the management of sludge. By comparing the eel ponds experiments in Chiayi and Yilan, the sediment accumulation rate and hypothetical flow fields are confirmed with using the simulations of computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The framework of different positions of aerators and the hypothetical flow fields are built based on the experiments of trapped contaminated solids. Advices are able to be given by knowing the sludge sediment area and the particle concentration flux. There are six aperture ratio models in different amounts and quantities of orifices of negative pressure discharge pipes that are designed for the eel ponds of Yilan. We discuss the differences in flow fields nearby the orifices, and then analyze the amount of water flow whether corresponds to the suggestion of negative pressure sewage. The results have suggested that changing the feeding settling if the feeding sites are in low velocity area, in order to avoid it turns into sludge settling. The velocity under 60cm and from the water surface in Chiayi eel pond is less than 0.17m /s. The bottom velocity is less than 0.14 m/s. In front of the paddlewheels is the highest velocity and then decreases gradually and vice versa. The aperture ratio of the negative pressure discharge pipes is better to be smaller. According to the investigation, the maximum velocity is 2.5 times difference between the aperture ratio being 0.38 and 3.04. The velocity of model which is reduced its orifices from ten to six is close to the model of aperture ratio being 1.74 from aperture ratio being 3.04 to 1.82. It is clear that the aperture ratio is the main factor to affect the velocity. The distance from the outflow department and velocity correlation in the model of aperture ratio is 0.62 R2 is 0.994 which brings out the conclusion that the velocity around the discharge pipes and the distance from the outflow department are in negative correlation. The amount of water flow of the negative pressure discharge pipes in Yilan is 105.1 gpm(gallons per minute) meets the suggestion that IDEQ(1998) proposed to be 100gpm. According to the achievement of this study, we can continue to investigate the experiments of collecting contaminated solids and discuss the efficiency of sewage. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:44:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97622025-1.pdf: 4457662 bytes, checksum: 2060c94d2c6aa621755d80fb436ecba6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 第一章 前言 1 1.1 研究緣起 1 1.2 研究內容及目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2.1 養殖池與底泥關係文獻彙整 3 2.2 養殖池與水車文獻彙整 5 2.3 計算流體力學 (Computational Fluid Dynamics, CFD)模擬原理 7 2.4 固形物收集裝置(Trap) 原理 9 2.5 負壓排污管設計文獻彙整 11 2.5.1 排污管 11 2.5.2 擴散管 12 第三章 研究方法 15 3.1 露天鰻池現場試驗 16 3.1.1 嘉義縣鰻池調查 16 3.1.2 宜蘭縣鰻池調查 18 3.2 CFD模擬兩鰻池現場之流況 20 3.3 水車造成固形物堆積試驗 26 3.3.1 Trap設計與預備試驗 26 3.3.2 嘉義縣鰻池水車造成之固形物分布與收集試驗 30 3.4 負壓排污管設計與試驗 33 3.4.1 排污管設計與流場造成標準試驗 33 3.4.2 宜蘭縣六種負壓式排污管模組之配置設計試驗 37 3.4.3 宜蘭縣重力式排污管最佳模組之流速與濁度分布試驗 41 3.5 固形物堆積速度分析法 42 第四章 結果與討論 44 4.1 露天鰻池現場試驗結果 44 4.1.1 嘉義縣鰻池水車佈置狀況 44 4.1.2 嘉義現地訪談結果 47 4.1.3 宜蘭縣鰻池狀況 49 4.2 CFD模擬與實測之流場分布差異 50 4.2.1 嘉義及宜蘭縣鰻池模擬與實測之流場分布差異 50 4.3 水車造成不同流速區之底泥堆積速率 54 4.4 負壓排污管試驗結果 56 4.4.1 六種排污管模組結果 56 4.4.2 CFD模擬與實測之負壓排污管流場分佈差異 62 4.4.3 負壓排污管最佳模組之流速與排污能力 66 4.5 不同動力方式造成流場與排污差異 70 第五章 結論與建議 72 5.1 結論 72 5.2 建議 73 參考文獻 74 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 養殖池排污方式與流場分布之關係研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Studies on the Relationship Between the Emission of Sludge and Flow Fields in Aquaculture Pond | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳弘成,周楚洋,謝正義,喻新 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 養殖池,曝氣法,排污法,底泥,計算流體力學, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Aquaculture pond,Aeration,Waste disposing,Sediment,Computational fluid dynamics, | en |
dc.relation.page | 77 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-04 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。