請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47749完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曹承礎(Dr Timothy Chou) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gautam Kamath | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 柯文談 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T06:16:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-08-12 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | ActKnowledge. (2010). Website: www.theoryofchange.org. www.theoryofchange.org
Anthony, R. N., & Young, D. W.(2002). Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations (Seventh Edition). Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw Hill. Alliance. (2009). Interview — Paul Brest, Jed Emerson, Katherina Rosqueta, Brian Trelstad and Michael Weinstein, Alliance Magazine. http://www.alliancemagazine.org/node/2128 Bornstein, D. (2007). How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford Press: London. Brest, P., & Harvey, H. (2008). Money Well Spent: A Strategic Plan for Smart Philanthropy. New York: Bloomberg Press. Brown, J. & Campanale, M, (2006). Developing a social equity capital market, New Economics Foundation, Publications. Retrieved from http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/developing-social-equity-capital-market Butler, L. M. (2007). The Nonprofit Dashboard: A Tool for Tracking Progress. Washington, D.C.: BoardSource. Campbell, D. (2002). “Outcomes Assessment and the Paradox of Nonprofit Accountability”, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(3): 243-25 Charity Navigator, GiveWell, Great Nonprofits, Guidestar, Philanthropedia, & Philanthropy Action. (2009). The Worst (and Best) Way to Pick a Charity This Year, Vol. 2010: Press Release: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.philanthropyaction.com/documents/Worst_Way_to_Pick_A_Charity_Dec_1_2009.pdf Clark, C, et. al. (2004). Double Bottom line Project Report: Assessing impact in double bottom line ventures, Rockefeller Foundation. Day, N. E. (2004). “Total Rewards Programs in Nonprofit Organizations”. In R. D. Herman, & Associates (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management, 2nd Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley. Ebrahim & Rajan (2010), “The Limits of Non-Profit Impact: A Contingency Framework for Measuring Social Impact”. Harvard Business School: Working Paper, 10-099. Emerson, J. and Twersky, F. ed., (1996). New Social Entrepreneurs: The Success, Challenge and Lessons of Non-Profit Enterprise Creation, San Francisco: The Roberts Foundation. Emerson, J. et al, (2000) “Social return on Investment: Exploring Aspects of Value Creation in the Nonprofit Sector”, in Social Purpose Enterprises and Venture Philanthropy in the New Millennium, Volume 2, San Francisco: The Roberts Foundation, pp. 131-173. Gair, C. (2005). “The Good Ship, SROI” in REDF Social Return on Investment Collections, San Francisco: REDF. Retrieved from http://www.redf.org/system/files/%282%29+A+Report+from+the+Good+Ship+SROI.pdf Gair, C. (2009), “SROI Act II: A Call to Action for Next Generation SROI”, REDF Publications. Retrieved from http://www.redf.org/system/files/REDF_SROI+Act+II_FINAL_10.09.pdf Grossman, A. (2000). “Getting it done: Improving Non-Profit Performance”. Working Knowledge: A Report on Research at Harvard Business School, Vol. IV, No. II. URL: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/1692.html Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3): 353-370. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Lawlor, E. et al. (2009). Seven Principles for measuring what matters. New Economics Foundation, Publications. Retrieved from http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/seven-principles-measuring-what-matters Leeuw, F., & Vaessen, J. (2009). Impact Evaluations and Development. Washington, D.C.: Network of Networks on Impact Evaluation (NONIE) Merchant, K., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. McAfee, A. (2009). Shattering the Myths about Enterprise 2.0, Harvard Business Review, November 2009, Harvard Press. New Economics Foundation, Publications. (2009). Tools for You: Approaches to proving and improving for charities, voluntary organisations and social enterprise. Retrieved from http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/tools-you Nicholls, J. (2000). A guide to Social Return on Investment, United Kingdom Cabinet office for the Third Sector, Retrieved from http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/guide-social-return-investment Rao, V. & Woolcock, M. (2005). “Quantitative Approaches in Program Evaluation” in Bourguignon, L. et al., The impact of economic policies on poverty and income distribution, Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=jTLopkz4yggC&oi=fnd&pg=PA165&dq=PSIA+World+Bank&ots=r8XDaa3XUG&sig=Q278BB4IN_lfinwcUFmWrp_Xvuo#v=onepage&q=PSIA%20World%20Bank&f=false Scholten, P. et. al.(2006). Social Return on Investment: A Guide to SROI Analysis. Lenthe Publishers. Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Tuan, M (2009), “Measuring and/or Estimating Social Value Creation: Insights Into Eight Integrated Cost Approaches”, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation World Microfinance Forum Geneva. (2008). “Is it fair to do business with the poor? “ Report on the debate between Muhammad Yunus and Michael Chu. Geneva | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47749 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Social Impact measurement has been a bone of contention for practitioners, researchers and other stakeholders involved in social entrepreneurship. Two main points of view exist – one that social impact cannot be measured and compared across program areas, and therefore demand a unique, case-by-case approach of appraisal, and another that argues that social impact must be measured in an objective and comparable manner so as to retain its usefulness as a tool for judgment and introspection. This research examines both these points of views through the lenses of the tools used for measurement, and draws up a suitable typology to help both practitioners and research understand the intricacies of social impact, and how to measure it. This research takes the position that while an overarching framework is required for comparing results of social enterprises, an integrative typology that helps the practitioner select the right mix of tools is the correct approach to comprehending an increasingly confusing and complex social impact measurement landscape. To this end, this research attempts to draw up such a typology, and paves the way for future research into combinations of different tools, and the evolution of currently popular tools in the field. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:16:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97749054-1.pdf: 3182382 bytes, checksum: 0102e9f32298c25de05ae7cfbe346903 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | The idea of social impact measurement 5
What is social impact measurement? 11 Defining social impact 13 General problems when defining social impact 15 Defining the methodology for measurement 19 Holistic measurement v. Specific measurement 21 Different stakeholders have different objectives for impact measurement 24 Methodology and Literature Review 26 Criteria for analyzing tools 30 Qualitative Tools 35 The Big Picture 35 World Bank’s PSIA 37 Quantitative Tools 41 The Social Return on Investment (SROI) method 44 Process Tools 48 The Social Enterprise Balanced Scorecard (SE-BSC) 50 Design Tools 52 Ashoka’s Social Impact Assessments 55 Towards a typology for social impact measurement? 58 Nota bene: Efforts to institutionalize social impact measurement 59 Conclusion 59 Bibliography 60 Appendix: Additional Case Studies/Tools 64 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 企業社會影響力衡量方法學研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Measurement of Social Impact | en |
| dc.subject | Social Enterprise | en |
| dc.subject | Innovation | en |
| dc.subject | Social Impact | en |
| dc.subject | Social Entrepreneurship | en |
| dc.title | 企業社會影響力衡量方法學研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigating an applicable typology of Social Impact Measurement | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 謝冠雄(Dr. Edward Hsieh) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 杜志挺(Dr. Timon Du) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 企業社會影響力衡量方法學研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Social Entrepreneurship,Social Impact,Innovation,Social Enterprise,Measurement of Social Impact, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 82 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。