請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47666
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周家蓓 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Chun Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王雅君 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T06:11:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Federal Aviation Administration. (2009). AC 150/5370-10E Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports.
2. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2004). International Standards and Recommended Practice, Aerodromes 4th . 3. 陳怡先,(2004),「機場鋪面平坦度評估指標研擬之研究」,國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文。 4. Federal Aviation Administration. (2009). AC 150/5380-9 Guidelines and Procedures for Measuring Airfield Pavement Roughness. 5. A. Y. Ayenu-Prah & N. O. Attoh-Okine. (2009). Comparative Study of Hilbert–Huang Transform, Fourier Transform and Wavelet Transform in Pavement Profile Analysis. Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 47, pp. 437-456. 6. Hachiya, Y., Yin, J., Takahashi, O. & Himeno K. (1999). Aircraft Response Based Airport Pavement Roughness Evaluation. J. Materials. Conc. Struct. Pavements, Vol.45, No.634, pp.403-411. 7. Gerardi, T. G. (1977). Digital Simulation of Flexible Aircraft Response to Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Runway Roughness. Shock and Vibration Bulletin, n. 47. 8. Gerardi, A. G. (1978). Dynamic Response of Aircraft to Pavement Unevenness. Transportation Research Board Special Report 175, pp.91-96. 9. APR Consultants, Inc. (2003). Aircraft Ride Quality Assessment of Airport Runway 02L–20R Final Report. 10. Rapol, J. (2002). Evaluation of grade and straightedge tolerances in federal aviation administration pavement construction specifications. Federal Aviation Administration Technology Airport Transfer Conference. 11. Gerardi, T., et al. (2007). Airfield Concrete Pavement Smoothness - A Reference (Report IPRF 01-G-002-02-4). Airport Concrete Pavement Technology Program. 12. DeBord, K. J. (1995). Runway Roughness Measurement, Quantification, and Application – the Boeing Method. Boeing Report D6–81746, Boeing Company, Chicago, IL, U.S.A. 13. Boeing Company. (1974). Runway Roughness Levels for Fatigue Life Study. Boeing Coordination Sheet, 737-LD-326. 14. Boeing Company. (1974). Fatigue Loads as a Function of Runway Roughness. Boeing Coordination Sheet, 737-LD-327. 15. Federal Aviation Administration. (2000). Airport Design. 16. Misiti, M., Misiti, Y., G. Oppenheom & J. M. Poggi. (2008). Wavelet Toolbox 4 User’s Guide. The Math Works Inc., Natick, MA, U.S.A. 17. Mallat, S. G. (1989) A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition:The Wavelet Representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol.11, No.11, pp.674-693. 18. Huang, M. L. Wu, S. R. Long, S. S. Shen, W. D. Qu, P. Gloersen & K. L. Fan (1998). The Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Hilbert Spectrum for Nonlinear and Non-Stationary Time Series Analysis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., 454A, pp.903-993. 19. 李曉雷,韓寶坤,(2003),「用小波變換分析路面不平度及振動回應」,北京理工大學學報,第23卷,第6期。 20. Liu, W., Fwa, T.F. (2004). Characterizing Road Roughness by Wavelet Transform. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1869, pp.152-158. 21. Liu, W., Fwa, T.F., Zhe, Z. (2005). Wavelet Analysis and Interpretation of Road Roughness. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 120-130. 22. Woods, J. E., Papagiannakis, A.T. (2009). Suitability of Runway Pavement Roughness Indices in Capturing Aircraft Response. Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC., 09-0558. 23. Ayenu-Prah, A. Y. & Attoh-Okine, N. O. (2009). Comparative Study of Hilbert-Huang Transform, Fourier Transform and Wavelet Transform in Pavement Profile Analysis. Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol.47, No.4, pp.437-456. 24. APR Consultants, Inc. http://www.aprconsultants.com/. 25. Evaluation of Pavement Roughness-Aircraft Computer Simulations. http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/international/technical/pavement/evaluation/smoothness/computersimulations.htm. 26. ASTM E1364-95. (2005). Standard Test Method for Measuring Road Roughness by Static Level Method. 27. AASHTO R40-05. (2007). Measuring Pavement Profile Using a Rod and Level. 28. ARRas3 User’s Manual. 29. 國立中央大學數據分析方法研究中心. http://rcada.ncu.edu.tw/research1.htm. 30. Huang, N. E. & Wu, Z. (2008). A Review on Hilbert-Huang Transform: Method and Its Applications to Geophysical Studies. Reviews of Geophysics, 46, RG2006. 31. Huang, N. E., Z. Wu, S. R. Long, K. C. Arnold, X. Chen & K. Blank. (2009). On Instantaneous Frequency. Advance in Adaptive Data Analysis, Vol.1, No.2. pp.177-229. 32. 張彥文,(2010),「航機起降與跑道接觸長度計算模式之建立與應用」,國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所碩士論文。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47666 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 機場鋪面平坦度與航機行駛安全有一定之相關性,其與航機動態反應亦有密切之關係;倘航機行駛於平坦度不佳之鋪面上,不但會使得乘坐者感到不適,於航機與鋪面剖面互相影響之劇烈垂直震動下,更可能造成機師無法準確判讀儀表板及影響操作上之困難,且機身結構與零件亦會產生疲勞破壞,而鋪面結構也會因此受到永久性之損害。故一良好之機場鋪面平坦度指標不僅可降低鋪面養護與機身之維修成本,更可提升航機行駛安全。
本研究首先藉由文獻回顧瞭解各平坦度指標之演算邏輯,並且利用各指標之演算邏輯、評估門檻、小波能量與評估方法等方面探討其適用性,結果發現現存機場鋪面平坦度指標與評估方法多數僅探討剖面之凹陷與隆起。其中,僅PRIA指標為以小波轉換為基礎,由分析航機動態反應與剖面波長特性之關係發展而成,由於該指標較能指出航機動態反應受鋪面剖面特性之影響,故本研究主要針對PRIA以進行指標之訊號處理方式與演算邏輯之改善。由文獻回顧得知HHT為利用EMD拆解訊號,可有效分析非穩態且非線性之自然界訊號,故以各機型之航機動態反應與波長特性分析為基礎,採用HHT進行原始剖面之訊號處理,並加入機場跑道實際使用情形如航機組成、起降速度分佈與起降位置等因素,進行指標之改善,將改善後之指標定名為PRIA2,最後以NASA建議之最大可接受垂直向加速度值0.4 g訂定評估門檻值。 PRIA2為利用HHT進行剖面訊號之處理,並加入跑道區段使用頻率之概念,除可提供機場管理單位進行養護工作時,其養護優先順序之考量,亦較符合各機場跑道實際之使用情形。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Pavement roughness index for airports is important for flight safety, and it relates to dynamic response of aircraft closely. While aircrafts take-off, land or taxi on roughness runway, it could cause passengers feel uncomfortable. In the worst case, pilots could operate hardly by the severe shock, and both aircraft structure and pavement structure could have fatigue damage. To avoid influence of these cases on flight safety, airport managers need a good pavement roughness index for airports.
The objective of this research based on PRIA to improve the algorithm by changing signal analysis method and adding runway situations as parameters, such as aircraft velocity, touchdown/take-off point and ratio of aircraft types in the same airport. According to the previous researches, HHT is one method to analyze nonlinear and non-stationary signal, and it is suitable for pavement profile analysis. In order to develop a better index, this research used HHT to decompose profile into parts of IMF, and established the correlation among observed aircraft types, speed distribution and various wavelengths by simulation. Finally, PRIA2 was determined by different airports parameters, and the threshold was determined by the maximum acceptable vertical acceleration 0.4g which is NASA recommended. Because PRIA2 used HHT to analyze profile and add the concept of frequency of aircrafts take-off/land/taxi on runway sections, PRIA2 could not only provide information of pavement management, but also provide a real runway-to-aircraft dynamic response. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:11:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97521516-1.pdf: 6164429 bytes, checksum: 0f4d756e78daa71d6225e305d7df49ca (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書i
誌謝iii 摘要 v ABSTRACT vii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究範圍 3 1.4 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 機場鋪面平坦度之相關研究 7 2.2 機場鋪面平坦度之直規評估方法 11 2.3 FAA機場鋪面平坦度指標Boeing Bump Index(BBI) 13 2.4 訊號處理於鋪面平坦度之應用 22 2.4.1 應用訊號處理於舖面平坦度之研究 22 2.4.2 機場鋪面糙度指標(PRIA) 29 2.5 小結 35 第三章 國內機場剖面資料收集與現存平坦度指標探討 39 3.1 資料收集 39 3.2 各機場平坦度指標分析結果 49 3.3 指標與剖面波長之關係分析 67 3.4 指標適用性評估 76 第四章 機場鋪面糙度指標修正 79 4.1 機場鋪面糙度指標2代(PRIA2)修正方法建立 79 4.1.1 Hilbert Huang Transform(HHT) 81 4.1.2 執行流程 84 4.2 PRIA2指標演算邏輯之修正 88 第五章 PRIA2於機場鋪面平坦度之應用與門檻值研擬 105 5.1 PRIA2於國內機場跑道平坦度之應用 105 5.1.1 國內機場跑道(C) 106 5.1.2 國內機場跑道(E) 111 5.1.3 國內機場跑道(A、B、D) 115 5.1.4 小結 124 5.2 PRIA2指標評估門檻之研擬 127 第六章 結論與建議 141 6.1 結論 141 6.2 建議 144 參考文獻 147 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 應用HHT於機場鋪面糙度指標改善之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Improvements in Pavement Roughness Index for Airports Using Hilbert-Huang Transform | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建旭,徐登文 | |
dc.subject.keyword | HHT,跑道平坦度,波長,航機動態反應,指標, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | HHT,Runway Roughness,Wavelength,Aircraft Dynamic Response,Index, | en |
dc.relation.page | 150 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.02 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。