請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47497完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周桂田 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Randall Kara David Walther | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王瑞庚 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T06:02:55Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻：
Denney ,David.（2005）. Risk and Society. Sage Publications of London.（面對風險社會），呂奕欣•鄭珮嵐譯，國立編譯館與韋伯文化合作翻譯發行。 世界衛生組織（2006）。世界衛生組織304號文件，2006年5月。報告原文網址：http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs304/en/index.html 朱國瑞（2006）。高壓線、微波爐及電磁武器Q&A。物理雙月刊，二十八卷，二期。506頁。 林宜平，詹長權（2007）。非屬原子能游離輻射對環境衝擊之研究。台北市：國立台灣大學公共衛生學院職業醫學與工業衛生研究所。 李文潮（2003）。技術倫理與形上學：試論尤納斯責任論述。自然辯證法研究，19卷，2期，p41-47. 吳建昌（2009）。成本效益分析與預警原則。 吳盛忠（2006）。非游離輻射管制現況。台北：環保署講座簡報。 吳霖堃（2001）。電磁場、電磁波是否有害人體健康。通訊雜誌，第37期。行政院環境檢測署。http://www.niea.gov.tw/analysis/publish/month/ListMonthlyNo.asp?MonthlyNo=37 吳宗霖，鄭博仁，郭志文（2002）。一行動電話及基地台電磁波對人體健康之影響程度評估－及其防範措施相關研究報告。交通部電信總局。 周桂田（1998）現代性與風險社會（Modernity and Risk Society）。台灣社會學刊，第二十一期，頁89-129。 周桂田（2000a）。生物科技產業與社會風險──遲滯型高科技風險社會。台灣社會研究季刊，第三十九期。 周桂田（2000b）。風險社會之政治實踐。當代，第154 期，頁36-53。 周桂田（2001）。科學風險：多元共識之風險建構，第二現代──風險社會的出路？（顧忠華編）（台北：巨流），頁47-76。 周桂田（2002a）。在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口─遲滯型高科技風險社會。台灣社會研究季刊，第四十五期，頁69-122。 周桂田（2002b）普遍與特殊激盪：全球在地化-研究與實踐的進路思考。台灣社會學年會，台中東海大學社會學系。 周桂田（2003a）。從全球化風險到全球在地化風險之研究進路：對貝克理論的批判思考。台灣社會學刊，頁1-20。 周桂田（2003b）。公眾信任與風險感知：以2003/2004年基因改造產品為案例分析。科技、醫療與社會，四期，頁151-178。 周桂田（2004）。獨大的科學理性與隱沒（默）的社會理性之對話。台灣社會研究季刊，第十六期，2004年12月 周桂田（2007）。新興風險治理典範之謅議。政治與社會哲學評論，第二十二期，2007年9月 周桂田（2008a）。全球在地化風險典範衝突－生物特徵辨識做為全球鐵的牢籠。政治與社會哲學評論，第二十二期，2008年3月 周桂田（2008b）。新興電信科技與風險治理。2008無線網路應用之健康、法律與社會議題風險溝通工作坊。台北：台大生醫暨科技倫理、法律與社會中心。 范玫芳（2007）。科技、民主與公民身份：以灰渣掩埋場設置為個案，台灣社會學會年會，台灣大學，11月24-25日 范玫芳（2008），科學不確定性、預警原則與民主審議：以基因改造作物與食品爭議為例，台灣社會學會年會，中研院，12月13-14日 范玫芳、陳俞燕（2009），預警原則與鄰苯二甲酸酯類塑化劑之爭議，台灣科技與社會學會年會，成功大學，4月18-19日。 張新樟、汪建達（2007）。技術倫理如何避開人類中心主義和生物中心主義—約納斯，責任的命令:尋求技術時代的倫理解讀。自然辯證法研究，23卷，8期，p6-10. 孫治本（2000）。風險抉擇與形而上倫理學。當代，一五四期：pp. 20-35 黃佰璋（2001）行動電話基地臺以及行動電話是否會對人體健康造成危害。環檢通訊雜誌，第37期。行政院環境檢測署。http://www.niea.gov.tw/analysis/publish/month/ListMonthlyNo.asp?MonthlyNo=37 程惠生（2003）。台灣地區行動電話基地臺電磁波之調查。台北，環保署環檢所。 程惠生（2004）。行動電話電磁波之評析。環檢通訊雜誌，34期。台北，環保署環檢所。 電信國家型科技計畫辦公室（2005）。電信科技與產業發展。台北：行政院電信國家行計畫辦公室。 網路通訊國家型科技計畫辦公室（2009）。網路通訊國家型計畫，規劃重點及執行簡要。台北：國家科學委員會。 簡慧貞（2007）。我國環境中非游離輻射管理現況與措施，環保署定期調查報告。台北：行政院環保署。 經濟部工業局（2005）。2005年台灣數位內容產業白皮書。台北：經濟部工業局 環保署定期調查報告。（2006）非游離輻射管制現況，環保署講座簡報。台北：環保署。 報導文獻 聯合報2005/11/22〈團體：電纜基地台離民居，指台陷輻射危機，盼收緊電磁波值〉 中國時報2007/01/26〈環盟：無線上網電磁波高〉 聯合晚報2007/06/01〈手機基地台問題多無線寬頻基地台又來〉 中央社2007/07/17〈WiMAX電磁波安全未確認田秋堇籲暫緩發照〉 中央社2008/09/13〈測量基地台電磁波 NCC：應使用正確方法〉 外文文獻： Apel , Karl-Otto.（1980）. Towards a transformation of philosophy .（translated by Glyn Adey and David Frisby）.Boston : Routledge & Kegan Paul Apel , Karl-Otto.（1990）.What right does ethics have? : public philosophy in a pluralistic culture . （Griffoen,Sander , Ed.）.Amsterdam : VU University Press. Apel , Karl-Otto.（1998）From a transcendental-semiotic point of view . Karl-Otto Apel edited by Marianna Papastephanou.Manchester ; New York : Manchester University Press. Apel , Karl-Otto.（2000） .Globalization and the Need for Universal Ethics.European Journal of Social Theory 2000; 3; 137. Apel , Karl-Otto.（2001）.Politico-Military Strategy in Our Time: A Philosophical Retrospective On the Relationship between Ethics, International Law and the Kosovo Conflict. European Journal of Social Theory2001; 4; 29 Apel , Karl-Otto.（2005）.The a priori of communication and the foundation of the humanities.Man and world, Volume 5, Number 1, Springer Netherlands, p3-37. Barrow, C. J. （2000）.Social Impact Assessment: an Introduction. London: Arnold Becker, H and F Vanclay. 2003. The international handbook of SIA. Cheltenham: E Elgar. Becker, H. A., 1997. Social impact assessment : method and experience in Europe, North America and the developing world London : UCL Press Burdge, Rabel J. 2004. The concepts, process and methods of SIA. Middleton, WI: The Social Ecology Press. ISBN 0-941042-35-9. Burdge, Rabel J. 2004. A Community Guide to Social Impact Assessment. Middleton, WI: The Social Ecology Press ISBN 0-941042-17-0. Beck, Ulrich.（1986）. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in einen andere Moderne. Suhrkamp. Beck, Ulrich. （1995）. Die feindlose Demokratie. Reclam. Beck, Ulrich. （1996）. Kapitalismus ohne Arbeit. Der Spiegel. Nr.20/1996. S. 140-146. Beck, Ulrich. （1997a）. Die Eröffnung des Welthorizontes: Zur Soziologie der Globalisierung, Herausgeber-Mitteilung. Soziale Welt 47（1997）, S. 3-16. Beck, Ulrich. （1997b）. Was ist Globalisierung. Suhrkamp. Beck, Ulrich. （Hg.）（1998）. Politik der Globalisierung. Suhrkamp. Beck, Ulrich.（1999）. World Risk Society.Polity Press. BioInitiative.（2007a）. BioInitiative Report A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields （ELF and RF）. BioInitiative Group BioInitiative.（2007b）. announcement :Serious Public Health Concerns Raised Over Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields （EMF） from Power Lines and Cell Phones. BioInitiative Group BioInitiative..（2009a）.International Scientists Find Harmful Effects from Wireless Technologies and Urge New Safety Rules for Cell Phones. BioInitiative Group. Blackman.（2009）.The relevance of discovery science for research on the health effects of EMF. Brazil :International NIR and health Workshop, May 18th and 19th,2009. Cameron, J. and Abouchar, J. （1991） .The 預警原則（precautionary principle）.Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 14（1）: 1-27. Cameron, J. and Wade-Gery, W. （1991） .Addressing uncertainty: law, policy and the development of the 預警原則（precautionary principle）. CSERGE Working Paper GEC1992-43. http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/gec/gec_1992_43.pdf （cited2008/03/25） Chou, kuei-tien.（2007）.Biomedtech Island Project and Risk Governance- Paradigm conflicts within a hidden and delayed high-tach risk society. Soziale Welt,58（2007）,pp123-143. Chou, kuei-tien.（2008）.Glocalized dioxin- regulatory science and public trust in a double risk society. Soziale Welt, 59（2008）,pp177-193. Chou, kuei-tien.（2009）.Reflexive risk governance in newly industrialized countries.Development and Society, 43（1）, pp57-90. Delanty, Gerard.（1999）. Biopolitics in the Risk Society: the Possibility of a Global Ethic of Societal Responsibility.Nature, Risk and Responsibility: Discourses of Biotechnology. （Patrick O'Mahony, eds.）. Dimbylow,P.J（1994）.SAR calculation in an anatomically realistic model of the head for momile communication transceivers at 900MHz and 1.8GHz.Phys/MedBiol.,39,pp1537-1553. Dusenbery, David B. （1992）.Sensory Ecology, pp.7-8.W.H. Freeman., New York. European Commission/Health & and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Directorate C.（2000）. Scientific Opinions: First Report on the Harmonisation of Risk Assessment Procedures,EU, Brussels. European Commission.（2001a）. European Governance. A White Paper, EU,Brussels. European Commission（2001b）. European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide. White Paper,EU, Luxembourg. European Commission.（2003）.Final Report on Setting the Scientific Frame for the Inclusion of New Quality of Life Concerns in the Risk Assessment Process, EU, Brussels. European Commission（2007）, Report “Electromagnetic Fields”, Special Eurobarometer Survey, Available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_272a_en.pdf European Commission.（2009）.Report of the Workshop on EMF and Health: Science and Policy to Adress Public Concerns, Workshop on EMF and Health Science and Policy to address public concerns. EU, Brussels. Fischer, Frank .（1990） .Technocratic Theory:The Basic Themes in Historical Perspective. Technocracy and Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park,Calif.:Sage Publications. Funtowicz, Silivo O. & Ravetz, Jerome R. （1992） .Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science, in: Krimsky & Golding （ed.）Social Theory of Risk, Praeger Publischer. Gee, David.（2009a）.Late lessons from early warnings: Toward realism and precautionary with EMF. Pathophysiology, 16（2009）,p217-231. Gee, David .（2009b）.EMF: Evaluation evidence and use of the 預警原則（precautionary principle）. Report of the Workshop on EMF and Health: Science and Policy to Adress Public Concerns, Workshop on EMF and Health Science and Policy to address public concerns.EU, Brussels. Gieryn.（1983）. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in perfessional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781-795. Hamilton RD, Foss AJ, Leach L. （2007）.'Establishment of a human in vitro model of the outer blood-retinal barrier'.Journal of Anatomy211: 707. Hardell, Lennart, A. Näsman, A. Påhlson, A. Hallquist, and Mild, Kjell Hansson. （1999）. Use of cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours: a case–control study. Int. J. Oncol. 15 （1）, 113–116. Hardell, Lennart, A. Näsman, A. Påhlson, and A. Hallquist.（2000）. Case–control studyon radiology work, medical X-ray investigations, and use of cellulartelephones as risk factors for brain tumors, MedGenMed, 2 （2）, E2. Hardell, Lennart, K. Hansson Mild, A. Påhlson, and A. Hallquist.（2001）. Ionizing radiation.cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours. Eur. J. CancerPrev, 10 （6） , 523–529. Hardell, Lennart, A. Hallquist, K. Hansson Mild, M. Carlberg, A. Påhlson, and A. Lilja.（2002）. Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumours.Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 11 377–386. Hardell, Lennart, K. Hansson Mild, M. Carlberg, A. Hallquist, A. Påhlson, and Vestibular schwannoma.（2003）. tinnitus and cellular telephones. Neuroepidemiology 22 124–129. Hardell, Lennart, K. Hansson Mild, M. Carlberg, and A. Hallquist.（2004） . Cellular and cordless telephones and the association with brain tumours in different age group.Environ. Health, 59 （3）, 132–137. Hardell, Lennart, M. Eriksson, M. Carlberg, C. Sundström, and K. Hansson Mild.（2005）. Use of cellular or cordless telephones and the risk for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.Occup.Environ. Health, 78 （8）, 625–632. Hardell, Lennart, M. Carlberg, C.G. Ohlson, H. Westberg, M. Eriksson, and K. Hansson Mild.（2007）. Use of cellular and cordless telephones and risk of testicular cancer.Androl , 30 （2）, 115–122. Hardell, Lennart, M. Carlberg, K. Hansson Mild. （2008）. Methodological aspects of epidemiological studies on the use of mobile phones and their association with brain tumors.Open Environ. Sci. 2, 54–61. Hardell, Lennart, Carlberg, Michael and Mild, Kjell Hansson. （2009）.Epidemiological evidence for an association between use of wireless phones and tumor diseases. Pathophysiology, 16（2009）, 113-122. Howitt, Richard 2003. Local and non-specialist participation in impact assessment, in: C.-Q. Liu, Z. Zhao, T. Xiao and J. Guha, Strategic Management of Environmental and Socio-Economic Issues: A Handbook. Guiyang, China, Guizhou Science and Technology Publishing House, 27-36 Howitt, R. 2001. Rethinking resource management: justice, sustainability and indigenous peoples. London: Routledge. Hyland, K. （1998）Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamin Publishers, Amsterdam & Philadelphia. ICEMS.（2006）. Benevento Resolution.The Precautionary EMF Approach: Rationale, Legislation andImplementation. Benevento, Italy. International Agency for Research on Cancer.（IARC, 2002）. Static and extremely lowfrequency electric and magnetic fields. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation ofCarcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 80.Available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/htdocs/monographs/vol80/80.html International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation.（ICNIRP, 1998）. Guidelines forlimiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields （up to 300GHz）, Health Phys., 74（4）, 494-522.Available at http://www.icnirp.de/documents/emfgdl.pdf International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation （ICNIRP,2003）.Non-Ionizing Radiations – Sources, Biological Effects, Emissions .Proceedings of the International Conference on Non-Ionizing Radiation at UNITEN ICNIR2003 Electromagnetic Fields and Our Health.http://www.who.int/peh-emf/meetings/archive/en/keynote3ng.pdf.and Exposures] Jasper, Karl.（1962） .Kant.（Hannah Arendt Ed）. translated by Ralph Manheim. San Diego, CA : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Jonas ,Hans.（1974）.Philosophical essays : from ancient creed to technological man.Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Jonas ,Hans.（1979 ）.Toward a Philosophy of Technology.The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 9, No. 1, （Feb., 1979）, pp. 34-43 Published by: The Hastings Center Jonas ,Hans.（1982）.Technology as a Subject for Ethics. Social Research, 49:4（1982:Winter） p.891 Jonas ,Hans.（1984）. The imperative of responsibility : in search of an ethics for the technological age.（translated by Hans Jonas, with the collaboration of David Herr）.Chicago : University of Chicago Press. JRC.（2009）. Electromagnetic Field Exposure: Risk Communication in the context of Uncertainty. EU,Brussels：JRC Kirkpatrick, C. and Lee, N., Editors, 1997. Sustainable development in a developing world: Integrating socioeconomic appraisal and environmental assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Keshvari, Jafar and Lang ,Sakari.（2005）.Comparison of radio frequency energy absorption inear and eye region of children and adults at 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz.PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY,50.pp4355-4369. Keshvari, Jafar, Keshvari ,Rahim and Lang ,Sakari.（2006）.The effect of increase in dielectric values on specific absorption rate （SAR） in eye and head tissues following 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz radio frequency （RF） exposure PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY,51.pp1463-1477. Kundi, Michael.（2008）.The Controversy about Epidemiological Evidence for a Relationship between Mobile Phone Use and Cancer.2008 International Conference on Health, Law and Society Issue in Wireless Communication Technology, Taipei, Taiwan. Kundi, Michael.（2009a）.The BioInitiative methodology.Report of the Workshop on EMF and Health: Science and Policy to Adress Public Concerns .Workshop on EMF and Health Science and Policy to address public concerns. EU, Brussels. Kundi, Michael.（2009b）.Conclusion of the BioInitiative Report. Report of the Workshop on EMF and Health: Science and Policy to Adress Public Concerns .Workshop on EMF and Health Science and Policy to address public concerns. EU, Brussels. Kundi, Michael.（2009c）.Epidemiologic evidence for a relationship between NIR and cancer - a controversial issue. International NIR and health Workshop, May 18th and 19th,2009, Brazil Lee,Chung-Yi.（2008）.Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Firlds on ampus: Data from Taiwan. 2008International Conference on Health, Law and Society Issue in Wireless Communication Technology, Taipei, Taiwan. Lin, Yi-Neng , Lin, Ying-Dar, Lai, Yuan-Cheng , Wu, Che-Wen.（2008） 'Latency and Modulation Aware Bandwidth Allocation Algorithm for WiMAX Base Stations,' IEEE Wireeless Communications and Networking Conference （WCNC'08）, Las Vegas, March 2008. Lin, Yi-Neng , Lin, Ying-Dar, Lai, Yuan-Cheng , Wu, Che-Wen.（ 2009）. 'Highest Urgency First （HUF）: A Latency and Modulation Aware Bandwidth Allocation Algorithm for WiMAX Base Stations,' Computer Communications, Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 332-342, 12 February 2009. [SCI, EI; impact factor: 0.884 in 2008] Lo, Chang-fa.（2008）.Risks, Scientific Uncertainty and the Application of 預警原則（precautionary principle）. 2008 International Conference on Health, Law and Society Issues in Wireless Communication Technology, Taipei,Taiwan. Muldur, Ugur. et al （2007）.A new deal for an effective european research policy. EU Commission, Brussels. Mayoux, L & R. Chambers 2005 Reversing the paradigm: quantification, participatory methods and pro-poor impact assessment. Journal of International Development 17(2) 271-298. Nowotny,Helga.（2006）. The quest for innovation and cultures of technology.（Helga Nowotny,ed.）Cultures of Technology and the Quest for Innovation , Berghahn Books,NY:New York,p1-23. O’Riordan, T. and Jordan, A.（1995）The precautionary principle in Contemporary Environmental Politics”.Environmental Values 4: 191-212 Patton, Michael Quinn.(2003). Impact Assessment.Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods.SAGE Publications. 10 Mar. 2010 Pozo, C. del,Papameletiou, D ,Wiedemann, P, Ravazzani,P , and Van Deventer, E.（2009）.Exposure to low-level EMF and possible health impacts:Risk communication and uncertainty. Electromagnetic Field Exposure: Risk Communication in the context of Uncertainty（del Pozo, C., Papameletiou, D ,Wiedemann, P, Ravazzani,P , and Van Deventer, E.ed）,p7-14. EU, Brussels：JRC Roche, C. 1999. Impact assessment for development agencies.Learning to value change. Oxford: Oxfam Renn, Ortwin （2007） The Risk Handling Chain .The Tolerability of Risk.Earthscan, 2007 p21. Renn, Ortwin.（2000）.Cross-Cultural Risk Perception：State and Challenge.Cross-Cultural Risk Perception.（Renn ,Ortwin , Rohrmann, Bernard.ed.） Kluwer Academic, 2000. Renn, Ortwin.（2000） Risk Perception Research. Cross-Cultural Risk Perception.（Renn ,Ortwin , Rohrmann, Bernard.ed.） Kluwer Academic, 2000. Renn,Ortwin .（2005）. White Paper on Risk Governance: Toward an Integrative Framework.Netherlands :Springer. Raffensperger C. & J. Tickner （eds.）（1999） Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the 預警原則（precautionary principle）. Island Press, Washington, DC Recuerda, M. A. （2008）Dangerous interpretations of the 預警原則（precautionary principle） and the foundational values of the European Union Food Law: Risk versus Risk. Journal of Food Law & Policy Vol. 4:1, 2008 Recuerda, Miguel A. （2006）. Risk and Reason in the European Union Law, 5 European Food and Feed Law Review. Salford, Leif （2009）.Effects of mobile phone radiation upon the blood-brain barrier, neurons, gene expression and cognitive function of the mammalian brain.International NIR and health Workshop, May 18th and 19th,2009, Brazil SCENIHR.（2007）Possible Effects of Electromagnetic Fields （EMF） on Human Health, SCENIHR Opinion,adopted on 21 March 2007. Available at:http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_007.pdf SCENIHR.（2009）.Health Effect of Exposure to EMF.European Commission, Health and Risk assessment Unit. Brussels Slovic,Paul.（1987）.Perception of Risk. Science, New Series,Vol.236, No4799, 1987 Slovic, Paul and Gregory, Richard Langton.（1999）. Risk Analysis, Decision Analysis, and the Social Context for Risk Decision Making;..Decision Science and Technology: Reflections on the Contributions of Ward Edwards. Netherlands:Kluwer Acdemic. Slovic,Paul.（2000）.Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency Formats. Law and Human behavior,3（24）, pp271-296. Slovic,Paul.（2005）. Social Theories of Risk , （Krimsky, Shelden, Golding, Dominic.ed） Greenwood Publishing Group 2005 Strydom, Piet .（1999）.The Civilisation of the Gene: Biotechnological Risk Framed in the Responsibility Discourse.（Patrick O'Mahony,eds）. Nature, Risk, and Responsibility: Discourses of Biotechnology. Routledge. Taylor CN, Bryan CH, Goodrich CG. 2004. Social Assessment: theory, process and techniques. Middleton, WI: The Social Ecology Press ISBN 0-941042-37-5. Tipler, Paul （2004）. Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Electricity, Magnetism, Light, and Elementary Modern Physics（5th ed.）. W. H. Freeman. UNCED.（1992）.Agenda 21.English-language version formerly available at http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm. 20 （August 2009）（United Nations Conference on Environment and Development）. U.S.:UNCED UNESCO.（2005）.The precautionary principle.（United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization） .U.S. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001395/139578e.pdf. 5 （January 2000）. U.S. EPA.（2000）. Benchmark Dose TechnicalGuidance Document （External ReviewDraft）. 2000.EPA/630/R-00/001. Walker, Ralph.（1998）.Kant and the moral law（2nd Edition）. London, Phoenix. Wang, Jianqing and Fujiwara.（1999）.FDTD computation of temperature rise in the human head for portable telephone. IEEE trans. Microwive Theory Tech,47. Wangsness, Roald K.（1986）. Electromagnetic Fields （2nd Edition） , Hoboken, NJ : Wiley. WHO.（2002）. WHO handbook on 'Establishing a Dialogue on Risks from Electromagnetic Fields'.Published in 2002.Available at http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/risk_hand/en/index.html Wiedemann , P.M. & Schütz , H.（Eds.）（2008） : The role of evidence in riskcharacterization.Making sense of conflicting data. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. Wiedemann , Peter.（2009）.The building blocks of risk communication. Electromagnetic field exposure: Risk communication in the context of uncertainty. EU, Brussels：JRC | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47497 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在政府的電信資訊發展政策下，2003年訂定經費370億新台幣的行動台灣應用推動計畫（M-TAIWAN），然後為了此計劃必須發展的科技需求，行政院的國家型計劃辦公室再委託國家科學委員會制訂「電信國家型計劃第二期（2004年）」來發展其所需的關鍵科技「寬頻無線網路」（WLAN, Wireless Local Area Network；WLAN），投入經費新台幣133億，然後其中有66億投入在WiMAX這項新型通訊技術的開發(加上業界投資則為260億元)。選擇WiMAX作為核心技術是由於當時全球的寬頻無線網路技術尚未完全成熟，政府希望以新規格來領先全球市場。
但M-Taiwan到WiMAX這樣龐大的國家科技政策與計劃，其實缺乏了電磁波健康風險評估專家進行研究，到目前為止電磁波健康影響風險，國際上的科學研究是處在風險未確定和研究尚未充分的狀況，從認為幾乎無風險顧慮到認為有高風險疑慮應該立即停止使用的科學建議都存在。隨著更多研究的進展，2011年行動通訊涵蓋的電磁波範圍被提升風險到WHO/IARC可能致癌物從過去的Group 3提升到Group 2B（過去只有高壓電纜的電磁波被列2B等級），但我國政府在投入400多億新台幣將臺灣整個建設為遍布無線通訊電磁波的島嶼，有關單位從未正確平衡將國際研究平衡的報導，沒有讓全民有完整的資訊可以去選擇要居住在怎樣環境、選擇通訊上要多便利與多健康，有關單位只採取國際上偏向安全的風險評估，單向的教育民眾只有便利增加毫無健康疑慮，也造成2007年民眾對WiMAX的抗爭。 我國單向專家政治的科技治理體制因為缺乏多元專家與開放民眾參與，缺乏預警原則與後常態科學的概念，容易造成上述漠視科學爭議與風險治理的決策，並且2010年實際上國際上已經跟隨INTEL退出WiMAX開發，轉為LTE技術的發展。這使我國無法達成原先規劃的獨佔規格目標，經濟效益亦無法如期發揮。面對全球化風險社會的臺灣不能再用過去專家政治的模式來制訂科技政策，在多元、複雜充滿科學未充分、科學爭議的新興科技種種議題下，本文要透過分析WiMAX所涉及的健康風險以及電信國家型計劃制訂的過程，來探討我國科技治理的問題與未來的可能發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Inspired by both science and social science, discussed governance risk associated with WiMAX(Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access)wireless system.WiMAX is a brand new mobile communication technology whose impact on health and environment has never been fully researched and evaluated bythe Taiwaneseacademia and regulatorydepartment, such as EPA.Thethesis starts from anelaborativescientific review andanalyzes the epidemiological literature to investigateits influence using precautionary principles, risk perceptions, and risk governances on technological policy in Taiwan thatused insufficient scientific evidence prior to implementation.The analysis of governance types, models, and factors that shaped these policies was completed as a part of my thesis.
In terms of a newly industrialized country,Taiwan is confronted with issues of modernity like Western Europe and North America. However, it is also deeply affected by local and uniquefactors that dialectically interact through globalization with local cultures. Furthermore, by competing with other industrialized countries, the Taiwanese government has enhanced its autonomy at the expense of democratic values. On one hand, efficiency of economic construction is improved and, on the other hand, the structure of technical bureaucracy and the authority of regimes will impede its communication through civil society . Hence, the development foundation of deliberative democracy and participatory democracy in Taiwan is eroded and ignored. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:02:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R96341054-1.pdf: 3210039 bytes, checksum: 9202ff1f92f4be9505c66f7081cdf9d4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章：緒論 - 1 -
1.1 何謂WiMAX - 1 - 1.2 WiMAX科技爭議－電磁波健康影響風險 - 2 - 1.3 問題意識與研究目的 - 3 - 1.4 研究架構 - 4 - 1.5研究方法 - 5 - 1.6 研究限制 - 5 - 第二章：理論與文獻回顧 - 7 - 2.1 電磁波健康安全的科學未知與爭議 - 7 - 2.2 專家政治與有關的決策模式理論 - 9 - 2.3 社會理論的批判－新興科技的風險治理議題 - 11 - 2.4名詞與概念界定 - 13 - 第三章國內外電磁波健康安全規範與建議 - 16 - 3.1國內外電磁波與人體健康影響研究 - 16 - 3.2國內外組織與團體發表之標準與建議探討 - 21 - 3.3 小結：WiMAX科技運用之健康風險定位－爭議與問題 - 36 - 第四章 WiMAX技術發展政策與台灣的科技治理探討 - 41 - 4.1 WiMAX技術發展政策制訂過程 - 42 - 4.2我國科技決策模式之背景與特點 - 45 - 4.3 我國科技決策模式背景與其特點分析 - 68 - 4.4. 科技決策漠視科學爭議與風險治理探討 - 78 - 4.5 小結－台灣的科技決策模式之科技治理問題 - 88 - 第五章對我國科技治理與風險治理的建議 - 90 - 5.1科學哲學探討－新興科技的科學爭議 - 91 - 5.2科學哲學探討－後常態科學範疇的科技政策制訂 - 97 - 5.3我國科技決策模式問題之可能解決方案－新興風險治理典範 - 103 - 5.4 科技風險治理的責任論述 - 119 - 第六章結論 - 127 - 6.1 研究的發現 - 127 - 6.2 後續研究的展望 - 133 - 參考書目： - 134 - 圖目錄 圖3.1國內外組織與團體對非游離輻射健康安全之標準與建議整理……………37 圖4.1我國科技體系發展與政策簡史……………………………………………...49 圖4.2我國科技機構體系圖…………………………………………………………51 圖4.3我國科技政策形成流程圖……………………………………………………52 圖4.4第8次全國科學技術會議議程表……………………………………………55 圖5.1後常態科學範疇示意圖………….………………………………….………103 圖5.2 國家通訊傳播委員會設置頻率資料庫查詢系統圖………………….……118 表目錄 表1.1非游離輻射種類來源與健康影響列表……………………………………..…9 表3.1 目前ICNIRP的建議值………………………………………………………23 表3.2 ICNIRP對一般民眾非游離輻射建議值……………………………………..24 表3.3 目前ICNIRP的SAR建議值………………………………………………..24 表3.4行動通訊電話在人體頭部內所造成的SAR分佈及溫度提升表（I）….…25 表3.5行動通訊電話在人體頭部內所造成的SAR分佈及溫度提升表（II）…...25 表3.6 FCC目前射頻輻射管制規範…………………………………………….…..28 表3.7 FCC目前射頻輻射管制規範………………..…………………………….…28 表3.8國內目前在WiMAX頻段的管制標準（依據ICNIRP1998）………….….34 表4.1 「雙元循環合作體系」：WiMAX技術發展政策發展時間表………..…..43 表4.2 行政院、科技顧問（組）與國家科學委員會在五大會議之任務與角色..58 表4.5 我國2008-2009年行政院科顧組名單………………………………….…..62 表4.6 我國2006-2007年行政院科顧組名單………………………………….…..62 表4.7我國2002-2003年科技顧問名單……………………………………………73 表4.8我國2000-2001年科技顧問名單……………………………………………64 表4.9 我國2004-2005年科技顧問名單……………………………………………64 表4.10台灣經濟與教育發展概況1951-2010………………………………………72 表4.11台灣高中科技製造業出口比重…………………………………………..…73 表4.12 近年來台灣的國家競爭力排名……………………………………….……77 表4.13 IMD分項排名………………………………………………………….……78 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 電信國家科技型計畫 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 預警原則 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 後常態科學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 科技治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 科技決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 專家政治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 風險治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 風險社會 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 電磁波健康影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | WiMAX | en |
| dc.subject | Technology Governance | en |
| dc.subject | Post-Normal Science | en |
| dc.subject | Technology Policy-making | en |
| dc.subject | Risk Governance | en |
| dc.subject | Precautionary Principle | en |
| dc.subject | Risk Society | en |
| dc.title | 台灣WiMAX技術發展政策之科技治理研究－漠視科學爭議與風險治理的科技決策模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigation on the Technology Governance of WiMAX Technology Developing Policy in Taiwan–The Technology Policy-making Model of Scientific Debate and Risk Governance Disregarded | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林宜平,吳建昌 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 電信國家科技型計畫,電磁波健康影響,風險社會,風險治理,專家政治,科技決策,科技治理,後常態科學,預警原則, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | WiMAX,Risk Society,Risk Governance,Technology Policy-making,Technology Governance,Post-Normal Science,Precautionary Principle, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 147 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國家發展研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。