請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47369
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 錢永祥(Sechin, Y.-S. Chien) | |
dc.contributor.author | YI-CHUN CHEN | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳奕君 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:56:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文參考書目:
錢永祥,2009 〈「肯認」是一項憲政價值嗎?——論肯認的政治性格〉,蕭高彥編,《憲政基本價值》,頁187-217,台北市南港:中研院人社中心。 蕭高彥,1998 〈多元文化與承認政治論〉,收入蕭高彥、蘇文流主編,《多元主 義》,台北:中央研究院社科所,頁487-509。 英文參考書目: Barry, Brain. 1995 Justice as Impartiality. NY: Oxford Univerity Press. 2001 Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. UK: Polity Press. 2005 Why Social Justice Matters? UK: Polity Press. Benhabib, Seyla. 2002 The Claims of Culture-Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. UK:Princeton University Press. Butler, Judith. 1998“Merely Cultural.” New Left Review 227: 33-44 Fraser, Nancy. 1997a Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge. 1997b “A Rejoinder to Iris Young.” New Left Review 223: 126-129. 1998 “Heterosexism, Misrecognition and Capitalism: A Response to Judith Butler.” New Left Review 228:140-149) 2000a “Why Overcoming Prejudice is Not enough: A Rejoinder to Richard Rorty.” Critical Horizon 1(1):21-28. 2000b “Rethinking Recognition.” New Left Review 3:107-120. 2009 Scales of Justice- Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. NY: Columbia University Press. Fraser, Nancy and Axel Honneth. 2003 Redistribution or Recognition? A Political- Philosophical Exchange. Trans. by Joel Golb, James Ingram, and Christiane Wilke, UK: Verso Press. Gutmann, Amy. 2003 Identity in Democracy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Honneth, Axel. 1995 The Struggle for Recognition-The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Trans. by Joel Anderson, UK: Polity Press. Kymlicka, Will. 1995a Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. NY: Oxford University Press. 1990 Contemporary Political Philosophy: an Introduction. NY: Oxford University Press. 1995b(ed) The Rights of Minority Cultures. NY: Oxford University Press. Kymlicka, Will and Wayne Norman. 2001(eds) Citizenship in Diverse Societies. NY: Oxford University Press. Philips, Anne. 1997 “From Inequality to Difference—A Severe Case of Displacement?” New Left Review 224:143-153. 1999 Which Equalities Matter? Cambridge: Polity Press. Rorty, Richard. 2000 “Is Cultural Recognition a Useful Concept for Leftist Politics?” Critical Horizon 1(1): 7-20. Taylor, Charles. 1994 “The Politics of Recognition”, in Amy Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition”, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Tully, James. 1995 Strange in Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge; NY: Cambridge University Press. Walzer, Michael. 1997 On Toleration, New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Young, Iris. 1990 Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1997 “Unruly Categories: A Critique of Nancy Fraser’s Dual Systems Theory,” New Left Review 222: 147-160. 1999 “Ruling Norms and the Politics of Difference: A Comment on Seyla Benhabib,” The Yale Journal of Criticism 12(2): 415-421. 2000 Inclusion and Democracy. NY: Oxford University Press. 2001 “Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgments of Injustice”, The Journal of Political Philosophy 9(1): 1-18. Zurn, Christopher F. 2003 “Arguing Over Participatory Parity: On Nancy Fraser’s Conception of Social Justice”, Philosophy Today 47 pp.130-144. 2005 “Recognition, Redistrubution, and Democracy: Dilemmas of Honneth’s Critical Social Theory”, in European Journal of Philosophy 13:1 pp.89-126. 譯本: Fraser, Nancy &Axel Honneth. 2009, 《再分配,還是承認?─一個政治哲學對話》, 周穗明譯,上海:上海人民出版社。 Olson, Kevin.(ed) 2008, 《傷害+侮辱─爭論中的再分配、承認和代表權》,高靜 宇譯,上海:上海人民出版社。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47369 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 「承認」自泰勒(Charles Taylor)之後已成為當代政治哲學的關鍵語彙,用以證明爭取身分認同與文化差異的重要性,甚至取代傳統政治哲學對資源重分配的關懷。然而,隨著全球化的腳步,資本主義不斷擴張致使貧富差距持續擴大,對於經濟重分配的要求同樣不可被漠視。於是,承認和重分配同樣是正義理論迫切需要面對的議題,但卻遇上一個棘手的困境:差異政治與身分政治鼓勵肯定差異團體的特殊性,憑藉差異以滿足群體的身分認同;然而,想要達到經濟重分配反而必須倚賴消弭差異才能達到,這之中所充滿的緊張與矛盾該如何處理?
傅瑞澤(Nancy Fraser)與洪內特(Axel Honneth)長期以來針對「承認或是重分配」究竟何者重要進行理論建構與辯論。傅瑞澤反對差異政治取代經濟不正義的模式,而主張兩者並重的「觀點二元論」;洪內特則將承認視為正義理論根本的範疇,並透過其承認領域的區別將經濟問題視為爭取承認鬥爭的衍伸物。本文將透過對兩人理論的爬梳來理解正義理論的各種樣貌,透過兩人的爭論將豐富我們對正義理論的認識。本文透過三個關於平等的問題來檢視承認與重分配之間的關係,並得出以下結論:不論是對文化承認或對經濟分配的平等訴求,最終將以重分配為動機,而真正的平等只能體現在政治程序與法律制度上。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The concept of ‘recognition’, as developed by Charles Taylor and having become a key word in modern political philosophy, is employed to underline the implications of identity politics and cultural differences. With the advent of these phenomena, the focus of traditional politics has moved from mere resource redistribution to recognition. Globalization and the expansion of capitalism, however, have aggravated the poverty gap problem. Thus the problems of redistribution remain to be taken seriously. Given that recognition and redistribution are both urgent issues to be addressed in a theory of justice, there are conflicting demands that only a comprehensive framework can accommodate: identity politics encourages uniqueness among individual groups, while economic redistribution requires eliminating differences to achieve equality. How should we resolve the tension between recognition and redistribution?
Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth have engaged in a debate on these issues. Fraser argues against replacing redistribution with recognition, and brings up her “perspective dualism” to place the two ideals on an equal footing. Honneth, on his part, conceives recognition as the fundamental value of justice. He recasts it in three categories to explain the socialist ideal of treating redistribution as a subvariety of the struggle for recognition. Through an examination of the debate between Fraser and Honneth, this dissertation intends to figure out the proper relationship between recognition and redistribution. By asking three questions on equality, I conclude that whether to search for culture recognition or economic redistribution, the ultimate concern is about resources redistribution. Real equality can only be realized through political procedures and institutions of law. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:56:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R93322003-1.pdf: 8411770 bytes, checksum: 83bc1fb71a1a006f16ad447ccc72d529 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………… I
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………..… II 目錄………………………………………………………………………… III 第一章、導言…………..……………………………………………………1 第二章、傅瑞澤論承認理論…………...…………………………………10 一、從承認回到重分配………………..……………………………....10 (一)焦點的轉移..……...…………………………………………….10 (二)重分配與認同的困境…….……………………………………12 1.兩種不平等的區分……………………………………………..12 2.重分配與認同間的依存與互斥關係…………………………14 (三)雙元結構型團體….…………………………..………………..14 二、對矯正方式的修正………………….…………………………….15 (一)階級與地位……………………..…………..…………….……15 (二)肯定與轉化…………………..……………..……………….…16 (三)非改良主義式的改革…………..……………………………..19 三、參與的概念:地位從屬模式與同等的參與…………………… 21 小結:重新思考承認與同等參與……………………………………..23 第三章、洪內特論承認理論……………………………………..………26 一、洪內特承認理論基礎……………………………………………..26 (一)三種承認領域的區別與法律承認 …………………………..26 (二)承認的鬥爭:團結作為承認的第三領域…………………..29 二、規範性的一元主義……………………………………………..…31 (一) 經驗與規範性.………………………………………………..31 (二)從資本主義看承認與分配…………………………………...33 三、承認與認同的政治………………………..………………………36 小結:重新思考承認領域的區別…………….………………………38 第四章、傅瑞澤與洪內特的交鋒……………….……………………….41 一、經驗在承認理論中的定位……………………………………….41 (一)傅瑞澤論經驗與道德心理學批判……………………………41 (二)批判社會理論與內在的超越性……...……………………….43 二、資本主義與社會整合關係……………………………………….45 (一)傅瑞澤論資本主義與系統整合………………………………45 (二)洪內特論資本主義與社會整合………………………………47 三、目的論與本務論的爭議…………………………………………...49 (一)傅瑞澤的本務論自由主義………..…………………………..49 (二)洪內特的目的論自由主義……..……………………………..52 小結與反思………………………………………………………………55 第五章、結論………………………………………………………………60 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………65 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 承認或是重分配?檢視傅瑞澤與洪內特的辯論 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Recognition or Redistribution? A Critical Examination of The Debate between Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 孫善豪,陳張培倫 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 承認,重分配,傅瑞澤,洪內特,承認的政治, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | RECOGNITION,REDISTRIBUTION,NANCY FRASER,AXEL HONNETH,THE POLITICS OF RECOGNITION, | en |
dc.relation.page | 67 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.21 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。