請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47356
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳鴻基 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Yi Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 呂欣宜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:56:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-02-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Agarwal, R. & Karahanna, E., 2000.”Time Flies When You’re Having Fun:Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage .”MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No.4, pp.665-694.
2. Albert Mehrabian and James A. Russell,1974,”A Verbal Measure of Information Rate for Studies in Environmental Psychology”, Environment and Behavior,6:2(1974:June)p.233-252 3. Andrews, J. C., Durvasula, S., and Akhter, S. H., 1990, ”A Framework for Conceptualizing and Measuring the Involvement Construct in Advertising,”Research Journal of Advertising, 19(4), pp. 27-40. 4. Baker J., Grewal D., Parasuraman A., 1994. The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 22(Fall): 328-339, 5. Belk, R., 1975. Situational variable and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 2,157-164 6. Berlyne, D.E., 1971.Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Meredith Corporation 7. Chau, P.Y.K. 1996“An Empirical Investigation on Factors Affecting the Acceptance of CASE by System Developers,” Information and Management,(30:6),.269-280. 8. Cooper, D. R. & Emory, C. W., 1996. Business Research Methods (5th). Singapore: McGraw 9. Davis, F. D., 1989 “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3, pp.319-339. 10. Dotson, Michael J. and Eva M. Hyatt, 2000,”Religious Symbols as Peripheral Cue in Advertising: A Replication of the Elaboration Likelihood Model,” Journal of Business Research, 48, 63-68. 11. Elliott,M.T. & Lockard, P., 1996 , “Rlaboration Likelihood Model.” Journal of Business Research,.48,63-68 12. Fishben, M. and Ajzen, I., 1975 “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior:An Introduction to Theory and Research. “Reading MA:Addison Weswly 13. Gefen, D., 2000, “E-Commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust,” Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 286, 725-737. 14. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W., 2003, “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model,” MIS Quarterly, 27, 1, 52-90. 15. Griffitt, W., 1970.” Environmental effects on interpersonal affective behavior: Ambient effective temperature and attraction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 240-244. 16. Hartwick, J. and H. Barki, 1994, “Explaining the Role of Use Participation in Information System Use,” Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1994, pp. 440-465. 17. Hui,M.K.M and J.E.G Bateson,1991. Perceived control and the effects of crowding and consumer choice on the service experience. Journal of Consumer Research 18,174-184 18. Igbaria, M., 1997, “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors In Small Firms:A Structural Equation Model” MIS Quarterly, (21:3), 1997, pp.279-305. 19. Keith K.,2009,Unleashing the Power of Digital Signage 5th, pp1-12 20. Kordelia Spies, Fredrich Hesse, Kerstin Loesch, 1997, Store atmosphere, mood and purchasing behavior, Internatinal Journal of Research in Marketing14,1-17. 21. Kotler P., 1973. “Atmospherics as a marketing tool.” . Journal of Retailing, 48-65. 22. Krugman, H. E., 1965, “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, Fall, pp. 349-356. 23. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y., 2000. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision support systems, 29, 269-282.’ 24. Lumpkin, James R.., Jon M. Hawes and Willian R. Darden,1986, “Shopping Patterns of the Rural Consumer : Exploring the Relationship Between Shopping Orientation and Outshopping,” Journal of Business Research,Vol 14,1,pp63-81 25. Mehrabianand Russel, J.A.,.,1974. An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 26. Park, J. W. and Hastak, M.,1994, “Memory-Based Product Judgments: Effects of Involvement at Encoding and Retrieval,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21,December, 534-547. 27. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., 1981, “Attitude and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches”, New York: Westview.. 28. Schiffman, Leon G. and Leslie Lazar Kanuk, 2000, Consumer Behavior 7th, NewJersey: Prentice-Hall. 29. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R., 1988.” The theory of reasoned action: A MetaAnalysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research.” Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343. 30. Spangenberg, Eric R., Ayn E. Crowley, and Pamela W. Henderson, 1996, “Improving the Store Environment: Do Olfactory Cues Affect Evaluations and Behaviors?” Journal of Marketing, 60 (April), 67-80. 31. Rook, D. W.(1987) “The Buying Impulse”, Jounal of Consumer Research, p189-199 32. Szajna, B. “Emperical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model,” Management Science, Vol.42, No.1, January 1996,.85-92. 33. Szajna, B., 1994, “Software evaluation and choice: Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument,” Management Information System Quarterly Vol.18, No.3, 1994/09,319-324 34. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: a Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research, Vol.6, No.2, June 1995, 144-176. 35. Turban, E., J. Lee, et al., 2000.” Electronic commerce: a managerial perspective. Englewood Cliffs”, New Jersey, Prentice Hall. 36. Venkatesh, V. and Davis. F. D. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, Vol.46, No.2 , February 2000,186-204. 37. Venkatesh, V.,2000 “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Intergrating Control Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,”Information Systems Research, Vol.11, No.4, pp342-365 38. Weinberg, P. and W. Gottwald, 1982. Impulsive consumer buying as a result of emotions. Journal of Business Research Vol.10(March),43-57 中文文獻 1. Hola和樂家居館http://www.hola.com.tw/ 2. 尤敏君 (1996),”連鎖體系之經營型態與策略分析”,台灣經濟研究月刊,19,5,39-45 3. 王文義 (1987),《百貨公司的明日》,臺北:作者自行出版。 4. 王保進 (1996),統計套裝程式SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北:松崗 5. 行政院主計處 (2006),中華民國行業標準分類第8次修訂。 6. 林苑晴. (2009).,液晶電視/數位看板大有可為-大尺寸面板產值看漲. 新電子. 7. 洪明奇 (2001),” 以科技接受模式探討供應鏈管理之採用”`,國立中正大學資訊管理所研究論文 8. 張芬瑜. (2005).,數位顯訊器之產業結構與競爭動態分析.,國立臺灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 9. 許曉嘉. (2010),研調:全球大尺吋面板5月出貨創新高, http://www.funddj.com 10. 陳焜元 (1996),行政管理資訊系統使用者參與效果之研究---技術接受模型檢證,國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。 11. 楊世瑩 (2008),SPSS 統計分析實務。台北:旗標 12. 經濟部 (2008),服務業之經營活動報告 13. 劉忠平 (1995),百貨公司折扣活動對消費者購買傾向之影響:消費者決策模式的應用,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 14. 賴彥中. (2008),互動體驗創造數位看板顯示器新價值. 工研院產業經濟與資訊服務中心. 15. 謝佳宇. (2009),防鴻戰線 從NB延燒至面板業. 數位時代. 16. 魏益權. (2010),數位看板在廣告通路放異彩. 工商時報, 資訊科技周刊數位視野/專2版. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47356 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 數位看板(Digital signage)為近年來多媒體播放的一種新的商業應用,市場研究機構DisplaySearch指出,過去五年數位看板整體的市場規模成長了300%以上,預估2011年時,全球數位看板的市場規模可望達到146億美元。Computex台北國際電腦展在2009年首次設立數位看板展覽展區。數位看板所涵蓋的應用產業廣泛,包括旅館業、博物館業、公共空間及零售業等。
研究機構iSuppli研究表示,全球數位看板自2008至2013年之年複合成率將達26.8%,而其成長來源關鍵產業之一即為零售產業,而本研究即為對數位看板在零售業導入之消費者研究。利用莫拉比安-羅素模型(The Mehrabian-Russell Model)瞭解消費者在接受數位看板之刺激後,透過情緒反應作為中介變數,最後影響其購物意願;同時,利用科技接受模式之認知易用性及認知有用性作為消費者消費購物之邊陲線索,衡量消費者對於數位看板之正面態度是否透過邊陲路徑影響消費者之購物意願。 本研究實際導入數位看板於HOLA位於左營店內,於店內發放問卷給消費者,共回收120份問卷,有效問卷112份問卷,研究結果顯示「認知易用性」及「認知有用性」對於消費者「購物意願」為正向影響;在莫拉比安-羅素模型中,「刺激」對於「愉悅」呈負向影響,其他兩種情緒「喚起」及「支配」則不顯著,而消費者的三種情緒反應,「愉悅」、「喚起」、「支配」,其對消費者「購物意願」呈正向影響,即消費者「情緒反應」越高,則消費者「購物意願」越高。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Digital signage has become a new multimedia communication device and has drawn a great attention on possible business applications in the field. A market survey Display Search have revealed that the market of digital signage in the past 5 year has grown more than 300%, and its worldwide market size will reach 14.6 billion US dollar in 2011. In 2009, one of the renowned computer exhibitions, Taipei Computex, set up an exhibition area for digital signage for the first time to recognize its possible trend and applications. Recent trend also shows that the digital signage technology have been deployed into various industries including hotel, museum, public space, and retail.
A study by iSuppli also indicates that one of the fast growing areas on digital signage application is the retailing industry. This study aims at examining the affecting factors on digital signage adoption in the retail industry, in particular from consumer’s perspective. Combing the Mehrabian-Russell Model and Technology Acceptance Model, a research model is proposed and tested. Under the “stimulus-mood-attitude” framework, the content of digital signage is regarded as incentive (a stimulus); the mood reaction of the consumers is intervening variable; and the consumers’ buying intention is treated as dependent variable. Moreover, in addition to test impacts of such central cues on the user intention, peripheral cues of ELM (Elaboration Likelyhood Model) model are also tested. Two proxy of digital signage technology - “perceived usefulness” and “perceived ease of use”, are used as peripheral cues in the research model. A new store of a large retailer chain in Taiwan was studied. In this new store, a digital signage is installed to provide a new way showing product information and related background dynamically. A survey questionnaire study was applied. The informants are those who had viewed the digital signage. A total of 112 valid questionnaires returned. The results indicate that “perceived usefulness” and “perceived ease of use” have positive impact on the consumer’s buying intention. The incentive has negative impact on pleasure (one of the three moods), however, its impacts on the other two moods “arousal” and “dominance” are not significant. All three moods have positive impact on the buying intention. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:56:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97741039-1.pdf: 1582261 bytes, checksum: a54b648315bd764d25a713f74cdc51a0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
中文摘要 II Abstract III 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究背景及動機 1 第二節、 研究目的 3 第三節、 研究對象與範圍 3 第四節、 論文架構及研究流程 4 第二章、 文獻探討 6 第一節、 數位看板概論 6 第二節、 莫拉比安-羅素模型(The Mehrabian-Russell Model) 14 第三節、 推敲可能模式(ELM) 17 第四節、 科技接受模式 20 第五節、 台灣零售業概況 27 第六節、 研究個案公司簡介--HOLA 31 第三章、 研究方法 33 第一節、 研究架構 33 第二節、 研究假設 35 第三節、 變數之定義 38 第四節、 問卷設計 41 第五節、 問卷收集 44 第六節、 資料分析方法 44 第四章、 研究結果 46 第一節、 問卷回收及樣本結構 46 第二節、 信度及效度檢驗 49 第三節、 自變數之共線性檢定 55 第四節、 假說檢定 56 第五節、 假說檢定結果 62 第五章、 結論與建議 64 第一節、 研究發現與結論 64 第二節、 管理意涵 66 第三節、 後續研究建議 68 參考文獻 69 英文文獻 69 中文文獻 74 附錄一:本研究問卷 75 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 零售業導入數位看板研究-以HOLA為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Research on Digital Signage Adoption in Retail Industry—
A Case of HOLA | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 施盛寶,黃崇興,杜志挺 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 數位看板,零售業,莫拉比安-羅素模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Digital signage acceptance,TAM,The Mehrabian-Russell Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 84 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。