請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47146完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張斐章 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Yu Li | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李國煜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:48:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.行政院公共工程委員會，2006，「公共建設相關專業人員生態工程講習」。
2.汪靜明，1994，「台灣櫻花鉤吻鮭資源價值及教育」，環境教育季刊(23):3-13。 3.吳子青，2008，結合河川流態與環境梯度概念於水資源最佳化管理之研究，國立臺灣大學碩士論文。 4.林鎮洋，2003，「台灣生態工法技術參考手冊」，經濟部水利署。 5.林曜松，2001，「國家公園生物多樣性保育策略之研究」，國家公園生物多樣性保育策略之研究與生物多樣性保育策略研討會論文集，1-2頁。 6.林曜松，1999，「生物多樣性之省思」，台灣陸域生物多樣性研習班研習手冊，54-60。 7.林曜松、趙榮台，1998，「維護生物多樣性與促進資源永續利用生物多樣性研討會論文集」，14-23頁。 8.邵廣昭、陳麗淑，2004，「魚類入門」，遠流，pp.263。 9.周欣穎，2008，「一群落之Shannon 熵指標與Hill 指標族之估計方法」，清華大學統計所碩士論文。 10.張斐章、張麗秋，2005，「類神經網路」，東華書局。 11.張斐章，2004，「生態水文於多目標水資源管理之研究與應用(1/2)」，經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所期末報告 ISBN-957-01-9429-4。 12.張斐章，2005，「生態水文於多目標水資源管理之研究與應用(2/2)」，經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所期末報告 ISBN-986-00-3534-2。 13.張斐章，2006，「水資源最佳化管理於河川生態復育之研究(1/3)」，經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所期末報告 ISBN-978-986-00-7663-9。 14.陳正昌，2001，「觀察體的分類」，教育學門提昇研究方法論研討會」。 15.陳義雄，2009，「台灣河川溪流的指標魚類」，國立台灣海洋大學。 16.陳佳煒，2008，「三群落β生物多樣性之統計分析」，清華大學統計所碩士論文。 17.楊津豪，2006，「河川生態廊道與魚類物理棲地之水理模式研究」，國立臺灣大學碩士論文。 18.韓若平，2008，「β生物多樣性的統計估計」，清華大學統計所博士論文。 19.蔡文柄，2007，「應用類神經網路推估溪流之生物多樣性」，國立臺灣大學碩士論文。 20.蔡尚，馮豐隆，1999，「生態歧異度及其求算方法之分類」，中國生物，42(1):65-83。 21.潘暐宏，2010，「生物多樣性指標的信賴區間」，清華大學統計所碩士論文。 22.蘇鴻傑等，1994，「太魯閣國家公園蘭科植物群落調查」，內政部營業署太魯閣國家公園管理處。 23.羅任遠，2008，「兩群落Beta生物多樣性之統計分析」，清華大學統計所碩士論文。 24.羅積玉，1990，多元統計分析方法與應用，科技圖書股份有限公司。 25.Bayley, P.B., 1991, “The flood pulse advantage and the restoration of river floodplain systems”, Regulated rivers-research & management, 6(1), 75-86. 26.Bradley, D.C. and Ormerod, S.J., 2002. Long-term effects of catchment liming on invertebrates in upland streams. Freshwater Biology, 47(1): 161-171. 27.Chao, A., Chazdon, R.L., Colwell, R.K. and Shen, T.-J., 2005. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecology Letters, 8(2): 148-159. 28.Chao, A. et al, 2008,'A Two-Stage Probabilistic Approach to Multiple-Community Similarity Indices.' Biometrics 64(4): 1178-1186. 29.Clausen, B. and biggs, B., 1997. Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biology, 38(2): 327-342. 30.Cushman, R.M., 1985. Review of Ecological Effects of Rapidly Varying Flows Downstream from Hydroelectric Facilities. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 5(3a): 330-339. 31.Fisher, R.A., Corbet, A.S., and Williams, C.B., 1943, “The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population”, Journal of Animal Ecology, 12, 42-58. 32.Gaston, K.J., 1996. Species-range-size distributions: patterns, mechanisms and implications. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(5): 197-201. 33.Harvey, B.C. and Stewart, A.J., 1991. Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams. Oecologia, 87(3): 336-342. 34.Horn, H.S., 1966. Measurement of 'Overlap' in Comparative Ecological Studies. The American Naturalist, 100(914): 419. 35.Hutchinson, G.E., 1953. The concept of pattern in ecology. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 105: 1. 36.Jaccard, P, 1902, Lois de Distribution Florale dans la Zone Alpine. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Natl. Bull. 38:69. 37.Jackson, J.K., Feder, L., 2006. Long-term studies of freshwater macroinvertebrates: a review of the frequency, duration and ecological significance. Freshwater Biology, 51(3): 591-603. 38.Jonathan D. G. Jones., Jeffery L. Dangl., 2006. The plant immune system. Nature, 444:323-329. 39.Jost, L., 2008, GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Molecular Ecology 17, 4015-4026. 40.Jowett, I.G. and Duncan, M.J., 1990. Flow variability in New Zealand rivers and its relationship to in-stream habitat and biota. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24(3): 305 - 317. 41.Karr, J.R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6(6): 21-27. 42.Kohonen, T., 1982, Self-Organizing Formation of Topologically Correct Feature Maps. Biological Cybernetics. 43:59-69. 43.Lytle, D.A. and Poff, N.L., 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(2): 94-100. 44.Macklin, M.G. and Rumsby, B.T., 2007. Changing climate and extreme floods in the British uplands. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(2): 168-186. 45.Margalef, R., 1972, Homage to Evelyn Hutchinson, or why is there an upper limit to diversity. Trans. Connect. Acad. Arts Sci. 44:211-235. 46.Magoulick, D.D. and Kobza, R.M., 2003. The role of refugia for fishes during drought: a review and synthesis. Freshwater Biology, 48(7): 1186-1198. 47.Magurran Anne E., 1988, Ecological diversity and its measurement. 48.Monk, B.J., Han, E., Josephs-Cowan, C.A., Pugmire, G. and Burger, R.A., 2006. Salvage bevacizumab (rhuMAB VEGF)-based therapy after multiple prior cytotoxic regimens in advanced refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 102(2): 140-144. 49.Morisita, M., 1961,'Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities.' Japanese Journal of Ecology 11(6): 252-252. 50.Naesje, T., Jonsson, B., and Skurdal, J., 1995, “Spring flood: a primary cue for hatching of river spawning Coregoninae”, Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, 52(10), 2190-2196. 51.Nei, M. and Chesser, R.K., 1983. Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Annals of Human Genetics, 47(3): 253-259. 52.Olden, J.D. and Poff, N.L., 2003. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications, 19(2): 101-121. 53.Pielou, E.C., 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13: 131-144. 54.Pielou, E.C., 1969. An Introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York. 55.Pielou, E.C., 1975. Ecological diversity. Wiley, New York. 56.Poff, N.L., Allan, J.D., 1997, “The natural flow Regime - A paradigm for river conservation and restoration”, Bioscience , December 1, Vol. 47, Issue 11. 57.Poff, N.L., Allan, J.D., Bain, M.B., Karr, J.R., Prestegaard, K.L., Richter, B.D., Sparks, R.E. and Stromberg, J.C., 1997, “The natural flow regime”, Bioscience, 47(11): 769-784. 58.Shannon, C.E., and W. Weaver., 1949, “The Mathematical Theory of Communication”, Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 59.Shannon, C.E., 1948, “A mathematical theory of communication”, Bell System Technical Journal, 27,379-423, 623-656. 60.Shannon, C.E., W. Wiener, 1963, The mathematical theory of communication, University of Illinois Press, pp.117. 61.Shannon, C., 2001,'A mathematical theory of communication.' ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 5(1): 3-55. 62.Simpson, E., 1949,'Measurement of diversity.' Nature 163(4148): 688-688. 63.Shiau, J.-T. and Wu, F.-C., 2004. Assessment of hydrologic alterations caused by Chi-Chi diversion weir in Chou-Shui Creek, Taiwan: opportunities for restoring natural flow conditions. River Research and Applications, 20(4): 401-412. 64.Sorensen, T.A., 1948, A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. K. Dan. Bidensk, Selsk. Biol. Skr. 5:1-34. 65.Stanford, J.A., 1993. An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: connectivity and the hyporheic corridor. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 12(1): 48. 66.Su, H. J., 1994. Species diversity of forest plants in Taiwan, In Biodiversity and terrestrial ecosystems. (C.I. Peng and C. H. Chon, eds.) Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica Monograph Series 14:87-98. 67.Suen Jian-Ping, Edwin E. Herricks, 2009. Developing fish community based ecohydrological indicators for water resources management in Taiwan. Hydrobiologia, 625(1):223-234. 68.Suen, J.P. and Eheart, J.W., 2006. Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. Water Resources Research, 42(3): W03417. 69.Suen, J.P., 2005, “Ecologically based methods for multi-objective water resources management in taiwan”, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana. 70.Suen, J.P., Herricks, E.E. and Eheart, J.W., 2004, “Ecohydrologic Indicators for Rivers of Northern Taiwan”, ASCE/EWRI World Water & Environmental Resources Congress 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Paper in CD ROM. 71.Spellerberg, L. F., 1991, Monitoring ecological change, 14-326. University Press, Cambridge. 72.Tharme, R.E., 2003. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications, 19(5-6): 397-441. 73.Tew, K.S., Han, C.C., Chou, W.R., and Fang, L.S., 2002, Habitat and fish fauna structure in a subtropical mountain stream in Taiwan before and after a catastrophic typhoon, Environmental Biology of Fishes 65(4): 457-462. 74.Thomas, J. et al., 1996, Bootstrap Confidence Intervals. Statistical Science 11(3):189-228. 75.Wagner Ina., Schmidt Kjeld., 2004, Ordering Systems: Coordinative Practices and Artifacts in Architectural Design and Planning. 13(5-6):349-408. 76.Ward Jr, J.H., 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301): 236. 77.Ward, J.V., Tockner, K. and Schiemer, F., 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 15(1-3): 125-139. 78.Welcomme, R.L., 1995. Relationships between fisheries and the integrity of river systems. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 11(1): 121-136. 79.Whittaker, R., 1960, Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs, 30(4): 407-407. 80.Whittaker, R., 1972,Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon: 213-251. 81.Wood, P.J., Armitage, P.D., 2004, The response of the macroinvertebrate community to low-flow variability and supra-seasonal drought within a groundwater dominated stream. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 161(1):1-20. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47146 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 生態群落在河川流態中，長時間的演化下已漸趨穩定，但隨著生物棲息環境的開發和水資源規劃與管理的影響下，不僅對於棲息地中物質能量的傳導造成影響，更會阻隔生物迴游的空間，亦同時改變河川流態的穩定性；因此河川流態特性及流量變化與河川生態系統的關係是相當錯綜複雜，如何量化及建立反應關係，定義對河川生態系統較佳的河川流態，將生態水文關係具體的化為生態需求目標等，為目前所遇到之難題，本研究將分別朝向全台流態特性和魚類生態特性兩個方向作探討，考量以日流量轉換之台灣生態水文指標作為河川流態特性指標，生物採樣資料以生物多樣性指標量化作為河川流態中生物群落分佈的依據，從複雜的「台灣生態水文指標-生物群落分佈」關係中歸納兩者間之特性，依據流態資料與魚類採樣資料之分類結果，各集群間皆有地文分佈的特性，在兩資料之中游區域的歧異度與均勻度指標值皆為三類中最佳，且流態特性趨勢變化亦相似，故流域中游之流態特性與生態特性之相關性高，期望藉由此結果提供未來水庫管理或水利規劃等單位，在研究作水資源控制操作時的參考資訊，在颱洪時期更可藉於此控制洪水排放量，以恢復或改變河川流量的變化來維護或提升生物群落的多樣性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The ecological community in river flow regime has become stable via long-term evolution. However the transportation of sustenance and the stability of river flow regime have changed due to exploitation of species habitats and water resources management. The relationship between river flow regime and river ecosystem is very complicated. The most important task at present is to develop ecological flow regimes by taking the interaction and relationship between flow regimes and river ecosystems into account. In this study, derivation of the characteristic relationship between “TEIS-Community Distribution” from taking TEIS(Taiwan Eco-hydrological Indicator System) conversed from daily flows as the index of river flow regimes and fish sampling data as the index of community distribution is the main research objective. According to the classification results of river flow regimes and fish sampling data, it shows that there exist physiographic relationships among fish communities. Furthermore, midstream possesses the best indices of diversity and uniformity with similar trend changes of flow regimes, compared to upstream and downstream. Therefore, the flow regime and ecological characteristics in midstream show high correlation. These research results can be applied to reservoir management, water resources management, flood management for discharge capacity during typhoon periods, and river flow restoration for sustaining ecological diversity. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:48:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97622014-1.pdf: 9609591 bytes, checksum: 7672e4fbf6712fd669ed25b8c18e0fe9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
摘 要 I Abstract II 目 錄 I 表目錄 III 圖目錄 IV 第一章 緒論 1 1-1 研究動機與目的 1 1-2 研究方法 2 1-3 論文架構 2 1-4 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2-1 自然河川流態與台灣生態水文指標 4 2-2 台灣魚類生態特性概論 6 2-3 魚類生態評估指標概述 8 第三章 理論概述 12 3-1台灣生態水文指標系統(TEIS) 12 3-1-1 TEIS考量因子 13 3-1-2 台灣生態水文指標之介紹 15 3-2 生態估計指標之概述 19 3-2-1 α生態評估指標之概述 19 3-2-2 β生態評估指標之概述 23 3-3 主成分分析 26 3-4 階層式集群分析 29 3-5 自主特徵映射網路(SOM) 30 第四章 研究區域 32 4-1 研究區域簡介 32 4-2 資料收集與處理 34 4-2-1 資料收集 35 4-2-2 資料處理 42 4-3 全台流量測站與魚類生態特性分區 43 4-3-1流態特性分區 44 4-3-2生態族群分區 45 第五章 結果與討論 48 5-1 流態資料之集群分析結果 48 5-2 魚類資料之集群分析結果 51 5-3 流態特性與魚類特性之生態估計指標探討 56 5-4 流態特性與魚類特性之台灣生態水文指標探討 58 第六章 結論與建議 71 6-1 結論 71 6-2 建議 73 參考文獻 74 附錄 83 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 集群分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 台灣生態水文指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生態估計指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 主成分分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | TEIS(Taiwan Eco-hydrological Indicator System) | en |
| dc.subject | Ecological diversity estimated index | en |
| dc.subject | Principal component analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Hierarchical cluster analysis | en |
| dc.title | 利用台灣生態水文指標推估魚類生態特性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigating the fish biodiversity in rivers by using Taiwan Ecohydrology Index System | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳弘?,張麗秋,孫建平,任秀慧 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 台灣生態水文指標,生態估計指標,主成分分析,集群分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | TEIS(Taiwan Eco-hydrological Indicator System),Ecological diversity estimated index,Principal component analysis,Hierarchical cluster analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 85 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 9.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。