請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46826
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 童慶斌(Ching-Pin Tung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsin Ho | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何宜昕 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:41:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王如意、謝龍生,1996,「半分布並聯型線性水庫降雨-逕流模式之研究」,第八屆水利工程研討會論文集。
2. 王如意等人,1996,「台北防洪整體檢討計劃(一)」,經濟部水利署委託研究報告。 3. 王如意等人,1997,「台北防洪整體檢討計劃(二)」,經濟部水利署委託研究報告。 4. 王如意等人,1998,「台北防洪整體檢討計劃(三)」,經濟部水利署委託研究報告。 5. 王如意、周建明與潘宗毅,2002,「防洪示範區淹水境況模擬與決策支援系統之研究(二)-子計畫六:基隆河流域水文環境評估及沿岸逕流量推測之研究(二)」。 6. 行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告,2004,「水庫供水機能檢討評估與改善對策─以石門水庫為例」 7. 呂季蓉,2006「台灣南部地區長期乾旱趨勢分析之研究」,國立成功大學水利及海洋工程學系碩士論文。 8. 宋嘉文,2003,「氣候變遷對台灣西半部地區降雨及乾旱影響之研究」,國立成功大學水利及海洋工程學系碩士論文。 9. 吳約西,2009,「政府組織再造-水利組織部分」,水資源管理會刊。 10. 金紹興、謝明昌,2001,「氣候變遷對台灣水文環境之影響」,新世紀水資源問題研析與對策研討會,台南縣,第A-1~A7頁。 11. 柳中明、郭振泰、黃文政、林淑華,2007,「因應氣候變遷及京都議定書水利政策調整之研究」,經濟部水利署,MOEAWRA0950119。 12. 徐年盛與魏志強,2003,「水庫防洪運轉規則對缺水風險之影響分析,中華水資源管理學會,水資源管理2003 研討會。 13. 許晃雄,1998,「人為的全球暖化與氣候變遷」,The 4th International Conference of Atmospheric Action Network East Asia, Taiepi 14. 許恩菁,1999,「設計暴雨雨型序率模式之研究」,國立台大學農業工程學研究所碩士論文。 15. 許晃雄、柯文雄、鄒治華、陳正達,2000,「台灣環境變遷與全球環境變遷衝擊之評析-氣候」,國科會研究計畫成果報告。 16. 葉弘德與韓洪元,1990,「臺北市暴雨雨型之研究」。 17. 童慶斌、李宗祐,2001,「氣候變遷對七家灣溪流量之影響評估」,農業工程學報,47(1):65-74。 18. 童慶斌、吳明進、張斐章、李明旭、柳文成、謝龍生,2002,「氣候變化綱要公約國家通訊衝擊調適資料建置-氣候、水文、生態部分(一)」,行政院環境保護署專題研究計畫報告,EPA-91-TA11-03-A100。 19. 黃文政、張守陽、陳孝宇、吳建興、劉欣霈、張益家、蘇元風,2003,「台灣地區近三十年來連續不降雨日數分析與探討」,台灣水利,第51期,第2卷,第1-9頁。 20. 童慶斌,2007,「氣候變遷與生態環境課程講義」,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學系。 21. 童慶斌與連宛渝,2009,「水庫系統在變遷氣候中之脆弱度評估與支援決策技術發展」,行政院國家科學委員會。 22. 黃文政、謝奇良、張惠雯、林淑華,2009,「氣候變遷對石門水庫集水區水文頻率的影響」,水資源管理研討會論文集。 23. 楊文仁、范正成、張于漢,2005,「台灣北部地區最大三十分鐘降雨強度之分析及預測」,農業工程學報,51(3):p1-10。 24. 經濟部水利署北區水資源局,2008,「石門水庫高濁度缺水分析及改善策略檢討」。 25. 經濟部水利署北區水資源局,2008,「區域水資源管理策略之擬定」。 26. 經濟部水利署北區水資源局,2007,「石門水庫增設取水工工程計畫綜合報告」。 27. 經濟部水利署北區水資源局,2000,「石門水庫集水區第三階段治理規劃」。 28. 劉建邦,2009,「石門水庫安全評估之特點」,石門水庫建設之回顧與展望。 29. 顏月珠,1986,「無母數統計方法」。 30. 顏清連、王如意、許銘熙等人,1998,「淡水河整體洪水預報系統模式之研發」,國立台灣大學水工試驗所研究報告。 31. 簡昭群、吳啟順,2009,「提升水庫供水能力─緊急供水工程暨水庫更新改善整治情形」,石門水庫建設之回顧與展望專題研討會論文集。 32. 石門水庫整治特別條例,http://shihmen.wra.gov.tw/。 33. 石門水庫運用要點,http://www.wra.gov.tw/。 34. Baffaut, C., M. A. Nearing, and A. D. Nick. 1996. “Impact of CLIGEN parameters on WEPP-predicted average annual soil loss. Trans. ” ASAE 39(2): 447-457 35. Chiew, F.H.S. and Teng, J. and vaze, J. and Kirono, D.G.C., 2009. “ Influence of global climate model selection on runoff impact assessment.”Journal of Hydrology, Vol.379(1-2): 172-180 36. Chow, V. T., 1959. Open Channel Hydraulic, Mcgraw-Hillbook co. ,New York 37. Cole, J.A. and Slade, S. and Jones, P.D. and Gregory, J.M.,1991. “ Reliable yield of reservoirs and possible effects of climatic change.” , Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol.36(6):591 38. Favis-Mortlock, D.T. and Guerra, S.J.T., 1999. “ The implications of general circulation model estimates of rainfall for future erosion: a case study from Brazil. ” Catena, Vol.37: 329-354. 39. Fiona J. and Ashish S., 2009. “ Measurement of GCM Skill in Predicting Variables Relevant for Hydroclimatological Assessments.”American Meteorological Society, Aug. 40. Haith, D. A. and L. L. Shoemaker, 1987. “ Generalized Watershed Loading Functions for Stream Flow Nutrients”, Water Resources Bulletin, 23(3): 471-478. 41. Hanratty, M.P. & Stefan, H.G., 1998. “ Simulating climate change effects in a Minnesota agricultural watershed”. Journal of Environmental Quality Vol. 27: 1524-1532. 42. Hamon, W.R., 1961. “Estimating potential evapotranspiration”, Journal of Hydraulics Division, Vol.83(7): 107-120 43. Hydrologic Engineering Center., 1990. “HEC-1 Flood hydrograph package: User’s manual and programer’s manual,” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Davis, California 44. Hsieh, L. S. and Wang, R. Y., 1999. “ A Semi-Distributed Parallel-Type Linear Reservoir Rainfall-Runoff Model and Its Application in Taiwan’ ”, Journal of Hydrological Processes, 13, pp.1247~1268. 45. Huff, F. A., 1967. “Time distribution of rainfall in heavy storms. ” Water Resources Research, 3(4), pp. 1007-1019. 46. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (AR4), http://www.ipcc.ch/index.htm 47. Johnson, F., Sharma, A., “Measurement of GCM Skill in Predicting Variables Relevant for Hydroclimatological Assessments.”American Meteorological Society, Aug. 2009. 48. Kaczmarek, Z., Napiorkowski, J. and Strzepek, K. 1996. “ Climate change impacts on the water supply system in the Warta River catchment, Poland. ” International Journal of Water Resources Development, Vol.(12): 165-180. 49. Kang, B. and Jorge A. Ramírez., 2007. “Response of Streamflow to Weather Variability under Climate Change in the Colorado Rockies, ” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering ASCE / JANUARY/FEBRUARY. 50. Kiely, G., Albertson J. D. and Parlange, M. B., 1998. “Recent trends in diurnal variation of precipitation at Valentia on the west coast of Ireland”, Journal of Hydrology, 207(3-4), pp.270-279. 51. Kiely, G., 1999. “ Climate change in Ireland from precipitation and streamflow observation”, Advances in Water Resources, 23(2), pp.141-151. 52. Koutsoyiannis, D., Efstratiadis, A., Mamassis, N., Christofides, A., “On the credibility of climate predictions.” Hydrological Sciences Journal. v53(4), 2008 53. Lettenmaier, D.P., Wood, A.W., Palmer, R.N., Wood, E.F. & Stakhiv, E.Z., 1999. “Water resources implications of global warming: A US regional perspective. ”Climatic Change Vol. 43: 537-579. 54. Loukas, A. Vasiliades, L., and Dalezios, N. R., 2002. “Potential Climate Change Impacts on Flood Producing Mechanisms in Southern British Columbia, Canada using the CGCMA1 Simulation Results.”, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 259: 163-188. 55. Mahlman, J. D., 1997. “ Uncertainties in projections of human-caused climate warming. ” Science, 278, 1416-1417. 56. Maurer, E. P. “Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California under two emissions scenarios.” Climatic Change, Vol. 82, No. 3-4, 309-325, 2007. 57. Nash, J. E., 1957. “The Form of the Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph”, IASH Publication No.45, Vol. 3- 4 pp. 114-121. 58. Nash, L.L. and Gleick, P.H., 1991. “ The sensitivity of streamflow in the Colorado basin to climatic changes. ” Journal of Hydrology. Vol. 125: 221-241. 59. Nash, L.L. and Gleick, P.H., 1993. “ The Colorado River Basin and climatic change: the sensitivity of streamflow and water supply to variations in temperature and precipitation. ” US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA230-R-93-009. Washington D.C. 121pp. 60. Ogrosky, H. O. and V. Mockus., 1964. “Hydrology agricultural lands. In , Handbook of Applied Hydrology ”, V. T. Chow(Editor)”, McGraw-Hill, New York. 61. Perkins, S.E., Pitman, A.J., Holbrook, N.J., McAneney, J., “Evaluation of the AR4 climate models’ simulated daily maximum temperature, minimum temperature and precipitation over Australia using probability density functions. ” Journal of Climate 20, 4356–4376, 2007. 62. Pettitt, A.N., 1979. “A Non-parametric Approach to the Change-point Problem”, Applied Statistic, Vol.28(2):126-135 63. Pickering, N.B., Stedinger, J.R.and Haith, D.A. ,1988. “Weather Input for Nonpoint-source Pollution Models”, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-asce, Vol.114(4): 674-690 64. Pickering, N.B., Hansen, J.W., Jones J.W., Wells, C.M., Chan, V.K. and Gowin, D.C., 1994. “WeatherMan: A Utility for Managing and Generating Daily Weather Data” , Agronomy Journal,Vol.86(2):332-337 65. Pilgrim, D.H. and Cordery, I., 1975. “Rainfall temporal patterns for design floods. ” Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 101: (HY1), 81-95. 66. Powell, David N., Abdul A. Khan, Nadim M. Aziz and John P. Raiford, 2007, “Dimensionless rainfall patterns for South Carolina. ” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 67. Rodriguez-Iturbe, G. Devoto and J. B. Vades, 1979. “Discharge Response Analysis and Hydrologic Similarity: The Interrelation between the Geomorphologic IUH and the Storm Characteristics” Water Resources Research, 15(6), pp. 1435-1444. 68. Sessa, R S., Zuleta, J. and Piccardi, C., 1990. “Remarks on the application of a risk-averse approach to the management of‘ElCarrizal’reservoir. ” Advances in Water Resources, 13(2): 76-84. 69. Suppiah, R., Hennessy, K.J., Whetton, P.H., McInnes, K., Macadam, I., Bathols, J.,Ricketts, J., Page, C.M.,“Australian climate change projections derived fromsimulations performed for the IPCC 4th assessment report. ” Australian Meteorological Magazine 56, 131–152, 2007. 70. Tung, C. P. and Haith, D. A. 1995. “ Global Warming Effects on New York Stream flows. ” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 121(2): 216-225. 71. Wilb RL and I.Harris,2006 , “A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts:Low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK”. Water Resources research, vol.42, w02419, dio: 10. 72. Whetton, P. H., McInnes, K. L., Jones, R. N., Hennessy, K. J., Suppiah, R., Page, C. M., Bathols, J. and Durack, P. J.,2005. “Australian climate change projections for impact assessment and policy application: A review. ” , CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Paper 001 73. Yen, B. C. and Chow, V. T., 1980. “Design hyetographs for small drainage structures. ” Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, 106: (HY6), 1055-1076. 74. Wilby, R.L., Whitehead, P.G., Wade, A.J., Butterfield, D., Davis, R.J., Watts, G., 2006. “Integrated modelling of climate change impacts on water resources and quality in a lowland catchment: River Kennet, UK”. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 330, pp. 204-220. 75. Zhang, G. H., M. A. Nearing, and B. Y. Liu. 2005. “Potential effects of climate change on rainfall erosivity in the Yellow River Basin of China”. Trans. ASAE 48(2): 511-517 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46826 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來台灣地區極端水文事件發生明顯較過去頻繁且更為極端,對水庫功能造成嚴重的衝擊,本研究分別探討短期(2010-2039年)氣候變遷情境對石門水庫供水與防洪能力之影響,包含水資源不足缺水事件及暴雨來臨時高濁度入流對供水能力之影響與現有水庫防洪運轉規則下是否會有溢頂之危機。
本研究首先藉由變異點分析歷史長期時間序列,將變異點年份之前的資料視為與過去具有相同統計特性之基期,然後根據大氣環流模式模擬結果計算溫度及降雨之統計特性修正值以建立未來氣候情境,並藉由連續氣象資料合成模式繁衍未來氣候變遷下可能之日氣象資料與暴雨時雨量資料,採用童慶斌與連宛渝等(2009)發展之連續性水文模擬模式,進行日及小時兩種不同時間尺度之流量模擬。並以過去石門水庫於汛期所測得之濁度資料,對應尖峰流量統計關係而建立推估暴雨時期水庫之濁度方法,且考量平時和汛期水庫操作規則建立石門水庫運轉模式,以分析氣候變遷對平時供水能力、高濁度時期供水能力和防洪能力所造成之衝擊。 研究結果顯示石門水庫長時間供水能力,無氣候變遷情況下,未來石門水庫供水能力下降趨勢,長期而言,若需水量持續上升且氣候條件越漸嚴苛,水庫將面臨更嚴重之缺水情勢,枯水期勢必衝擊桃園地區產業發展,尤其以農業首當其衝;暴雨期間,分層取水設施對高濁度時期之供水能力將有顯著的改善;另外,防洪功能研究結果顯示石門水庫溢堤機會有增加的可能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The frequency of extreme hydrological events in Taiwan have been obviously increasing recently and greatly impacted the function and operation of the reservoirs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of climate change on water supply and flood mitigation capacity in Shihmen Reservoir. The effects including water shortages due to low flows and the high turbidity inflows in storm period and the risk of overflow under the current flood mitigation regulations are assessed in this study.
First, the change point of climate is derived through analyzing the historic temperatures and rainfall data. The statistical properties of weather data in a period before the change point are served as baseline, and then the baseline statistical properties are adjusted to setup future climate scenarios according to the future temperature and rainfall changes projected by the outputs of General Circulation Models. Possible future daily and hourly weather data based on different climate scenarios’ statistical properties are generated by a continuous weather generator. The hydrological model developed by Tung and Lien (2009) is further used to simulate daily and hourly discharges. Historical relation between peak discharge and peak turbidity measured in the reservoir is constructed to project the possible turbidity in the future flood events. According to the Shihmen operational regulations for both ordinary days and event periods, the impacts of climate changes on water supply ability in drought period, in high-turbid period, and flood mitigation capability, are assessed. The results indicate that the water supply ability of Shihmen Reservoir may have decline trend because of less flow in dry periods. Furthermore, the climate change may exacerbate the shortage of water resource and impact the economics of Tao-Yuan region, especially agriculture. Withdrawing water from new water intakes during the high turbid period will significantly improve water supply ability. In addition, the results show that Shihmen Reservoir may increase the probability of overflow due to climate change. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:41:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97622037-1.pdf: 8577762 bytes, checksum: 87ac230aba65c2b5dbd84c94d49c7061 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract ii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 x 第一章、前言 1.1研究動機 1 1.2研究目的 2 1.3研究架構 3 第二章、文獻回顧 2.1氣候變遷對水資源之影響 6 2.2氣候變遷對水庫功能之衝擊 8 2.3大氣環流模式之不確定性 11 第三章、研究方法 3.1歷史氣候變異點分析 14 3.2氣候變遷情境資料應用 18 3.3連續性水文模式 34 3.4建立濁度歷線 42 3.4建立連續性水庫運轉模式 45 第四章、氣候情境設定與研究模式驗證 4.1歷史氣候變點分析結果 54 4.2大氣環流模式效能評估成果 56 4.3連續性水文模式檢定驗證 62 4.4濁度歷線建立與分析 68 4.5連續性水庫運轉模式驗證 74 第五章、氣候變遷於河川流量衝擊評估 5.1研究區域概述 81 5.2氣候變遷對入流量之影響 83 5.3氣候變遷對水庫供水能力評估 87 5.4氣候變遷對水庫防洪能力評估 99 5.5氣候變遷對高濁度供水能力評估 100 5.6 小結 104 第六章、結論與建議 6.1 結論 106 6.2 建議 108 參考文獻 110 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 建立氣候變遷對石門水庫供水與防洪能力之影響評估方法 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Establishing a Methodology to Evaluate the Capabilityof Water Supply and Flood Mitigation of the Shihmen Reservoir under Climate Change | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李明旭,林裕彬,陳彥璋 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 氣候變遷,石門水庫,供水,防洪,高濁, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Climate Change,Shihmen Reservoir,Water Supply,Flood Mitigation,High Turbidity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 116 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。