請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46790
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 賴勇成(Yung-Cheng Lai) | |
dc.contributor.author | Szu-Han Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王思涵 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:41:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | REFERENCES
Abril, M., Barber, F., Ingolotti, L., Salido, M. A., Tormos, P., and Lova, A. (2008). “An assessment of railway capacity.” Transport Research Part E, Vol. 44, pp. 774-806. Alstom (2007). “Seamless interoperability.” < http://www.alstom.com/assetmanagement/DownloadAsset.aspx?ID=704c9106-c640-48bf-a683-d82fb06a3814&version=770c660847094d5eb34eff82b9dab6875.pdf> (Dec. 22, 2009). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2007). “Transportation - Invest in our future: America's freight challenge.” AASHTO, Washington, D.C. Arcadis (2007), “Second opinion ERTMS implementatieplan en 160 km/u.” Arcadis, Netherlands. Banedanmark (2010). “The signalling programme – a total renewal of the Danish signalling infrastructure.” Banedanmark, United Kingdom. Bureau of Energy (2009). “Energy Statistics Handbook” Bureau of Energy, Taiwan. Charles R Page (2001). “ERTMS for Australia.” Proc., Institution of railway signal engineers(IRSE) Australasia Technical Meeting, Brisbane, Australia.Wanglian, C. F., Yang, C. Y., Chen, Y. C., Wang, C. C., Kang, S. M., Guo, B. Y. and Huang, Y.H. (2009). “The study on the procedure of economic analysis for transportation projects (1/2).” Publication No. IOT-98-112-1262, Institute of Transportation (IOT), Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan. Detmold, P.J. (1985). “New concepts in the control of train movement.” Transportation Research Record, Vol 1029, 43–47. Drapa, J., Moore Ede, B., Polivka, A. and Polivka, E. (2007). “PTC starts to roll out across the USA.” Railway Gazette International, Reed Business Information, UK, Vol. 163, Issue 5, pp. 285-289. Emery, D. (2008). “Enhanced ETCS_L3 train control system.” Proc., 11th International Conference on Computer System Design and Operation in Railway (Computer in railways XI 223). Wessex Institute of Technology, Toledo, Vol. 105, pp. 15-17. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) (2009). “North American Joint Positive Train Control (NAJPTC) project.” Docket NO. DOT/FRA/ORD-09/04, FRA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Hartong, M. (2009). “Secure Communications Based Train Control (CBTC) operations.” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2003a). “Train protection – review of economic aspects of the work of the ERTMS programme team.” HSE, Sudbury, Suffolk United Kingdom. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2003b). “Train protection – Technical review ofthe ERTMS Programme Team report.” HSE, Sudbury, Suffolk United Kingdom. Hill, R. J. and Bond, L. J. (1995). “Modelling Moving-Block railway signaling systems using discrete-event simulation.” Proc., ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, New York, pp. 105–111. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (1999). “IEEE standard for Communications-Based Train Control (CBTC) performance and functional requirements.” IEEE, IEEE Std 1474.1-1999, New York, USA. International Union of Railways (UIC). (1996). “Links between Railway Infrastructure Capacity and the Quality of Operations.” UIC, Paris, France. International Union of Railways (UIC). (2004a). “Implementing the European train control system – ETCS migration strategies on corridors and at national level.” UIC, Paris, France. International Union of Railways (UIC). (2004b). “UIC Code 406 Capacity.” UIC, Paris, France. International Union of Railways (UIC). (2008) “Influence of ETCS on line capacity: Generic study.” UIC, Paris, France. International Union of Railways (UIC). (2009) “ERTMS implementations Benchmark – final report.” UIC, Paris, France. International Union of Railways (UIC). (2010) “Influence of the European Train Control System (ERTCS) on the capacity of nodes.” UIC, Paris, France. Invensys Rail Group (IRG). (2007). “Transportation capacity research paper – a comparison of the costs of different methods of increasing capacity in road & rail environments.” IRG, United Kingdom. Invensys Rail (2009) “Environmental research paper – the current and future carbon efficiency.” Invensys Rail, United Kingdom. Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions (JASPER). (2010) “Evaluation of Major Project Applications – Guidance for evaluators” JASPER, Luxembourg. Jong, J. C., Lee, C. K., Lu, L. S., Chang, S., Chang, E. F., Lin, K. S.and Liou. J. R.(2005). “Rail capacity research – Rail capacity model for TRA system (1).” Publication No. IOT-94-8-1217, Institute of Transportation (IOT), Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan. Jong, J. C., C. K. Lee, L. S. Lu, S. Chang, E. F. Chang, K. S. Lin, and J. R. Liou (2006). “Rail capacity research – Rail capacity model for TRA system (2).” Publication No. IOT-95-58-1228, Institute of Transportation (IOT), Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan. Jong, J. C., Lee, C. K., Lai, Y.C. and Huang, S.H. (2009a). “Capacity analysis of rail transportation system and its applications (4/4).” Publication No. IOT-99-52-1270, Institute of Transportation (IOT), Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan. Jong, J. C., Chang, E. F., and Huang, S. H. (2009b). “A railway capacity for estimating hourly throughputs with mixed traffic and complex track layouts.” Proc., 3th International Seminar on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis Engineering and Optimisation Approaches, Zurich, Switzerland. Kon, Y. (2002). “The new train control system ATACS by using ADS technologies.” Proc., 2nd International Workshop on Autonomous Decentralized Systems, pp. 206–210. Kraft, E. R. (1998). “Analytical Models for Rail Line Capacity Analysis.” Journal of Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.153-162. Lai, Y.C. and Barkan, C.P.L. (2008). “A quantitative decision support framework for optimal railway capacity planning.” Proc., 8th Word Congress on Railway Research, Seoul, Korea. Lai, Y. C., Shih, M. C. and Jong, J. C. (2010). Railway capacity model and decision support process for strategic capacity planning. Proc., 89th Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Landex, A., Kaas, A. H., Schittenhelm, B., and Jan., S. T. (2006). “Evaluation of Railway Capacity, Centre for Traffic and Transport.” Technical University of Denmark. Lee J.D., Lee J.H., Cho C.H., Jeong P.G., Kim K.H., and Kim Y.J. (2000). “Analysis of Moving and Fixed Autoblock Systems for Korean High Speed Railway.” Computer in Railways VII, WIT Press, Southampton, Boston, 842–851. Lee C.K., Jong J.C., Lin T.H., Chang Sloan, Chang E.F., Chen I.C., Chang K.K. and Wu H.J. (2009). “A study on the safety performance of TRA.” Transportation Planning Journal, Vo1. 38 No. 4, pp. 381-406. Li, K. P. and Gao, Z. Y. (2007). “An improved equation model for the train movement.” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 15, Issue 9, pp. 1156-1162. Li T.Y. (2010). “Evaluation of timetable stability and efficiency for Taiwan Railways Administration.” M.S. thesis, Nation Taiwan University. Liu M.C. (2010). “The development of the operational risk analysis system for Taiwan Railways Administration” M.S. thesis, Nation Taiwan University. Matsumoto, M. (2005). “The revolution of train control system in JAPAN.” Proc., the 7th International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems, pp. 599-606. Mattalia, A. (2007). “The effects on operation and capacity on railways deriving from the switching to continuous signals and tracing systems (ERTMS).” M.S. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology KTH. Midya, S. and Thottappillil, R. (2008). “An overview of electromagnetic compatibility challenges in European rail traffic management system.” Journal of Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Elsevier, Vol. 16C, Issue 5, pp. 515-534. Ministry of Transportation and Communication (MOTC). (2009). ”Statistics of transportation and communication” <http://www.motc.gov.tw/mocwebGIP/wSite/ct?xItem=4302&ctNode=546&mp=1> (2011/03/02). Ministry of Transport, public Works and Water Management (2010). “Social cost benefit analysis of implementation strategies for ERTMS in the Netherlands.” Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Netherlands. Moore Ede, W. J., Polivka, A., Brosseau, J., Tse, Y. and Reinschmidt, A. (2009). “Improving enforcement algorithms for Communications-Based Train Control using adaptive methods”, Proc., the 9th International Heavy Haul Conference – Heavy Haul Innovation and Development, Shanghai, China, pp. 722-727. Murphy, E. (2007). “The application of ERTMS/ETCS systems.” Proc., Institution of railway signal engineers(IRSE) Australasia Technical Meeting, Melbourne. Oliver Wyman, Inc. (2010). “Assessment of the commercial benefits of positive train control.” Oliver Wyman, Inc., New York, USA. Railtrack Group PLC (1997). “Infrastructure risk modeling electrical signals multiple aspect main type.” Railtrack Group PLC, London, United Kingdom. Rail Safety and Standards Board (2005). “Reducing accidents and collision damage in maintenance depots.” Rail Safety and Standards Board, London, United Kingdom. Strategic Rail Authority (SRA). (2005a). “National ERTMS programme team (Progress report)”, SRA, London, United Kingdom. Strategic Rail Authority (SRA). (2005b). “ProgrammeTeam 2004/05 Progress Report.” SRA, London, United Kingdom. The European Rail Industry (UNIFE). (2010a). “Deployment world map, Taiwan.” <http://www.ertms.com/deployment-maps/deployment-world-map.aspx> (Feb 23, 2011). The European Rail Industry (UNIFE). (2010b). “ERTMS application levels.” < http://www.ertms.com/media/2428/fact-3.pdf > (March 18, 2010). The European Rail Industry (UNIFE). (2010c). “ERTMS benefits.” <http://www.ertms.com/ertms/ertms-benefits.aspx> (March 24, 2010). The Final Report of the ERTMS Programme Team (EPT). (2002). “The ERTMS programme team final report issued to HSC.” EPT, UK Transport Research Laboratory (TRL). (2010). “ERTMS level 3 risks and benefits to UK railways – Final Report.” TRL, United Kingdom. Verkehrswissenschaftliches Institut (2008). “Influence of ETCS on line capacity - generic study”, UIC, Paris Wilson, W. (2009). “Signalling change.” Rail Professional, Issue 151, pp. 34-36. 交通部運輸研究所Institute of Transportation . MOTC (IOT) (1988). 「城際客運時間價值之研究」,交通部運輸研究所,台灣 行政院經濟建設委員會 Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) (2008). 「公共建設計畫經濟效益評估及財務計畫作業手冊」,行政院經濟建設委員會,台灣 行政院主計處Directorate - General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan (DGBAS) (2009). 「薪資及生產力統計 ─ 查詢系統」 <http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas04/bc5/earning/ht456.asp> (2011/06/25). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46790 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 為了因應軌道運輸需求之成長,各國正積極地擴展軌道路網之容量,並增強其系統之可靠度,台灣鐵路管理局〈台鐵〉亦是其中一員。為了適應日漸成長之需求、增進系統的可靠度以及運作之安全,台鐵有興趣了解採用各種先進的信號系統之潛在利益,如歐洲鐵路運輸管理系統〈ERTMS〉。發展適當的評估工具以瞭解採用這些先進號誌系統之成本有效性是有其必要性的,因此本研究對於建置先進號誌系統,發展完整的成本效益分析流程,並針對其中容量效益之部分,研發容量解析模式應用在通勤鐵路營運上。成本效益分析流程與容量解析模式可以幫助有類似操作環境的鐵路部門執行容量管理以及資源規畫。
以台鐵最繁忙的西部段基隆至新竹為案例分析對象,雖然實證結果顯示建置先進號誌系統在對容量提升、延誤減少以及安全和環境上有正面的效果,然而其建置的效益無法滿足建置所需之成本。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Railways around the world are experiencing growth in traffic demand and need to expand their network capacity and increase system reliability. The commuter railway operator in Taiwan, the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA), is no exception. To accommodate the substantial future demand, increase the reliability of system and reinforce the safety of operation, the TRA is interested in understanding the potential benefit of adopting various advanced signaling systems, such as ERTMS systems. Appropriate evaluation tools are required to understand the cost-effectiveness of adopting these new systems; therefore, in this study, I developed a process of cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the impact from using advanced signaling systems; I also developed a set of analytical capacity models for commuter rail operations with advanced signaling systems. The use of this process and capacity models can help railway agencies with similar operational environments on their capacity management and resource planning. These models were implemented in the busiest corridor in the TRA system. Although the empirical results show that advanced signaling systems generally have positive effects on capacity, delay reduction, safety and environment, the net present value of various scenarios are negative. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:41:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98521510-1.pdf: 1295936 bytes, checksum: 42712210710eb3d3697279a541c69649 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | LIST OF TABLES (viii)
LIST OF FIGURES (x) 1 INTRODUCTION (1) 1.1 Background and Motivation (1) 1.2 Objective of Study (1) 1.3 Scope of the Study (2) 1.4 Organization (3) 2 LITERATURE REVIEW (4) 2.1 European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) (4) 2.2 Review of Cost Benefit Studies on Adoption of ERTMS Systems (7) 2.2.1 Cost Components of ERTMS (7) 2.2.2 The Benefits from Implementation of ERTMS (10) 2.3 Review of the TRA Capacity Model (13) 2.4 Summary (22) 3 THE PROCESS OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR ADVANCED TRAIN CONTROL SYSTEMS (23) 3.1 Project Objectives (25) 3.2 Base Case and the Alternatives (25) 3.3 Specification of Assumptions (26) 3.4 Evaluation Period (26) 3.5 Estimation of Cost (26) 3.6 Estimation of Benefit (28) 3.7 The Attribute of Cost-Benefit Analysis Computation (37) 3.8 Alternative Selection (38) 3.9 Summary (38) 4 DEVELOPMENT OF ANALYTICAL CAPACITY MODELS FOR COMMUTER RAIL OPERATIONS WITH ADVANCED SIGNALING SYSTEMS (39) 4.1 Signal Headway Equations for Advanced Signaling Systems (39) 4.1.1 Scenario 1: Adjacent Trains Arriving at the Same Track at a Station (41) 4.1.2 Scenario 2: Adjacent Trains Arriving at Different Tracks at a Station (44) 4.1.3 Scenario 3: Adjacent Trains Departing from the Same Track at a Station (47) 4.1.4 Scenario 4: Adjacent Trains Departing from Different Tracks at a Station (51) 4.1.5 Scenario 5: Trains in Opposite Directions (56) 4.2 Summary (57) 5 CASE STUDY (58) 5.1 Objective of the Case Study (59) 5.2 Identification of the Base Case and Alternatives (61) 5.3 Assumptions and Evaluation Period (62) 5.4 Cost Estimation (62) 5.5 Benefit Measurement (64) 5.5.1 Capacity Benefit (65) 5.5.2 Delay Benefit (70) 5.5.3 Safety Benefit (71) 5.5.4 Environmental Benefit (72) 5.5.5 Alternative Evaluation (73) 5.6 Sensitivity Analysis (75) 5.6.1 Revenue Passenger Kilometer (75) 5.6.2 Value of Passenger Travel Time (76) 5.6.3 Value of Life (77) 5.6.4 Price of Energy and Carbon (78) 5.7 Summary (80) 6 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH (81) 6.1 Summary (81) 6.2 Contribution (82) 6.3 Future Research (82) REFERENCES (83) | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 建立先進鐵路號誌系統之成本效益分析流程 | zh_TW |
dc.title | THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROCESS AND CAPACITY MODELS FOR ADVANCED RAILWAY SIGNALING SYSTEMS | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李治綱,胡守任 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 軌道運輸,成本效益分析,容量分析,號誌系統, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Railway Transportation,Cost-Benefit Analysis,Capacity Analysis,Signaling System, | en |
dc.relation.page | 89 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。