Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 電機資訊學院
  3. 資訊工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46523
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor傅楸善(Chiou-Shann Fuh)
dc.contributor.authorKuan-Liang Kuoen
dc.contributor.author郭冠良zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T05:13:35Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-29
dc.date.copyright2010-07-29
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-07-22
dc.identifier.citation1 Fitzmaurice, J.M., Adams, K., and Eisenberg, J.M., Three Decades of Research on Computer Applications in Health Care Medical Informatics Support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 9:144-160, 2002.
2 Evidence-based clinical prevention, Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, 2000.
3 Periodic health examination monograph: report of the Task Force to the Conference of Deputy Ministers of Health, Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, 1980.
4 Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2006: Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, AHRQ Publication No. 05-0570, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2006.
5 Gruber, T.R., Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43:907-928, 1995.
6 Huang, M.J., and Chen, M.Y., Integrated design of the intelligent web-based Chinese Medical Diagnostic System (CMDS)–Systematic development for digestive health. Expert Systems With Applications 32:658-673, 2007.
7 Ohno-Machado, L., Gennari, J.H., Murphy, S.N., Jain, N.L., Tu, S.W., Oliver, D.E., Pattison-Gordon, E., Greenes, R.A., Shortliffe, E.H., and Barnett, G.O., The GuideLine Interchange Format: A Model for Representing Guidelines. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 5:357-72, 1998.
8 Wang, D., Peleg, M., Tu, S.W., Boxwala, A.A., Greenes, R.A., Patel, V.L., and Shortliffe, E.H., Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: A literature review of guideline representation models. International Journal of Medical Informatics 68:59-70, 2002.
9 Field, M.J., and Lohr, K.N., Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1992.
10 Audet, A.M., Greenfield, S., and Field, M., Medical practice guidelines: current activities and future directions. Annals of Internal Medicine 113:709-14, 1990.
11 Johnston, M.E., Langton, K.B., Haynes, R.B., and Mathieu, A., Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research. Annals of Internal Medicine 120:135-42, 1994.
12 Hunt, D.L., Haynes, R.B., Hanna, S.E., and Smith, K., Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes A Systematic Review. The Journal of the American Medical Association 280:1339-46, 1998.
13 Lobach, D.F., and Hammond, W.E., Development and evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Management Protocol (CAMP): improved compliance with care guidelines for diabetes mellitus. Proceedings of Annual Symposium of Computer Application in Medical Care:787-91, 1994.
14 McDonald, C.J., and Overhage, J.M., Guidelines you can follow and can trust. An ideal and an example. The Journal of the American Medical Association 271:872-3, 1994.
15 Osheroff, J.A., Teich, J.M., Middleton, B., Steen, E.B., Wright, A., and Detmer, D.E., A Roadmap for National Action on Clinical Decision Support, The Sixth Meeting of American Health Information Community, Washington, 2006.
16 Teich, J.M., Osheroff, J.A., Pifer, E.A., Sittig, D.F., and Jenders, R.A., Clinical Decision Support in Electronic Prescribing: Recommendations and an Action Plan Report of the Joint Clinical Decision Support Workgroup. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 12:365-76, 2005.
17 Tierney, W.M., Overhage, J.M., Takesue, B.Y., Harris, L.E., Murray, M.D., Vargo, D.L., and McDonald, C.J., Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: the example of heart failure. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 2:316-22, 1995.
18 Vissers, M.C., Hasman, A., and van der Linden, C.J., Impact of a protocol processing system (ProtoVIEW) on clinical behaviour of residents and treatment. International Journal of Biomedical Computing 42:143-50, 1996.
19 Chu, S., Guideline representation formalism and electronic decision support systems: Addressing the guideline–implementation gap. Health Care and Informatics Review Online, 2005.
20 de Clercq, P.A., Hasman, A., Blom, J.A., and Korsten, H.H.M., The application of ontologies and problem-solving methods for the development of shareable guidelines. Artifical Intelligence in Medicine 22:1-22, 2001.
21 Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R.A., Hall, R., Johnson, P.D., Jones, N., and Kumar, A., Comparing Computer-interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-study Approach. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 10:52-68, 2003.
22 Kolesa, P., Spidlen, J., and Zvarova, J., Obstacles to Implementing an Execution Engine for Clinical Guidelines Formalized in GLIF. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 116:563-8, 2005.
23 Seyfang, A., Kosara, R., and Miksch, S., Asbru's Reference Manual, Version 7.3. Vienna University of Technology, Institute of SoftwareTechnology, Vienna, 2002.
24 Tu, S.W., and Musen, M.A., From guideline modeling to guideline execution: defining guideline-based decision-support services. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:863-867, 2000.
25 Tu, S.W., and Musen, M.A., Modeling Data and Knowledge in the EON Guideline Architecture. Proc Medinfo 2001:280-284, 2001.
26 Sutton, D., and Fox, J., The syntax and semantics of the PROforma guideline modeling language. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10:433-443, 2003.
27 Purves, I., Sugden, B., Booth, N., and Sowerby, M., The PRODIGY project--the iterative development of the release one model, 1999 AMIA Symposium, American Medical Informatics Association, 1999, pp. 359.
28 Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., Fox, J., Greenes, R., Hall, R., Johnson, P., Jones, N., and Kumar, A., Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10:52, 2003.
29 Elkin, P., Peleg, M., Lacson, R., Bernstam, E., Tu, S., Boxwala, A., Greenes, R., and Shortliffe, E.H., Toward Standardization of Electronic Guideline Representation. MD Computing 17:39-44, 2000.
30 Bennett, J.W., and Glasziou, P.P., Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Medical Journal of Australia 178:217-222, 2003.
31 Casalino, L., Gillies, R.R., Shortell, S.M., Schmittdiel, J.A., Bodenheimer, T., Robinson, J.C., Rundall, T., Oswald, N., Schauffler, H., and Wang, M.C., External Incentives, Information Technology, and Organized Processes to Improve Health Care Quality for Patients With Chronic Diseases. The Journal of the American Medical Association 289:434-441, 2003.
32 Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., Wu, S., Maglione, M., Mojica, W., Roth, E., Morton, S.C., and Shekelle, P.G., Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Annals of Internal Medicine 144:742-70, 2006.
33 Jiang, S.T., How information technologies have improved both productivity and quality of health care. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology 29:38-41, 2005.
34 Nobel, J., Bridging the knowledge--action gap in diabetes: information technologies, physician incentives and consumer incentives converge. Chronic Illness 2:59-60, 2006.
35 Sequist, T.D., Cullen, T., and Ayanian, J.Z., Information Technology as a Tool to Improve the Quality of American Indian Health Care. American Journal of Public Health 95:2173-2179, 2005.
36 Sim, I., Gorman, P., Greenes, R.A., Haynes, R.B., Kaplan, B., Lehmann, H., and Tang, P.C., Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 8:527-534, 2001.
37 Evans, R.S., Pestotnik, S.L., Classen, D.C., Clemmer, T.P., Weaver, L.K., Orme, J.F., Lloyd, J.F., and Burke, J.P., A Computer-Assisted Management Program for Antibiotics and Other Antiinfective Agents. New England Journal of Medicine 338:232-238, 1998.
38 Hunt, D.L., Haynes, R.B., Hanna, S.E., and Smith, K., Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes A Systematic Review. The Journal of the American Medical Association 280:1339-1346, 1998.
39 Johnston, M.E., Langton, K.B., Haynes, R.B., and Mathieu, A., Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research. Annals of Internal Medicine 120:135-142, 1994.
40 Osheroff, J.A., Teich, J.M., Middleton, B., Steen, E.B., Wright, A., and Detmer, D.E., A Roadmap for National Action on Clinical Decision Support. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14:141-145, 2007.
41 Teich, J.M., Osheroff, J.A., Pifer, E.A., Sittig, D.F., and Jenders, R.A., Clinical Decision Support in Electronic Prescribing: Recommendations and an Action Plan Report of the Joint Clinical Decision Support Workgroup. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12:365-376, 2005.
42 Lhotska, L., Marik, V., and Vlcek, T., Medical applications of enhanced rule-based expert systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics 63:61-75, 2001.
43 Mookerjee, V.S., and Chaturvedi, A.R., A blackboard control architecture for model selection and sequencing. European Journal of Information Systems 2:3-14, 1993.
44 Russell, S.J., and Norvig, P., Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, New Jersey, 2003.
45 Rector, A.L., Thesauri and formal classifications: terminologies for people and machines. Methods of Information in Medicine 37:501-9, 1998.
46 Rosenbloom, S.T., Miller, R.A., Johnson, K.B., Elkin, P.L., and Brown, S.H., Interface Terminologies: Facilitating Direct Entry of Clinical Data into Electronic Health Record Systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13:277-288, 2006.
47 Fuh, C.S., and Kuo, K.L., The Decision Support System Used in HEALS (Health Examination Automatic Logic System). 2006 American Medical Informatics Association Spring Congress Posters, 2006.
48 Kuo, K.L., and Fuh, C.S., HEALS: Health Examination Automatic Logic System. 2006 American Medical Informatics Association Spring Congress Posters, 2006.
49 Kuo, K.-L., and Fuh, C.-S., A Health Examination System Integrated with Clinical Decision Support System. Journal of Medical Systems (online first), 2009.
50 Kantor, G.S., Wilson, W.D., and Midgley, A., Open-source software and the primary care EMR. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10:616-616, 2003.
51 PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor, The PHP Group, 2008.
52 About the Java Technology, Sun Microsystems, Inc., 2008.
53 Extensible Markup Language (XML), W3C, 2008.
54 The Apache HTTP Server Project, The Apache Software Foundation, 2008.
55 Apache Tomcat, The Apache Software Foundation, 2008.
56 MySQL_AB, About MySQL, MySQL_AB, 2007.
57 What is Linux, Linux Online, Inc., 2008.
58 Doll, W., and Torkzadeh, G., The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS quarterly 12:259-274, 1988.
59 Achour, S., Dojat, M., Rieux, C., Bierling, P., and Lepage, E., A UMLS-based knowledge acquisition tool for rule-based clinical decision support system development. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 8:351-360, 2001.
60 Saade, R., Tsoukas, A., and Tsoukas, G., Prototyping a decision support system in the clinical environment: assessment of patients with osteoporosis OSTEODSS. Expert Systems with Applications 27:427-438, 2004.
61 Huang, M., and Chen, M., Integrated design of the intelligent web-based Chinese Medical Diagnostic System (CMDS)–Systematic development for digestive health. Expert Systems with Applications 32:658-673, 2007.
62 DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R., Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3:60-95, 1992.
63 Meijden, M.J.v.d., Tange, H.J., Troost, J., and Hasman, A., Determinants of Success of Inpatient Clinical Information Systems: A Literature Review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10:235-243, 2003.
64 Balas, E.A., Information Systems Can Prevent Errors and Improve Quality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 8:398-399, 2001.
65 McRoy, S.W., and Hirst, G., Misunderstanding and the negotiation of meaning. Knowledge-based Systems 8:126-134, 1995.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46523-
dc.description.abstractHealth examinations are important for the personal and public health management. Besides they play a key role in preventive medicine. We propose a health examination system named Health Examination Automatic Logic System (HEALS) to efficiently assist clinical workers in improving the total quality of health examinations. In order to customize the clinical decision support system intuitively and flexibly, we also propose a novel rule syntax to implement computer-interpretable logic for health examinations. Quality of automated inference is confirmed by the zero inference error where during 6 months and 14,773 cases. Automated inference time is less than one second per case in contrast to two to five minutes for physicians. The most significant result of efficiency evaluation is that 3,494 of 4,356 (80.2%) cases take less than three minutes per case for making a report summary. In the evaluation of effectiveness, novice physicians got 18 percent improvement in making decisions with the assistance of our system. A survey on user satisfaction revealed high satisfaction with our system. We conclude that a health examination system integrated with a clinical decision support system can markedly reduce the mundane burden on clinical workers and improve the quality and efficiency of health examination tasks.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:13:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-D93922009-1.pdf: 1318203 bytes, checksum: f3bbecc1cbf33c6dd4ca2fb759e38c7c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
Acknowledgements ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract v
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Clinical Decision Support 1
1.2 The Academic Importance of Clinical Decision Support 2
1.3 Health Examination 3
1.4 Health Examinations and the Need of Clinical Decision Support 4
1.5 The Importance of Ontology 7
1.6. The Health Examination Ontology 8
1.7 Clinical Knowledge Representation Models 10
2 Design Objectives 16
2.1 Reduce the Mundane Daily Tasks of Clinical Workers 16
2.2 Improve the Quality of Health Examination 16
2.3 Improve the Efficiency of Health Examination 17
2.4 Provide Education for Novice Clinical Workers 17
2.5 Eliminate Common Mistakes in Health Reports 17
2.6 Provide Services Beyond the Territory Boundary 18
3 A Rule-based Clinical Decision Model to Support Interpretation of Multiple Data in Health Examinations 19
3.1 Architecture 19
3.2 CDSS Architecture 21
3.3 Rule Syntax 27
3.4 Modular Design 29
3.5 Content Base 35
3.6 Database Contains Health Examination Results of Cases 36
4 Implementation 37
4.1 Prototypical System for Health Examination 37
4.2 Implementation 39
5 Execution of the CDSS 43
5.1 Hepatitis B Markers 44
5.2 Anemia Related Tests 55
6 Evaluation and Result 63
6.1 Evaluation of Quality 63
6.2 Evaluation of Effectiveness 68
6.3 Evaluation of System Performance 72
6.3 Evaluation of System Performance 72
6.4 Evaluation of Efficiency 73
6.5 Evaluation of User Satisfaction 78
7 Discussions 79
8 Conclusion 85
Bibliography 87
Appendices 93
A. Backus–Naur Form (BNF) Grammar of the Proposed Rule Syntax in HEALS CDSS 93
B. The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction on HEALS CDSS 96
C. The Questions for Evaluating Effectiveness of HEALS CDSS 97
Publication List 102
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject診斷錯誤zh_TW
dc.subject預防醫學zh_TW
dc.subject病人安全zh_TW
dc.subject健康檢查zh_TW
dc.subject預防性健康服務zh_TW
dc.subject規則式推理zh_TW
dc.subject臨床決策支援zh_TW
dc.subjectPatient Safetyen
dc.subjectClinical Decision Supporten
dc.subjectRule-Based Reasoningen
dc.subjectPreventive Medicineen
dc.subjectHealth Examinationen
dc.subjectPreventive Health Serviceen
dc.subjectDiagnostic Erroren
dc.title整合臨床決策支援之健檢系統zh_TW
dc.titleA Health Examination System Integrated with Clinical Decision Support Systemen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee侯勝茂,張天鈞,楊榮森,賴飛羆,劉秀雯
dc.subject.keyword臨床決策支援,規則式推理,預防醫學,健康檢查,預防性健康服務,診斷錯誤,病人安全,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordClinical Decision Support,Rule-Based Reasoning,Preventive Medicine,Health Examination,Preventive Health Service,Diagnostic Error,Patient Safety,en
dc.relation.page104
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2010-07-23
dc.contributor.author-college電機資訊學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.29 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved