請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45962完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 錢永祥 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Lung Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭焙隆 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:49:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-06 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部份
吳秀瑾，2009，〈德沃金機運平等觀：女性主義批評〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第28期，頁89-138。 周保松，2004，〈自由主義、平等與差異原則〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第8期，頁121-179。 徐友漁，2008，《重讀自由主義及其他》，河南：河南大學出版社。 徐向東，2005，《自由主義、社會契約與政治辯護》，北京：北京大學出版社。 徐向東，2007，《自我、他人與道德——道德哲學導論》，北京：商務印書館。 錢永祥，2001，〈自由主義為甚麼關切平等？——當代的一個看法〉，《縱欲與虛無之上：現代情境裏的政治倫理》，台北：聯經，頁347-369。 錢永祥，2003，〈道德平等與待遇平等：試探平等概念的二元結構〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第6期，頁195-228。 謝世民，1999，〈合理契約論與分配正義〉，《 歐美研究》，第29卷第4期，頁49-80。 謝世民，2004，〈羅爾斯與社會正義的場域〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期，頁1-38。 貳、英文部份 Anderson, Elisabeth S. 1999. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics, 109(2): 287-337. Anderson, Elisabeth S. 2008. “How Should Egalitarians Cope with Market Risks?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9(1): 239-270. Arneson, Richard J. 1988. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies, 56(1): 77-93. Arneson, Richard J. 1990. “Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(2): 158-194. Arneson, Richard J. 1999. “Debate: Equality of Opportunity for Welfare Defended and Recanted.” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(4): 488-497. Arneson, Richard J. 2008a. “Rawls, Responsibility, and Distributive Justice.” In Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes From Harsanyi and Rawls, eds. M. Fleurbaey, M. Salles, and J. A. Weymark. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 80-107. Arneson, Richard J. 2008b. “Justice is Not Equality.” Ratio, 21(4): 371-391. Balibar, Etienne. 1994. “‘Rights of Man’ and ‘Rights of Citizen’: The Modern Dialectic of Equality and Freedom.” In Masses, Classes, Ideas: Studies on Politics and Philosophy Before and After Marx, trans. James Swenson. New York: Routledge, 39-59. Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, ed. Henry Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 166-217. Bird, Colin. 2004. “Status, Identity, and Respect.” Political Theory, 32(2): 207-232. Buchanan, Allan, Dan Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler. 2000. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Cavanagh, Matt. 2002. Against Equality of Opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Callinicos, Alex. 2000. Equality. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. Christiano, Thomas. 2007. “A Foundation for Egalitarianism.” In Egalitarianism: New Essays On The Nature and Value of Equality, eds. N. Holtug and K. Lippert-Rasmussen. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 41-82. Cohen, G. A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics, 99(4): 906-944. Cohen, G. A. 1993. “Equality of What? On Welfare, Goods, and Capabilities.” In The Quality of Life, eds. A. Sen and M. Nussbaum. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 9-29. Cohen, G. A. 2000. If You're An Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cohen, G. A. 2004. “Expensive Taste Rides Again.” In Dworkin and his Critics: with replies by Dworkin, ed. Justine Burley. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 3-29. Cohen, G. A. 2006. “Luck and Equality: A Reply to Hurley. ” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72(2): 439-446. Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cohen Christofidis, Miriam. 2007. “Talent, Slavery, and Envy.” In Dworkin and his Critics: with replies by Dworkin, ed. Justine Burley. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 30-44. Daniels, Norman. 2003. “Rawl's Complex Egalitarianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 241-276. Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Dworkin, Ronald. 1995. “Foundations of Liberal Equality.” In Equal Freedom: Selected Tanner Lectures On Human Values, ed. S. Darwall. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 190-306. Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. “Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 25(2): 87-139. Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Dworkin, Ronald. 2001. “Do Liberal Values Conflict?” In The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin, eds. M. Lilla, R. Dworkin, and R. Silvers. New York: New York Review Books, 73-90. Dworkin, Ronald. 2002. “Sovereign Virtue Revisited.” Ethics, 113(1): 106-143. Dworkin, Ronald. 2003. “Equality, Luck, and Hierarchy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(2): 190-198. Dworkin, Ronald. 2004. “Ronald Dworkin Replies.” In Dworkin and his Critics: with replies by Dworkin, ed. Justine Burley. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 339-395. Feinberg, Joel. 1970. Doing & Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Feldman, Leonard C. 2002. “Redistribution, Recognition, and the State: The Irreducibly Political Dimension of Injustice.” Political Theory, 30(3): 410-440. Fleischacker, Samuel. 2004. A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Fleurbaey, Marc. 2008. Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Frankfurt, Harry. 1987. “Equality as a Moral Ideal.” Chicago Journals, 98(1): 21-43. Frankfurt, Harry. 1997. “Equality and Respect.” Social Research, 64(1): 3-15. Fraser, Nancy. 1995. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age.” New Left Review, 212: 68-93. Fraser, Nancy. 2000. “Rethinking Recognition.” New Left Review, 237: 107-120. Fraser, Nancy and Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso. Freeman, Samuel. 2007 “Rawls and Luck Egalitarianism.” In Justice and The Social Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 111-142. Geras, Norman. 1985. “The Controversy About Marx and Justice.” New Left Review, 150: 47-85. Gray, John. 2000. Two Faces of Liberalsim. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. Gutmann, Amy. 2003. Identity in Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hayek, Friedrich. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hayek, Friedrich. A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. II: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hayek, Friedrich. A. 1978. “The Atavism of Social Justice.” In New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and The History of Ideas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 57-68. Hurley, Susan L. 2003. Justice, Luck, and Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hurley, Susan L. 2007. “Choice and Incentive Inequality.” In The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen, ed. C. Sypnowich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 140-153. Holtug, Nils and Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. 2007. “An Introduction to Contemporary Egalitarianism.” In Egalitarianism: New Essays On The Nature and Value of Equality, eds. N. Holtug and K. Lippert-Rasmussen. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1-37. Honneth, Axel. 2001. “Recognition or Redistribution? Changing Perspectives on the Moral Order of Society.” Theory, Culture & Society, 18(2-3): 43-55. Kaufman, Alexander, ed. 2006. Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. New York: Routledge. Knight, Carl. 2005. “In Defence of Luck Egalitarianism.” Res Publica, 11(1): 55-73. Kymlicka, Will. 1989. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Kymlicka, Will. 2002. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lukes, Steven. 2006. Individualism. Colchester: ECPR Press. Macleod, Colin M. 1998. Liberalism, Justice, and Markets. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Markovits, Daniel. 2008. “Luck Egalitarianism and Political Solidarity.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9(1): 271-308. Matravers, Matt. 2007. Responsibility and Justice. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. Miller, David. 1976. Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Miller, David. 1990. “Equality.” In Philosophy and Politics, ed. G. M. K. Hunt. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 77-98. Miller, David, and Michael Walzer, eds. 1995. Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mulhall, Stephen, and Adam Swift. 1996. Liberals and Communitarians. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Mortal Questions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Nagel, Thomas. 1980. “The Limits of Objectivity.” The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 1: 75-139. Nagel, Thomas. 1991. Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nagel, Thomas. 2002. “Cohen on Inequality.” In Concealment and Exposure: And Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107-112. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books. Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha and Amartya Sen, eds. 1993. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Otsuka, Michael. 2002. “Luck, Insurance, and Equality.” Ethics, 113(1): 40-54. Otsuka, Michael. 2003. Libertarianism without Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Otsuka, Michael. 2003. “Liberty, Equality, Envy, and Abstraction” In Dworkin and his Critics: with replies by Dworkin, ed. Justine Burley. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 70-78. Parfit, Derek. 2000. “Equality or Priority?” In The Ideal of Equality, M. Clayton and A. Williams. New York: St. Martin's Press, 81-125. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice, 1st. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univeristy Press. Rawls, John. 1980. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” The Journal of Philosophy, 77(9): 515-572. Rawls, John. 1982 “Social Unity and Primary Goods.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, eds. A. Sen and B. Williams. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 159-185. Rawls, John. 1999a A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univeristy Press. Rawls, John. 1999b. “A Kantian Conception of Equality.” In Collected Papers, ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 254-266. Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univeristy Press. Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism, expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press. Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Raz, Joseph. 1994. Ethics in the Public Domain: Ethics in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ripstein, Arthur. 2007. “Liberty and Equality.” In Ronald Dworkin, ed. A. Ripstein. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 82-108. Roemer, John. 1993. “A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility For the Egalitarian Planner.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 22(2): 146-166. Sadurski, Wojciech. 2008. Equality and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Scanlon, Thomas. M. 1975. “Preference and Urgency.” The Journal of Philosophy, 72(19): 655-669. Scanlon, Thomas. M. 1982. “Utilitarianism and Contractualism.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, eds. A. Sen and B. Williams. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 103-128. Scanlon, Thomas. M. 1986. “Equality of Resources and Equality of Wefare: A Forced Marriage?” Ethics, 97(1): 111-118. Scanlon, Thomas. M. 1995. “The Significance of Choice.” In Equal Freedom: Selected Tanner Lectures On Human Values, ed. S. Darwall. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 39-104. Scanlon, Thomas. M. 2000. “The Diversity of Objections to Inequality.” In The Ideal of Equality, eds. M. Clayton and A. Williams. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 41-59. Scanlon, Thomas. M. 2007. “Justice, Responsibility, and the Demands of Equality.” In The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen, ed. C. Sypnowich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 70-101. Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. “What is Egalitariansim?” Philosophy & Publics Affairs, 31(1): 5-39. Scheffler, Samuel. 2005. “Choice, Circumstance, and the Value of Equality.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4(1): 5-28. Scheffler, Samuel. 2007. “Is Basic Structure Basic?” In The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen, ed. C. Sypnowich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 102-129. Segall, Shlomi. 2007. “In Solidarity with the Imprudent: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism.” Social Theory and Practice, 33(2): 177-198. Sen, Amartya. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Pub. Co. Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Sen, Amartya. 1995. “Equality of What?” In Equal Freedom: Selected Tanner Lectures On Human Values, ed. S. Darwall. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 307-330. Sen, Amartya. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books. Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univeristy Press. Swift, Adam. 2006. Political Philosophy: A Beginner's Guide for Students and Politicians. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. Taylor, Charles. 1994 “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism, ed. A. Gutmann. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 25-73. Temkin, Larry S. 1993. Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Temkin, Larry S. 2002. “Equality, Priority, and the Levelling Down Objection.” In The Ideal of Equality, eds. M. Clayton and A. Williams. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 126-161. Vallentyne, Peter. 2002. “Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equality of Initial Opportunities” Ethics, 112(3): 529-557. Vallentyne, Peter and Hillel Steiner, eds. 2000. Left-Libertarianism and its Critics: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Van Parijs, Philippe. 1995. Real Freedom for All: What (if Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon Press. Van Parijs, Philippe. 2003. “Difference Principle.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 200-240. Van Parijs, Philippe. 2004. “Equality of Resources Versus Undominated Diversity.” In Dworkin and his Critics: with replies by Dworkin, ed. Justine Burley. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 45-69. Voigt, Kristin. 2007. “The Harshness Objection: Is Luck Egalitarianism Too Harsh on the Victims of Option Luck?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10(4): 389-407. Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Oxford: Martin Robertson. Wilkinson, T. M. 2000. Freedom, Efficiency and Equality. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Williams, Bernard. 1981. “Moral Luck” In Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 20-39. Williams, Bernard. 2005. “The Idea of Equality.” In In the Beginning Was the Deed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 97-114 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45962 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文嘗試從一個當代自由主義的觀點討論運氣、平等與社會公正的概念以及三者之間的觀念連結。運氣就道德而言是任意的，但它能對人們產生實質且重大的影響。因此，如何處置運氣及其效果關係到一種公正理論能否得到證明；尤其是該公正觀念必須能妥當面對運氣所產生的實質不平等。羅爾斯與德沃金皆在其自由平等主義式的公正理論之中緩和運氣的影響，但不要求消除它；另一方面，運氣平等的理念要求使運氣中立化，在它看來這能同時在理論層次實現自由、平等與公正。運氣平等的分配公正觀念根本來說是以某種關於個人選擇或掌控的應得原則為基礎；在此表述中，運氣的排除使每個人得其應得。雖然運氣平等主義在直覺上很有吸引力，本文不能接受這個主張。理由在於，任何的自由行動以及伴隨而來的正當期望都無法以應得原則為基礎，而必須以既定存在的規則為基礎。運氣平等的主張無法同時讓一種公正分配的範式符合應得原則以及自由規則觀念的要求，因此它無法在其分配公正觀念之中調和自由與平等兩種基本價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines the concepts of luck, equality and social justice, and their conceptual relationship, within the framework of contemporary liberal political philosophy. Luck is morally arbitrary, yet people’s lives can be influenced by it in substantive ways. Therefore a theory of justice must deal with luck and its effect; in particular, the deep inequalities that originated from luck must be treated in a proper manner. The liberal egalitarian theories of Rawls and Dworkin intend to mitigate the effects of luck without neutralizing it. But the basic idea of luck egalitarianism seems to require that luck be neutralized in order to obtain liberty, equality and justice simultaneously. The luck egalitarian conception of distributive justice is primarily based on a principle of desert, which is here defined and embodied in what is within a person’s choice or control: thus what one deserves is indeed defined in the exclusion of luck. In this thesis luck egalitarianism is rejected in spite of its intuitive attraction. It is argued that the principle of desert constitutes at best just one, albeit important, element of justice. In a just society, free actions and legitimate expectations cannot be based on a principle of desert, but have to rely on and to be determined by some existing rules. Luck egalitarianism fails to formulate a pattern of just distribution which is consistent with the principle of desert and a concept of rules at the same time, so it also fails to reconcile liberty and equality, the two fundamental values, in it’s conception of distributive justice. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:49:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96322035-1.pdf: 13629468 bytes, checksum: 8317e168c2e5ecd1d7710dd38a43b61d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書………………………………………………………… i
誌謝……………………………………………………………………… iii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………… vii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………viii 導言……………………………………………………………………… 1 第一章 運氣與公正…………………………………………………… 7 第一節 認識運氣…………………………………………………… 7 壹、運氣存在的事實……………………………………………… 7 貳、評價運氣……………………………………………………… 9 第二節 運氣與自主………………………………………………… 16 壹、控制、選擇與肯認…………………………………………… 17 貳、從赤裸到可選擇的運氣……………………………………… 21 第三節 社會公正與分配平等……………………………………… 23 第四節 應得與公正………………………………………………… 29 壹、以應得為基礎的運氣平等公正觀…………………………… 29 貳、拒絕運氣中立化的社會公正觀……………………………… 34 第五節 福祉、分配與平等………………………………………… 39 壹、個人福祉與社會實踐………………………………………… 40 貳、運氣與基本能力……………………………………………… 47 第二章 平等…………………………………………………………… 51 第一節 認識平等…………………………………………………… 51 壹、關於政治道德的說明………………………………………… 51 貳、界定平等……………………………………………………… 54 第二節 平等與自由………………………………………………… 57 壹、德沃金論自由主義…………………………………………… 57 貳、平等的關懷與尊重…………………………………………… 61 第三節 反平等主義者的挑戰……………………………………… 64 壹、拉茲…………………………………………………………… 64 貳、法蘭克福……………………………………………………… 68 參、小結…………………………………………………………… 79 第四節 個人、社會與平等………………………………………… 82 第三章 平等、規則與公正…………………………………………… 87 第一節 試論諸平等主義式公正觀………………………………… 88 壹、羅爾斯………………………………………………………… 90 貳、德沃金……………………………………………………….. 100 參、運氣平等主義……………………………………………….. 108 第二節 制度、程序與規則……………………………………….. 111 壹、程序公正與平等…………………………………………….. 111 貳、遊戲與規則………………………………………………….. 115 參、規則與平等………………………………………………….. 121 第三節 如果你是一個平等主義者……………………………….. 126 壹、資格對上應得，或自由對上平等………………………….. 128 貳、平等的義務………………………………………………….. 130 結論…………………………………………………………………….. 135 參考文獻……………………………………………………………….. 137 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 德沃金 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會公正 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 運氣平等主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 羅爾斯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | John Rawls | en |
| dc.subject | Social Justice | en |
| dc.subject | Luck Egalitarianism | en |
| dc.subject | Ronald Dworkin | en |
| dc.title | 運氣與社會公正：檢視運氣平等主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Luck and Social Justice: A Critical Examination of Luck Egalitarianism | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝世民,吳秀瑾 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 社會公正,運氣平等主義,羅爾斯,德沃金, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Social Justice,Luck Egalitarianism,John Rawls,Ronald Dworkin, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 147 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 13.31 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。