請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45631完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳政位 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Ping Fan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 范宇平 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:31:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-21 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 司法院,2009,「司法院法學資料檢索系統」,網址:http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/Index.htm,access on 2009/4/21,台北:司法院。
台糖公司畜產研究所,1996,「成立42週年暨重要研究發展成果」,中國畜牧雜誌,第28卷第6期,頁41-46。 行政院主計處,2009,「各縣市重要統計指標查詢系統」,網址:http://61.60.106.82/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp,access on 2009/5/21,台北:行政院主計處。 行政院農業委員會,2007,「豬-台灣良好農業規範」,台北:行政院農業委員會。 ———,2000-2008,「糧食供需年報」,台北:行政院農業委員會。 ———,1997-2008,「養豬頭數調查報告」,台北:行政院農業委員會。 ———,2000-2008,「農業統計年報」,台北:行政院農業委員會。 ———,2009,「台灣農產品安全追溯資訊網」,台北:行政院農業委員會。 ———,2009,「畜牧調查統計資料線上查詢系統」,台北:行政院農業委員會。 ———,2007,「農產品驗證標章啟動安全農業邁入新紀元」,台北:行政院農業委員會。取自http://www.coa.gov.tw/show_news.php?serial=9_diamond_20070614113705 朱宗亮,1985,「臺灣毛豬供給與豬肉需求動態模型之分析」,國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。 朱慶誠,1994,「斃死豬肉問題之處理與檢討」,農政與農情,8月號,頁22-26。 何燦成,2006,「從法規影響分析之角度談我國專利法因應WTO公共衛生議題之修正」,台北:IPO專利商品化網站,取自http://pcm.tipo.gov.tw/pcm/pro_show.asp?sn=211。 何泰寬,1992,「犯罪的經濟分析」,國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 李皇照,1993,「臺灣地區肉品需求體系之研究」,臺灣土地金融季刊,29(4):49-68。 林灼榮、鄭季博,1987,「臺灣主要肉類需求體系之研究」,農業經濟,22:115-134。 法務部,2009,「全國法規資料庫」,台北:法務部。網址:http://law.moj.gov.tw/。 法務部調查局,2005,「94年經濟犯罪防制工作年報」,台北:法務部調查局。 洪美惠 ,1993,「臺灣主要肉品需求之探討」,臺灣銀行季刊,44(3): 307-395。 財團法人中央畜產會,2005,「肉類加工食品業實施食品安全管制系統指導手冊」,台北:財團法人中央畜產會。 財團法人中央畜產會,2009,「畜產行情資訊網」,網址:http://quotes.naif.org.tw/h-asp/top-v.asp。 周愫嫻、曹立群,2007,犯罪學理論及其實證,台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 許妘萍、李明聰,2005,台北消費者對豬肉安全憂慮之研究,第五屆觀光休閒暨餐旅產業永續經營學術研討會,高雄 :高雄餐旅學院。 許義忠,2004,「考慮外溢效果下之最適補貼率」,農業經濟半年刊,76,87-106。 許義忠、徐偉初,2005,「考慮外溢效果下以污染稅融通之環境政策」,農業經濟半年刊, 78,151-183。 陳明健,1992,「臺灣養豬事業之社會成本分析與解決對策(一)」,行政院環境保護署補助研究計畫,國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所。 陳明健,吳珮瑛,蔡惠雯、陳怡欽,陳雅琴,1993,「臺灣養豬事業之社會成本分析與解決對策(二)」,行政院環境保護署補助研究計畫,國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所。 陳明健,1993,「臺灣養豬業因應環境保護之策略研究」,行政院農業委員會補助研究計畫,國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所。 陳明健,1994,「臺灣毛豬生產的生物經濟分析」,行政院國家科學委員會補助研究計畫,國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所。 陳智華、謝智源,2008,「污染管制與經濟成長:一個不完全競爭的總體模型」經濟論文叢刊,36:3 :357–392。 郭瑞基、王瑞昌,2002,「環保投資補貼與污染清除稽核政策之分析」,人文及社會科學研究集刊,16(4):505-537。 張倉耀,方文碩,林哲彥,1999,「多變量共整合誤差修正模型對台灣地區犯罪人口率的研究1951-1996」,警學叢刊,30(1):47。 黃健兒,1995,「貿易自由化下臺灣養豬業結構調整之動態經濟分析」,國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所博士論文。 黃柏凌,1994,「臺灣個別毛豬農場之技術效率分析-跨期隨機性邊界函數法之應用」,國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。 黃儀蓁和李明聰,2005,「消費者社經背景與食品安全議題擔心程度之相關研究」,2005中華觀光管理學會研討會,台中 :靜宜大學。 監察院,2009,「第098000004號糾正案文」,台北:監察院。 溫佳諭,2004,「竊盜犯罪之經濟分析」,國立中興大學應用經濟學研究所碩士論文。 謝惠婷、陳智華、謝智源,2007,「環境政策和經濟成長:事前管理或事後管制?」,農業經濟半年刊,81,165-196。 顏愛靜,2003,「農地管理與違規使用問題之研究」,行政院農業委員會科技研究計畫,中國土地經濟學會。 鄭蕙燕,1982,「臺灣毛豬供需之動態經濟分析-乘數分析之應用」,農業經濟,31:85-124。 蕭景楷,2003,「斃死豬集運處理體系規劃及輔導策略之研究」,行政院農業委員會農糧署研究報告,中興大學應用經濟學系。 鄒茂瑜,2001,「淺談斃死豬刑事案件之法律適用」,新竹律師會刊,9:88-90。 Akerlof, G. A.,1970.“The market for ‘lemons’:quality uncertainty and the market mechanism,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84:488-500. Antle, J. M., 2000. “No such thing as a free safe lunch: the cost of food safety regulation in the meat industry,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82:310-322 Bas, M., Yuksel, M., and Cavusoglu, T., 2007.“Difficulties and baarriers for the implementing of haccp and food safety systems in food business in Turkey,” Food Control, 18: 124-130. Becker, G.S., 1968. “Crime and punishment: an economic approach,” Journal of Political Economy, 78:169-217. Bertolini, M., Rizzi, A., and Bevilacqua, M., 2007.“An alternative approach to haccp system implementation.” Journal of Food Engineering 79:1322-1328. Bowers, W. and Pierce, G.., 1975.”The illusion of deterrence in Issac Ehrlich’s work on the deterrent effect of capital punishment,” Yale Law Journal, 85:187-208. Cameron, S., 1994.”A review of the economic evidence of the effects of capital punishment,” Journal of Socioeconomics, 23:197-214. Carlton, D. and Perloff, J., 1994. Modern industrial organization. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers. Caswell, J.A. and Hooker, N.H., 1996. ”HACCP as an international trade standard,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics.78: 775-779. Cheung, C., and Goldberger, A.,1984.“Proportional projections in limited dependent variable models,”Econometrica, 52:531-534. Cohen, W., 1995.“Empirical studies of innovative activitiy,”Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Paul Stoneman ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers,pp:182-264. Cox, D.1961. “Tests of separate families of hypotesese.”Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematucal Stastics and Probability, Vol. 1. Berkeley: Univeraity of Califorina Press. Cox, D.1962. “Further results on tests of separate families of hypotesese.”Journal of the Royal Stastical Society, Seriess B, 24, 406-424. ,1962)、 Cropper, M.L., and Oates, W.E., 1992.“Enviromental economics: a survey,”Journal of Economics Literature, 30:675-740. Crutchfield, S.R., Buzby, J.C., Roberts, T., Ollinger, M., and Lin, C.-T. J., 1997.“An economics assessment of food safety and inspection. The New Approach to Meat and Poultry Inspection.”Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report, 755, Washington DC. Darby, M. R., and Karni, E., 1973.“Free competition and optimal amount of fraud,” Journal of law Economics, 16(1):67-88. Edmark, K., 2005.”Unemployment and crime: is there a connection?,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(2):353-373. Ehrlich, I., 1973. “Participation in illegitimate activities: a theortical and empirical investigation,” Journal of Political Economy, 81:521-565. Ehrlich, I., 1975a. “The deterrent effect of capital punishment- a question of life and death,” American Economics Review, 65:397-417. Ehrlich, I., 1975b. “Deterrence, evidence and inference,” Yale Law Journal, 85:209-227. Ehrlich, I., 1996. “Crime, punishment and the market for offences,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10:43-67. Ehiri, J. E., Morris, G. P., and Mcewen J.(1995).“Implementation of haccp in food business: The way ahead.”Food Control, 6:341-345. Fair, R.C.,1977.“A note on computation of the tobit estimator,” Econometrica, 45(7):1723-7. Fishe, R. P. H., and Maddala, G.S. and Trost, R.P.,1979.“Estimation of a heteroscedasticitc tobit model,” Manuscript. University of Florida. Food and Drug Administration, 1994.“Food safety assurance program: development of hazard analysis critical control points: proposed rule.”Federal Register:39888-39896. Freeman, R.,1983.“Crime and labour market, in crime and public policy(ed,)”J.Q. Wilson, Institute for Comtempoary Studies, San Francisco, 89-106. Freeman, R.,1999.”The economics of crime in handbook of labour economics(ed,)”O. Ashenfelter and D. Card Elsevier, Amsterdam, 3259-71. Freeman, R. and Rodgers, W. M.,1999.”Area economics conditions and the labor market outcomes of young men in the 1990s expansion,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 7073. Gibbon, D.C., 1994.Talking about crime and criminal behavior. 4th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Golan, E., Roberts, T., Salay, E., Caswell, J., Ollinger, M., and Moore, D. 2004.”Food safety innovation in the United States evidence from the meat industry”. Agricultural Economic Report No 831. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Goldberg, A. S., 1964.“Econometric theory,”New York: Wiley. Greene, W. H., 2003.”Econometric analysis,” 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Hennessy, D. A., 2005.“Slaughterhouse rules: animal uniformity and regulating for food safety in meat packing ” American Journal of Agricultural Economics . 87(3):600-609 Henson, S., Brouder, A., and Winnie Mitullah.2000. “Food safety requirements and food exports from developing countries: the case of fish exports from Kenya to the European Union,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics,82(5): 1159-1169 Howsen, R. M. and Jarrel, S. B.,1987“Some determinants of property crime: economic factors influence criminal behavior but cannot completely explain the syndrome,”American Journal of Economics and Sociology,46(4):445-457. Hurd, M., 1979.“Estimation in truncated samples when there is heteroscedasticity.”Journal of Econometrics. 11:247-258. Ippolito, P. M., 1984.”Consumer protection economics: a selective survey, empirical approaches to consumer protection economics,” P. M. Ippolito and D.T. Scheffman, (Eds), Washington DC: Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission April 1984. KAM, T.Y., and LIN, J.R., 2002. “The effects of the pollution cost internalization on Taiwan’s hog industry,” Applied Economics Letters, 9, 889-892 Klein, L., Forst, B. and Filitov, V., 1978. “The deterrent effect of capital punishment: an assessment of the estimates,” In deterrence and incapacitation: estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates(eds), A. Blummstein, J. Cohen, and D. Nagin, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, 336-360. Klein, N.L., and Brester, G.W.,1997.“Economic impacts of the zero tolerance directive on the cost structure of beef packing companies,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics,22:392. Layson, S., 1983.”Homicide and deterrence: another view of the Canadian time series evidence.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 16:52-73. Layson, S., 1985.”Homicide and deterrence : a re-examination of the United States time series evidence,” Southern Economic Journal, 52:68-89. Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R. and Winter.S.G.,1987.“Appropriating the returns from industrial r&d.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 783-820. Long, S. K. and Witte, A. D., 1981. “Current economics trends: implications for crime and criminal justice in a declining economy (eds)” K. N. Wright, I. Oelgeschlager, T. Gunn and H. Medoff, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 69-114. Mackinnon, J., H. White, and R. Davidson., 1983, “Tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses; some further results.”Journal of Econometrics, 21, 53-70. Maddala, G. S. and Nelson, F.,1975. “Switching regression models with exogenous and endogenous switching,”Proceedings of the American Stastical Assocation (Business and Economics Section): 423-6. Mizon, G. and J. Rochard., 1986. “The encompassing principle and its application to testing nonnested models.”Econometrica, 54, 657-678. Narayan, P. K. and Smyth, R., 2004.”Crime rates, male youth unemployment and real income in Australia: evidence from Granger causality tests,” Applied Economics, 36:2079-2095. Narayan, P. K. and Smyth, R., 2006. “Dead man walking: an empirical reassessment of the deterrent effect of capital punishment using the bounds testing approach to cointegration,” Applied Economics, 38:1975-1989. Nelson, F. D.,1975.“Estimation of economic relationships with censored, truncated and limited dependent variables,” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Rochester. Prais, S. J. and Houthhakker, H. S.,1955.“The analysis of family budgets.”Cambridge University Press. Passell, P. and Taylor, J., 1977. “The deterrent effect of capital punishment: another view,” American Economics Review, 67:445-451. Resosudarmo, B. P. and Subiman N. I. L., 2006. “The link between firm characteristics, bribery, and illegal logging in Indonesian wood-based industries,” Asean Economic Bullitin,23(3):360-372. Rosen, S., 1987.”Dynamic animal economics,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics,69:547-557. Rutemiller, H. C. and Bowers, D. A.,1968.“Estimation in a heteroscedasticity regression model,”Journal of the American Statistical Association. 63:552-7. Sandelin, B. and Skogh, G., 1986.“Property crimes and the police: an empirical analysis of Swedish data.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics,88(3):547-561. Schmookler, J., 1962.“Economic sources of tentive activity,”Journal of Economic History 22:1-10. Schmookler, J., 1966. Invention and economic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J.A., 1934.The Theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter,J.A.,1942.Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper. Sesnowitz, M. L. and Hexter, L.J., 1982“Economic determinants of theft: some empirical results,”Public Finance Quaterly, 10(4):618-630. Sjoquist, D. L., 1973.”Property crime and economic behavior: some empirical results” The American Economic Review,63(3):439-446. Tao, H.L., 2004. “Property crime distribution and equal police deployment an empirical study of Taiwan,” Journal of Urban Economics, 55:165-178. Tappen, P. W.,1947.“Who is the criminal?”American Sociological Review,12(1):96-102. Taylor, E., 2001. “HACCP in small companies: benefit or burdens?” Food Control, 12:217-222. Tobin, J.,1958.“Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables,” Econometrica, 26:24-36. Unnevehr, L. and Jensen, H. H., 1996.“Haccp as a regulatory innovation to improve food safety in the meat Industry,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78:764-769. Unnevehr, L. J., Miller,G. Y. and Gomez, M. I., 1999. “Ensuring food safety and quality in farm-level production: emerging lessons from the pork industry”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81:1096-1101. Unnevehr, L., 2003. “Food safety: setting and enforcing standards”. Choices, 18(1): 9-14. Winkelmann R. and Boes S., 2006. “Analysis of microdata,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Witte, A.D., 1980. “Estimating the economic model of crime with individual data,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics:57-84. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45631 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 豬肉為國人重要蛋白質來源,其安全與國人健康密切相關。由於國內持續發生豬肉殘留抗生素及斃死豬肉供人食用案件,使消費者對豬肉品質存疑,如何提高豬肉安全實需深入探討改進。本研究針對國內豬肉安全制度架構進行探討,先架設出豬肉安全法規並找出豬肉安全相關之產業計畫,瞭解目前豬肉安全制度執行現況後,找出斃死豬犯罪可能管道及因應辦法。透過文獻回顧瞭解食品產業對食品安全議題之探討找出以往解決豬肉安全研究方向,並嘗試透過污染防治文獻及犯罪經濟學文獻,找出合適的廠商經營模型供斃死豬肉生產行為分析及政府應採取何種政策解決斃死豬問題。
本研究透過「司法院法學資料檢索系統」搜集1998-2007年各地方法院對斃死豬案件之判決,及利用「農委會」、「財團法人中央畜產會」、「畜產行情資訊網」及「各縣市重要統計指標查詢系統」蒐集畜牧、社會、經濟統計資料。在資料蒐集過程中,由於資料具有受限無法偵測之可能,故引進限制性變數迴歸模型統計工具並在經濟理論上結合財產權犯罪模型,在實證上發現透過不同規模戶數控制可能有助於抑制斃死豬犯罪。豬價上漲將提高違法銷售誘因,因此維持豬價將減少斃死豬販售數量。政府部門的查緝投入可遏阻犯罪。而高收入地區會吸引斃死豬的混充流入。 最後對於政策內涵的探討,由於行政管制手段及經濟誘因措施皆可解決犯罪,但深入討論國內行政管制體系及民間認證,發現執行人力資本不足之情形,建議對豬肉安全檢查人力有增加之必要。現行死亡保險制度對斃死豬隻數量的控制影響不大應檢討保險給付及死豬回收程序。另應加強養豬場的查核,同時產業政策上應進行總量管制維持穩定價格。推動擴大經營規模時,政府也應考量人力投入的增加解決死豬的運送管理問題,以幫助豬肉安全品質的提昇。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Pork is an important protein food to Taiwanese, the safety quality is very related to Taiwanese’s health. Due to pork is easily contaminated with pathogens and events of dead hog illegal reproduce to pork, it is important to improve the quality of pork safety management for Taiwanese’s health. This research first found out the laws related the production and marketing of pork safety and the pork safety programs to understand the Taiwan’s pork safety system, then found out the solution of dead hog illegal marketing .With food safety, pollution improvment and crime economics literatures review, this research collected firm characteristics to set up the illegal production model of hog farms and tested what kind of policy was suited for deterring crime of dead hog marketing.
This research collected some data of social, economics and firms characteristics from government web sites and yearly inguiries. Due to some data may be censored , this research introduced the truncated model and the tobit model to regress crime supply variable on social, economics and firms characteristics variables, and found out crimes could be prohibited by decreasing the number of medium hogs farms, stabilizing price of hog and increasing monitoring effort. This research also found that area of higher income would attract illegal marketing, and dead hog marketing became an underground industry. To discuss the effectness of pork safety policy, both economic incentives and the direct orders control methods could improve pork safety, however supervisors too less to make more improvement. Dead hog insurance policy needed to check insurance payment to match dead hog collecting procedure, increased hog farm inspections and stabilized price of hog to control amount of hogs could deter dead hog crime. When government set up policy of extending hog farm scale, more farm labor input needed to deal with dead hog to improve pork safety. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:31:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-D93627006-1.pdf: 810479 bytes, checksum: 3062d3fe8dfabebf37970a3cb3deb4cb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………… i
誌謝…………………………………………………………………. ii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………… iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………. iv 第壹章 緒論……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的及研究步驟…………………………………………10 第三節 論文架構………………………………………………………11 第貳章 豬肉安全管理及斃死豬非法流用介紹………………………14 第一節 臺灣豬肉安全法規介紹………………………………………14 第二節 臺灣豬肉安全產業計畫………………………………………30 第三節 臺灣現行豬肉安全檢查現況…………………………………36 第四節 斃死豬處理介紹………………………………………………38 第五節 斃死豬非法流用之現況調查…………………………………45 第參章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………52 第一節 豬肉安全………………………………………………………52 第二節 污染防治………………………………………………………59 第三節 監督執法………………………………………………………64 第肆章 理論模型之探討………………………………………………73 第一節 斃死豬非法流用之犯罪理論…………………………………74 第二節 限制性應變數模型……………………………………………80 第伍章 實證模型及變數說明…………………………………………91 第一節 實證模型設定…………………………………………………91 第二節 研究資料之處理說明…………………………………………94 第陸章 實證結果及政策內涵之探討…………………………………99 第一節 實證結果………………………………………………………99 第二節 直接命令管制政策之探討…………………………………103 第三節 經濟誘因政策之探討………………………………………106 第四節 產業政策之探討……………………………………………108 第柒章 結論及建議…………………………………………………111 參考文獻………………………………………………………………114 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 犯罪 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 食品安全 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 斃死豬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Tobit迴歸模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 截斷式迴歸模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | hog dying of disease | en |
| dc.subject | food safety | en |
| dc.subject | crime | en |
| dc.subject | truncated model | en |
| dc.subject | Tobit model | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣斃死豬非法流用防治對策之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on Deterring Policies of Dead Hog Illegal Marketing in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 傅祖壇,陳淑恩,萬鍾汶,黃英豪,楊奕農 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 食品安全,斃死豬,Tobit迴歸模型,截斷式迴歸模型,犯罪, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | food safety,hog dying of disease,Tobit model,truncated model,crime, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 121 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 791.48 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
