請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45514
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 沈中華 | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhi-Wei Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊志偉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:24:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-10 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-09-10 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-09-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. 王盈傑(2003) ,「具學習能力之專家系統在貨幣危機預警模型上之應用」,靜宜大學會計所碩士論文。 2. 林郁翎(2002) ,「銀行危機預警指標之建立-Signal Extraction Approach和Logit Model之結合」,東吳大學經濟所碩士論文。 3. 沈中華(2000) ,「四十分鐘學會匯率危機預測」,台北:新陸書局。 4. 沈中華,謝孟芬(1999) ,「事件風險:以貨幣危機及銀行危機為例」,企銀季刊,第二十二卷第二期,頁1-17。 5. 李佳穎(2002),「通貨危機預警指標之建立-Signal Extraction Approach和Logit Model之結合」,東吳大學經濟所碩士論文。 6. 何宣萱(2000),「通貨危機預警制度之建立-----以東亞金融危機為例」,暨南大學經濟所碩士論文。 7. 邱喬(2004),「貨幣危機預警系統之分析:1970-2000新興市場的經驗」,台灣大學經濟所碩士論文。 8. 胡春田(1997),「貨幣危機下總體變數之實質效應」,中正大學國際經濟所碩士論文。 9. 陳柏羽(1999),「運用總體經濟指標評估通貨危機」,東吳大學國貿所碩士論文。 10. 梅家媛(1999),「從亞洲金融危機談預警指標」,主計月報,第八十七卷第一期,頁37-45。 11. 葉南輝(2002) ,「金融自由化與銀行危機、匯率危機:台灣總體經濟實證研究」,台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 12. 黃健輝(2003),「貨幣危機是否可預測:Probit模型、Logit模型與馬可夫轉換模型之實證比較」,暨南大學經濟研究所。 13. 楊乃誠譯(1999),Michael R. Rosenberg原著,「新興市場的貨幣危機(下)--投機性攻擊模型及早期預警系統之導論」,貨幣觀測與信用評等,3月,頁88-104。 14. 蔡秉翰(1997),「東亞地區貨幣危機領先指標之研究與預測--台灣地區實證分析」,暨南大學經濟研究所。 15. 蕭文宜(2003),「亞洲單一貨幣的中心匯率機制與貨幣危機預警模型之關聯性研究」,中原大學企業管理研究所。 16. 鍾佳蓉(2003),「雙元危機之預警模型」,政治大學財政所碩士論文。 17. 顏厚棟(2001),「資本移動、經常帳餘額與通貨危機」,逢甲大學經濟所碩士論文。 英文部分 Berg, A. and C. Pattillo (1999), “Are currency crises predictable? A test,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 46, pp.107-138. Berg, A. and C. Pattillo (1999), “Predicting currency crises: The indicators approach and an alternative,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 18, pp.561-586. Bosworth, B. P. and S. M. Collins (1999), “Capital Flows to Developing Economies: Implications for Saving and Investment,' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp.143-180. Corsetti, G., P. Pesenti and N. Roubini (1998), ”A Model of the Asian Crises,” NBER Working paper No.6783. Diebold, F. X. and G. D. Rudebusch (1989), “Scoring the Leading Indicators,” Journal of Business, 62, pp.369-391. Edison, H. J. (2000), ”Do Indicators of Financial Crises Work? An Evaluation of an Early Warning System,” International Finance Discussion Papers, No.675, pp.1-74. Eichengreen, B., A. Rose and C. Wyplosz(1995), “Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks,” Economic Policy 21 (October), pp.249-312. Frankel, A. Jeffrey and A. Rose (1996), 'Currency Crashes in Emerging- Market: Empirical Indicators,' NBER Working paper, No.5437. Goldfain, I. and R. O. Valdes (1998), “Are currency crises predictable?” European Economic Review, 42, pp.873-885. Hardy, D. C. and C. Pazarbasioglu (1998), “Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different?” IMF Working Paper, Washington, D.C. Kaminsky, G. L. and C. M. Reinhart (1996), “The Twin Crises: The Cause of Banking and Balance-of-Payment Problems,” Working paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, Washington, D.C. Kaminsky, G. L., S. Lizondo and C. M. Reinhart (1997), ”Leading Indicator of Currency Crisis,” IMF Working Paper, Washington, D.C. Krugman, P. (1979), “A Model of Balance-of-Payment Crises,” Journal 0f Monetary, Credit, and, and Banking, 11, pp.311-325. Frederic, M. (1996), “Understanding Financial Crises: A Developing country Perspective,” Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, World Bank, Washington D.C., pp.29-62. Obstfeld, M. (1994), ”The Logic of Currency Crises,” NBER Working Paper No.4640. Obstfeld, M. (1996), “Model of Currency Crises with Self-fulfilling Features,” European Economic Review 40, pp.1037-1047. Otker I. and P. Veyla (1997), ”Speculative Attacks and Macroeconomic Fundamentals: Evidence from Some European Currencies,” European Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings(April 1997), 41, pp.847-860. Sachs J. D., A. Tornell and A. Velasco (1996), ”Financial Crises in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from 1995,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp.147-88. Saxena, S. C. (2001), ”Perspective on Currency Crises,” Working Paper, NBER, No.74. Velasco, A.(1987), “Financial Crises and Balance of Payment Crises: A Simple Model of the Southern Cone Experience.” Journal of Development Economics, October 1987, 27(1-2), pp.263-283. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45514 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究試圖找出顯著影響貨幣危機之總體經濟因子,並以這些總體經濟因子為主軸建立貨幣危機預警模型,同時另一方面,再以地理區域與國家主權評等,將樣本國家加以細分至數小樣本,探討是否其顯著影響貨幣危機之總體經濟因子是否有所不同,及其背後之關係。因此,本研究採IMF的IFS資料庫與World Bank的WDI以及國內外文獻為基礎蒐集59個樣本國家,研究期間自1980年至2007年為止的資料作為樣本,資料頻率為年資料。
從實證結果可以發現經濟成長率只有在以國家主權評等在BBB+以上之研究樣本內才有與假說相同之顯著解釋能力。再者,消費者物價指數成長率對於全部國家皆有相當不錯且與假說相同之解釋能力,其中又以在國家主權評等在BBB+以上之國家為研究樣本時有最佳之解釋能力。其次,消費比率不論在哪一種樣本下,皆為相當不顯著之總體經濟因子。過度投資率在不同樣本下,皆有不錯之解釋能力,其中又以美洲國家為研究樣本下,有相當顯著之解釋能力。關於資本產出增量比,則出現與假說相反之影響方式。其次,關於金融機構放款給私部門增量,本研究發現在以國家主權評等BBB+以上之國家中,會得到與假說相反之結論。另一方面,經常帳比率在不同樣本下,皆出現與假說相同之實證結果,此外,此假說效果在國家主權評等在BBB以下國家之研究樣本中最為顯著。接著,關於外資反轉流出,只有在金融體系較不健全之國家,假說之影響方式才會成立。另一方面,關於出口比率,本研究得到與假說相反之實證結果。再者,財政收支餘額比率在不同樣本下皆有與假說相同之影響效果,其中又以在美洲國家、國家主權評等在BBB以下國家為研究樣本時,有極為顯著之實證結果。 以Pseudo判定係數而言,本研究發現當國家經過適度的細分時,會出現較佳之Pseudo判定係數。而就Probit Model與Logit Model來說,本研究發現,不論哪種樣本下,在採用Probit Model時所得到的實證結果,皆比採用Logit Model來的稍微顯著一點。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In this thesis, I try to find the substantial macro-factors which result in currency crisis, and to build a currency crisis warning model based in these macro-factors. Furthermore, I dividend all of the sample countries into several groups, according to geographic zones and ratings, and discuss whether the influential macro-factors would be different and the relationship. Therefore, all of the data are downloaded from IFS database, IMF, and WDI, World Bank. Meanwhile, I select 59 countries as samples by referring to local and international theses. The period is from 1980 to 2007. The frequency of data is yearly.
In the empirical results, I discover that the GDP Growth Rate is substantial and the same as the hypothesis merely in the sample of the countries with rating above BBB+. What is more, the Consumer Price Index Growth Rate has decent capacity of explaining in all kinds of the samples. Among them, the sample of countries above BBB+ shows the best capability of explaining. Also, the Consumption to GDP is an unsubstantial macro-factor whichever I adopt. However, the Difference between Saving to GDP and Investment to GDP holds good explaining abilities whichever I use, and the sample of America shows the most powerful one. In terms of Incremental Capital Output Ratio, the empirical result is opposite to the hypothesis. Next, in view of the Loan for Private Sector, this empirical research discovers the sample of the countries below BBB appears an adverse effect, compared with the hypothesis. On the other hand, Current Account to GDP presents the same empirical outcome as the hypothesis in all samples. Moreover, in terms of Anti-Flow Foreign Capital, the hypothesis is tenable only in the countries with unstable financial systems. What is more, the Export to GDP appears reverse conclusions. Furthermore, the influence of Financial Surplus or Deficit is identical. In view of the Pseudo R-square, this research will detect better ones if all of the countries are divided into several small groups. In terms of the model, the outcomes of the Probit models are more substantial than the ones of the Logit models slightly. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:24:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96723068-1.pdf: 1308687 bytes, checksum: 5b6ef390b34f4cd73f15e713b4affbb8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次....................................................v
表次....................................................vii 圖次....................................................vii 第壹章 緒論.............................................1 第一節 研究動機.....................................1 第二節 研究目的.....................................1 第三節 研究貢獻.....................................1 第四節 研究架構.....................................2 第五節 研究範圍.....................................3 第貳章 文獻回顧.........................................4 第一節 貨幣危機....................................4 第二節 貨幣危機預警模型............................6 第參章 研究設計與模型建立...............................19 第一節 研究時間與對象...............................19 第二節 研究變數與假說...............................20 第三節 研究方法.....................................28 第肆章 實證分析與結果...................................33 第一節 全部樣本國家下之實證分析.........................33 第二節 以地理區域別之子樣本實證分析.....................36 第三節 以國家主權評等別之子樣本實證分析.................49 第伍章 結論與建議.......................................68 第一節 結論.............................................68 第二節 研究限制與建議...................................70 參考文獻................................................72 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以貨幣危機預警模型探討不同國家主權評等與地理位置下之匯率風險 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Discussing Exchange Rate Risk of Different Ratings and Geographic Areas with Currency Crisis Warning System | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳孟紋,黃宜侯 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 貨幣危機,匯率風險,預警模型,國家主權評等,總體經濟因子, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Currency Crisis,Exchange Rate Risk,Waning System,Ratings,Macroeconomic Factors, | en |
dc.relation.page | 74 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-09-07 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。