請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45297
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 柯俊成(Chiun-Cheng Ko) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jhih-Rong Liao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 廖治榮 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:12:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Amitai, S., and E. Swirski. 1981. A new species of Amblyseius (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from the Far East. Israel J. Entomol. 15: 59-66.
Athias-Henriot, C. 1957. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d'Alg6rie. I. Genres Blattisocius Keegan, Iphiseius Berlese, Amblyseius Berlese, Phytoseius Ribaga, Phytoseiulus Evans. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nord. 48: 62-107 Athia-Heriot, C. 1958. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d’Algerie. II. Phytoseiidae cle des genres, Amblyseius Berlese (Suite)et Seiulus Berlese. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nord 49: 23-43. Athias-Henriot, C. 1974. The idiosomatic euneotaxy and epineotaxy in gamasids (Arachnida, Parasitiformes). Z. Zool. Syst. Evol. Forsch. 13, 97-109. Baker, E. W., and G. W. Wharton. 1952. An Introduction to Acarology. Macmillan Co., New York, 465 pp. Beard, J. J. 1999. A revision of the Australian mite genus Australiseiulus Muma (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Invertebr. Syst.13: 351-368. Beard, J. J. 2001. A review of Australian Neoseiulus Hughes and Typhlodromips de Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Amblyseiinae). Invertebr. Syst. 15: 73-158. Beard, J. J., and D. E. Walter. 1996. Australian mites of the genera Paraphytoseius Swirski and Shechter and Paraamblyseius Muma (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Aust. J. Entomol. 35: 235-241. Berlese, A. 1913. Berlese, A. 1914. Acari nuovi. Manipulus IX. Redia 10: 113-150. Blommers, L. 1974. Species of the genus Amblyseius Berlese, 1914, from Tamatave, East Madagascar (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Bull. Zool. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam 3: 143-155. Caterino, M. S., S. Cho, and F. A. H. Sperling. 2000. The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving Tower of Babel. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45: 1-54. Chang, H. Y., and Y. H. Tseng. 1978. A field survey of Phytoseiid mites of tropical orchards in southern Taiwan. Plant Prot. Bull. 20: 338-345. Chant, D. A. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in Southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic revision of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. Can. Entomol. Suppl. 12: 1-166. Chant, D. A. 1965. Generic concepts in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina). Can. Entomol. 97: 351-374. Chant, D. A. 1985. Systematic and taxonomy. pp. 17-29. In: W. Helle, and M. W. Sabelis, eds. Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. (World Crop Pests, Vol. 1B). Elsevier, Amsterdam. Chant, D. A. 1992. Trends in the discovery of new species and adut setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Phytoseiidae), 1839-1989. Internat. J. Acarol. 18: 323-362. Chant, D. A. 1993. Adaptive radiation in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina) as reflected by adult idiosomal setation. Internat. J. Acarol. 19: 203-231. Chant, D. A. 2007. Species of Phytoseiid mites from northern tundra (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Internat. J. Acarol. 33: 199-221. Chant, D. A., and J. A. McMurtry. 1994. A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Internat. J. Acarol. 20: 223-310. Chant, D. A., and J. A. McMurtry, 2003. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part I. The tribe Neoseiulini new tribe. Internat. J. Acarol. 29: 3-46. Chant, D. A., and J. A. McMurtry. 2004a. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Amblyseiina N. subtribe. Internat. J. Acarol. 30: 171-228. Chant, D. A., and J. A. McMurtry. 2004b. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part IV. Tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein, subtribe Arrenoseiina Chant and McMurtry. Internat. J. Acarol. 30: 291-312. Chant, D. A., and J. A. McMurtry. 2005. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part V. tribe Amblyseiini, subtribe Proprioseiopsina Chant and McMurtry. Internat. J. Acarol. 31: 3-22. Chant, D. A., and J. A. McMurtry. 2006. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acar: Phytoseiidae): part IX. an overview. Internat. J. Acarol. 32: 125-152. Chant, D. A., and J. A. McMurtry. 2007. Illustrated Keys and Diagnoses for the Genera and Subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the World (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House. USA. 220 pp. Chant, D. A., and E. Yoshida-Shaul. 1986. Chant, D. A., and E. Yoshida-Shaul. 1989. Adult dorsal setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Internat. J. Acarol. 15: 219-233. Chant, D. A., and E. Yoshida-Shaul. 1991. Adult ventral setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Internat. J. Acarol. 17: 187-199. Chant, D. A., and E. Yoshida-Shaul. 1992. Adult idiosomal setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasida). Internat. J. Acarol. 18: 177-193. Chant, D. A., H. A. Denmark, and E. W. Baker. 1959. A new subfamily Macroseiinae Nov., of the subamily Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Gamasina). Canad. Entomol. 91: 808-811. Cruickshank, R. H. 2002. Molecular markers for the phylogenetics of mites and ticks. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 7: 3-14. Collyer, E. 1980. Phytoseiidae (Acari) from the Pacific Islands: note. New Zealand Entmol. 7: 138-139. Corpuz-Raros, L. A. 1966. Seven new species of mites of the genera Typhlodromus and Phytoseius (Phytoseiidae: Acarina). Philipp. Agric. 50: 729-738. Corpuz-Raros, L. A. 1995a. Two new species of Amblyseiulella (Phytoseiidae, Acari) from the Philippines. Asia Life Sci. 4: 15-22. Corpuz-Raros, L. A. 1995b. Notes on a collection of predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari) from Singapore. Asia Life Sci. 4: 83-87. Corpuz-Raros, L. A., and R. C. Garcia. 1994. Two additional records and a key to the species of Phytoseius (Phytoseiidae, Acari) from the Philippines. Philipp. Agric. 77: 473-479. Corpuz, L. A., and L. Rimando. 1966. Some Philippine Amblyseiinae (Phytoseiidae: Acarina). Philip. Agric. 50: 114-136. Dabert, M., W. Witalinski, A. Kazmierski, Z. Olszanowski, and J. Dabert. 2010. Molecular phylogeny of acariform mites (Acari, Arachnida): strong conflict between phylogenetic signal and long-branch attraction artifacts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 56: 222-241. Daneshvar, H., and H. A. Denmark. 1982. Phytoseiids of Iran (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Internat. J. Acarol. 8: 3-14. De Leon, D. 1961. Eight new Amblyseius from Mexico with collection notes on two other species (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Fla. Entomol. 44: 85-91. Denmark, H. A., and T. Edland. 2002. The subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Norway. Internat. J. Acarol. 28: 195-220. Denmark, H. A., G. A. Evans, H. Aguilar, C. Vargas, and R. Ochoa. 1999. Phytoseiidae of Central America (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, Michigan. 125 pp. Denmark, H. A., and M. H. Muma. 1989. A revision of the genus Amblyseius Berlese, 1914 (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Occasional Papers of the Florida State Collection of Arthropods 4. 149 pp. Ehara, S. 1967. Phytoseiid mites from Okinawa Island (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Mushi 40: 67-82. Ehara, S. 1972. Some phytoseiid mites from Japan, with descriptions of thirteen new species. Mushi 46: 137-173. Ehara, S. 1970. Phytoseiid mites from Taiwan. Mushi 43: 55-63. Ehara, S. 1977. A review of taxonomic studies on natural enemies of spider mites in Japan. Rev. Plant Protec. Res. 10: 29-49. Ehara, S. 2002a. Some phytoseiid mites (Arachnida: Acari: Phytoseiidae) from west Malaysia. Species Divers. 7: 29-46. Ehara, S. 2002b. Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Sumatra with description of a new species. Acta Arachnol. 5: 125-133. Ehara, S., and H. Amano. 1998. A revision of the mite family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari: Gamasida), with remarks on its biology. Species Divers. 3: 25-73. Ehara, S., and H. Amano. 2002. Some Japanese phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) mostly from Ishigaki and Taketomi Islands. Entomol. Sci. 5: 321-329. Ehara, S., and H. Amano. 2004. Checklist and keys to Japanese Amblyseiinae (Acari: Gamasina: Phytoseiidae). J. Acarol. Soc. Jpn. 13: 1-30. Ehara, S., and A. Bhandhufalck. 1977. Phytoseiid mites of Thailand (Acarina: Mesostigmata). J. Fac. Educ. Tottori Univ., Nat. Sci. 27: 43-82. Ehara, S., and H. Kishimoto. 2007. Description of a new species of Phytoscutus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Kyushu, Japan. Internat. J. Acarol. 33: 111-113. Ehara, E., S. Toyoshima, and H. Amano. 2006. Three new species of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Japan. Internat. J. Acarol. 32: 345-350. Ehara, S., and A. Bhandhufalck. 1977. Phytoseiid mites of Thailand (Acarina: Mesostigmata). J. Fac. Educ. Tottori Univ., Nat. Sci. 27: 43-82. Evans, G. O. 1957. The genera Podocinum Berl. and Podoci1lella gen. nov. (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 12: 913-932. Ferla, N. J., G. L. da Silva, and G. J. de Moraes. 2010. Description of a new species of Arrenoseius Wainstein (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Brazil and a redescription of a similar species from Argentina. Internat. J. Acarol. 36: 15-19. Folmer, O., M. Black, W. Hoeh, R. Lutz, and R. Vrijenhoek. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech. 3: 294-299. Garman, 1948. Halliday, R. B., B. M. O’Connor, and A. S. Baker. 1999. Global diversity of mites. pp. 192-203. In: P. H. Raven, and T. Williams, eds. Nature and Human Society. National Academy Press, Washington DC. Hirschmann, W. 1962. Gangsystematik der Parasitiformes. Acarol. Schrift. Vergleichende Milben. Hirschmann-Verlag, FurthIBay, Germany 5(5-6). 80 pp. Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 41: 95-98. Higgins, D. Thompson, J., and T. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680. Hilker, M., and T. Meiners. 2010. How do plants “notice” attack by herbivorous arthropods? Biol. Rev. 85: 267-280. Ho, C. C., and P. K. C. Lo. 1989. Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Paraphytoseius Swirski and Shechter (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Taiwan. J. Agric. Res. China 38: 88-99. Ho, C. C., H. T. Shih, and W. H. Chen. 2003. Eight phytoseiid mites from the Matsu Islands. Plant Prot. Bull. 45: 145-154. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. Mrbayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755. Jeyaprakash, A., and M. A. Hoy. 2002. Mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequences used to design a molecular ladder assay to identify six commercially available phytoseiidae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Bio. Control 25: 136-142. Joharchi, O., and B. Halliday. 2011. New species and new records of mites of the family Laelapidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) associated with Coleoptera in Iran. Zootaxa 2883: 23-38. Johnston, D. E., and M. L. Moraza. 1991. The idiosomal adenotaxy and poroidotaxy of Zerconidae (Mesostigmata: Zerconina). pp. 349-356. In: F. Dusbabek, and V. Bukva. Eds. Modern Acarology. Vol. 2. Academia, Prague and SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague. Karg, W. 1960. Zur Kenntnis der Typhlodromiden (Acarina: Parasitiformes) Ackerund Grunlandboden. Zetschr. Angew. Entomo1. 47: 440-452. Karg, W. 1965. Larvalsystematische und phylogenetische Untersuchung sowie Revision des System der Gamasina Leach, 1915 (Acarina, Parasitiformes). Mitt. Zoo1. Mus. Berlin 41: 193-340. Karg, W. 1976. Zur Kenntnis der Uberfamilie PhytoseioideaKarg, 1965. Zoo1. Jahr. Syst. 103: 505-546. Karg, W. 1983. Systematische untersuchung der Gattungen und Untergattungen der Raubmilbenfatnilie Phytoseiidae Berlese, 1916, mit der beschreibung von 8 neuen Arten. Mitt. Zoo1. Mus. Berlin 59: 293-328. (in German) Koch, C. C. 1839. Koch, C. L. 1839. Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden, Regensburg, v. 5 and 6, fasc. 25, t. 22; fasc. 27, t. 6, 13. Kostainen, T., and M. A. Hoy. 1996. The Phytoseiidae as biological control agents of pest mites and insect. Monograph 17, Univ. Florida Agric. Expt. Stn. 355 pp. Lindquist, E., and G. O. Evans. 1965. Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesositgmata). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Canada 47: 64pp. Lindquist, E., G. W. Krantz, and D. E. Walter. 2009. Order Mesostigmata. pp. 124-232. In: G.W. Krantz and D. E. Walter Eds. A Manual of Acarology. 3rd. Texa Tech University Press, USA. Lee, E. S. 1961. Abstract of lecture at the 5th Annual Meeting of the Zoological Society of Korea. Kor. J. Zool. 4: 64. (in Korean) Lee, W. K., and M. O. Ryu. 1989. A taxonomic study on the phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Arachnida) in Korea. Kor. J. Entomol. 19: 215-225. Lo, P. K. C. 1970. Phytoseiid mites from Taiwan (I). Sun Yatsen Cult. Found. Bull. 5: 41-62. Lo, P. K. C., H. K. Tseng, and C. C. Ho. 1984. Biological control of spider mites on strawberry in Taiwan. J. Agric. Res. China 33: 406-417. (in Chinese) Matos, C. H. C., A. Pallini, F. F. Chaves, J. H. Schoereder, and A. Janssen. 2006. Do domatia mediate mutualistic interactions between coffee plants and predatory mites? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 118: 185-192. Matthysse, J. G., and H. A. Denmark. 1981. Some phytoseiids of Nigeria (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Florida Entomol. 64: 340-357. Mayr, E., and P. D. Ashlock. Principles of Systematic Zoology. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York. 475 pp. McMurtry, J. A. 2010. Concepts of classification of the Phytoseiidae: relevance to biological control of mites. pp. 393-398. In: M. W. Sabelis, J. Bruin. Eds. Trends in Acarolog: Proceeding of the 12th International Congress. 393-398. McMurtry, J. A., and de Moraes, G. J. 1984. Some phytoseiid mites from the South Pacific, with descriptions of new species and a definition of the Amblyseius largoensis species group. Internat. J. Acarol. 10: 27-37. McMurtry, J. A., and de Moraes, G. J. 1985. Some phytoseiid mites (Acari) of Papua New Guinea, with descriptions of six new species. Internat. J. Acarol. 11: 75-88. Muma, M. H. 1961. Subfamilies, genera and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Fla. St. Mus. Bull. Biol. Sci. 5: 267-302. Muma, M. H. 1962. New Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Florida. Fla. Entomol. 45: 1-10. Muma, M. H. 1965. Eight new Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Florida. Fla. Entomo1. 48: 245-254 Muma, M. H., and H. A. Denmark. 1970. Phytoseiidae of Florida. Arthropods of Florida and neighboring land areas, 6. Fla. Dep. Agric. Consum. Serv., Div. Plant Ind., Gainesville, Florida, 150 pp. de Moraes, G. J., H. A. Denmark, H. van den Berg, and A. Belloti. 1989. Some phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from the Far East, with description of a new species. Internat. J. Acarol. 15: 129-133. de Moraes, G. J., J. A. McMurtry, and H. A. Denmark. 1986. A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae references to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. IMBRAPA-DDT, Brasilia, Brazil: 353 pp. de Moraes, G. J., J. A. McMurtry, H. A. Denmark, and C. B. Campos. 2004. A revised catalog of mite family of Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 434: 1-494. Navajas, M., J. Lagnel, G. Fauvel, and G. J. de Moraes. 1999. Sequence variation of ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS) in commercially important Phytoseiidae mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 851-859. Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiidae (Family Laelaptidae) predaceous upon Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zoo1. Verhandl., The Netherlands, 12. 64 pp. Nylander, J. A. A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolution Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Okassa, M., M. S. Tixier, B. Cheval, and S. Kreiter. 2009. Molecular and morphological evidence for a new species status within the genus Euseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 87: 689-698. Pasquer, F., M. Pfunder, B. Frey, and J. E. Frey. 2009. Microarry-based genetic identication of beneficial organisms as a new tool for quality control of laboratory cultures. Biocontrol. Sci. Tech. 19: 809-833. Prasad, V. 1968. Amblyseius mites from Hawaii. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61: 1514-1521. Ramadan, H. A. I., E. M. El-Banhawy, A. A. Hassan, and S. I. Afia. 2004. Genetic variation in the predacious phytoseiid mites, Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Analysis of specific mitochondrial and nuclear sequences. Arab. J. Biotech. 7: 189-196. Raros, L. A. C. 2001. Further records of predatory phytoseiid mites (Phytoseiidae, Acari) from the Philippines. Philipp. Agric. Sci.84: 244-277. Readshaw, J. L. 1969. Predatory mites in Australian apple orchards. In: Div. Entomol. Ann. Report. CSIRO, Asutralia, 1968-69. P.42. Rowell, H. J., and D. A. Chant. 1978. A quantitative comparison of characters common to both sexes in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Can. J. Zoo1. 56: 2422-2429. Ryu, M. O. 1993. A review of the Phytoseiidae (Mesostigmata: Acarina) from Korea. Ins. Koreana 10: 92-137. Ryu, M. O. 1998. A new species of the genu Amblyseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Korean deciduous plants. Korean J. Biol. Sci. 2: 183-185. Ryu, M. O. 2007. List of and key to the genera and species of the subfamily Amblyseiinae (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Korea. Entomol. Res. 37: 251-260. Ryu, M. O., and S. Ehara. 1990. Description of a new species of phytoseiid mite (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) and list of phytoseiids from Korea. Korean J. Entomol. 20: 145-150. Ryu, M. O., and S. Ehara. 1991. Three phytoseiid mites from Korea (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acta. Arachnol. 40: 23-30. Ryu, M. O., and S. Ehara. 1992. A new and two unrecorded species of phytoseiid mites from Korea (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Jpn. J. Ent. 60: 723-729. Ryu, M. O., and W. K. Lee. 1992. Ten newly recorded phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from Korea. Korean J. Entomol. 22: 23-42. Ryu, M. O., and W. K. Lee. 1995. Two new species of the genus Amblyseiulella Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Korea. Korean J. Syst. Zool. 11: 199-205. Saito, Y., Mh. Osakabe, Y. Sakagami, and Y. Yasui. 1993. A method for preparing permanent specimens of mites with Canada balsam. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 28: 593-597. Schicha, E. 1981 A new species of Amblyseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Australia compared with ten closely related species from Asia, America and Africa. Internat. J. Acarol. 7: 203-216. Schicha, E. 1987. Phytoseiidae of Australia and Neighboring Areas. Indira Publishung House, Michigan. 187pp. Shih, C. I. T. 1985. Biological control of mulberry spider mites, Tetranychus kanzawai, with augmentation of Amblyseius womersleyi. pp. 21-27. In: S. C. Chiu. Eds. A Review of the Biological Control of Crop Pests in Taiwan. The Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung. Schicha, E., and L. A. Corpuz-Raros. 1992. Phytoseiidae of the Philippines. Indira Publishing House. 190pp. Schicha, E., and J. Guttierrez. 1985. Phytoseiidae of Papua New Guinea, with three new species, and new records of Tetranychidae (Acari). Internat. J. Acarol. 11: 173-181. Schuster, R. O., and L. M. Smith. 1960. The spermathecae as taxonomic features in phytoseiid mites of western North America. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 62: 181-188. Simon, C., F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene-sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain-reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 651-701. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Tixer, M. S., V. Klaric, and C. Duso. 2010. Phytoseiid mite species from Croatia, with description of a new species of the genus Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 103: 165-180. Tixier, M. S., S. Kreiter, Z. Barbar, and S. Ragusa. 2006a. Status of two cryptic species, Typhlodromus exhilaratus Ragusa and Typhlodromus phialatus Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae): consequences for taxonomy. Zool. Scr. 35: 115-122. Tixier, M. S., S. Kreiter, F. Ferragut, and B. Cheval. 2006b. The suspected synonymy of Kampimodromus hmiminai and Kampimodromus adrianae (Acari: Phytoseiidae): morphological and molecular investigations. Can. J. Zool. 84: 1216-1222. Tixier, M. S. S. Kreiter, B. A. Croft, and B. Cheval. 2008. Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from the USA: morphological and molecular assessment of its density. Bull. Entoml. Res. 98: 125-134. Tseng, Y. H. 1972. Two new species of the mite family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Taiwan. Plant Prot. Bull. 14: 1-7. Tseng, Y. H. 1973. Two new predatory mites from Taiwan (Acarina: Cheyletidae, Phytoseiidae). Plant Prot. Bull. 15: 76-81. Tseng, Y. H. 1975. Systematics of the mite family Phytoseiidae from Taiwan, with a revised key to genera of the world (I). J. Agr. Ass. China New series 91: 44-68. Tseng Y. H. 1976. Systematics of the mite family Phytoseiidae from Taiwan, with a revised key to genera of the world (II). J. Agr. Ass. China New series 91: 85-128. Tseng, Y. H. 1983. Further study on Phytoseiid mites from Taiwan (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Chinese J. Entomol. 3: 33-74. von Vitzthum, H. 1941. Acarina. pp. 764-767. In: H. G. Bronns, ed. Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs 5. Akadem. Verlag, Leipzig. Germany. (in German) Wainstein, B. A. 1962. Revision du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 et systematique de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Berlese, 1916) (Acarina: Parasitiformes). Acarologia 4: 5-30. Walter, D. E. 1999. Review of Australian Asperoseius Chant, Euseius Wainstein, Okiseius Ehara and Phytoscutus Muma (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) with a key to the genera of Australian Amblyseiinae and descriptions of two new species. Aust. J. Entomol. 38: 85-95. Walter, D. E., and J. J. Beard. 1997. A review of the Australian Phytoseiinae (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae). Invertbr. Taxon. 11: 823-860. Walter, D. E., and G. W. Krantz. 2009. Collection, rearing, and preparing specimens. pp. 83-96. In: G.W. Krantz and D. E. Walter Eds. A Manual of Acarology. 3rd. Texa Tech University Press, USA. Wiley, E. O., D. Siegel-Causey, D. R. Brooks, and V. A. Funk. 1991. The Compleat Cladist: a primer of phylogenetic procedures. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Special Publication 19: 1-158. Womersley, B. A. 1954. Species additions to the subfamily Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 2: 169-191. Wu, W. N. 1981. Descriptions of five species of phytoseiid mites from Fujian (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Wuyi Sci. J. 1: 205-213. Wu, W. N. 1997. A review of taxonomic studies of the genus Phytoseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from China. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2: 149-160. Wu, W. N., and Z. O. Li. 1983 Descriptions of four new species of phytoseiid mites and the male of Iphiseius dinghuensis from Fujian Province (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Wuyi Sci. J. 3: 170-176. Wu, W. N., L. R. Liang, and W. M. Lan. 1997. Acari: Phytoseiidae. Economic Insect Fauna of China, Science Press, Beijing, China, 53, 227 pp. (in Chinese) Wu, W. N., and J. F. Ou. The obtusus species group of the genus Amblyseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae), with descriptions of two new species in China. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 6: 101-108. Wu, W. N., J. F. Ou., and J. L. Huang. 2009. Fauna Sinica Invertebrata Vol. 47 Arachnida Acari Phytoseiidae. Science Press. Beijing, China. (in Chinese) Yli-Mattila, T., S. Paavanen-Huhtala, B. Fenton, and T. Tuovinen. 2000. Species and strain identification of the predatory mite Euseius finlandicus by RAPD-PCR and ITS sequences. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 24: 863-880. Zannou, I. D., G. J. de Moraes, E. A. Ueckermann, A. R. Oliveira, J. S. Yaninek, and R. Hanna. 2007. Phytoseiid mites of the subtribe Amblyseiina (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Amblyseiini) from sub-Saharan Africa. Zootaxa 1550: 1-47. Zhang, C. C. 2003. Mites of greenhouses. Identification, biology and control. CABI, UK. 244 pp. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45297 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 植綏蟎科(捕植蟎)(Phytoseiidae) 包含 3 亞科:鈍綏蟎亞科 (Amblyseiinae)、植綏蟎亞科 (Phytoseiinae) 與盲走蟎亞科 (Typhlodrominae)。截至目前為止,全世界已經紀錄超過 2300 種。部分種類是生物防治時常被以應用的捕食性天敵,多能捕食田間植食性的微小害蟲,如葉蟎、節蟎及一些微小的昆蟲,對於農業生態系提供重要的貢獻。因此,自 1960 年代起,植綏蟎就因其生物防治潛力而受到重視,廣被研究。為了能妥善的應用植綏蟎,基礎的分類學研究是不可或缺的。錯誤的鑑定將使得非標的之天敵被釋放於田間,無法確實偵測田間天敵與害蟲之密度,掌握施用時機,甚至在新天敵的開發上均將造成問題。現行分類系統主要是依據背毛的毛相 (chaetotaxy)(排列、長度與形狀)、螯肢鉗 (chelicera chela) 形狀、腹肛板 (ventrianal shield) 形狀與毛相、第 4 對足的巨毛 (macroseta) 相等特徵,而雌性交尾囊在種的鑑定也是十分重要的。在臺灣,關於植綏蟎分類的研究可追溯至1970年代,大多完成於 1983 年之前;迄目前為止,已經記錄 54 種植綏蟎。然而,有許多可著墨之處:1. 多年來關於植綏蟎的調查,偏重於農業耕作區。2. 先前之種類描述多缺乏雄成蟎。3. 有些描述與繪圖可能缺乏晚近重視之特徵。4. 存在同物異名之可能性。6. 筆者判斷臺灣尚有未紀錄之種類。此外,整個科之系統發生史尚未論定。而在植綏螨科中,鈍綏螨族是常見且廣泛分布的類群,因此本研究將從鈍綏蟎族開始進行研究。除了平地外,也加入對山區與離島的調查,形態紀錄上加入足基節毛式 (coxal formula) 與 4 對足的足巨毛相描述,並針對雄蟎進行描述。由採集資料得知禾草綏蟎 (Graminaseius Chant and McMurtry) 與渡綏蟎屬 (Transeius Chant and McMurtry) 為臺灣地區發現之新紀錄屬,彎曲鈍綏蟎 (Amblyseius curvus sp. nov.)、巨趾鈍綏蟎 (A. megadactylus sp. nov.)、新三刺鈍綏蟎 (A. neotrisetosus sp. nov.)、馬唐禾草綏蟎 (Graminaseius digitaria sp. nov.)、高山渡綏蟎 (Transeius altusmontis sp. nov.) 與尖石擬鈍綏蟎 (Paraamblyseius jianshiensis sp. nov.) 為新種,佛氏鈍綏蟎 (A. fletcheri Schicha, 1981)、肯氏鈍綏蟎 (A. keni Schicha, 1987)、武夷鈍綏蟎 (A. wuyiensis Wu & Li, 1983) 3 種為臺灣地區發現之新紀錄種。重新調查後,臺灣地區紀錄之鈍綏蟎族種類自 4 屬 13 種增加至 6 屬 21 種。本研究並以形態上的共衍徵進行支序學之分析,其結果顯示鈍綏蟎族為一單系群,而其內分為兩分支:鈍綏蟎亞族一支、壯綏蟎亞族 (Arrenoseina) + 似前鋸綏蟎亞族 (Proprioseiopsina) 一支。此結果符合現行分類系統與其親緣關係假說;然而僅能解析亞族之關係,屬級以下分支呈現梳狀之情形。本研究另外希望藉以 DNA 之分子資料,釐清江原鈍綏蟎 (A. eharai Amitai & Swirski, 1981)、長尾鈍綏蟎 (A. herbicolus (Chant, 1959)) 與拉哥鈍綏蟎 (A. largoensis (Muma, 1955)) 之親緣關係,研究中選取部分粒線體 (mitochondrial) DNA 之細胞色素氧化酶第一次單元基因 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, COI) 與核醣體核酸基因 (rDNA) 之內轉錄區 (internal transcribed spacer, ITS) 進行比較分析;其結果顯示 ITS 基因在探討近緣種的關係時,有較好的解析度。而 COI 與 ITS 基因之結果顯示江原鈍綏蟎、長尾鈍綏蟎與拉哥鈍綏蟎三者均為單系群,而其分化順序結果並不一致;而江原鈍綏蟎與長尾鈍綏蟎間之形態混合種被認為是屬於長尾鈍綏蟎。最後,由分子結果推斷,胸版末緣有無凹陷用以鑑定江原鈍綏蟎與長尾鈍綏蟎不是穩定之特徵。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The family Phytoseiidae is comprised of three subfamilies Amblyseiinae, Phytoseiinae, and Typhlodrominae. Up to date, more than 2300 species have been recorded. Mites of the family Phytoseiidae are famous biological control agents, which can purnish a strong contribution to agroecosystem. Therefore, phytoseiid mites had draw much attention due to their biological control potential since 1960s, and been studied extensively. In order to study, apply and monitor accurately on the appropriate species, a reliable taxonomy of Phytoseiidae is urgently needed. The current classification system is based on morphological characters, including the dorsal chaetotaxy, shape and dentition of chelicerae, shape and chaetotaxy of ventrianal shield , and macroseta on leg IV. In addition, the morphology of spermatheca is also important in the determination of species. In Taiwan, the taxonomic studies of phytoseiid mites can be traced back to 1970s. Most works were done before 1983. Fifty four species of phytoseiid mites were recorded from Taiwan. Nevertheless, there remains many works to be accomplished: 1. The survey of phytoseiid mites species were mainly carried out in agricultural areas. 2. Males of many species are still unknown. 3. Some works lack descriptions of characters and illustration considered important recently. 4. Possibility of the presence of synonyms. 5. My confidence on the existence of undescribed or unrecorded species in Taiwan. Furthermore, the phylogeny of phytoseiid mites is still not fulls resolved. This study, therefore, chose the tribe Amblyseiini, a large, species rich tribe both in the world and in Taiwan, as the first work to access Phytoseiidae. Mountain areas and offshore Islands were emphasized for collecting specimens. In addition to those characters conventionally described, the macrosetae on legs I-III, the morphology of male spermatodactyl, the setation of the ventrianal shield of adult male mites, and the coxal formula were also described. This study adds two newly recorded genera, Graminaseius Chant and McMurtry and Transeius Chant and McMurtry, five species new to science, Amblyseius curvus sp. nov., A. megadactylus sp. nov., A. neotrisetosus sp. nov., Graminaseius digitaria sp. nov., Transeius altusmontis sp. nov., Paraamblyseius jianshiensis sp. nov., and three newly recorded species, A. fletcheri Schicha, 1981, A. keni Schicha, 1987, A. wuyiensis Wu & Li, 1983 to the fauna of Amblyseiini from Taiwan. Taiwanese Amblyseiini increases from 4 genera 13 species to 6 genera 21 species after this survey. The phylogeny of the tribe Amblyseiini was also reconstructed by synapomorphic characters. The result revealed the tribe Amblyseiini is a monophyletic group, the subtribes within Amblyseiini form two clades, Amblyseiina and Arrenoseiina+Proprioseiopsina. It is congruent with the current classification system and the hypothetic phylogeny. However, the result can only explain the relationship among subtribe. The relationships among genera revelaed by current data is in polytomy. Besides, DNA-based were also performed to investigate the relationship between three closely species, Amblyseius eharai Amitai & Swirski, 1981, A. herbicolus (Chant, 1959), and A. largoensis (Muma, 1955). Two molecular markers were chosen to make the inference, mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and nuclear DNA ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS). ITS provided better resolution than COI for inferring the relationship of related species, but the divergence were incongruent between these two genes. The results revealed these three species are monophyletic assemblages, repectively. The specimens collected with intermediate morph between A. eharai and A. herbicolus belong to A. herbicolus. Therefore, the curvature of posterior margin of sternal shiled is not a stable character for the distinguishment of A. eharai and A. herbicolus. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:12:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98632006-1.pdf: 5357791 bytes, checksum: 19cb1543e8f9b88cead5e7ecc4018f51 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT v CONTENTS vii LIST OF FIGURES xi LIST OF TABLES xvii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Historical taxonomic review 5 2.1 Historical taxonomic research in the family Phytoseiidae 5 2.2 Historical taxonomic research in the tribe Amblyseiini 10 2.3 Historical taxonomic research in the neighboring countries 11 2.3.1 Eastern Asia 11 2.3.2 Southeast Asia 12 2.3.3 Australia 14 2.4 Historical taxonomic research in Taiwan area 14 2.5 Studies of dorsal setation 15 2.6 Molecular taxonomy in the Phytoseiidae 17 Chapter 3 Materials and Methods 19 3.1 Collecting specimens and preparing mounted slides 19 3.1.1 Specimens collection 19 3.1.2 Slide mounting 20 3.1.3 Locality 21 3.1.4 Depository 22 3.2 Terminology and general characteristics of phytoseiid mites 23 3.3 Morphological phylogenetic analysis 33 3.3.1 Taxa sampled 33 3.3.2 Character sampled 33 3.3.3 Phylogenetic analysis by morphological characters 34 3.4 Molecular phylogeny of Amblyseius largoensis and related species 36 3.4.1 DNA extraction 36 3.4.2 Markers used 36 3.4.3 DNA amplification and sequencing 37 3.4.4 Sequence alignment 38 3.4.5 Molecular phylogenetic analyses of Amblyseius largoensis and related species 38 Chapter 4 Results 39 4.1 The tribe Amblyseiini in Taiwan 39 Tribe Amblyseiini Muma, 1961鈍綏蟎族 41 Subtribe Amblyseiina Muma, 2004 鈍綏蟎亞族 43 Genus Amblyseius Berlese, 1914 鈍綏蟎屬 46 Amblyseius alpinia Tseng, 1983 月桃鈍綏蟎 48 Amblyseius bellatulus Tseng, 1983 純潔鈍綏蟎 53 Amblyseius curvus sp. nov. 彎曲鈍綏蟎 57 Amblyseius eharai Amitai & Swirski, 1981 江原鈍綏蟎 62 Amblyseius fletcheri Schicha, 1981 (n. record) 佛氏鈍綏蟎 71 Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant, 1959) 長尾鈍綏蟎 74 Amblyseius keni Schicha, 1987 (n. record) 肯氏鈍綏蟎 82 Amblyseius largoensis (Muma, 1955) 拉哥鈍綏蟎 87 Amblyseius maai Tseng, 1976 馬氏鈍綏蟎 93 Amblyseius megadactylus sp. nov. 巨趾鈍綏蟎 97 Amblyseius neotrisetosus sp. nov. 新三刺鈍綏蟎 102 Amblyseius pascalis Tseng, 1983 牧草鈍綏蟎 107 Amblyseius trisetosus Tseng,1983 三刺鈍綏蟎 109 Amblyseius wuyiensis Wu & Li, 1983 (n. record) 武夷鈍綏蟎 111 Genus Graminaseius Chant and McMurtry, 2004 (n. record) 禾草綏蟎屬 114 Graminaseius digitaria sp. nov. 馬唐禾草綏蟎 115 Genus Transeius Chant and McMurtry, 2004 (n. record) 渡綏蟎屬 120 Transeius altusmontis sp. nov. 高山渡綏蟎 121 Subtribe Arrenosiina Chant and McMurtry, 2004 壯綏蟎亞族 124 Genus Paraamblyseius Muma, 1962 擬鈍綏蟎屬 126 Paraamblyseius formosanus (Ehara, 1970) 臺灣擬鈍綏蟎 127 Paraamblyseius jianshiensis sp. nov. 尖石擬鈍綏蟎 132 Genus Phytoscutus Muma, 1961 植鈍蟎屬 135 Phytoscutus salebrosus (Chant, 1960) 粗糙植盾蟎 137 Subtribe Proprioseiopsina Chant and McMurtry, 2004 似前鋸綏蟎亞族 142 Genus Proprioseiopsis Muma, 1961 似前鋸綏蟎屬 144 Proprioseiopsis asetus (Chant, 1959) 少毛鈍綏蟎 146 Proprioseiopsis ovatus (Garman, 1958) 卵圓鈍綏蟎 150 Proprioseiopsis pubes (Tseng, 1976) 柔毛鈍綏蟎 154 4.2 Higher-level phylogeny by morphological characters 158 4.3 Molecular phylogeny of Amblyseius largoensis and related species 161 4.3.1 Sequence information 161 4.3.2 Phylogenetic analysis of Amblyseius largoensis and related species 161 Chapter 5 Discussion 167 5.1 Tribe Amblyseiini in Taiwan 167 5.1.1 Taxonomy of the tribe Amblyseiini from Taiwan 167 5.1.2 Factors influence distribution of phytoseiid mites 168 5.2 Slide-mounting 171 5.3 Higher-level phylogeny 172 5.4 Molecular phylogeny of Amblyseius largoensis and related species 173 Chapter 6 Conclusion 175 6.1 Taxonomy of the tribe Amblyseiini 175 6.2 Higher-level phylogeny 176 6.3 Molecular analysis in Amblyseius largoensis and related species 177 References 180 Appendix I. Data matrix of the morphological chracters used in the phylogenetic analysis 195 Appendix II. Collection data from Y. H. Tseng 196 Appendix III. Sequence of COI 199 Appendix IV. Sequence of ITS region 200 Appendix V. List of phytoeiid mites in Taiwan area (Tseng, 1983; Ho and Lo, 1989; Ho et al., 2003; Moraes et al., 2004; this study) 202 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 臺灣產鈍綏蟎族之系統分類學研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Systematics of the tribe Amblyseiini (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 何琦琛(Chyi-Cheng Ho) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許洞慶(Tung-Ching Hsu),蕭旭峰(Shiuh-Feng Shiao),徐堉峰(Yu-Feng Hsu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 鈍綏蟎,族,背毛,系統分類,親緣關係,分子分類, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Amblyseiini,dorsal seta,systematics,phylogeny,molecular taxonomy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 204 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.23 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。