請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45290
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃宗儀 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Chien Chung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鍾欣倩 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:12:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-02-04 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-02-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-01-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 2006最佳創新/商業模式讓國人都期待台北101跨年煙火 (2007),遠
見雜誌,2月1日版。 王志弘 (2005) 記憶再現體制的構作:台北市官方城市書寫之分析, 中外文學,33 (9): 10-52。 王志弘譯 (2002) 地租的藝術:全球化、壟斷與文化的商品化,發表 於世新大學蕭宗讓講座:「文化產業與消費-文化、經濟、後現 代」演講講稿,12月10日。 王茜穎 (2006) 擬全球城市中心與邊陲的界線運作與穿越─以信義計 畫區與基隆路整宅為個案,國立臺灣大學地理環境資源研究所碩 士論文。 台北101董事長陳敏薰像世界借光把台北點亮 (2007),遠見雜誌,5 月1日版。 台北101垂直城市1好3多 風水好,酷炫辦公室多、帥哥美女多、跨國 企業菁英多 (2007),工商時報,10月11日版。 成之約 (1998) 淺論「派遣勞動」及其對勞資關係的影響,就業與訓 練,16 (6): 52-56。 李清潭、楊斯琦、冷澤森 (2008) 企業非核心職務人力外包決策因素 及評估之探討,中華管理評論國際學報,11 (2): 1-24。 吳光庭、林芳怡 (1998) 創造高雄天空的翦影─訪李祖原建築師,建 築師,287: 70-71。 我很好強,要做就做到最好 (2004),e天下,12月1日版。 每坪60萬 金主買7戶 (2008),台灣蘋果日報,3月3日版。 周素卿 (2003) 全球化與新都心的發展:曼哈頓意象下的信義計畫 區,地理學報,34: 41-60。 周素卿 (2005) 新企業地景:華人全球城市高層建築的生產與再現, 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,1-82。 周素卿、林潤華 (2008) 與世爭高:台北市高層建築生產的在地脈 絡,都市與計劃,35 (1): 1-28。 林建廷 (2006) 全球在地化之感官經驗及其文化表現:以「台北 101」與「閃亮三姐妹」為例,國立交通大學外國文學與語言研究 所碩士論文。 林靖傑 (2004) 台北幾米,向左走影像工作隊。 柴智屏 (2008) 這裡發現愛,台北:台灣觀光局。 夏鑄九 (1994a) 公共空間,行政院文化建設委員會/策劃出版,台 北:藝術家出版社/執行。 夏鑄九 (1994b) (重)建構公共空間─理論的反省,台灣社會研究季 刊,16: 21-54. 夏鑄九 (2004) 建築巨無霸,逢甲人月刊,141。 黃宗儀 (2004) 都市空間的生產:全球化的上海,台灣社會研究季 刊,53: 61-83. 黃馨儀 (2005) Shopping體驗、Shopping文化:以台北101購物中心 為例,東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。 傅朝卿 (1999) 日治時期台灣建築1895-1945,台北:大地地理。 新西城,新國門 (都市更新篇) (2009),天下雜誌,433: 10。 龍蛇萬華起漲靠更新 (2007),台灣壹週刊,8月9日版。 顧玉玲 (2008) 我們:移動與勞動的生命記事,台北:印刻文學。 Cobb, H. (2004) 市民摩天樓─私有建築於公眾生活的反思,世界建 築,6。 Connerton, P. (1989) 社會如何記憶,納日碧力戈譯,上海:人民 出版社。 COOL<2 ℃ 101秀密碼提倡減碳 (2008),聯合晚報,4月21日版。 Dirlik, A. (2005) 建築與全球現代性、殖民主義以及地方,張歷君 譯,中外文學,34 (1): 24-44。 Discovery (2007) 建築奇觀:台北101大樓 (Man Made Marvels - Taipei 101),台北:采昌國際多媒體。 Banerjee, T. (2001) The future of public space: beyond invented streets and reinvented places, Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (1): 9-24. Barker, C. (2003) Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N. and Malpass, A. (2005) Consuming ethics: articulating the subjects and space of ethical consumption, Antipode, 37 (1): 23-45. Barthes, R. (1964) The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies, New York: Hill and Wang. Bunnell, T. (1999) Views from above and below: the Petronas Twin Towers and/in contesting visions of development in contemporary Malaysia, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 20 (1): 1-23. Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford: Blackwell. Charney, I. (2005) Reflections on the Post-WTC skyline: Manhattan and elsewhere, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29 (1): 172-179. Chen, L.-W. and Shih, C.-M. (2009) The public nature of high-rise buildings in Taiwan, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27: 317-330. Crilley, D. (1993) Megastructures and urban change: aesthetics, ideology and design. In: Knox, P. (ed.) The Restless: Urban Landscape, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 127-164. Domosh, M. (1988) The symbolism of the skyscraper case studies of New York’s first tall buildings, Journal of Urban History, 14 (3): 321-345. Douglass, M. (2006) The globalization of capital cities: civil society and neo-liberal state and the reconstruction of urban space in Asia Pacific. In: Ho, K.-C. and Hsiao, H.-H. M. (eds.) Globalization and Asia-Pacific Capital Cities: Primary and Diversity, Taipei: Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies. RCHSS, Academic Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 28-45. Douglass, M. and Jones, G. (2007) The Rise of Mega-Urban Regions in Pacific Asia, Singapore: Singapore University Press. Durning, A. (1992) How Much is Enough? London: Earthscan. Emporis Corporation (2004) Available from www.emporis.com. Ford, L. R. (1992) Reading the skyline of American cities, Geographical Review, 82: 180-200. Ford, L. R. (1998) Midtowns, megastructures, and world cities, Geographical Review, 88 (4): 528-547. Ford, L. R. (2001) Skyscraper competition in Asia: new city images and new city form. In: Vale, L. J. and Warner, S. B. (eds.) Imaging the City: Continuing Struggles and New Directions, New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, 119-144. Friedmann, J. and Wolff, G. (1982) World city formation: an agenda for research and action, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6 (3): 309-345. Gottmann, J. (1966) Why the skyscraper? Geographical Review, 56 (2): 190-212. Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Haila, A. (1998) The neglected builder of global cities. In: Kalltrop, O., Elander, I., Erisson, O. and Franzen, M. (eds.) Cities in Transformation- Transformation in Cities: Social and Symbolic Change of Urban Space, Aldershot: Ashgate, 51-64. Hall, S. (ed.) (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, London: Sage association with the Open University. Hall, S. and du Gay, P. (eds.) (1997) Production of Culture/ Cultures of Production, London: Sage in association with the Open University. Hartley, J. (1992) The Politics of Pictures: The Creation of the Public in the Age of Popular Media, London: Routledge. Harvey, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Harvey, D. (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Oxford: Blackwell. Harvey, D. (2000) Spaces of Hope, Berkeley: University of California Press. Harvey, D. (2007) Neoliberalism as creative destruction, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610 (21): 22-44. Huang, T.-Y. M. (2004) Walking Between Slums and Skyscrapers: Illusions of Open Space in Hong Kong, Tokyo and Shanghai, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. King, A. D. (1996) Re-Presenting the City: Ethnicity, Capital, and Culture in the 21st-Century Metropolis, New York: New York University Press. King, A. D. (1996) Worlds in the city: Manhattan transfer and the ascendance of spectacular space, Planning Perspectives, (11): 97-114. King, A. D. (2004) Space of Global Culture: Architecture Urbanism Identity, London: Routledge. Kotkin, J. (2002) The New Geography: How Digital Revolution is Reshaping the American Landscape, New York: Random House. Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, Oxford: Blackwell. Libby, B. (2002) Cesar Pelli. Available from www.salon.com. Law, L. (2002) Defying disappearance: cosmopolitan public spaces in Hong Kong, Urban Studies, 39 (9): 1625-1645. LMDC (2002) Lower Manhattan Development Corporation announces design study for the World Trade Center site and surrounding areas. Press Release, 14 August (available from www.renewnyc.com). Lynch, K. (1972) Openness of open spaces. In: Banerjee, T. and Southworth, M. (eds.) City Sense and City Design: Writings and Projects of Kevin Lynch, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 396-412. Marston, S. (1990) Who are the people: gender, citizenship, and the making of the American nation, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8: 449-458. McNeill, D. (2005) Skyscraper geography, Progress in Human Geography, 29 (1): 41-55. Mills, E. (2002) Terrorism and U.S. real estate, Journal of Urban Economics, (51): 198-204. Mitchell, D. (1995) The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85 (1): 108-133. Mitchell, D. (2000) Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell. National Building Museum (2001) The future of skyscrapers. 9 November (available from www.nbm.org). Newholm, T. (1999) Relocating the ethical consumer. In: Norman, R. (ed.) Ethics and the Market, Aldershot: Ashgate, 162-184. Olds, K. (2001) Globalization and Urban Changes: Capital, Culture and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects, London: Oxford University. Paul, D. E. (2004) World cities as hegemonic projects: the politics of global imagineering in Montreal, Political Geography, 23: 571-596. Rodríguez, E. G. (2007) The “hidden side” of the new economy: on transnational migration, domestic work, and unprecedented intimacy, Frontiers, 28 (3): 60-83. Sassen, S. (1996) Whose city is it? globalization and the formation of new claims, Public Culture, 8 (2): 205- 223. Sassen, S. (1998) Globalisation and Its Discontents, New York: New Press. Sassen, S. (2000) Cities in a World Economy, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Sassen, S. (2001) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton University Press. Sassen, S. (2002) Global cities and survival circuits. In: Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild, A. R. (eds.) Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy, New York: Henry Holt and Company, 254-274. Sassen, S. (2007) A Sociology of Globalization, New York: W.W. Norton. Shields, R. (1996) A guide to urban representation and what to do about it: alternative traditions of urban theory. In: King, A. D. (ed.) Re-Presenting the City: Ethnicity, Capital and Culture in the 21st-Century Metropolis, New York: New York University Press, 227- 252. Sturken, M. and Cartwright, L. (2001) Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture, New York: Oxford UP. TenantWise (2003) Available from www.tenantwise.com. Woodward, K. (ed.) (1997) Identity and Difference, London: Sage association with the Open University. Zukin, S. (1991) Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World, Berkeley: University of California Press. Zukin, S. (1992) The city as a landscape of power: London and New York as global financial capitals. In: Budd, L. and Whimster, S. (eds.) Global Finance and Urban Living: A Study of Metropolitan Change, London: Routledge, 195-223. Zukin, S. (2002) Our World Trade Center. In: Sorkin, M. and Zukin, S. (eds.) After the World Trade Center: Rethinking New York City, New York and London: Routledge, 13-22. 台北旅遊網 http://www.taipeitravel.net/tw/mainpage.asp 台北市政府觀光傳播局 http://www.tpedoit.taipei.gov.tw/ 台北市政府都市更新處 http://www.uro.taipei.gov.tw/ 台北101官方網 http://www.taipei-101.com.tw/index.asp 交通部觀光局 http://tourtaiwanyears.net/main1-5.htm 維基百科 http://zh.wikipedia.org/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45290 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文旨在透過台北101摩天樓此類鉅型建築,分析有關它在接合全球化、全球城市之各種的再現與行銷策略,所牽連出與資本發展的矛盾性,回應對於全球化與不均等發展的主要關懷。在亞洲許多城市企圖與世界爭高的模式中,可以發現在作為後殖民時代下的國家,經常會試圖效法第一世界的巨塔建築形式,以建構並強化一種新興的國家自我認同,同時,這也是象徵國家高度的現代化,更試圖擠身全球城市的地位。然而,爭取摩天樓世界第一的地位,在20世紀末、21世紀初的時代下,是大幅縮短了其擁戴世界第一皇冠的頭銜。因此,在這樣的脈絡下,曾為世界第一高的台北101,它的特殊性地位和對於全球化的意義便顯得格外重要。
透過眾多語言和影像所建構的象徵意義與行銷活動,可謂是彩繪摩天樓最佳的化妝師。然而,服膺於全球資本、跨國菁英的巨塔,表面上高度象徵國家進步的發展;但實際上,卻存有更多包括對於權力、階級身分與公共性等問題之省思。因此,本研究將由台北101的不同論述再現,透過對意識形態的批判,來思考摩天樓的文化意義。究竟我們到底需要摩天樓,還是根本不需要,台北101的案例分析,在作為省思摩天樓和資本的發展外,同時,也是一種對整體亞洲藉由興建摩天樓企圖與世界爭高模式的反省。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis attempts to analyze the mega-project of Taipei 101 in terms of its representations and marketing strategy as a skyscraper in the context of globalization and its self-making as a global city. Addressing the underlying contradiction underlying in the capitalistic logic of development as is seen in the case of Taipei 101, this thesis also intends to tackle the implicated correlation between globalization and uneven development. Postcolonialism has clarified that many Asian cities would imitate those located in the “First World” and construct gigantic buildings, so as to constitute and consolidate national identity of the newly formulated nations. With the establishment of towering skyscrapers, these Asian cities can boast of their extent of modernization and invent themselves as global cities. However, the dream of owning the highest building in the world will be end up as an impossible one, in particular so at the end of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first century. The outcome of such “skyscraper race,” that is, the effort to have the tallest structure on earth, is usually the reduction of the time these cities can assert that they are cities with the highest building and hence of the top status in the world. Considering this, an exploration of Taipei 101, once the tallest building in the word, especially its extraordinary status and its relation with globalization and uneven development, will be of specific significance.
The symbolic meanings and marketing strategies created in a plethora of texts can be regarded as the best cosmetician of a given skyscraper. At the superficial level, gigantic towers, whose ideological and material operation pivots upon the global capital and international elites, symbolize the advancement and progress of a given (nation-)state. At the deeper level, they demand a more thorough and critical thinking regarding the interrelationship between power, class, and publicness. Therefore, this thesis will criticize the ideology embedded in the different discourse of Taipei 101 to think the cultural meanings of skyscraper. It is always essential to think over the necessity for a given city to have skyscrapers and highest buildings in the world. In this view, the investigation of Taipei 101 in the thesis suggests not only an examination of the cultural implication of skyscraper and capital development. It also refers to a reflection of the ideological work embedded in the phenomenon of building skyscrapers and “skyscraper race” as is seen in the context of Asia. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:12:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96228004-1.pdf: 2783652 bytes, checksum: 8493d44889a8fbd2a37ea23b3075e1f2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………ⅰ
謝辭…………………………………………………………………ⅱ 中文摘要……………………………………………………………ⅳ 英文摘要……………………………………………………………ⅴ 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機與背景…………………………………………1 第二節 文獻回顧…………………………………………………5 第三節 問題意識……………………………………………… 18 第四節 研究概念與方法……………………………………… 20 第五節 章節安排……………………………………………… 26 第二章 摩天樓作為人造物 (artefact) 的意義:象徵壟斷的 建構…………………………………………………… 27 第一節 無畏911的陰影:亞洲城市摩天樓的熱潮和慾望… 27 第二節 由後殖民城市邁向世界城市:台北101紀念碑的 建造…………………………………………………… 32 第三節 巨神的神話:資本發展的最佳代言人……………… 35 第四節 小結…………………………………………………… 46 第三章 摩天樓與華麗行銷:權力和公共性的探討………… 48 第一節 地標記憶的構築:101跨年煙火晚會…………………48 第二節 誰的摩天樓:為何是一種選擇性的公共論述?…… 54 第三節 BOT精神的消逝:資本家還是最大贏家?……………62 第四節 小結…………………………………………………… 66 第四章 摩天樓與他者再現:階級身分的排他性…………… 69 第一節 《這裡發現愛》:全球城市的想像圖譜………………69 第二節 《台北幾米》:全球化弔詭的資本邏輯………………76 第三節 《我們》:國家發展的不均等和跨國身分的重思……84 第四節 小結…………………………………………………… 98 第五章 結論……………………………………………………100 第一節 研究發現與討論 …………………………………… 100 第二節 研究限制與後續研究方向……………………………104 引用文獻…………………………………………………………106 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 巨神陰影下的台北:摩天樓的再現政治與全球化不均等發展 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Shadow of Shining Tower in Taipei: Representations of
Skyscraper and Uneven Development in Globalization | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李明璁,顏亮一 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 台北101,摩天樓,再現,公共性,道德消費,階級, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Taipei101,skyscraper,representation,publicness,ethical consumption,class, | en |
dc.relation.page | 111 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-01-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 地理環境資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.72 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。