請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44925完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江宜樺(Yi-Hua Jiang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jia-Jing He | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 何佳靜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T03:58:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-05-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-05-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-05-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
壹 中文部份 石元康，1995，〈社群與個體：社群主義與自由主義的論辯〉，《當代》，114：94-104。 江宜樺，1998，《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》，台北市：揚智文化。 余鴻榮譯，2005，《盧騷懺悔錄》，台北市：志文出版社。 林火旺，1995，〈自由主義可否建立一個政治社群？〉，陳秀容、江宜樺（編），《政治社群》，臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書(38)，頁249-270。 林火旺，1998，〈公民身分：認同和差異〉，蕭高彥、蘇文流（編），《多元主義》，臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書(43)，頁379-409。 沈清松，1995，〈盧梭社會契約論的評析：一個奠基性迷思的轉變〉，張福建、蘇文流（編），《民主理論：古典與現代》，臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書(35)，頁51-72。 苑舉正，2008，〈盧梭政治哲學中的倫理基礎〉，「第十一屆儒佛會通暨文化哲學學術研討會：東西政治哲學的交談」論文（3月28日），台北：華梵大學。 張顯超，〈加拿大魁北克省（Quebec）1995年獨立公投研究〉，財團法人台灣民主基金會輔助計畫成果報告：http://www.tfd.org.tw/docs/iri_quebec.pdf。 蕭高彥，1995，〈愛國心與共同體政治認同之構成〉，陳秀容、江宜樺（編），《政治社群》，臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書(38)，頁271-296。 蕭高彥，1997，〈國家認同、民族主義與憲政民主：當代政治哲學的發展與反思〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，26：1-27。 龔尤倩，2006，〈客工制度安魂曲？由台灣與德國客工政策的比較談起〉，「第三屆『跨界流離』國際學術研討會」論文（10月7日），台北市：世新大學社會發展研究所。 貳 英文部份 Abbey, Ruth. 2000. Charles Taylor. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Affeldt, Steven G. 1999. “The Force of Freedom: Rousseau on Forcing to Be Free.” Political Theory 27(3): 299-333. Appiah, K. Anthony. 1994. “Identity, Authenticity, Survival: Multicultural Societies and Social Reproduction.” In Multiculturalism, Examining the Politic of Recognition, ed. Amy Gutmann. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 149-163. Barnard, Friedrich M. 1983. “National Culture and Political Legitimacy: Herder and Rousseau.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44(2): 231-253. Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bloom, Allen. 1979. “Introduction.” Emile, or Education, Trans. Allen Bloom. New York: Basic Books. Bloom, Allen. 1987. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau.” History of Political Philosophy, ed. Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 559-580. Canivez, Patrice. 2004. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Concept of People.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 30(4): 393-412. Cassirer, Ernst. 1989. The Question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Trans. Peter Gay. New Haven : Yale University Press. Cook, Maeve. 1997. “Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas, and the Politics of Recognition.” Political Theory 25(2): 258-288. Cranston, Maurice. 1997. The Solitary Self: Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Adversity and Exile. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Crocker, Lester G. 1995. “Rousseau’s Soi-Disant Liberty.” In Rousseau and Liberty, ed. Robert Wokler. New York : Manchester University Press, pp. 244-66. Cullen, Daniel E. 1993. Freedom in Rousseau's Political Philosophy. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press. Dent, N. 1992. “Absolute and Relative Existence: Man and Citizen in Rousseau.” Convivium : Revista de Filosofia 3(1992): 39-52. Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1991. “Sovereignty, Identity, Sacrifice.” Millennium - Journaal of International Studies 20(3): 395-406. Emberley, Peter. 1984. “Rousseau and the Domestication of Virtue.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 17(4): 731-753. Fierlbeck, Katherine. 1996. “The Ambivalent Potential of Cultural Identity.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 29(1): 3-22. Forbes, H. D. 1997. “Rousseau, Ethnicity and Difference.” In The Legacy of Rousseau, ed. Clifford Orwin and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 220-245. Frazer, Elizabeth. 1999. The Problems of Communitarian Politics : unity and conflict. New York : Oxford University Press. Furet, Francois. 1997. “Rousseau and the French Revolution.” In The Legacy of Rousseau, ed. Clifford Orwin and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 168-182. Hampsher-Monk, Ian. 1995. “Rousseau and Totalitarianism-with Hindsight?” In Rousseau and Liberty, ed. Robert Wokler. Manchester University Press, pp. 267-288. Huddy, Leonie. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity Theory.” Political Psychology 22(1): 127-156. Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Contemporary Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. Levine, Andrew. 1976. The Politics of Autonomy : a Kantian Reading of Rousseau's Social Contract. Amherst : University of Massachusetts Press. Lyshaug, Brenda. 2004. “Authenticity and the Politics of Identity: A Critique of Charles Taylor’s Politics of Recognition.” Contemporary Political Theory 3: 300-320. Maclure, Jocelyn. 2003. “The Politics of Recognition at an Impasse? Identity Politics and Democratic Citizenship.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36(1): 3-21. Marks, Jonathan. 2005. “Misreading One’s Sources: Charles Taylor’s Rousseau.” American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 119-134. Mason, John Hope. 1997. “Originality: Moral Good, Private Vice, Or Self-Enchantment.” In Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the Sources of the Self, ed. Timothy O’Hagan. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 37-55. Masters, Roger. 1997. “Rousseau and the Rediscovery of Human Nature.” In The Legacy of Rousseau, ed. Clifford Orwin and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 110-141. Melzer, M. Arthur. 1990. The Natural Goodness of Man: On the System of Rousseau’s Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Miller, Dale. 2001. “Atomists, Liberals and Civic Republicans: Taylor on the Ontology of Citizenship.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79(4): 465-478. Miller, David. 2000. Citizenship and National Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Morgnstern, Mira. 1996. Rousseau and the Politics of Ambiguity: Self, Culture, and Society. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. Neuhouser, Frederick. 2003. “Rousseau on the Relation between Reason and Self-Love (Amour propre).” International Yearbook of German Idealism, Berlin : Walter de Gruyter, pp. 221-239. Noone Jr., John. 1970. “The Social Contract and the Idea of Sovereignty in Rousseau.” The Journal of Politics 32(3): 696-708. Oldfield, Adrian. 1990. Citizenship and Community: Civic Republicanism and the Modern World. London: Routledge. Oldfield, Adrian. 1994. “Citizenship: An Unnatural Practice.” The Political Quarterly 61(2): 177-189. Polanyi, Michael. 1962. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press. Reisert, Joseph R. 2000. “Authenticity, Justice, and Virtue in Taylor and Rousseau.” Polity 33(2): 305-330. Rempel, Henry D. 1976. “On Forcing People to Be Free.” Ethics 87(1): 18-34. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1960. Polics and the Arts: Letter to M. D’ Alembert on the Theatre. Trans. Allen Bloom. New York: Cornell University Press. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1979a. Emile, or Education. Trans. Allen Bloom. New York: Basic Books. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1979b. Reveries of the Solitary Walker. Trans. Peter France. London: Penguin Books. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997a. The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Trans. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997b. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Trans. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schwarzmental, John. 2003. Citizenship and Identity: Toward a New Republic. New York: Routledge. Shklar, Judith N. 1985. Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau's Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Talmon, Jacob L. 1952. The Origin of Totalitarian Democracy. London: Secker & Warburg Press. Taylor, Charles. 1985a. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, Charles. 1985b. Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, Charles. 1992a. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Morden Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Taylor, Charles. 1992b. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Taylor, Charles. 1994. Multiculturalism: Examining The Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Taylor, Charles. 1995. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Taylor, Charles. 1998. “The Dynamics of Democratic Exclusion.” Journal of Democracy 9(4): 143-156. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44925 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 泰勒認為盧梭在關於政治認同感的議題上，啟發了許多關於政治正當性的討論；但是盧梭對於該認同概念的陳述，卻造成一個相當嚴重的問題—過度強調同質性。為了兼顧個體本真與群體認同二者，泰勒認為將次級文化的議題帶入公共領域，要求社會大眾正視那些支撐、孕育差異個體的少數文化，將是面對這個難題最妥適的方式。
然而筆者認為盧梭理論中所提供的論述，卻能為這個現代性的難題帶來新的啟發。盧梭告訴我們群體認同是在一種持續不斷的互動關係下所形構，這個互動關係蘊含著一個相當重要的概念—一個透過內在反思與外在行動、不斷的在自我與他者之間進行對話的過程。這個過程創造了某種共同感知，將你我共同涵納在其中。我們在這個共識之中不僅看到了自己，也看到了其他個體；我們在這個共同認知形成的過程裡，陳述了自己的看法，也修正了自身的行動。並且逐漸形成一個基於共同感知的社群。 相較之下，泰勒所提供的方案就像未走完的旅程，僅僅停留在「即將邁入」互動關係的前置準備階段，尚未進入對話溝通的過程，因此也就沒有任何能夠提供差異個體相互肯認的根基，也就難以稱之為「肯認」「政治」。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Question concerning how to combine authenticity with commonality is the most important issue on the morden political theory. Charles Taylor offers an original perspective on this problem, based upon his inquisition through Rousseau’s political theory. But Taylor thinks the Rousseauean politics is suspicious of cultural differentiation and receptive to the homogenizing. Is Taylor’s analysis exactly correct? Should a liberal democratic society accept Taylor’s viewpoint? As this thesis dedicated to inquiry, Rousseau maybe gives another perspective on this tendency. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T03:58:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R94322026-1.pdf: 1308374 bytes, checksum: 54124f534705c851ee020e69fe75bfc2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 序論______________________________________________________________1
壹 前言__________________________________________________________________1 貳 當代民主社會的問題____________________________________________________1 參 泰勒筆下的盧梭________________________________________________________5 肆 文獻回顧_____________________________________________________________14 伍 本文論旨_____________________________________________________________17 陸 章節安排_____________________________________________________________19 第二章 泰勒—身份認同與民主的排他性_____________________________________21 壹 前言_________________________________________________________________21 貳 身份認同與意義視界___________________________________________________23 參 需要獲得肯認_________________________________________________________28 肆 民主的排他性_________________________________________________________33 伍 肯認政治_____________________________________________________________39 陸 小結_________________________________________________________________42 第三章 盧梭—激動人心的慾望與個體認同的重塑_____________________________43 壹 前言_________________________________________________________________43 貳 「絕對的存在」抑或「相對的存在」_____________________________________44 參 激動人心的慾望—「自重」_____________________________________________47 肆 個體認同的重塑_______________________________________________________54 伍 以共識為基礎的政治社群_______________________________________________58 陸 小結_________________________________________________________________62 第四章 盧梭與泰勒的對話_________________________________________________63 壹 前言_________________________________________________________________63 貳 社群—個體自我理解的參照基準_________________________________________64 參 相互肯認的內涵—差異與同一___________________________________________67 肆 政治權威的角色_______________________________________________________72 伍 共同認知的形成—從「個體本真」邁向「群體共融」_______________________76 陸 小結_________________________________________________________________79 第五章 結論—肯認作為一種政治行動_______________________________________81 參考文獻 _______________________________________________________________83 壹 中文部份_____________________________________________________________83 貳 英文部份_____________________________________________________________84 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 認同 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共通性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 本真性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 泰勒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 盧梭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | COMMONALITY | en |
| dc.subject | IDENTITY | en |
| dc.subject | AUTHENTICITY | en |
| dc.subject | CHARLES TAYLOR | en |
| dc.subject | JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU | en |
| dc.title | 真摯的自我與共融的群體如何並存—試從盧梭與泰勒的理論觀之 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | How to Combine Authenticity with Commonality- by inquiring theories of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Charles Taylor | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭高彥(Carl K.Y. Shaw),蔡英文(Ing-wen Tsai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 盧梭,泰勒,本真性,共通性,認同, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU,CHARLES TAYLOR,AUTHENTICITY,COMMONALITY,IDENTITY, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 89 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-05-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。