請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44866完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林世銘 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsiao-Yi Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡孝宜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T03:56:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-06-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-06-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王建煊,「租稅法」30版,2006年8月,文笙書局。
2. 吳瑞源,最低稅負制之隱稅及盈餘管理效果之研究,2009年,成功大學會計學系博士論文。 3. Allen, R. G., and H. J. Iglarsh. 1996. A cluster analysis of horizontal tax equity. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 18 (Spring): 31-46. 4. Anderson, K. E. 1985. A horizontal equity analysis of the minimum tax provisions: An empirical study. The Accounting Review 60 (July) 8: 657-371. 5. Anderson, K. E. 1988. A horizontal equity analysis of the minimum tax provisions: 1976-1968 tax acts. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 10 (Fall): 6-25. 6. Aronson, J. R and P. J. Lambert. 1994. Decomposition the Gini coefficient to reveal the vertical, horizontal and reranking effects of income effects of income taxation. National Tax Journal 47 (June): 273-294. 7. Atkinson, A. B. 1980. Horizontal equity and the distribution of the tax burden. The Economics of Taxation, edited by H. J. Aron, and M. J. Boskin, 3-18. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution. 8. Enis, C. R., and D. L. Craig. 1990. An empirical analysis of equity and efficiency attributes of degressive forms of a flat tax. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 11 (Spring): 17-33. 9. Feldstein, M. 1976. On the theory of tax reform. Journal of Public Economics 6: 77-104. 10. Grasso, L. P., and P. J. Frischmann. 1992. Measuring horizontal equity: A regression approach. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 14 (Fall): 123-133. 11. Iyer, G. S., and A. Seetharaman. 2000. An evaluation of alternative procedures for measuring horizontal equity. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 22 (Spring): 123-133. 12. King, M. 1983. An index of inquality with applications to horizontal inequity and social mobility. Econometrica 51 (January): 99-115. 13. Musgrave, R. A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. 14. Pierce, B. J. 1989. Homeowner preferences: The equity and revenue effects of proposed changes in status quo. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 10 (Spring): 54-67. 15. Plotnick, R. 1981. A measure of horizontal inequity. Review of Economics and Statistics 63: 283-288. 16. Plotnick, R. 1982. The concept and measurement of horizontal inequity. Journal of Public Economics 17: 373-391. 17. Ricketts, R. C. 1990. Social security growth versus income tax reform: An analysis of progressivith and horizontal equity in federal tax systems in the 1980s. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 11 (Spring): 34-50. 18. U.S. Congress, Congressional Budget Office, Reducing the Deficit: Spending and Revenue Options (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984). 19. Westort, P. 2001. Measuring variation in tax liability among economics equals. Advances in Taxation 13: 169-203. 20. Westort, P. J., and J. M. Wagner. 2002. Toward a better measure of horizontal equity. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 24 (Spring): 17-28. 21. White, M., and A. White. 1965. Horizontal inequity in federal income tax treatment of homeowners and tenants. National Tax Journal (September): 225-239. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44866 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 我國自95年1月1日起施行「所得基本稅額條例」。最低稅負制之實施目的,係為使適用租稅減免規定而繳納較低所得稅負或甚至免稅之公司或個人,至少負擔一定比例之所得稅,可兼顧既有產業或社會政策,並適度減緩過度適用租稅減免規定造成的不公平。本文以最低稅負制實施前後各一年為比較標的,分析比較最低稅負制實施前後之租稅公平性,包含租稅水平公平程度和租稅垂直公平程度。
本文以台灣經濟新報資料庫(TEJ)之93年、96年兩年度的上市、櫃公司財務報告相關資料為研究樣本,並選用租稅負擔變異係數比值(Coefficient of Variation Ratio)作為租稅水平公平之衡量工具;Gini係數作為租稅垂直公平衡量工具。本文研究結果顯示,最低稅負制實施後之各區間租稅水平公平程度,大多優於最低稅負制實施前之情形;而以整體稅制而言,最低稅負制實施後亦較實施前更具有租稅水平公平。在租稅垂直公平程度方面,本文之結果亦顯示,最低稅負制實施後之整體租稅垂直公平程度,優於最低稅負制實施前之情形。本文之研究結果可作為我國政府過去租稅政策成效之回顧以及未來相關租稅政策制定時之參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Taiwan has adopted the Income Basic Tax Act since January 1st 2006. The purpose of the new income tax system is to make the companies or individuals, who only pay little or even negative income taxes because of tax relief, have at least a certain percentage of the income tax burden. Therefore, the Income Basic Tax Act could appropriately mitigate the unfairness caused by tax relief. The main objective of the thesis is to examine the horizontal equity and the vertical equity of the Income Basic Tax Act. The thesis chooses one year before the Income Basic Tax Act and one year after that as the research sample periods to compare and analyze.
Using“CV ratio” (Coefficient of Variation Ratio) as the horizontal equity measure and the Gini coefficient as the vertical equity measure, the thesis analyzes the data of the listed companies and the OTC companies from the 2004 and from the 2007 finacial reports collected by Taiwan Economics Journal (TEJ) to measure the horizontal equity and the vertical equity of income tax systems before and after the Income Basic Tax Act. The findings indicate that the tax system after the Income Basic Tax Act is more horizontally equitable than that before the Income Basic Tax Act in most income levels and for the whole tax system. The findings also indicate the tax system after the Income Basic Tax Act yields more vertical equity than that before the Income Basic Tax Act. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T03:56:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97722003-1.pdf: 588888 bytes, checksum: 371a0616cfe7c2c3d9b9ad693edb5250 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程與架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 租稅公平原則 6 第二節 租稅水平公平原則 7 第三節 租稅水平公平衡量工具 8 第四節 租稅垂直公平原則 14 第五節 租稅垂直公平衡量工具 15 第六節 最低稅負制 19 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 租稅水平公平衡量工具之選擇 23 第二節 租稅垂直公平衡量工具之選擇 30 第三節 研究資料之年度選擇 31 第四節 觀察值之篩選 32 第五節 變異係數比值之計算 34 第六節 區間分布情形 37 第四章 研究結果 53 第一節 水平公平實證結果(區間寬度不同) 53 第二節 水平公平比較與分析(區間寬度不同) 58 第三節 水平公平實證結果(區間寬度相同) 61 第四節 水平公平比較與分析(區間寬度相同) 66 第五節 垂直公平實證結果 69 第五章 結論與建議 73 第一節 結論 73 第二節 建議 78 參考文獻 80 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | Gini係數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 最低稅負制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 租稅水平公平 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 租稅垂直公平 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 變異係數比值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Horizontal equity | en |
| dc.subject | Gini coefficient | en |
| dc.subject | Coefficient of variation ratio | en |
| dc.subject | Vertical equity | en |
| dc.subject | Income Basic Tax Act | en |
| dc.title | 對最低稅負制實施前後之租稅公平性分析之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Analysis of Horizontal and Vertical Equity of the Alternative Minimum Tax | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃美祝,陳國泰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 最低稅負制,租稅水平公平,租稅垂直公平,變異係數比值,Gini係數, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Income Basic Tax Act,Horizontal equity,Vertical equity,Coefficient of variation ratio,Gini coefficient, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 81 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-06-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 575.09 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
