Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44789
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃?莉(Li-Li Huang)
dc.contributor.authorHsiao-Ping Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃筱蘋zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T03:54:58Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-20
dc.date.copyright2010-07-20
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-06-28
dc.identifier.citation阿蓋爾 (Argyle, M ., Monika, H., 1985/1996)。「人際關係剖析」(苗延威譯)。臺北:巨流出版。
危芷芬(2001)。「華人的關係類型與人際義務」。台灣大學心理研究所博士論文。
派頓(Patton., Michael., Quinn., 1995)。「質的評鑑與研究」(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。臺北:桂冠出版。
孫俊才、盧家楣( 2009 )。大學生情緒社會分享的公眾觀。「心理科學」,32(1):201-203。
陳向明(2002)。「社會科學質的研究」。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
陳皎眉(2004)。「人際關係與人際溝通」。台北:雙葉書廊。
彭泗清、楊中芳(1999)。人際交往關係的影響因素與發展過程。見楊國樞(主編)「本土心理學研究」,第十二期,頁291-311。台北:台灣大學本土心理學研究室。
黃光國(1988)。人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。見黃光國(主編)「中國人的權力遊戲」,頁7-55。台北:巨流圖書公司。
黃囇莉(1999/2006)。「人際和諧與衝突-本土化的理論與研究」。台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
黃囇莉、許詩淇(2006)。虛虛實實之間: 婆媳關係的和諧化歷程與轉化機制。「中華心理學刊」,25,3-45。
楊中芳(1999)。人際關係與人際情感的構念化。見楊國樞(主編)「本土心理學研究」,第十二期,頁105-179。台北:台灣大學本土心理學研究室。
楊中芳(2001)。人際關係與人際情感的構念化。見楊中芳(主編)「中國人的人際關係、情感與信任」,頁337-370。台北:遠流出版公司。
楊宜憓(1999)。「台灣大學生的情緖經驗與社會關係」。台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。
楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦(主編)「中國人的心理與行為-1992理念與方法篇」,頁87-142。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
麥斯威爾(Maxwell, J. A , 1996/2001)。「質化研究設計─一種互動取向的方法」(高薰芳、林盈助、及王向葵譯)。台北:時報文化。
董定儀(2009)。「保持距離,以策安全?友誼間的親密到疏離」。佛光大學心理研究所碩士論文。
Allan, G.A.(1979). A sociology of friendship and kinship, London: Allen & Unwin.
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: the development of interpersonal relationship. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1054-1068.
Antonuucci, T.C., & Akiyama. H.(1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of convoy model. The gerontologist, 27, 519-527.
Aronson, E., & Linder, D.(1965).Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness, Journal of Experimental social psychology, 1,156-72.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G.(1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A.(1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad Is Stronger Than Good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship an early adolescence. Child Development, 53(6): 1447-1460.
Berscheid, E. (1985).Interpersonal attraction.In G. Lindzey and E.Aronson(eds.).Handbook of Social Psychology(pp. 413-481). New York: Random House.
Berg, J. H., & Clark, M. S.(1986). Differences in social exchange between intimate and other relationships: Gregually evolving or quickly apparent? In V J. Derlega & B A. Winstead (Eds). Friendship and social interaction(pp.101-124).New York: Spring Verlag.
Bliszner, R., & Adams,R.G.(1992).Adult friendship, Newbury Park, Calif. : Sage Publications.
Bond, M. H. (1993). Emotions and their expression in Chinese culture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17, 245-262.
Brownell, A., & Schumaker, S. A.(1984). Social support: an introduction to a complex phenomenon. Journal of social issue, 40, 1-10.
Byrne, D. E.(1971). The attraction paradigm, New York: Academic Press.
Caplan, G. (1974). Support systems and community mental health. New York. NY, Behavioral publications.
Cassel, J. (1976). The contribution of the social environment to host resistance .American Journal of Epideomiology, 65, 971-991.
Clore, G.L., & Byrne, D.(1970).A reinforcement model of attraction. In T.I Huston(Ed.),Foundation of Interpersonal Attraction(pp. 143-170). New York:Academic Press,
Christophe, V., & Rime, B. (1997). Exposure to the social sharing of emotion: Emotional impact, listener responses and secondary social sharing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(1): 37-54.
Cozby, P. C. (1973). Self-disclosure-Literature review, Psychological Bulletin, 79(2): 73-91.
Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A metaanalytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3): 457-475.
Curci, A., & Bellelli, G. (2004). Cognitive and social consequences of exposure to emotional narratives: Two studies on secondary social sharing of emotions.Cognition & Emotion, 18(7): 881-900.
Curtis, R. C., & Miller, K. (1986). Believing another likes or dislikes you- Behaviors making the beliefs come true. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2): 284-290.
Derlega, V. J., Margulis, S. T., & Winstead, B. A. (1987). A social-psychologicla analysis of self-disclosure in psychotherapy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5(2), 205-215.
Derlega, V.D., Metts, S., Petronio, S., Margulis, S.T.(1993).Self -disclosure. London: Sage publication.
DeVito, J. A.(2003).The interpersonal communication book(10th ed.), New York: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Dion, K. K., & Berscheid, E. (1974) .Physical attractiveness and peer perception among children, Sociometry, 37,1-12.
Dolgin, K. G., Meyer, L., & Schwartz, J. (1991). Effects of gender, target’s gender, topic, and self-esteem on disclosure to best and middling friends. Sex Roles, 25, 311–329.
Duck, S.(1991). Friends, for life : the psychology of personal relationships .New York ; London : Harvester Wheatsheaf,
Duck, S. W., & Craig, G. (1978). Personality similarity and development of friendship-longitudinal study. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17(SEP), 237-242.
Dwyer, D.(2000).Interpersonal relationships, London ; New York : Routledge.
Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 207-283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Fehr, B. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2): 265-284.
Finkenauer, C., & Rime, B. (1998). Keeping emotional memories secret: Health and subjective well-being when emotions are not shared. Journal of Health Psychology, 3(1): 47-58.
Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228-245.
Galton, M., Gray, J., & Ruddock, J. (2003). Transfer and transitions in the middle years of schooling (7-14): Continuities and discontinuities in learning. (DfES Research Report No. 443). London: DfES.
Graham, S. M., Huang, J. Y., Clark, J.Y., & Helgeson, V. S. (2008). The positives of negative emotions: Willingness to express negative emotions promotes relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(3): 394-406.
Harber, K. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1992). Overcoming traumatic memories. In S. A. Christianson(Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory(pp.359-387). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994)Emotion Contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hays, R. B.(1985). A longitudinal study of friendship developement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48, 909-924.
Hays, R. B. (1988). The day-to-day functioning of close versus casual friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 21–37.
Homans, G. C.(1961). Social Behavior, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Hustain, A., & Kureshi, A. (1983). Value similarity and friendship – A study of interpersonal attraction. Psychological, 26(3): 167-174.
Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J.E., & Hodge, C. N.(1995).Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quartely, 58, 108-122.
Johnson, A. J., Wittenberg, E., Villagran, M. M., Mazur, M., & Villagran, P. (2003). Relational progression as a dialectic: Examining turning points in communication among friends. Communication Monographs, 70(3), 230-249.
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36(3): 306-312.
Kanyangara, P., Rime, B., Philippot, P., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Collective rituals, emotional climate and intergroup perception: Participation in 'Gacaca' tribunals and assimilation of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 63(2), 387-403.
Kelly, A. E. & McKillop, K. J. (1996). Consequences of revealing personal secrets. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3): 450-465.
Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238-1251.
Lea, M., & Duck, S. (1982). A model for role of similarity of values in friendship development. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21(NOV), 301-310.
Luminet, O., Bouts, P., Delie, F., Manstead, A. S. R., & Rime, B. (2000). Social sharing of emotion following exposure to a negatively valenced situation. Cognition & Emotion, 14(5), 661-688.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. ( 2002). A Comparison of Methods to Test Mediation and Other Intervening Variable Effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.
Mikulincer, M., & Floian, V. (2001).Attachment style and effect regulation-implications for coping with stress and mental health, In G. J. O. Fletcher& M. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: interpersonal process(pp.537-557). Oxford, UK: Blackwell publisher.
Mikulincer, M., & Nachshon, O.(1991). Attachment style and self-disclosure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61, 159-179.
Moore, S., & Boldero, J. (1991). Psychological development and friendship functions in adolescence. Sex Roles, 25(9-10), 521-536.
Monsour, M. (1992). Meaning of intimacy in cross- and same-sex friendships. Journal of social and personal relationships, 9, 277-95.
Morton, T. L., & Douglas, M. A.(1981).Growth of relationships. In S. Duck &R. Gilmore(Eds.), Personal relationships2: Developing personal relationships(pp.3-26). New York: Academic press.
Murstein, B. I. (1977). The stimulus-value-role theory of dyadic relationships. In S. Duck(ed.). Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction(pp. 105–127.). London: Academic Press.
Nehamow, L., & Lawton, M.P.(1975).Similarity and propinquity in friendship formation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 32(2), 204-213.
Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children's friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306-347.
Omarzu, J.(2000). Adisclosure Decision model: determining how and when individual will self-disclosure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2): 174-185.
Parks, M. R. & Floyd, K. (1996). Meanings for closeness and intimacy in friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(1): 85-107.
Pennebaker, J. W., Zech, E. & Rima, B. (2001). Disclosing and sharing emotion: Psychological, social, and health consequences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Peters-Golden, H. (1982).Breast cancer: varied perceptions of social support in the illness experience. Social science and medicine, 16, 483-491.
Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001). Calculation for the Sobel Test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. [http://www.people.ku.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm].
Pronin, E., Fleming, J. J., & Steffel, M. (2008). Value revelations: Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 795-809.
Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Rime , B., Mesquita, B., Philippot, P., & Boca, S. (1991). Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on social sharing of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 435-465.
Rime, B. (2007). The social sharing of emotion as an interface between individual and collective processes in the construction of emotional climates. Journal of Social Issues 63(2): 307-322.
Rime, B., Finkenauer, C., Luminet, Q., Zech, E., & Philippot,P. (1998). Social sharing of emotion: New evidence and new questions. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol.9, pp. 145-189). Chichester: Wiley.
Rime , B., Philippot, P., Boca, S., & Mesquita, B.(1992). Long-lasting cognitive and social consequences of emotion: Social sharing and rumination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol.3, pp. 225-58). Chichester: Wiley.
Rosenbaum,M. E.(1986). The repulsion hypothesis: on the nondevelopement of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1156-1166.
Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment process in close relationships – an interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175-204.
Seeman, T. E.(1996). Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Annals of Epidemiology, 6, 442-451.
Simpson, J. A.(1990).Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology ,59, 971-980.
Struthers, N. J., & Johnson, J. T. (1991). Self-disclosure and the secret self-The impact of disclosure on inferences of covert emotionality. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(4), 843-858.
Suttles, G. (1970). Friendship as a social institution. In G.J. McCall, N.K. Genzin, G.D. Suttles,& S. Kurth(Eds.),Social relationships(pp.95-135).Chicago: Aldine.
Swenson, L. M., Nordstrom, A., & Hiester. M. (2008). The Role of Peer Relationships in Adjustment to College. Journal of College Student Development, 49(6): 551-567.
Thibaut, J.W., & Kelly, H.H.(1959).The Social Psychology of Groups, New York: Wiley.
Thoits, P. A.(1984).Coping, social support, and psychological outcomes. In P. Shaver(Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 5. (pp.219-238). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H . (2006). Cultural Variation in Affect Valuation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90(2): 288-307.
Ueno, U., & Adams, R. G.(2006). Adult friendship: a decade review. In P. Noller & J A. Feeney(Eds). Close relationships: function, form, processes (pp. 152-169). New York: Psychology Press.
Vangelisti, A.L.(1994). Family secrets: forms, functions and correlates. Journal of personal and social relationships, 11, 113-135.
Zajonc, R.B.(1968).Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality(Monograph Suppl.,Pt.2).1-29.
Zech, E., & Rime, B. (2005). Is talking about an emotional experience helpful? Effects on emotional recovery and perceived benefits. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12(4), 270-287.
Zech, E., Rime, B., & Nils, N. (2004). Social sharing of emotion, emotional recovery, and interpersonal aspects. In P. Philippot & R S. Feldman(Eds). The regulation of emotion.(pp.157-185). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44789-
dc.description.abstract過去對友誼發展的研究多採社會滲透論,認為互動雙方在日常接觸中隨著時間由淺到深互相自我揭露,在揭露過程中彼此的親近感慢慢增加,友誼也逐步增進。然而黃囇莉(1999/2006)揭示了華人友誼中虛性和諧的部份。在虛性和諧中的朋友彼此心中暗藏著不滿或不合,可能在生活中行禮如儀、互稱朋友,卻沒有主動親近對方、深化兩人關係的意願,平常的溝通互動也只停留在表面層次,若以自我揭露理論來看,虛性和諧的友誼似乎只停留且凍結在虛化狀態中。本論文進行三個研究,試圖探討Rime(1991)所提出的「社會情緒分享」──個人產生情緒後自動對週遭關係對象進行分享──這種近乎自然反應的現象,並理解其對友誼關係的影響,進而探討情緒分享使虛性和諧友誼破冰的可能性及要件。
前導研究主要目的在檢驗華人文化下情緒分享的基本現象,且探討實/虛性和諧友誼中情緒分享模式的異同,以及情緒分享是否影響分享後之友誼關係變化。研究採問卷施測,以383位大學生為對象。結果顯示:情緒分享不論在實/虛性關係中都會發生,且各種情緒都會分享,也會影響分享後之友誼關係變化。實/虛性和諧友誼之情緒分享模式大致相近,但實性和諧朋友中情緒分享的頻率顯著高於虛性關係中的朋友。研究二針對前導研究結果中分享頻率較低的虛性和諧中的情緒分享現象,以深度訪談進行質化研究。結果發現,虛性和諧中的情緒分享能化解虛性和諧中的不合部分,使原先的虛性友誼「歸零」,且歸零過程涉及分享時的「共享秘密感」。因此,本論文再進行研究三,以進一步檢驗情緒分享對關係變化之影響。研究三以問卷方式進行實驗故事操弄,以四種情緒如悲傷、快樂、內疚、喜歡之分享為獨變項,以無情緒分享為控制組,檢驗不同情緒與分享前之實虛性關係對分享後關係變化的影響。另外,也檢驗研究二中「共享秘密感」作為影響分享後關係變化之中介效果。研究結果顯示,再次確認情緒分享能使分享後關係變好,且這樣的效果受到先前關係實/虛性和諧的調節。另外,也確認在虛性和諧中,負向情緒對分享後關係變化的影響是以「共享秘密感」為中介因子,而正向情緒則未以此為中介。
綜合三個研究結果得知,主動分享方出於宣洩情緒的衝動,在偶然機會下會對虛性和諧朋友進行情緒分享,雖然在分享時並未想要藉此改變兩人關係,然而對接受分享方而言,這樣的情緒分享卻促使兩人關係解凍,因接受方對分享方產生同理,改變先前的不良印象,且出現「共享秘密感」,令傾向負面的關係回到沒有心結的原點,兩人不再抗拒親近,雙方在後續的相處中慢慢往實性和諧的友誼邁進。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMost researches on friendship usually followed the “Social Penetration Theory” that considers the interacting dyad progressively disclose their selves each other in daily interaction and gradually develop intimacy. Huang’s theory (1999/2006) suggests paying attention to superficial harmonious side of friendship. Friends under superficial harmony may conceal their disagreements and not really like each other, even they call the other as “a friend”. They also won’t be willing to get close to each other voluntarily. According to self-disclosure theory, the superficial friendship seems to stay in this state forever. But is it really true? This thesis including 3 studies tries to exam whether the automatic process of “social sharing of emotion” (Rime, 1991) may result in a change or a breakthrough under superficial harmony friendship.
In Study 1, questionnaires were completed by 383 Taiwanese college students. The results of data analysis showed that the social sharing of emotion really happened in both superficial and genuine harmony friendships in Chinese society and different type of harmony had the same sharing pattern. All kinds of emotion were shared and then affect the friendship quality after sharing. Study 2 aimed at the emotion sharing in superficial harmony that showing lower frequency in study 1 and used in-depth interview as method for qualitative study. The finding proposed that emotion sharing in superficial friendship could diminish the superficial part in relationship, brought the superficial friendship “back to the origin”. Besides, that process involved “feeling of secret sharing”. In order to further exam the findings in previous two studies, experimental method were used in study 3. The experimental stories included manipulated four emotions, such as sadness, joy, guilt, affection, and one control condition of non emotion sharing. The results indicated that friendship quality was affected by emotion sharing and the change was moderated by previous harmony type. Furthermore, in superficial friendship, the effect of negative emotion sharing on friendship quality was mediated by “feeling of secret sharing”, but positive emotion sharing was not the same.
In conclusion, when encountering emotional arousal, someone may share one’s emotion with a superficial friend by accident, even one may not intend to improve the relationship during the time of sharing. That is, this sharing will let the receiver suppose that the relationship has became better, and then creates a kind of “secret- sharing feeling ” between them which make their negative relation back to the origin, and makes their friendship follow the ideal process like penetration theory suggests, and finally progresses from superficial harmony to genuine harmony.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T03:54:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R96227119-1.pdf: 835033 bytes, checksum: fcf904cf8b463cc22ce5cdfc4a32772c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝............................................................... i
中文摘要...........................................................iii
英文摘要........................................................... v
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 西方的友誼研究.............................................2
1.1 朋友的定義..................................................2
1.2 友誼的發端..................................................3
1.3 友誼形成的原因..............................................5
1.4 友誼的發展歷程..............................................6
第二節 華人的友誼.................................................8
2.1 華人的友誼觀................................................8
2.2 人際關係的實/虛性和諧......................................10
2.3 虛性和諧的友誼關係.........................................11
第三節 社會情緒分享論............................................13
3.1 社會情緒分享的對象.........................................16
3.2 不同情緒的分享.............................................17
3.3 社會情緒分享對人際關係的影響...............................17
第四節 研究目的..................................................19
第二章 實徵研究與結果
前導研究 台灣大學生之情緒分享現象 21
第一節 方法......................................................22
第二節 結果......................................................25
第三節 討論......................................................38
第三章 虛性和諧中的情緒分享之質性研究(研究二) 43
第一節 方法......................................................43
第二節 結果......................................................48
第三節 討論......................................................64
第四章 促成關係改變的中介因子之檢證(研究三) 69
第一節 方法......................................................70
第二節 結果......................................................73
第三節 討論......................................................86
第五章 綜合討論....................................................91
參考文獻...........................................................97
附錄一 前導研究問卷A版..........................................107
附錄二 前導研究問卷B版..........................................113
附錄三 研究三問卷................................................117
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title破冰之旅――虛性和諧友誼中的情緒分享zh_TW
dc.titleA Journey to Icebreaking:Emotion Sharing in Superficial Friendshipen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉奕蘭,王叢桂
dc.subject.keyword社會情緒分享,虛性和諧,友誼,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordsocial sharing of emotion,superficial harmony,friendship,en
dc.relation.page121
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2010-06-28
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:心理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
815.46 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved