請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44621完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chih-Jui Yu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 于志睿 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T03:51:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-07-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王裕順，(2004)，臺灣地區家犬數目變化趨勢及其原因探討，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學獸醫學研究所，臺北。
2. 周樺暄，(2009)，寵物共生理念落實於臺灣住宅環境之探討，碩士論文，國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所，臺北。 3. 高俊雄，(1993)，休閒參與體驗形成之分析，戶外遊憩研究，6(4)，1-12。 4. 高俊雄，(1995)，休閒利益三因素模式，戶外遊憩研究，8(1)，15-28。 5. 高俊雄、溫景財，(1998)，臺灣職業棒球選手休閒參與與自覺訓練效果之研究，戶外遊憩研究，11(4)，43-57。 6. 高俊雄，(1999)，運動員休閒參與、休閒利益與自覺訓練效果之比較研究，戶外遊憩研究，12(3)，43-61。 7. 高美芝，(2007)，從休閒效益角度看伴侶動物對銀髮族的影響，碩士論文，世新大學觀光學研究所，臺北。 8. 莊碧玉，(2007)，我國「寵物公園」民營化可能性之研究－以非營利組織與政府部門合作為例，碩士論文，南華大學非營利事業管理研究所，嘉義。 9. 陳中雲，(2001)，國小教師休閒參與、休閒效益與工作滿意之關係研究，碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所，臺北。 10. 楊姮稜，(2002)，畜主對畜犬行為發展之影響研究，博士論文，國立臺灣大學獸醫學研究所，臺北。 11. 塗紫吟，(2008)，探討家犬服從訓練與社會化課程對飼主休閒生活之效益，碩士論文，臺北市立體育學院休閒與運動管理研究所，臺北。 12. 詹勝利，(1995)，臺灣地區家戶寵物飼養之初步調查，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學公共衛生學研究所，臺北。 13. 潘麗雯，(2006)，動物輔助休閒活動影響照護機構老人身心健康之研究，碩士論文，國立體育學院休閒產業經營學研究所，桃園。 14. 蔡珮芸，(2005)，都市公園之寵物犬活動區設置研究－以臺北市大安森林公園使用者為調查對象，碩士論文，銘傳大學媒體空間設計研究所，臺北。 15. 蘇美玲、林晏州，（1999），都市公園使用者休閒態度之研究-以台北市大安森林公園為例，戶外遊憩研究，12(1)，61-86。 16. 鐘瓊珠，(1998)，大專運動員休閒行為之研究─以國立臺灣體專專長學生為例，碩士論文，國立體育學院教練研究所，桃園。 17. 行政院農委會，(2010)，各縣市犬貓統計，下載日期：20010/03/20，取自：http://animal.coa.gov.tw/html。 18. Ajzen, I. (1991). Benefits of leisure: A social psychological perspective. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. & Peterson, G. L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 411-418). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 19. Anderson, W. P. (1992). Pet ownership and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Medical Journal of Australia, 157(5), 298-301. 20. Bright, A. D. (2000). The role of social marketing in leisure and recreation management. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 12-17. 21. Brown, S. G., & Rhodes, G. M. (2006). Relationship among dog ownership and leisure-time walking in western Canadian adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 131-136. 22. Cutt, H., Giles-Corti, B., Knuiman, M., & Burke, V. (2007). Dog ownership, health and physical activity: A critical review of the literature. Health & Place, 13(1), 261-272. 23. Cutt, H., Giles-Corti, B., & Knuiman, M. (2008). Encouraging physical activity through dog walking: Why don't some owners walk with their dog. Preventive Medicine, 46(2), 120-126. 24. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass. 25. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: HarperCollins. 26. Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J., & Peterson, G. L. (1991). Benefits of leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc. 27. Driver, B. L. (1997). The defining moment of benefits. Parks & Recreation, 32(12), 38-41. 28. Edwards, V., & Knight, S. (2006). Understanding the psychology of walkers with dogs: New approaches to better management. London: The Kennel Club. 29. Friedmann, E., Katcher, A. H., Lynch, J. L., & Thomas, S. (1980). Animal companions and one year survival of patients after discharge from a coronary care unit. Public Health Reports, 95(4), 307-312. 30. Goodale, T. (1993). Parks and recreation. Vital Speeches of the Day, 59(20), 632-637. 31. Godbey, G. (1999). Leisure in your life: An exploration, State college. PA: Venture Publishing, Inc. 32. Hamilton-Smith, E. The construction of leisure. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. & Peterson, G.L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 445-450). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 33. Ho, C., Sasidharan, V., Elmendorf, W., Willits, F. K., Graefe, A., & Godbey, G. (2005). Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation and perceived benefits. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(3), 281-306. 34. Kelly, J. R. (1991). Sociological perspectives on recreation benefits. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P.J. & Peterson, G. L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 419-422). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 35. Kobelt, A. J., Hemsworth, P. H., Barnett, J. L., & Coleman, G. J. (2003). A survey of dog ownership in suburban. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 82(2), 137-148. 36. Lewis, D. E., & Kaiser, H. F. (1991). Managerial needs for information on benefits of leisure. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. & Peterson, G. L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 21-24). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 37. Laurier, E., Maze, R., & Lundin, J. (2006). Putting the dog back in the park: Animal and human mind-in-action. Mind, Culture & Activity, 13(1), 2-24. 38. Lee, H., Mardelle, S., & Huang, C. (2009). Evaluation of off-leash dog parks in Texas and Florida: A study of use patterns, user satisfaction, and perception. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(3), 314-324. 39. Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row. 40. Mannel, R. C., & Stynes, D. J. (1991). A retrospective: The benefits of leisure. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. & Peterson, G. L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 461-473). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 41. McPherson, B. D. (1991). Aging and leisure: A life cycle perspective. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. & Peterson, G. L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 423-430). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 42. McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 61-70. 43. McNicholas, J., Gilbey, A., Rennie, A., Ahmedzai, S., Dono, J-A., & Ormerod, E. (2005). Pet ownership and human health: A brief review of evidence and issues. British Medical Journal, 331(7527), 1252-1254. 44. McGraw, C. (2007). Dog ownership and physical activity. Primary Health Care, 17(2), 30-30. 45. Orthner, D. K., & Mancini, J. A. (1991). Benefits of leisure for family bonding. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. & Peterson, G. L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 289-302). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 46. Philipp, S. F. (1997). Race, gender, and leisure benefits. Journal of Leisure Science, 19(3), 191-207. 47. Rolston, H. (1991). Creation and recreation: Environmental benefits and human leisure. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. & Peterson, G. L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 393-406). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 48. Roberts, R. (2007). A walk in the park. Parks & Recreation, 42(1), 50-53. 49. Serpell, J. (1991). Beneficial effects of pet ownership on some aspects of human health and behaviour change. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84(12), 717-720. 50. Thorpe, R. J., Simonsick, E. M., Brach, J. S., Ayonayon, H., Satterfield, S., Harris, T. B., Garcia, M., & Kritchevsky, S. B. (2006). Dog ownership, walking behavior, and maintained mobility in late life. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(9), 1419-1424. 51. White, S. (1993). The tourism/wellness connection. Parks & Recreation, 28(9), 1-4. 52. Wankel, L. M., & Berger, D. J. (1991). The personal and social benefits of sport and physical activity. In Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J. & Peterson, G. L. (Eds), Benefits of leisure, (pp. 121-144). Stage College, PA: Venture Publishing. 53. Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital? Social Science & Medicine, 61(6), 1159-1173. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44621 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 許多文獻已提出人們因伴侶動物陪伴所獲得之益處，然而針對遛狗活動者從事遛狗活動所獲效益之瞭解甚少，因此本研究旨在探討遛狗活動者從事遛狗活動之休閒效益並進行問卷調查。本研究所探討之休閒效益包含均衡生活體驗、健全生活內涵及提升生命品質三個構面。在將收集之數據以獨立樣本t檢定及單因子變異數分析等統計方法進行分析後，發現在休閒效益的感受方面，遛狗活動者之整體休閒效益感受頗高，其中以均衡生活體驗最高，而提升生命品質的感受最低。研究結果並可發現不同性別、遛狗活動時間、主要活動及共同活動犬體型之遛狗活動者，在部份休閒效益感受上均有顯著差異。其中女性及遛狗活動時間較久之遛狗活動者在均衡生活體驗及健全生活內涵效益上，皆有較高之感受。此外亦發現主要活動不同之遛狗活動者在提升生命品質效益感受上有顯著差異，即遛狗時主要活動為和狗遊戲之遛狗活動者在提升生命品質效益上感受較高。另一方面結果亦顯示共同活動犬體型不同之遛狗活動者在健全生活內涵及提升生命品質效益感受上有顯著差異，即與中大型犬共同活動之遛狗活動者在健全生活內涵及提升生命品質效益上感受較高。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Researchers have demonstrated clear benefits to people in their relationships with companion animals. However, little is known about how dog walkers may benefit from walking their dogs. The purpose of the current research was to investigate potential leisure benefits to dog walkers when walking their dogs and it was conducted via questionnaires, and the leisure benefits of the current research contain three categories: balancing living experiences, promoting the wellness of lifestyle, and enhancing the quality of life. Collected data have been analyzed through Descriptive Statistical Analysis, independent sample t-test, and One-way ANOVA. Research results showed leisure benefits experienced by dog walkers were high. The greatest was balancing living experiences, while the lowest was enhancing the quality of life. Parts of leisure benefits were significantly different among dog walkers who have different gender, the durations of dog-walking, main activities and body-sized dogs. That means the balancing living experiences and promoting the wellness of lifestyle parts of leisure benefits experienced by dog walkers who are female and had longer duration of dog-walking were higher. In addition, dog walkers who carried out different main activities while walking the dog showed a significant difference in experienced enhancing the quality of life part of leisure benefits. That means enhancing the quality of life part of leisure benefits experienced by dog walkers who played with dogs while walking the dog were higher. Finally, dog walkers who walked different body-sized dogs showed a significant difference in experienced promoting the wellness of lifestyle and enhancing the quality of life parts of leisure benefits. That means promoting the wellness of lifestyle and enhancing the quality of life parts of leisure benefits experienced by dog walkers who walked medium-sized or big-sized dogs were higher. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T03:51:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97628305-1.pdf: 1023707 bytes, checksum: 19357b07010dcb1d7782e3bcbe189544 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 遛狗活動之探討 5 第二節 休閒效益之探討 14 第三節 文獻回顧總結 36 第三章 研究方法與設計 37 第一節 研究架構與研究假設 37 第二節 資料收集程序與資料分析 43 第四章 結果與討論 51 第一節 基本描述分析 51 第二節 個人背景特性與休閒效益之關係 66 第三節 活動參與特性與休閒效益之關係 72 第四節 研究結果與討論 81 第五章 結論與後續研究方向 87 第一節 結論 87 第二節 公園中遛狗活動區之建議 89 第三節 後續研究之建議 91 參考文獻 93 附錄一 99 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 遛狗活動休閒效益之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Leisure Benefits of Dog-walking | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 歐聖榮,顏家芝,陳惠美,沈立 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 休閒,休閒效益,遛狗活動,遛狗活動者,犬, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Leisure,Leisure benefits,Walking dogs,Dog walkers,Dogs, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 100 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 999.71 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。