請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44427
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 徐則謙 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Te Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳韋德 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:56:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aitken, Brian J. and Harrison, Ann E. (1999), “Do domestic firms benefit
from direct foreign investment? evidence from venezuela”, American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–618. Aw, Bee Yan, Chung, Sukkyun, and Roberts, Mark J (2000), “Productivity and turnover in the export market: Micro-level evidence from the republic of korea and taiwan (china)”, World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 65–90. Baldwin, Richard and Robert-Nicoud, Fre’de’ric (2004), “The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity: A comment”, Technical Report 4634, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. Baldwin, Richard E. and Robert-Nicoud, Fre’de’ric (2008), “Trade and growth with heterogeneous firms”, Journal of International Economics, 74(1), 21 – 34. Bernard, Andrew and Wagner, Joachim (2001), “Export entry and exit by german firms”, Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 137(1), 105–123. Bernard, Andrew B., Jensen, J. Bradford, and Schott, Peter K. (2006), “Survival of the best fit: Exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of u.s. manufacturing plants”, Journal of International Economics, 68(1), 219–237. Bernard, Andrew B., Redding, Stephen J., and Schott, Peter K. (2007), “Comparative advantage and heterogeneous firms”, Review of Economic Studies, 74(1), 31–66. Chaney, T. (2005), “Productivity overshooting: The dynamic impact of trade opening with heterogeneous firms”, Technical report, University of Chicago. Clerides, Sofronis K., Lach, Saul, and Tybout, James R. (1998), “Is learning by exporting important? micro-dynamic evidence from colombia, mexico, and morocco”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 903–947. Delgado, Miguel A., Farinas, Jose C., and Ruano, Sonia (2002), “Firm productivity and export markets: a non-parametric approach”, Journal of International Economics, 57(2), 397–422. Feenstra, Robert C. (2003), “A homothetic utility function for monopolistic competition models, without constant price elasticity”, Economics Letters, 78(1), 79–86. Ghironi, Fabio and Melitz, Marc J. (2005), “International trade and macroeconomic dynamics with heterogeneous firms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, (120), 865–915. Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan (1991), “Innovation and growth in the global economy”, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Helpman, Elhanan and Krugman, Paul R. (1985), “Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the international economy”, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Helpman, Elhanan, Melitz, Marc J., and Yeaple, Stephen R. (2004), “Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms”, American Economic Review, 94(1), 300–316. Hicks, John (1932), “The theory of wages”, London: Macmillan. Hsu, Tsechien (2009), “Heterogeneous producers with a homothetic utility function and endogenous elasticity”, Technical report, Department of Economics in National Taiwan University. Krugman, Paul (1980), “Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade”, American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–59. Lo’pez, Ricardo A. (2005), “Trade and growth: Reconciling the macroeconomic and microeconomic evidence”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(4), 623–648. Melitz, Marc J. (2003), “The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity”, Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. Melitz, Marc J. and Ottaviano, Giancarlo I. P. (2008), “Market size, trade, and productivity”, Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 295–316. Pavcnik, Nina (2000), “Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from chilean plants”, NBER Working Papers 7852, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44427 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本篇文章結合產品數量之研發模型與異質性廠商, 探討開放貿易時, 對經濟成長
及資源如何在產業和廠商之間移轉的影響。結果顯示在長期本國會完全專業化 生產及研發在有比較利益的產業, 同時此產業會完全獨占整個全球市場。另外當 貿易壁壘降低時, 雖然會帶動整個產業的平均生產力增加, 但卻會使得產品研發 速度下降, 因此降低經濟成長。但是若做開放貿易前後的比較靜態分析, 開放後 仍是讓產業的平均生產力增加, 同時產品研發速度會加快, 經濟成長因此提高。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | We embed the product innovation process and heterogeneous firms
model into the Heckscher-Ohlin model to discuss what is the impact of trade on growth, resource reallocations between firms, sectors and countries. One novelty of this model is that trade can possibly endogenously generates hysteresis effect,that is, a country complete specialize in the industry it has comparative advantage. Although trade liberalization improves the average productivity in a level, it harms it in a dynamic growth as Baldwin and Robert-Nicoud (2008) present. However, moving from autarky to costly trade, we show the possibility that not only the average productivity increases in a level due to the Melitz’s effect, but the pro-growth effect overwhelmingly dominates the negative effect of trade on growth in comparative advantage industry. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:56:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96323002-1.pdf: 499326 bytes, checksum: bcbd18381aad29eac1031848257f43f9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
1 Introduction 1 2 Closed Economy 3 2.1 Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3 Research Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.4 Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.4.1 Zero Profit Cuts-Off Condition . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.4.2 Free Entry Condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.4.3 Factor Market Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.5 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3 Free Trade 11 3.1 Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.2.1 The Properties of the Free Trade Equilibrium . . . 13 3.2.2 From Autarky to Free Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4 Costly Trade 18 4.1 Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5 Numerical Analysis 23 5.1 Productivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.2 Growth Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.3 Average Productivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 5.4 Wage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.5 Welfare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6 Conclusion 29 Appendices 30 A Numerical Setup 30 B Figure 31 Reference 36 List of Figures 1 Productivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2 Growth Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3 Time Path of Growth Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 4 Time Path of Average Measured Productivity . . . . . . . 32 5 Wage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 6 Real Wage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 7 Composite Good . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 8 Time Path of Composite Good . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 磁滯效應與異質性廠商 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Hysteresis and Heterogeneous Firms | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 毛慶生,陳虹如,黃俞寧 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 異質性廠商,磁滯,經濟成長,比較利益,貿易, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | hesteresis,heterogeneous firms,growth,comparative advantage,trade, | en |
dc.relation.page | 36 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 487.62 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。