請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44322
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林居正(Jiu-Jenq Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Ju Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 洪承儒 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:51:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-09-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bang, MD, Deyle, GD. Comparison of supervised exercise with and without manual physical therapy for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000; 30(3): 126-37.
Bigliani, LU, Levine, WN. Subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79(12): 1854-68. Brox, JI, Staff, PH, Ljunggren, AE, Brevik, JI. Arthroscopic surgery compared with supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome). BMJ 1993; 307(6909): 899-903. Cook, KF, Roddey, TS, Gartsman, GM, Olson, SL. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Flexilevel Scale of Shoulder Function. Med Care 2003; 41(7): 823-35. Deyo, RA, Centor, RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39(11): 897-906. Fischer, JE, Bachmann, LM, Jaeschke, R. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29(7): 1043-51. Fu, FH, Harner, CD, Klein, AH. Shoulder impingement syndrome. A critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (269): 162-73. Ginn, KA, Cohen, ML. Exercise therapy for shoulder pain aimed at restoring neuromuscular control: a randomized comparative clinical trial. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37(2): 115-22. Hagen, MD. Test Characteristics. How good is that test? Prim Care 1995; 22(2): 213-33. Hay, EM, Thomas, E, Paterson, SM, Dziedzic, K, Croft, PR. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy for the treatment of new episodes of unilateral shoulder pain in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62(5): 394-9. Jaeschke, R, Guyatt, G, Sackett, DL. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271(5): 389-91. Kirkley, A, Alvarez, C, Griffin, S. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clin J Sport Med 2003; 13(2): 84-92. Kuhn, JE. Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: A systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008. Laudner, KG, Stanek, JM, Meister, K. The relationship of periscapular strength on scapular upward rotation in professional baseball pitchers. J Sport Rehabil 2008; 17(2): 95-105. Lin, JJ, Hanten, WP, Olson, SL, Roddey, TS, Soto-quijano, DA, Lim, HK, Sherwood, AM. Functional activity characteristics of individuals with shoulder dysfunctions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2005; 15(6): 576-86. Lin, JJ, Yang, JL. Reliability and validity of shoulder tightness measurement in patients with stiff shoulders. Man Ther 2006; 11(2): 146-52. Ludewig, PM, Borstad, JD. Effects of a home exercise programme on shoulder pain and functional status in construction workers. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60(11): 841-9. Ludewig, PM, Cook, TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther 2000; 80(3): 276-91. Lukasiewicz, AC, McClure, P, Michener, L, Pratt, N, Sennett, B. Comparison of 3-dimensional scapular position and orientation between subjects with and without shoulder impingement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1999; 29(10): 574-83; discussion 584-6. McClure, PW, Bialker, J, Neff, N, Williams, G, Karduna, A. Shoulder function and 3-dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and after a 6-week exercise program. Phys Ther 2004; 84(9): 832-48. McClure, PW, Michener, LA, Karduna, AR. Shoulder function and 3-dimensional scapular kinematics in people with and without shoulder impingement syndrome. Phys Ther 2006; 86(8): 1075-90. McGinn, TG, Guyatt, GH, Wyer, PC, Naylor, CD, Stiell, IG, Richardson, WS. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000; 284(1): 79-84. Michener, LA, Boardman, ND, Pidcoe, PE, Frith, AM. Scapular muscle tests in subjects with shoulder pain and functional loss: reliability and construct validity. Phys Ther 2005; 85(11): 1128-38. Michener, LA, McClure, PW, Karduna, AR. Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003; 18(5): 369-79. Michener, LA, Walsworth, MK, Burnet, EN. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 2004; 17(2): 152-64. Moser, JS, Barker, KL, Doll, HA, Carr, AJ. Comparison of two patient-based outcome measures for shoulder instability after nonoperative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008. Neer, CS, 2nd. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (173): 70-7. Roy, JS, Moffet, H, Hebert, LJ, Lirette, R. Effect of motor control and strengthening exercises on shoulder function in persons with impingement syndrome: A single-subject study design. Man Ther 2008. Sackett, DL. The rational clinical examination. A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. JAMA 1992; 267(19): 2638-44. van der Windt, DA, Koes, BW, Boeke, AJ, Deville, W, De Jong, BA, Bouter, LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. Br J Gen Pract 1996; 46(410): 519-23. van der Windt, DA, Koes, BW, de Jong, BA, Bouter, LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54(12): 959-64. Vecchio, P, Kavanagh, R, Hazleman, BL, King, RH. Shoulder pain in a community-based rheumatology clinic. Br J Rheumatol 1995; 34(5): 440-2. Walther, M, Werner, A, Stahlschmidt, T, Woelfel, R, Gohlke, F. The subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder treated by conventional physiotherapy, self-training, and a shoulder brace: results of a prospective, randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13(4): 417-23. Winters, JC, Sobel, JS, Groenier, KH, Arendzen, HJ, Meyboom-de Jong, B. Comparison of physiotherapy, manipulation, and corticosteroid injection for treating shoulder complaints in general practice: randomised, single blind study. BMJ 1997; 314(7090): 1320-5. Wu, G, van der Helm, FC, Veeger, HE, Makhsous, M, Van Roy, P, Anglin, C, Nagels, J, Karduna, AR, McQuade, K, Wang, X, Werner, FW, Buchholz, B. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 2005; 38(5): 981-992. Yang, JL, Chang, CW, Chen, SY, Lin, JJ. Shoulder kinematic features using arm elevation and rotation tests for classifying patients with frozen shoulder syndrome who respond to physical therapy. Man Ther 2007. Yang, JL, Lin, JJ. Reliability of function-related tests in patients with shoulder pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006; 36(8): 572-6. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44322 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 肩峰下夾擠症候群在活動量大的族群有很高的發生率,並且常伴隨疼痛與肩關節功能損失。患者對接受物理治療並不是都有好的療效,治療的策略可能因病患不同而有所差異。因此鑑別哪些肩峰下夾擠症候群病患適合作物理治療,以及了解哪些肩胛運動學與機能損傷特性的改變與降低疼痛和功能進步有相關是很重要的。本實驗目的有二 : (一) 找出哪些肩胛運動學與機能損傷的特性,與肩峰下夾擠症候群病患接受物理治療有成效有關係。本實驗將利用修改後的臨床預測規則來檢視,是否肩胛運動學與機能損傷的特性和肩峰下夾擠症候群病患接受物理治療成效有關係。(二) 看哪些肩胛運動學與機能損傷特性,在治療前後的改變與物理治療成功有相關,來解釋物理治療的機制。本實驗徵招33位肩峰下夾擠症候群病患,治療前接受三維肩胛運動學、機能損傷(包括關節活動度、肌力與自述式肩關節功能評估)。所有個案均接受六周每周兩次標準物理治療,完成治療後再作與治療前相同的評估。病患進步與否使用綜合評估改變量表(global rating of change scale)。肩胛運動學與機能損傷參數先使用獨立t 檢定找出預測影響進步因素,在合併於多變量預測模式。結果三個預測進步參數為:肩功能評估量表分數(FLEX-SF score)小於41分,前距肌肌力小於27.4%體重,和手臂未拿重物情況下,肩外展30度時肩胛內轉角度小於0.7度。而若前距肌肌力進步6.16%體重以及肩功能評估量表分數增加兩分,是決定病患進步的重要指標。總結來說,肩胛運動學和機能損傷特性可以預測肩峰下夾擠症候群接受物理治療的成效。此預測方法的驗證仍有待未來進一步研究。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS) associated with pain and a loss of function has a high occurrence in the physically active population. Not all patients responded positively to physical therapy. The purposes of the study were 2-folds: (1) to identify the shoulder kinematic and impairment of the patients who are more likely to response to physical therapy. Specifically, this study used a prediction method modified from a clinical prediction rule to establish the method of outcome prediction after physical therapy in patients with SAIS. (2) To determine which changes of impairments pre and post treatment among patients are related to the successful outcome for SAIS. Thirty-three subjects presenting SAIS were studied to determine altered shoulder kinematics and impairments. Three measurements were collected: (1) three-dimensional scapular kinematics during performing functional tasks; (2) impairment measurements of range of motion and muscle force; and (3) self-reported measurements of pain, satisfaction, and function. All patients received 6 weeks (2 times per week) physical therapy. After intervention, all the measurements will be collected again. Improvement with treatment was determined using the Global Rating of Change Scale. Scapular kinematics and impairment measurements were first identified by t-test in predicting improvement and then combined into a multivariate prediction method. A prediction method with three variables (FLEX-SF score < 41, muscle power of serratus anterior < 27.4% body weight, degree of scapular internal rotation at 30° shoulder flexion during lowing arm phase in unloading condition < 0.7°) were identified. For determinating improvement, serratus anterior increased 6.16% body weight, and FLEX-SF improved 2 points were more valuable. It appears that scapular kinematics and impairment features may predict improvement in subjects with SAIS. Prospective validation of the proposed prediction method is needed to further investigated. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:51:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96428011-1.pdf: 15001625 bytes, checksum: b29afa23d72e595f1381e5784d524af6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
致謝 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT V NATURE OF THE STUDY 1 Background 1 Statement of the problem 3 Purposes of the study 4 LITERATURE REVIEW 6 Definition of the subacromial impingement syndrome 6 Stages of subacromial impingement syndrome 6 Prevalence of subacromial impingement syndrome 7 Etiology of subacromial impingement syndrome 7 Intrinsic impingement 7 Extrinsic impingement 8 Factors of the extrinsic (mechanical) theory 8 Altered scapular kinematics in SAIS 8 Faulty posture: spine, shoulder 12 Posterior shoulder tightness 13 Rotator cuff musculature dysfunction 15 Scapular musculature dysfunction 16 Physical therapy of subacromial impingement syndrome 16 Exercise in SAIS 17 METHODS 20 Design 20 Subjects 20 Inclusion criteria 20 Exclusion criteria 21 Procedure 21 Three-dimensional scapular kinematics 23 Impairment measures 24 Self-report measures 26 Intervention 28 Data analysis 29 RESULTS 32 Basic data 32 Three-dimensional scapular kinematics 32 Impairment measures 32 Prediction results 33 Changes of kinematic and impairment variables associated with improvement 34 DISCUSSION 35 CONCLUSION 41 REFERENCE 42 FIGURE 46 Figure 1- Abduction in the scapular plane test 46 Figure 2- Axes and rotations used to describe scapular orientation and position 47 Figure 3- Range of Motion 48 Figure 4- External rotation strength 49 Figure 5- internal rotation strength 50 Figure 6- Shoulder abduction strength 51 Figure 7- Lower trapezius strength 52 Figure 8- Serratus anterior strength 53 Figure 9- Posture 54 Figure 10- Posterior shoulder tightness 55 TABLE 56 Table 2 -Treatment outcome of physical therapy in SAIA- muscle force 59 Table 3- Treatment outcome of physical therapy in SAIA-shoulder function 61 Table 4 -Demography of subjects 64 Table 5-Scapular kinematics- posterior tipping 65 Table 6- The changes between post-treatment and pre-treatment of scapular kinematics - posterior tipping 66 Table 7- Scapular kinematics- upward rotation 67 Table 8- The changes between post-treatment and pre-treatment of scapular kinematics - upward rotation 68 Table 9- Scapular kinematics- internal rotation 69 Table 10- The changes between post-treatment and pre-treatment of scapular kinematics- internal rotation 70 Table 11 -Impairment measure included ROM, muscle force, posture, shoulder 71 posterior tightness and self reports. 71 Table 12 –The change scores between post-treatment and pre-treatment of impairment measure 72 Table 13 Sensitivity and specificity statistics (with 95% confidence intervals) of predicting variables 73 Table 14 A prediction method 74 Appendix I. Treatment protocols 75 Appendix II. The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index 85 Appendix III. Flexilevel Scale of Shoulder Function 88 Appendix IV. Informed consent form 92 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 肩峰下夾擠症候群病患之肩胛運動學與機能損傷特性:預測接受物理治療之成效 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Scapular Kinematic and Impairment Features in Patients with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: Outcome Prediction after Physical Therapy | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹美華,徐阿田,林永福,王亭貴 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 肩峰下夾擠症候群,物理治療,動作學,機能損傷, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Subacromial impingement syndrome,Physical therapy,Kinematic,Impairment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 14.65 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。