請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44027完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 左正東(Chen-dong Tso) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-peng Liang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 梁毅鵬 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:36:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | “A U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement”, 2003, PNAC
Memorandum. Blumenthal, Dan and Gary Schmitt, 2005, Don’t Belittle Taiwan’s Effort to Defend Itself, Asian Wall Street Journal, September 2. Blumenthal, Dan and Gary Schmitt, 2005, Lien’s Trip Takes Taiwan Down the Wrong Path, Asian Wall Steet Journal, Apr. 27. Bolton, John R., 1998, Welcome Back, Taiwan, New Jersey Law Journal/ PNAC, June 29. Bork, Ellen, 2003, No Exceptions for Democracy in China, PNAC Memorandum, Nov. 15. Bork, Ellen, 2004, Asian Blues: Why the Problem of China Will not Go Away, The Weekly Standard, July 19. Bork, Ellen, 2005, “One China, One Taiwan”, The Weekly Standard, December 19. Clarke Halper, 2004, America Alone, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. Dietrich, John W., 2005, The George W. Bush Foreign Policy Reader: Presidential Speeches with Commentary, New York: M.E. Sharp, Inc. Donnelly, Tom, 2000, China and Containment, PNAC Memorandum, September 27. Donnelly, Tom, 2001, China, Memorandum, PNAC, Oct. 18. Donnelly, Tom, 2002, China’s Persecution Complex, The Weekly Standard, Feb. 4. Ehrman, John, 1995, The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs 1945-1994, New Haven and London, Yale University Press. Eisendrath, Craig R. and Melvin A. Goodman, 2004, Bush League Diplomacy: How the Neo-conservatives are putting the World at Risk, New York: The Prometheus Books. Friedberg, Aaron L., 2000, Asian Allies: True Strategic Partners, Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy, San Francisco: Encounter Books. Friedberg, Aaron L., 2007, Are we Ready for China?, Commentary, October. Friedman, Murray, 2005, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Fukuyama, Francis, 2006, America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy, New Haven and London, Yale University Press. Gold, Philip, 2004. Take Back the Right: How The Neocons and the Religious Right Have Betrayed the Conservative Movement, New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers. Halper, Stefan and Jonathan Clarke, 2004. America Alone: the Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hurst, Steven, 2005, Myths of Neoconservatism: George W. Bush’s Neo-conservative Foreign Policy Revisited, UK, Manchester Metropolitan University, International Politics, 2005, 42, (75-96). Kagan, Robert and William Kristol, 1998, Stop Playing by China’s Rules, The New York Times, June 22. Kagan, Robert, 1999, The Price of Engaging China, The New York Times, January 15. Kagan, Robert and William Kristol, 1999, Clinton’s Sorry Excuse for a China Policy, The Weekly Standard, March 22. Kagan, Robert, 1999, China’s No. 1 Enemy, The New York Times, May 11. Kagan, Robert and William Kristol, 2000, Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy, San Francisco: Encounter Books. Kagan, Robert, 2001, The World and President Bush, Survival, Vol. 43, No 1, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, Spring, pp. 7-16. Kagan, Robert, 2001, China’s Game of Chicken, The Washington Post, March 12. Kagan, Robert, 2001, Carrot and Stick, Szechuan Style, The Weekly Standard, March 26. Kagan, Robert, 2001, We Lost, The Washington Post, April 13. Kagan, Robert, 2001, A National Humiliation, The Weekly Standard, April 16. Kagan, Robert, 2001, Bush’s Straight Talk on China, The Washington Post, April 30. Kagan, Robert, 2003, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Kagan, Robert and William Kristol, 2003, “Stand by Taiwan”, Weekly Standard, December 30. Kaplan, Lawrence F. and William Kristol, 2003. The War over Iraq: Saddam’s Tyranny and America’s Mission, San Francisco: Encounter Books. Kirlpatrick, Jeane, Neoconservatism as a Response to the Counter-culture, The Neocon Reader, New York: Grove Press. Kristol, Irving, 1995. Neo-Conservatism: the Autobiography of an Idea: Selected Essays 1949-1995. New York: The Free Press. Kristol, Irving, 2003, The Neoconservative Persuation: What it was, and what it is, The Neocon Reader, New York: Grove Press. Kristol, William, 1999, Free Taiwan, The Weekly Standard, July 26. Kristol, William, 1999, The Present Danger, The Weekly Standard, August 23. Kristol, William, 1999, Pressuring Taiwan, Appeasing Beijing, The Weekly Standard, August 2. Kristol, William, 1999, China, PNAC Memorandum, November 12. Kristol, William, 2001, Taiwan Arms Sale, PNAC Memorandum, April 24. Kristol, William, 2001, Embrace Taiwan, The Washington Post, Dec. 4. Kristol, William, 2003, President Bush’s Meeting with Chinese President Hu, PNAC Memorandum, Jun. 4. Kristol, William, 2003, Taiwan’s President on the “One China” Policy, PNAC Memorandum, Oct. 7. Kristol, William and Gary Schmitt, 2003, A Dangerous New Policy Toward Taiwan?, Memorandum of the Project of the New American Century, December 2. Kristol, William, Robert Kagan and Gary Schmitt, 2003, “U.S.-China-Taiwan Policy”, Memorandum of the Project for the New American Century, December 9. Kristol, William and Ellen Bork, 2004, “The Bush Administration, Taiwan and China”, Memorandum of the Project for the New American Century, February 10. Kristol, William, 2004, “The Taiwan Relations Act: The Next Twenty-five Years”, Testimony at the Committee on International Relations, U.S. House of Representatives, April 21. Lagon, Mark, 1998, Taiwan’s Strait Talk, The Washington Times, October 28. Lagon, Mark, 1999, Taiwan Gets Bold: What the United States Should do, National Review/ PNAC, August 9. Mann, James, 2000. About Face, New York: Vintage Books. Mann, James, 2004.” Rise of the Vulcans: the History of Bush’s War Cabinet”, New York, Penguin Group. Mastel, Greg, 2003, “A U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement”, 2003, Washington D.C.: Project for the New American Century, October 09. Muravchik, Joshua, 2004, The Neoconservative Cabal, The Neocon Reader, New York: Grove Press. Muravchik, Joshua, 2007, The Past, Present, and Future of Neo-conservatism, Commentary Magazine, October. Murray, Douglas, 2006, “Neoconservatism: why we need it”, New York, Encounter Books. Munro, Ross H., 2000, China: The Challenge of Rising Power, Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy, San Francisco: Encounter Books. Pan Chengxin, 2006. “Neoconservatism, US-China Conflict, and Australia’s great and powerful friends’ dilemma”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 19 No.4 December 2006: 429-448. “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces, and Resources for a New Century”, 2000, Washington, D.C., Project for the New American Century, September. Rumsfeld, Donald, 1998, Strategic Imperatives in East Asia, Heritage Lecture, March 3. Rosen, Gary, 2007, My Short March Through China, Commentary, December. Samples, John, 2004, The Rise and Fall of Conservative Reform in the United States: George W. Bush and the Transformation of the Reagan Legacy, Asia-Pacific Review, Vol. 11, No 2, Institute for International Policy Studies. Scheunemann, Randy and Dan Blumenthal, 2005, “Tense Straits”, National Review Online, January 27. Schmitt, Gary, 1997, U.S.-China Policy, PNAC Memorandum, November 4. Schmitt, Gary, 1998, Is this a Successful China Policy? The Washington Times, May 4. Schmitt, Gary, 1999, U.S.-China Policy, PNAC Memorandum, June 21. Schmitt, Gary, 1999, China, PNAC Memorandum, July 27. Schmitt, Gary and Tom Donnelly, 2000, Arms and Taiwan: Our Interests Lie with Theirs, The Washington Post, April 23. Shmitt, Gary, 2001, Bush’s First Foreign Policy Test, The Wall Street Journal, April 3. Shmitt, Gary, 2001, China and Taiwan, PNAC Memorandum, April 30. Schmitt, Gary, 2002, Asia and the Bush Doctrine, PNAC Memorandum, Feb. 20. Schmitt, Gary, 2002, Our Ambivalent China Policy, The Weekly Standard, Jul. 15. Schmitt, Gary, 2003, U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan, PNAC, Jun. 24. Schmitt, Gary, 2004, Taiwan’s Democracy Needs Support, Not Benign Neglect, Wall Street Journal, Mar. 23. “Statement on the Defense of Taiwan”, 1999, Washington, D.C.: The Heritage Foundation and Project for the New American Century, August 20. Stein, Jeff, 2007, Defense Officials Tried to Reverse China Policy, Says Powell Aide, Congressional Quarterly, June 1. Stelzer, Irwin, 2004. The Neocon Reader, New York: Grove Press. “The Statement of Principles”, 1997, Washington, D.C., Project for the New American Century, June 3. Weinstein, Kenneth, 2004, “The Triangular Relationship: The U.S. Taiwan and China.”, Washington D.C., Hudson Institute, July 8. Wolfowitz, Paul, 2000, Statesmanship in the New Century, Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy, San Francisco: Encounter Books. Wolfowitz, Paul, 2000, Asian Democracy and American Interests, Heritage Lecture, September 29. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/44027 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 一、本文旨在說明美國新保守主義之特質與內涵，並探討其對美國
臺海外交政策的批評、主張及影響。 二、研究主採文獻分析法。研究重點為： （一）回顧新保守主義發展歷程，說明其背景特殊、影響深遠； （二）探討新保守主義理念信仰，整理其戰略與政策主張； （三）研究新保守主義對美國臺海政策之批評與觀點，掌握具體思 維； （四）論述新保守主義思維對政策制定與臺海情勢產生之影響與意 義。 三、研究範圍係以1993年到2004年間，「新美國世紀計畫」為核心 向外幅射的新保守派代表人物著作與論述。 四、研究結果發現： （一）新保守主義視東亞為新世紀之戰略競爭區域。 （二）新保守主義主張以競爭型的「戰略圍堵」，遏阻中共威脅。 反對「交往政策」與「戰略夥伴關係」策略。 （三）新保守主義主張加強與東亞民主盟邦戰略夥伴關係，反對疏 離盟邦的「中國中心」政策。 （四）新保守主義主張在臺海應改採「戰略明確」政策，防衛民主 臺灣，維繫美國霸權，反對操作「戰略模糊」策略。 （五）新保守主義曾有絕佳機會掌握美國政府臺海政策主導權，惟 因影響力隨伊戰不利迅速滑落，具體主張未及實踐。 （六）新保守主義仍對臺海情勢帶來影響，例如1.「戰略圍堵」策 略使中共選擇避免與美國正面衝突；2.「戰略明確」策略可 能誘發了陳水扁政府冒進，導致區域緊張情勢升高。 （七）「戰略明確」策略被簡化為支持臺獨是不精確的描述，新保 守主義針對臺海情勢的核心思維為： 1.正視真實現狀、尊重民主； 2.尊重民主自決、信任民主； 3.實力維繫和平、維護民主； 4.確保美國優勢、擴張民主。 （八）新保守主義未死，只是蟄伏而已，美國主流媒體仍在關切注 視，必須繼續追蹤研究，掌握發展趨勢。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper surveys and investigates the ideas and impact on U.S. foreign policy directed toward the Taiwan Strait of a small but influential group of liberals who became known as the Neo-conservatives.
The focus of this research is on the transformation of the Neo-conservatives from liberal Democrats to conservative Republicans, and how they have viewed and influenced the strategic debate over cross-strait issues since the Cold War. The thesis contains three main points. First, that the Neo-conservatives’ steadfast ant-communism was based on their historical experience and accompanied by a belief in the superiority of American democratic values; second, that the Neo-conservatives saw Europe as the main venue of superpower rivalry—the strategic center of gravity—during the Cold War, and now perceive that the new strategic center of concern is shifting to East Asia; and therefore thirdly, that Neo-conservatives have asserted a policy of strategic containment rather than engagement regarding China. They have sought to strengthen defensive relationships with key Asian democratic alliances instead of adopting a more “Sino-centric” approach and abandoning strategic ambiguity for the more current concept of strategic clarity. These assertions have had considerable influence on the triangle relationship between the U.S., Taiwan and China. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:36:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-P92322028-1.pdf: 877683 bytes, checksum: 9905264e5ba3c602d12c07e62d39199a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１ 第一節 研究動機．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１ 第二節 研究問題．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．３ 第三節 文獻探討．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．４ 第四節 研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．８ 第五節 研究範圍．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１０ 第二章 美國新保守主義的發展歷程．．．．．．．．．．．１３ 第一節 從自由派萌生．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１３ 壹、自由派對共產主義的幻想．．．．．．．．．．．．． １３ 貳、自由派對蘇共政權的質疑．．．．．．．．．．．．． １４ 第二節 從自由派分離．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１７ 壹、自由派在二次戰後的共識．．．．．．．．．．．．． １７ 貳、自由派內的歧見．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． １８ 一、越戰．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． １８ 二、反猶．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ２０ 三、新保守派誕生．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ２１ 四、總統選舉．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ２４ 五、卡特．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ２５ 第三節 與保守派合作．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．２６ 壹、雷根政府時期．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ２６ 貳、後冷戰時期．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ２９ 第三章 新保守主義之理念信仰與政策主張．．．．．．．． ３１ 第一節 信仰自由民主理念．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．３１ 壹、民主為崇高理念．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ３１ 貳、民主為核心利益．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ３３ 參、民主為核心的內政思維．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ３４ 第二節 美國承擔領導責任．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．３６ 壹、「戰略暫歇」招致危機．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ３６ 貳、歐洲墮落無能領導．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ３８ 參、美國領導深化民主．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ３９ 第三節 維持美軍超強優勢．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．４０ 壹、實力原則．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ４０ 貳、核心任務．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ４３ 參、先制攻擊．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ４４ 第四節 擴張外交宣揚民主．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．４５ 壹、民主為核心的外交思維．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ４５ 貳、積極增進盟邦關係．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ４６ 參、更換政權．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ４７ 第五節 正視東亞戰略挑戰．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．４９ 第四章 新保守主義的臺海政策思維．．．．．．．．．．．．５２ 第一節 中共角色遭到翻轉．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．５２ 第二節 在柯林頓政府時期的主張．．．．．．．．．．．．５４ 壹、反對「交往」政策及「戰略夥伴關係」概念．．．．． ５４ 一、柯林頓政府的政策．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ５４ 二、新保守派的批評．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ５５ 三、新保守派的主張．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ５８ 貳、反對「中國中心」的東亞政策．．．．．．．．．．． ５９ 一、新保守派的批評．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ５９ 二、新保守派的主張．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ６０ 參、「戰略模糊」vs.「戰略明確」．．．．．．．．．．．６１ 一、美國的「戰略模糊」政策．．．．．．．．．．．． ６１ 二、新保守派的批評．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ６４ 三、新保守派的主張．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ６６ 第三節 在布希政府時期的主張．．．．．．．．．．．．．６８ 壹、熱切期盼布希政府執政．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ６９ 貳、美中關係不能再回到「正常」．．．．．．．．．．． ７０ 一、EP-3偵察機擦撞事件．．．．．．．．．．．．． ７０ 二、宣布對臺軍售．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ７２ 參、臺海政策應跨進「戰略明確」新時代．．．．．．．． ７３ 一、布希總統的立場．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ７３ 二、新保守派闡述主張．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ７４ 三、「戰略明確」的敏感與限制．．．．．．．．．．． ７６ 第五章 新保守主義對臺海政策與情勢的影響．．．．．．．．７９ 第一節 對政策制定的影響．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．７９ 壹、完成世代交替、主導政治議題．．．．．．．．．．． ７９ 貳、進入政府高層、爭取主導政策．．．．．．．．．．． ８１ 參、全盛時期雖臨、戰略環境劇變．．．．．．．．．．． ８２ 第二節 對臺海情勢的影響．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．８４ 壹、「戰略圍堵」使中共震懾而避免與美國正面衝突？．． ８５ 貳、「戰略明確」政策誘發臺海與臺美緊張情勢升高？．． ８７ 第三節 未來展望．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．９２ 第六章 結論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．９５ 參考文獻．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． １０１ 附錄一、Statement of Principles（PNAC成立聲明）．． １０７ 附錄二、Statement on the Defense of Taiwan（PNAC與傳統基金 會防衛臺灣聯合聲明）．．．．．．．．．．． １０９ 附錄三、新保守派及其支持者與小布希政府關係一覽表．． １１１ | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 新保守主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新保守派 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 臺海政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新美國世紀計畫 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 戰略明確 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Neo-conservative | en |
| dc.subject | Strategic clarity | en |
| dc.subject | The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) | en |
| dc.subject | Taiwan Strait policy | en |
| dc.subject | Neo-conservatism | en |
| dc.title | 美國新保守主義之臺海政策思維 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The U.S. Neo-conservatism and Its Views on
Taiwan Strait Policy | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳一新(I-hsin Chen),李瓊莉(Chyungly Lee) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 新保守主義,新保守派,臺海政策,新美國世紀計畫,戰略明確, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Neo-conservatism,Neo-conservative,Taiwan Strait policy,The Project for the New American Century (PNAC),Strategic clarity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 116 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 857.11 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。