請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43842完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江瑞祥(Risharng Chiang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shinn-Ren Niou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 牛信仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:30:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、 中文部分
丘昌泰，(2008)，《公共政策基礎篇》，台北：麗文。 石世豪，(2009a)，〈淺析《通訊傳播管理法草案》〉，《向競爭轉的通訊傳播匯流法制》，台北：元照。 石世豪，(2009b)，〈第224次委員會議中華電信股份有限公司、亞太電信股份有限公司及台灣固網股份有限公司「95年度數據通信接取普及服務補助金額」另為適法處分討論案協同即一部不同意見書」〉，《NCC關鍵報告－創會委員的協同及不同意見書》，台北：元照。 江岷欽、劉坤億，(1999)，《企業行政府－理念、實務、省思》，台北：智勝。 江耀國，(2008)，〈英國2003年通訊傳播法之研究-兼論我國通訊傳播匯流立法〉，《東吳法律學報》，第20卷第3期，第114-189頁。 李自杰、蔡銘譯，(2007)，《交易成本經濟學經典名篇選讀》，北京：人民出版社。譯自 Williamson, Oliver E.，Masten, Scott E.，(1999)，The economics of transaction costs。 林心湄，(2003)，《從科技匯流談普及服務到普及接取的政策轉變》，台北：國立交通大學碩士論文。 林建甫審閱，(2004)，《經濟學導論》，台北：美商麥克羅、希爾國際股份有限公司。譯自Frank, Robert ， Bernanke ,Ben，(2001)，Principles of Economics。 林修葳、謝振環、饒秀華譯，(2004)，《經濟學原理》，台北：東華。譯自Mankiw, N. Gregory，(2004) ，Principles of economics, 3rd ed.。 林淑馨，(2004)，〈電信事業自由化對於普及服務影響之研究〉，《政治科學論叢》，第22期，第221-254頁。 林淑馨，(2008)，〈電信產業改革與普及服務制度:日本與台灣的比較分析〉，《公共行政學報》，第26期，第71-103頁。 姜建強，羅長遠譯，(2006)，《新制度經濟學 : 一個交易費用分析範式》，上海：三聯。譯自Furubotn, Eirik G.，. Richter, Roudolf，(2000)，Institutions and economic theory : the contribution of the new institutional economics。 徐仁輝，陳敦源、黃光雄譯，(2005)，《政府失靈－公共選擇的初探》，台北：智勝。譯自Tullock, Gordon，Seldon, Arthur，Brady, Gordon L.，(2000)，Government Whose Obedient Servant? A Primer in Public Choice。 徐源豐譯，(2002)，《經濟學與法律的對話》，台北：先覺。譯自Friedman, David D.，(2000)，Law’s Order。 浩平，蕭羨一譯，(2003)，《公共行政之政治經濟學》，台北：商周。譯自Horn,Murray J.，(1995)，The political economy of public administration :institutional choice in the public sector。 高凱聲，(1998)，〈論電信普及服務制度的設立〉，《經社法制論叢》，第21期，第105-130頁。 國家通訊傳播委員會(NCC)，(2009)，《97年通訊傳播績效報告》，台北：國家通訊傳播委員會。Available at: http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/09072/950_090814_1.pdf 國家通訊傳播委員會(NCC)，(2010)，《98年通訊傳播績效報告》，台北：國家通訊傳播委員會。Available at: http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/10080/2257_100805_1.pdf 陳郁等譯，(1995)，《集體行動的邏輯》，上海：上海人民出版社。譯自Olson, M.，(1965) ，The Logic of Collective Action。 陳敦源，(2005)，〈為公共選擇辯護：論公共選擇理論與「公共性」議題在行政學中的相容性〉，《行政暨政策學報》，第40期，第1-36 頁。Available at: http://120.126.122.251/ntpu_dep/user_file/000283.pdf 陸俊、謝旭譯，(2006)，《市場，還是政府－不完善的可選擇事物間的選擇》，重慶：重慶出版社。譯自Wolf, Charles，(1996)，Market or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives。 曾淑芬、吳齊殷，(2001)，〈先進各國對消弭數位落差之政策分析〉，Available at: http://www.iis.sinica.edu.tw/2001-digital-divide-workshop/2-1.htm 曾劍秋譯，(2006)，《通信法》，北京：北京郵電大學出版社。譯自Lloyd, Ian & Mellor, David，(2003)，Telecommunication Law。 黃偉倫、孫立群，(2009)，〈臺灣電信普及服務的無形利益〉，《中華技術學院學報》，第40期，第1-30頁。 楊曉維譯，(1999)，《集體選擇經濟學》，上海：三聯。譯自Stevens, Job B.，(1993)，The Economics of Collective Choice。 劉元春譯，(2009)，《經濟政策的制定：交易成本政治學的視角》，北京：中國人民大學出版社。譯自Dixit, Avinash K.，(1996)，The Making of Economic Policy：A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective。 劉崇堅，(2010)，〈「第一類電信事業價格調整上限制調整係數訂定討論案」協同意見及一部不同意見書〉，國家通訊傳播委員會第336次委員會議紀錄。 劉崇堅、莊懿妃，(1996)，〈電信產業普及服務〉，《經社法制論叢》，第17、18期，第1-23頁。 鄭嘉逸，(2007)，《數位匯流下電信普及服務之檢討》，台北：國立清華大學碩士論文。 韓朝華譯，(2008)，《制度經濟學－社會秩序與公共政策》，北京：商務印書館。譯自Kasper, Wolfgang ，Streit, E. Manfred.，(2000)，Institutional Economics :Social Order and Public Policy。 聶輝華譯，(2009)，《規制與發展》，北京：中國人民大學出版社。譯自Laffont, Jean-Jacques，(2002) ，Regulation and Development。 羅耀宗譯，(2008)，《選擇的自由》，台北：經濟新潮。譯自Friedman, Milton ， Friedman, Rose，(1980)，Free to Choose。 邊明道、陳心懿譯，(2005)，《傳播政策基本原理》，台北：揚智。譯自Napoli, Philip M.，(2001)，Foundations of Communications Policy: Principles and Process in the Regulation of Electronic Media。 龐思等譯，(2006)，《公共政策研究－政策循環與政策子系統》，北京：三聯書店。譯自Howlett, Michael ， Ramesh, M.，(2003) ，Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems 2th。 蘇彩足，(1999)，〈民主化對於政府預算決策的衝擊與因應之道〉，《理論與政策》，第11卷第3期，第47-63頁。 續俊旗、Bernd Holznagel，(2008)，《融合背景下的中歐電信管制比較》，北京：北京郵電大學出版社。 顧建光譯，(2006)，《公共政策工具:對公共管理工具的評價》，北京：中國人民大學出版社。譯自Peters,B.Guy，F.K.M.,Nispen eds，(1998)，Public policy Instruments:Evaluating The Tools of Public Administration。 貳、西文部分 Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for' lemons': Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488. Alleman, J., Rappoport, P. N. & Weller, D.(2000).Universal Service: The Poverty of Policy. University of Colorado Law Review, 71, 4. Available at: http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/alleman/print_files/Universal_Service_The_Poverty_of_Policy.PDF Benjamin, P. & Dahms, M.(1999).Background paper on Universal Service and Universal Access issues. Telecommunications in Society 1999 seminar. Available at: http://www.piramidedigital.com/Documentos/TEL/pdtelecomuniversalserviceanduniversalaccess.pdf BIS (2010). Consultation on proposals for a Next Generation Fund. Available at：http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/corporate/docs/migrated-consultations/consultation%20on%20proposals%20for%20a%20next%20generation%20fund.pdf BIS & DCMS (2009). DIGITAL BRITAIN. Available at：http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/corporate/docs/d/digital-britain-final-report.pdf Blackman, C. R. (1995). Universal service: obligation or opportunity? Telecommunications Policy, 19(3), 171. Blackman, C. & Forge, S. (2008). The future of universal service in Europe. Info, 10(5/6), 152. Bromley, D. W. (2006). Sufficient reason : volitional pragmatism and the meaning of economic institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Buchanan, J. M. (1968). The demand and supply of public goods. Chicago: Rand McNally. Chakchouk, M. (2009).Definition and Scope of Universal Access/ Service. ITU/BDT Arab Regional Workshop on ICT Applications for Rural Communication seminar. Available at: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/arb/COE/2009/RuralCommunications/Documents/Doc5-Definition%20and%20Scope.pdf Choi, S. K., Kim, D.-J. & Kim, H.-C. (1998). Network spillovers as an alternative efficiency argument for universal service policy. Telematics and Informatics, 15(4), 265. Clarke, G. R. G., & Wallsten, S. J.(2002).Universal(ly Bad)Service Providing Infrastructure Services to Rural and Poor Urban Consumers. The World Bank Development Research Group Regulation and Competition Policy, Policy Researvh Working Paper 2868, The World Bank,Washington ,DC Clement, A. & Shade, L. (1998). The Access Rainbow: Conceptualizing Universal Access to the Information/Communications Infrastructure. Available at: http://bscw.fis.utoronto.ca/pub/bscw.cgi/d399799/RainbowProof.pdf Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, The, 3(1), 1. Crandall, R. W. & Waverman, L. (2000). Who pays for universal service?: when telephone subsidies become transparen. Cremer, H., Gasmi, F., Grimaud, A. & Laffont, J.(1998).The Economics of Universal Service: Theory The Economic Development Institute of World Bank, Washington, DC, Available at : http://www.worldbabk.org/wbi/regulation/pubs/theory.html Cremer, H., Gasmi, F., Grimaud, A. & Laffont, J.(2001). Universal service: An economic perspective. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 72(1), 5. Dijk, J. V. (2006). The network society : social aspects of new media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Dordick, H. S. (1990). The origins of universal service: History as a determinant of telecommunications policy. Telecommunications Policy, 14(3), 223. Dye, T. R. (2008). Understanding public policy. New York: Parson Education,Inc. EU(2010). Progress Report on The Single EUROPEAN Electronic Communications Market(15thReport).Available at：http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ecomm/doc/implementation_enforcement/annualreports/15threport/15report_part1.pdf FCC(1999). Connecting the Globe： A Regulator’s Guide to Building a Global Information Community. Available at：http://www.fcc.gov/connectglobe/ FCC(2010). Connecting America：The National Broadband Plan, Available at：http://www.broadband.gov/ Federal-State Joint Board (2009). Monitoring Reports, Available at：http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf Goggin, G. & Newell, C. (2000). An end to disabling policies? Toward enlightened universal service. Information Society, 16(2), 127. Hardy, A. P. (1980). The role of the telephone in economic development. Telecommunications Policy, 4(4), 278. Hudson, H. (1994). Universal service in the information age. Telecommunications Policy, 18(8), 658. ITU(1998).World Telecommunication Development 1998:Universal Access. Geneva: ITU. ITU (2010). Question 20/1 – Access to Telecommunication Services for People with Disabilities Final, Available at：http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/stg/D-STG-SG01.20-2010-PDF-C.pdf Kanayama, T. (2003). Leaving it up to the industry: People with disabilities and the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Information Society, 19(2), 185. Katz, M. L. & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 424. Kelly,T., Mulas, V., Siddhartha, E., Qianghristine,Z.-W. & Williams M.(2009).What role should Governments play in broadband development ?,World BANK ,Paper prepared for infoDev/OECD workshop on Policy Coherence in ICT for Development”,Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/40/47/43631862.pdf Kim, D. (2008). Widening universal service in Korea to include broadband and mobile communications. Info, 10(5/6), 70. Kiyohara, S.(2008).A Study of Current Telecommunications Policy-making in the U.S.：The Case of Universal Service in comparison With Japanese case.Keio Communication Review No.30. Laffont, J.-J. & Tirole, J. (2000). Competition in telecommunications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Leff, N. H. (1984). Externalities, information costs, and social benefit-cost analysis for economic development: An example from telecommunications. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32(2), 255. Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs.' X-efficiency'. American Economic Review, 56(3), 392. Martin, S. & Parker, D. (1997). The impact of privatisation : ownership and corporate performance in the UK. New York: Routledge. Milne, C. (1998). Stages of universal service policy. Telecommunications Policy, 22(9), 775. Milne, C.(2006).Improving affordability of telecommunications：cross-fertilisation between the developed and the developing world. Telecommunications Policy Research, Conference 2006, Georges Mason University. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.109.5151&rep=rep1&type=pdf Mitomo, H. & Tajiri, N.(2010).Provision of universal service and access over IP networks in Japan. Telecommunications Policy, 34,98-109. Mueller, M. (1993). Universal service in telephone history: A reconstruction. Telecommunications Policy, 17(5), 352. Mueller, M. (1996). Telecommunications Access in the Age of Electronic Commerce: Toward a Third-Generation Universal Service Policy. Federal Communications Bar Journal, 49, 655. Mueller, M. (1997a). Universal service : competition, interconnection, and monopoly in the making of the American telephone system. Washington, D.C.: AEY Press. Mueller, M. (1997b). Universal service and the telecommunications act. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 39. Mueller, M. (1999). Universal service policies as wealth redistribution. Government Information Quarterly, 16(4), 353. Navas-Sabater,J., Dymond, A. & Juntunen, N.(2002).Telecommunications and Information Services for the Poor: Towards a Strategy for Universal Access, World Bank Discussion Paper No.432,The World Bank,Washington, DC. Available at : http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2002/05/03/000094946_02041804225061/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf NTIA(2010a). Digital Nation: 21st Century America’s Progress Toward Universal Broadband Internet Access. Available at： http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/2010/NTIA_internet_use_report_Feb2010.pdf NTIA(2010b). Exploring The Digital Nation: Home Broadband Internet Adoption in the United States. Available at：http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/2010/ESA_NTIA_US_Broadband_Adoption_Report_11082010.pdf Noam, E. M. (1994). Beyond liberalization III: reforming universal service. Telecommunications Policy, 18(9), 687. Noam, E. M. (1997). Will Universal Service and Common Carriage Survive the Telecommunications Act of 1996? Columbia Law Review, 97(4), 955. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Oxford: Princeton University Press. Nuechterlein, J. E. & Weiser, P. J. (2005). Digital crossroads : American telecommunications policy in the internet age. London: MIT Press. Muente-Kunigami,A. & Navas-Sabater,J. (2010), Options to increase access to telecommunications services in rural and low-income areas, World Bank Working Paper No.178, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/01/05/000333038_20100105000339/Rendered/PDF/518390PUB0REPL101Official0Use0Only1.pdf OECD(2001).Understanding The Digital Divide, Available at：http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/57/1888451.pdf OECD (2003a).Universal Service Obligations,Policy Rundtables, Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/21/28/45036202.pdf OECD(2003b).Universal Service Obligations and Broadband, Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4/23/2496799.pdf OECD(2006a).Liberalization and Universal Access to Basic Services Telecommunications, Water and Sanitation, financial Services, and Electricity. OECD(2006b).Rethinking Universal Service for Next Generation Network Generation Network Environment. Available at：http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/48/36503873.pdf OFCOM(2006). Review of the Universal Service Obligation. Available at：http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/uso/statement/statement.pdf OFCOM(2009).Access and Inclusion. Available at：http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/access/statement/ai_statement.pdf OFCOM(2010a). Communications Market Report: England Available at：http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/753567/CMR_England_2010.pdf OFCOM(2010b). Communications Market Report Available at：http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/753567/CMR_2010_FINAL.pdf Ramos, B., Saeed, K., & Pavlov, O. (2010). The impact of Universal Service Obligations and International Cross-subsidies on the dispersion of telephone services in developing countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 44(2), 57. Reiss, D. R. (2009). Agency accountability strategies after liberalization: universal service in the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden. Law and Policy, 31(1), 111. Riordan, M. H.(2001).Universal Residential Telephone Service , Forthcoming in Martin Cave, Sumit Majumdar and Ingo Vogelsang (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics Chapter 10, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Available at : http://www.columbia.edu/~mhr21/US-aug-29.pdf Röller, L. H. & Waverman, L. (2001). Telecommunications infrastructure and economic development: a simultaneous approach. American Economic Review, 91(4), 909. Rosston, G. L. & Wimmer, B. S. (2000). The 'state' of universal service. Information Economics and Policy, 12(3), 261. Schement, J. R. (1995). Beyond universal service-Characteristics of Americans without telephones, 1980-1993. Telecommunications Policy, 19(6), 477. Schement, J. R. & Forbes, S. C. (2000). Identifying temporary and permanent gaps in universal service. Information Society, 16(2), 117. Shepherd, W. G., & Shepherd, J. M. (2004). The economics of industrial organization 5th ed Long Grove, Ill.: Waveland Press. Spulber, D. F. (1989). Regulation and markets. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3. The World Bank(2000).Telecommunications Regulation Handbook, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.22.html The World Bank(2009).Workshop on Universal Access & Service (UAS) & Broadband Development, Washington, DC. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTEDEVELOPMENT/Resources/AndrewDymond2.pptx Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopoly, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(3), 224. USAC(2009).Annual Report .Available at: http://www.usac.org/_res/documents/about/pdf/usac-annual-report-2009.pdf Verhoest, P. (2000). The myth of universal service: Hermeneutic considerations and political recommendations. Media, Culture and Society, 22(5), 595. Wallis, J. J.& North, D.(1986). Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970. In Stanley L. Engerman and Robert E. Gallman, eds., Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth,95-162, University of Chicago Press. Available at: http://www.tetonsands.info/library/WallisNorth.pdf WEF(2010a). The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf WEF(2010b). The Global Information Technology 2009-2010 ： ICT for Sustainability, March. Available at: http://www.itu.int/wsis/implementation/2010/forum/geneva/docs/publications/GITR%202009-2010_Full_Report_final.pdf Wellenius, B. (1994). Implementing reforms in the telecommunications sector : lessons from experience, The World Bank. Available at : http://go.worldbank.org/VY1GCVNT80 Williamson,O.E.(1975).Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications . New York: Free Press. Williamson,O.E.(1985).The economic institutions of capitalism : firms, markets, relational contracting. London: Collier Macmillan. Xavier, P. (1997). Universal service and public access in the networked society. Telecommunications Policy, 21(9-10), 829. Xavier, P. (2003). Should broadband be part of universal service obligations? Info, 5(1), 8. Xavier, P. (2008). From universal service to universal network access? Info, 10(5/6), 20. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43842 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 電信普及服務政策雖然已發展各種理論，但目前仍未有系統及整合性理論，提供政策規劃之準繩。本研究即藉由公共政策制定之福利經濟學、公共選擇理論及新制度經濟學途徑，對照現有電信普及服務政策制定的原因、目標、服務對象、服務範圍及政策工具的選擇，經由系統性的理論基礎，並參考美國與英國電信普及服務政策，歸納、解釋我國現有政策，期運用既有相關理論觀照可能的不足之處，以供我國未來電信普及服務政策規劃之參考。
本研究發現，電信普及服務理論政策制定的原因，可歸納為經濟性、政治性與社會性理由。而可利用性、可負擔性與可近用性，同時界定了政策的問題與目標，其中電信網路或國家的發展，雖然提供政策變遷的基本條件，但無法推論因此而必然發生變遷。在提供服務的對象方面，制度仍以資源分配效能與降低不當侵擾市場機制的方向設計。在服務範圍的界定，源自於科技所造成的不確定性，在制度上多維持彈性並藉由程序性與定期檢視，以避免恣意變更。電信普及服務政策演變，是一種政策工具失靈與變遷的過程，而無論利用市場與政府機制，均有其本質上的缺限，致使政策規劃不完全以市場或政府絕對式的區分，而演變的方向更受制於正式與非正式制度的制約，致使政策的選擇可能只是實存制度與利害關係人互動下，交易成本最小化一種選擇與變遷過程。 本研究就我國電信普及服務政策提出下列建議：一、調整失衡的電信普及服務政策，宜納入可負擔與可近用性目標；二、電信普及服務對象與範圍，宜以成本為基礎，有效鑑別目標族群，強化競爭機制，維持技術中立，並補強利害關係人參與機制；三、電信普及服務基金宜速改善透明度；四、應創造其它混合型工具的發展空間；五、降低使用強制型政策工具，強化治理能力，善用市場機制。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Theories of policies on universal access and universal service in telecommunications have been developed in various perspectives, yet a systemized and integrated paradigm is not available to serve as a criterion for policy making. Following principles of public policy making from the perspectives of welfare economics, public choice theory, and new institutional economics, this research uses present policies on universal access and universal service to study the rationale of policy making and its targets, served users and its range, and choice of policy Instruments. Through a systematic framework and references of policies on universal access and universal service in telecommunications from the US and UK, it is expected that this research could spot out deficiencies in current policies and provide a reference to future policy making in Taiwan.
The research results demonstrate that the rationale of policy making is grounded in economic, political, and social factors whereas the scope and objective of policies are defined by availability, affordability, and accessibility. Developments of telecommunications and states are prerequisites for policy changing, yet changes are not requisite. From the perspective of served users, current framework is designed on efficient distribution of resources and reduction of improper market interferences. The framework of defining service range, restrained by unstableness of technology, remains flexible, and is examined by procedural and regular investigation in order to prevent haphazard changes. Revision of policies on universal access and universal service in telecommunications reflects the incompetence of policy tools and their changing process. There are deficiencies in utilizing either market mechanism or governmental mechanism, which result in an ambiguous distinction between market and government when proposing policies. The direction of revision is confined by formal and informal systems, which limit the choice of policy tools to the interplay between existing system and stakeholders, compromising the choice of policy tools and revision of policies on minimized trading costs. Based on the research results, it is suggested that 1) the disparity of policies on universal access and universal service in telecommunications can be amended through including affordability and accessibility; 2) served users and range should be based on costs, effectively distinguish target groups, strengthen competitive mechanism, maintain technology neutrality, and reinforce the participatory mechanism of stakeholders; 3) the universal service fund should be improved and crystalized; 4) other mixed policy Instruments should be developed; 5) usage of compulsory policy Instruments should be reduced, management skills are to be strengthened, and market mechanism should be maneuvered. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:30:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-P97322023-1.pdf: 2339281 bytes, checksum: ff084acfc4f098e316febd29350c096d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論........................... 1
第一節 研究動機與目的.................1 第二節 研究範圍與方法.................4 第三節 研究限制與預期成果.............8 第二章 理論探討與文獻回顧..............9 第一節 市場失靈與政府失靈理論.........10 第二節 電信普及服務政策原因...........21 第三節 電信普及服務政策理論綜整.......31 第三章 電信普及服務政策規劃分析........39 第一節 電信普及服務定義與目標.........39 第二節 電信普及服務對象與範圍.........50 第三節 電信普及服務政策工具...........56 第四章 美國與英國電信普及服務..........75 第一節 美國電信普及服務...............76 第二節 英國電信普及服務...............91 第三節 美國與英國電信普及服務比較.....104 第五章 我國電信普及服務政策............115 第一節 我國電信普及服務簡介...........116 第二節 我國電信普及服務成效...........120 第三節 我國電信普及服務檢討...........129 第六章 結論............................161 第一節 研究發現.......................161 第二節 政策建議.......................165 第三節 未來研究建議...................170 參考文獻...............................171 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 電信普及服務政策規劃之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study of Telecommunications Universal Service Policy | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 江耀國(Yao-Kuo Eric Chiang) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖俊雄,葉志良 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 電信政策,普及服務,新制度經濟學,政策工具,普及服務基金, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Telecommunications Policy,Universal Service,New institutional Economics,Public Policy Instruments,Universal Service Fund, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 182 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。