請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43668完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思賢 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chun Hsiao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蕭伃君 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:25:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Bibliography
Works by Leo Strauss 1936. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Translated by Elsa M. Sinclair. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; reprint, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1952. 1945. “Farabi’s Plato,” in Louis Ginzberg Jubilee Volume. New York: American Academy for Jewish Research. 1946. “On a New Interpretation of Plato’s Political Philosophy,” Social Research 13, no. 3 (1946), pp. 326-367. 1947. “On the Intention of Rousseau,” Social Research 14, no. 4 (1947), pp. 455-487. 1952. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1952. “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History,” Review of Metaphysics 5, no. 4 (1952), pp. 559-586. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1958. Thoughts on Machiavelli. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1959. What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1964. The City and Man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1965. Spinoza’s Critique of Religion. Translated by Elsa M. Sinclair. New York: Schocken Books. 1966. Socrates and Aristophanes. New York: Basic Books. 1968. Liberalism Ancient and Modern. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers. 1970. Xenophon’s Socrates Discourse: An Interpretation of the Oeconomicus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1975. The Argument and the Action of Plato’s Laws. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1983. Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1987. “Introduction,” in History of Political Philosophy. Edited by Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1989. The Rebirth of Classical Political Rationalism: Essays and Lectures by Leo Strauss. Selected and introduced by Thomas L. Pangle. Chicage: The University of Chicago Press. 1989. An Introduction to Political Philosophy: Ten Essays. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. 1990. “Some Remarks on the Political Science of Maimonides and Farabi”, trans. Robert Bartlett, Interpretation 18 (1990), pp. 3-30. 1993. Faith and Political Philosophy: The Correspondence between Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin, 1934-1964. Edited and translated by Peter Emberley and Barry Cooper. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1995. Philosophy and Law: Contributions to the Understanding of Maimonides and his Predecessors. Translated and with an introduction by Eve Adler. Albany: State University of New York Press. 1996. “Notes on The Concept of the Political,” trans. J. Harvey Lomax, in The Concept of the Political. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1997. Jewish Philosophy and the Crisis of Modernity: Essays and Lectures in Modern Jewish Thought. Edited with an introduction by Kenneth Hart Green. Albany: State University of New York Press. 1997. Gesammelte Schriften Bd. 2: Philosophie und Gesetz – Frühe Schriften. Edited by Heinrich Meier. Stuttgart/Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler. 2000. On Tyranny: Revised and Expanded Edition – Including the Strauss-Kojève Correspondence. Edited by Victor Gourevitch and Michael S. Roth. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2001. Gesammelte Schriften Bd. 3: Hobbes’ politische Wissenschaft und zugehörige Schriften. Edited by Heinrich Meier. Stuttgart/Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler. 2001. On Plato’s Symposium. Edited and with a foreword by Seth Benardete. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2002. Leo Strauss: the early writings, 1921-1932. Translated and edited by Michael Zank. Albany: SUNY Press. 2004. “The Place of the Doctrine of Providence According to Maimonides,” Review of Metaphysics 57, no. 3 (March 2004), pp. 537-549. 2006a. “Reason and Revelation” in Leo Strauss and the Theologico-political Problem. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006b. “Notes on Reason and Revelation” in Leo Strauss and the Theologico-political Problem. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006c. 《回歸古典政治哲學─施特勞斯通信集》，朱雁冰、何鴻藻等譯，北 京：華夏。 Secondary Sources Adler, Eve. 1995. “Translator’s Introduction: The Argument of Philosophy and Law,” in Philosophy and Law. Albany: State University of New York Press. Benardete, Seth. 1978. “Leo Strauss’s The City and Man,” The Political Science Reviewer, Vol. 8, No. 1, (Fall, 1978), pp. 1-20. 2000. The Argument of the Action: Essays on Greek Poetry and Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Blitz, Mark. 1991. “Strauss’s Laws,” The Political Science Reviewer, Vol. 20, No. 1, (Fall, 1991), pp. 186-222. Bluhm, Harald. 2002. Die Ordnung der Ordnung: Das politische Philosophieren von Leo Strauss. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Brague, Remi. 1991. “Leo Strauss and Maimonides,” in Leo Strauss’s Thought: Toward a Critical Engagement, ed. Alan Udoff. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publisher, Inc. Cropsey, Joseph. 1962. “A Reply to Rothman,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 56, No. 2, (Jun., 1962), pp. 353-359. Devigne, Robert 1994. Recasting Conservatism: Oakeshott, Strauss, and the Response to Postmodernism. Yale University Press: New Heaven. Deutsch, Kenneth L., and John A. Murley 1999. Leo Strauss, the Straussians, and the American Regime. Eds. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Deutsch, Kenneth L., and Walter Nicgorski 1994. Leo Strauss: Political Philosopher and Jewish Thinker, eds. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Drury, Shadia B. 1988, 2005. The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss (updated edition). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 1997. Leo Strauss and the American Right. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Fuller, Timothy. 1991. Book Review in Political Theory, Vol. 19, No. 1, (Feb., 1991), pp. 137-141. Gordon, Peter Eli. 2007. “The Concept of the Apolitical: German Jewish Thought and Weimar Political Theology,” Social Research, Vol. 74, No. 3, (Fall 2007), pp. 855-878. Gourevitch, Victor. 1968a. “Philosophy and Politics, I,” Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 22, No. 1, (Sept., 1968), pp. 58-84. 1968b. “Philosophy and Politics, II,” Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 22, No. 2, (Dec., 1968), pp. 281-328. Green, Kenneth Hart. 1993. Jew and Philosopher: The Return to Maimonides in the Jewish Thought of Leo Strauss. Albany: State University of New York Press. Gunnell, John G. 1978. “The Myth of the Tradition,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 72, No. 1, (Mar., 1978), pp. 122-134. 1979. Political Theory: Tradition and Interpretation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishers, Inc. 1985. “Political Theory and Politics: The Case of Leo Strauss,” Political Theory, Vol. 13, No. 3, (Aug., 1985), pp. 339-361. 1986. Between Philosophy and Politics: The Alienation of Political Theory. USA: The University of Massachusetts Press. 2000. “Political Theory as Metapractice,” Political Theory and Partisan Politics. New York: SUNY Press. Jaffa, Harry 1984. “The Legacy of Leo Strauss,” The Claremont Review of Books, Vol. III, No. 3, (Fall 1984). Janssens, David. 2005. “A Change of Orientation: Leo Strauss’s ‘Comments’ on Carl Schmitt Revisited,” Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 33/1 (Fall/Winter 2005), pp. 93-104. 2008. Between Athens and Jerusalem: Philosophy, Prophecy, and Politics in Leo Strauss’s Early Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press. Kateb, George. 2007. Book Review in Political Theory, Vol. 5, No. 2, (Jun., 2007). Kennington, Richard. 1981. “Strauss’s Natural Right and History,” Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 35, No. 1, (Sept., 1981), pp. 57-86. Kochin, Michael S. 2002. “Morality, Nature, and Esotericism in Leo Strauss’s Persecution and the Art of Writing,” The Review of Politics, Vol. 64, No. 2, (2002: Spring), pp. 261-283. Lampert, Laurence. 1996. Leo Strauss and Nietzsche. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lilla, Mark. 2004a. “Leo Strauss: The European,” The New York Review, October 21. 2004b. “The Closing of the Straussian Mind,” The New York Review, October 21. Lowenthal, David. 1985. “Leo Strauss’s Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy,” Interpretation, Vol. 13, No. 3, (Sept., 1985), pp. 297-320. McCormick, John P. 1994. “Fear, Technology, and the State: Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and the Revival of Hobbes in Weimar and National Socialist Germany,” Political Theory, Vol. 22, No. 4, (Nov., 1994), pp. 619-652. McDaniel, Robb A. 1998. “The Nature of Inequality: Uncovering the Modern in Leo Strauss’s Idealist Ethics,” Political Theory, Vol. 26, No. 3, (Jun., 1998), pp. 317-345. Meier, Heinrich. 1995. Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: the Hidden Dialogue. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2002.《隱匿的對話─施米特與施特勞斯》，朱雁冰、汪慶華等譯，劉小楓 編，北京：華夏。 2006. Leo Strauss and the Theologico-Political Problem. New York: Cambridge University Press. Moyn, Samuel. 2007. “From experience to law: Leo Strauss and the Weimar crisis of the philosophy of religion,” History of European Ideas, Vol. 33, (2007), pp. 174-194. Novak, David. 1996. Leo Strauss and Judaism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Orr, Susan. 1995. Jerusalem and Athens: Reason and Revelation in the Work of Leo Strauss. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Pangle, Thomas. 1983. “Introduction” in Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1985. “The Platonism of Leo Strauss: A Reply to Harry Jaffa,” The Claremont Review of Books, Vol. IV, No. 1, (Spring 1985). 2006. Leo Strauss: An Introduction to His Thought and Intellectual Legacy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Peukert, Detlev J. K. 1989. The Weimar Republic: The Crisis of Classical Modernity. New York: Hill and Wang. Pippin, Robert B. 1992. “The Modern World of Leo Strauss,” Political Theory, Vol. 20, No. 3, (Aug., 1992), pp. 448-472. Rorty, Richard. 1988. “That Old-Time Philosophy,” The New Republic, April 4, 1988, pp. 28-33. Rosen, Stanley. 1987. Hermeneutics as Politcs. New York: Oxford University Press. 1991. “Leo Strauss and the Quarrel Between the Ancients and the Moderns,” in Leo Strauss’s Thought: Toward a Critical Engagement, ed. Alan Udoff. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publisher, Inc. 1999. Metaphysics in Ordinary Language. New Haven: Yale University Press. 2002. “Wittgenstein and Strauss” in The Elusiveness of the Ordinary: Studies in the Possibility of Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press. 2006. “Leo Strauss in Chicago,” Daedalus, Summer 2006. Schaefer, David Lewis. 1994. “Shadia Drury’s Critique of Leo Strauss,” Political Science Reviewer 23: 80-127. Schmitt, Carl. 1955. “Die geschichtliche Struktur des heutigen Welt-Gegensatzes von Ost und West,” in Freundschaftliche Begegnungen. Festschrift für Ernst Jünger zum 60. Geburtstag. Frankfurt/Main. 1996. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Shell, Susan. 1994. “Taking Evil Seriously: Schmitt’s ‘Concept of the Political’ and Strauss’s ‘True Politics,’” in Deutsch and Nicgorski (1994). Sheppard, Eugene R. 2006. Leo Strauss and the Politics of Exile. Lebanon: Bandeis University Press. Smith, Steven B. 1997. “Destruktion or Recovery?: Leo Strauss’s Critique of Heidegger,” The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 51, (Dec., 1997). 2000. “Leo Strauss’s Platonic Liberalism,” Political Theory, Vol. 28, No. 6, (Dec., 2000), pp. 787-809. 2006. Reading Leo Strauss: Politics, Philosophy, Judaism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Soffer, Walter. 1994. “Modern Rationalism, Miracles, and Revelation: Strauss’s Critique of Spinoza,” in Deutsch and Nicgorski (1994). Tanguay, Daniel. 2007. Leo Strauss: An Intellectual Biography. New Haven: Yale University Press. Tarcov, Nathan. 1983. “Philosophy and History: Tradition and Interpretation in the Work of Leo Strauss,” Polity, Vol. 16, No. 1, (Autumn, 1983), pp. 5-29. Vatter, Miguel. 2004. “Strauss and Schmitt as Readers of Hobbes and Spinoza: On the Relation between Political Theology and Liberalism,” CR: The New Centennial Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, (Winter, 2004), pp. 161-214. Villa, Dana R. 1998. “The Philosopher Versus The Citizen: Arendt, Strauss, and Socrates,” Political Theory, Vol. 26. No. 2, April 1998: 147-172. Ward, James F. 1987. “Political Philosophy & History: The Links between Strauss & Heidegger,” Polity, Vol. 20, No. 2. (Winter, 1987), pp. 273-295. Zank, Michael. 2002. “Introduction” to Leo Strauss: the early writings, 1921-1932. Albany: SUNY Press. Zuckert, Catherine. 1996. Postmodern Platos. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Zuckert, Catherine and Michael. 2006. The Truth About Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43668 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 李奧•史特勞斯與其政治哲學在政治學界向來是受爭論的議題。本論文試圖從層層爭辯中開出新路，對史特勞斯的政治哲學提出一較為整全的解釋。這個解釋是從史特勞斯自身對神學─政治問題的強調出發，即對史特勞斯早期的著作做深入的探討，以此為正確解讀史特勞斯在到達美國之後所建立的對政治哲學的特別詮釋的主要方法。從史賓諾沙的宗教批判中的發現、到對邁蒙尼德的前現代的理性主義的研究，史特勞斯的「政治哲學」的理解乃是經過一連串對神學─政治問題的反省與思考；而後者也使我們得以對史特勞斯向來被視為難解的自然概念以及自然權利有一更為深入的探究。這一過程同時也說明了本論文對史特勞斯的理解途徑的有效性：史特勞斯的思想並不是斷裂的，因此也只有從整體的(尤其不忽略早期發展與問題的重要性)角度才能真正地理解史特勞斯的政治哲學的真意。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The controversies surrounding the German-born American scholar Leo Strauss and his political philosophy have always been fierce. In this study, I intend to offer my understanding of Strauss’s political philosophy by showing that how Strauss’s thought responds to his time, with the problem that it is pointing to, is the key to his political philosophy. And this understanding has to be based upon the awareness that his “political philosophy” is idiosyncratic in the way that we should refrain from simply judging and criticizing it from the present and modern point of view.
I argue that Strauss’s “political philosophy” is to be examined with the thought that Strauss is holding a unique view of philosophy, and it is to be assessed as one whose insight and value is no less enlightening than other philosophical developments of the time. Going over the genesis and development of Strauss’s “political philosophy” would finally lead us to the realization that the idea of nature constitutes the core of his political philosophy. This process also justifies our early point that Strauss’s thought can only be fully comprehended when we take his early works into account. I argue that this is how we obtain the most comprehensive interpretation of his “political philosophy.” | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:25:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R93322055-1.pdf: 605414 bytes, checksum: f6cd680eb4d222875eb92bceccf686d8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
Acknowledgements ii Abstract (Chinese) iii Abstract iv List of Abbreviations viii Chapter One Introduction 1 1.1 The Leo Strauss Controversies 1 1.1.1 For or Against Strauss 2 1.1.2 In or Out of the Straussian Core 7 1.1.3 Leo Strauss: The European Philosopher and Jew 10 1.2 The Objective of the Study 13 1.3 Literature Review 18 1.4 The Structure of the Study 24 Chapter Two The “Problem” 26 2.1 The Theologico-Political Problem 31 2.1.1 The Question of God, The Question of Politics 35 2.1.2 “Theologico-political”, Two-Fold 40 2.2 Spinoza and Theological-Political Treatise 44 2.2.1 Spinoza’s Theological-Political Problem: Critique of Religion 46 2.2.2 Spinoza and the Sufficiency of Reason – Against Maimonides 52 Chapter Three Strauss’s “Political Philosophy”: Its Genesis and Development 59 3.1 Maimonides: Insufficiency of Reason 64 3.2 “Free of the Present” 68 3.2.1 Medieval Enlightenment: the Falasifa’s Encounter with Plato 72 3.2.1.1 Going Toward Radical Rationalism: Maimonides as a Platonist 73 3.2.1.2 Radical Rationalism: Maimonides as a Farabian Platonist 77 3.2.1.3 Radical Rationalism in Question: Maimonides as a Political Philosopher 83 3.2.2 A Horizon Beyond Liberalism: Hobbes as a Modern Political Philosopher 90 Chapter Four Strauss’s “Political Philosophy”: On the Idea of Nature 99 4.1 The First Expression of Strauss’s Change of Orientation – Notes on The Concept of the Political 100 4.2 The Question of What is Right 107 4.2.1 “The Socratic or the Hobbesian Question?” 108 4.2.2 On Naturrecht – Natural Right and Natural Law 113 4.2.2.1 Hobbes’s Natural Right and Natural Law 113 4.2.2.2 Strauss’s Naturrecht – the Aporias 115 4.2.2.3 The Socratic-Platonic-Stoic Type of Classic Natural Right 121 4.3 The Problem of Socrates 126 4.3.1 What is Virtue? – The Question toward the Possibility of Political Philosophy 127 4.3.2 Why Political Philosophy? 135 4.3.2.1 “Farabi’s Plato” as Strauss’s Plato 137 Chapter Five Conclusion: What is Political Philosophy? 143 5.1 What is (Strauss’s) Political Philosophy? 143 5.2 Anachronism? 151 Bibliography 154 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 邁蒙尼德 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 史特勞斯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治哲學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 神學─政治問題 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 法拉比 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自然 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自然權利 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | natural right | en |
| dc.subject | Leo Strauss | en |
| dc.subject | political philosophy | en |
| dc.subject | the theologico-political problem | en |
| dc.subject | Maimonides | en |
| dc.subject | Farabi | en |
| dc.subject | nature | en |
| dc.title | 定位史特勞斯：其「政治哲學」之釋義 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Situating Leo Strauss: 'Political Philosophy' Re-defined | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹康,許文柏 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 史特勞斯,政治哲學,神學─政治問題,邁蒙尼德,法拉比,自然,自然權利, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Leo Strauss,political philosophy,the theologico-political problem,Maimonides,Farabi,nature,natural right, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 167 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 591.22 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。