請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43651完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭富書 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shao-Wei Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王少韡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:25:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.Barton, N. and Choubey, V., “The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice.” Rock Mechanics 10, pp. 1-54, 1977.
2.Botero, E., Méndez, B.C., Zapata, J.C. and Romo, M.P., “Dynamic Performance Of Concrete Sliding Interfaces”, 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 149, October 12-13, 2006. 3.Chaudhuri, S.R. and Hutchinson, T.C., “Characterizing frictional behavior for use in predicting the seismic response of unattached equipment.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 25, pp. 591–604, 2005. 4.Chen, W.F. and Liu, X.L., “Limit analysis in soil mechanics.” In Developments in geotechnical engineering, pp.27-60, 1990. 5.Crespellani, T. Madiai, C. and Vannucchi, G., “Earthquake Destructiveness Potential Facter and Slope stability.” Geotechnique 48, No. 3, pp.411-419, 1998. 6.Jeng, F.S., Lee, K.C. and Huang, T.H., “The study on the critical acceleration of block sliding using small scale shaking table.” Proc. of The 20th KKCNN, Korea on Civil Engineering, pp. 306-309, 2007. 7.Kafali, C., Fathali, S., Grigoriu, M. and Whittaker, A.S., “Static and Kinetic Coefficients of Friction for Rigid Blocks.” MCEER Technical Roport MCEER-07-0001, 2007. 8.Matasovic, N., Kavazanjian, E., Jr. and Giroud, J.P., “Newmark Seismic Deformation Analysis forGeosynthetic Covers.” Geosynthetics International, Vol. 5, Nos. 1-2, pp. 237-264., 1998. 9.Mendez, B.C., Botero, E. and Romo, M.P., “A new friction law for sliding rigid blocks under cyclic loading.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 29, pp. 874-882. 2009. 10.Newmark, N. M., ”Effect of Earthquakes on Dam and Embankments.”.Geotechnique 15,No. 2, pp.139-160, 1965. 11.Park, B.K., Jeon, S. and Lee, C.S., “Evaluation of dynamic frictional behavior of rock joints through shaking table test.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 21, pp.427, 2006. 12.Rosenblad, J.L., “Failure Modes of Models of Jointed Rock Masses.” Proc. of the 2nd Cong. of ISRM, Beograd, pp.3-11, 1970. 13.Terzaghi, K., ”Mechanisms of landslides.” The Geological Survey of America, Engineering Geology, 1950. 14.Wartman, J., Bray, J. D. and Seed, R.B, “Inclined Plane Studies of the Newmark Sliding Block Procedure.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 8, pp.673-684, August 1, 2003. 15.Yegian, M.K. and Lahlaf, A.M., “Dynamic Interface Shear Strength Properties of Geomembranes and Geotextiles.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Vol. 118, No. 5, pp.760-779, May, 1992. 16.楊長義,模擬規則節理岩體強度與變行性之研究,國立臺灣大學土木工程研究所博士論文,1992。 17.張平,吳德倫,動荷載下邊坡滑動的試驗研究,重慶建築大學學報,第19卷,第2期,p.80-86,1997。 18.李正楠,草嶺崩坍地受震行為初探,國立臺灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2000。 19.游建恒,岩石節理面正向閉合引致導水性變化之硏究,國立臺灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2000。 20.林敬智,岩石節理面之反覆閉合行為及其對導水性之影響,國立臺灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,2001。 21.彭文飛,以位移法分析自然邊坡在地震時之破壞行為的初步探討,國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文,2001。 22.祁生文,考慮結構面退化之岩質邊坡地震永久位移研究,岩土工程學報,第29卷,第3期,p.452-457,2007。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43651 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 岩石邊坡與土壤邊坡最大的差異在於岩石邊坡發生破壞往往沿著弱面破壞,此種有主要滑動面之邊坡破壞的行為,於1965年Newmark提出了滑動塊體法,為這類邊坡穩定性分析注入了新的分析方式。
在滑動塊體法中,提出了臨界加速度的觀點,當可能滑動之塊體所受的地震加速度超過其所能承受之臨界加速度時,塊體便會滑動產生永久位移。此方法假設塊體之臨界加速度為一定值,滑動面間的摩擦行為造成之影響暫不考慮,且臨界加速度係以靜態力平衡的狀態下得到。在前人的研究中,透過尖峰摩擦角所定義的臨界加速度,計算得到之累積位移量會有低估的現象,而以殘餘摩擦角定義之臨界加速度則是會有高估現象,因此也有學者提出了臨界加速度衰減的概念或塊體滑動後即採用殘餘摩擦角進行計算。 因此本研究便是基於滑動塊體法的基本概念,利用模擬岩塊於小型震動台進行一系列之實驗,首先探討震動條件下,塊體滑動時的即時靜摩擦角 是否與靜態條件所得到之靜摩擦角 相同,更進一步的探討受震滑動歷程中滑動面間的摩擦行為,並且探討震動頻率、滑動塊體正向應力及材料特性對即時靜摩擦角 、滑動歷程之摩擦行為的影響。 本研究中發現震動頻率及正向應力皆會對震動條件下,塊體的即時靜摩擦角 造成影響,當基盤的震動頻率提高,塊體的即時靜摩擦角 會有提高的趨勢;塊體的正向應力增加時,反而塊體的即時靜摩擦角 會有降低之趨勢。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Different from soil slope, the failure of rock slope destroyed along weak plane. Accordantly, block sliding method for these slope stable analysis was be devised by Newmark in 1965.
A new point “critical acceleration” was devised in block sliding method; when block acceleration induced by earthquake exceed the “critical acceleration” of the sliding interface, the permanent displacement of sliding block was happened. However, in the method, “critical acceleration” derived from static force equilibrium was assumed to be a constant. The “critical acceleration” determined by peak friction angle could resulted the underestimate of permanent block sliding displacement; the “critical acceleration” determined by residual friction angle could resulted the overestimate of permanent displacement. Base on block sliding method, in this study, there were series experiments by using shake table. At first, to compare the instantaneous static friction angle of block obtained from shake table experiment and static friction angle obtained from tilt test, and then to investigate the influence of block frictional behavior by following factor: frequency of base vibration, normal stress of block, material of block. In this study, the instantaneous static friction angle of block was affected by frequency of base vibration and normal stress of block under dynamic shaking condition. When the frequency of base vibration was higher, the instantaneous static friction angle of block was higher; the instantaneous static friction angle of block reduced when the normal stress of block increased. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:25:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96521104-1.pdf: 5112196 bytes, checksum: 47a3fc606cc1572c59c8829a729590dd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
誌謝 II 摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 V 表目錄 VIII 圖目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究動機 1 1.2研究目的 1 1.3研究方法 2 1.4研究內容 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 傳統斜坡岩塊受震分析方法 5 2.2 塊體受震滑動之動態分析 5 2.3 摩擦行為探討 9 2.4 研究相關名詞定義 10 第三章 研究方法 20 3.1模擬岩塊之選取 20 3.1.1 模擬岩塊之材料相似律 20 3.1.2 模擬岩塊之材料選擇 21 3.1.3 模擬岩塊之基本力學性質 22 3.1.4 模擬岩塊相似律分析 22 3.2儀器介紹 22 3.2.1 傾斜台 22 3.2.2 試體承載基座 22 3.2.3 小型震動台 (small scale shake table) 23 3.2.4 雷射位移計 (laser displacement meter) 23 3.2.5 單壓試驗壓力機 23 3.3實驗方法 23 3.3.1靜摩擦角量測 23 3.3.2 動摩擦角量測 24 3.3.3 動態即時摩擦係數量測 24 第四章 震動條件下模擬岩塊即時靜摩擦角探討 35 4.1靜態條件下模擬岩塊之摩擦角 35 4.2震動條件下即時靜摩擦角之理論推導 37 4.3基盤震動頻率對即時靜摩擦角之影響 38 4.4正向應力對即時靜摩擦角之影響 40 4.5模擬岩塊材料配比對即時靜摩擦角之影響 42 4.5.1 水灰比不同之模擬岩塊與即時靜摩擦角之影響 42 4.5.2細骨材不同之模擬岩塊與即時靜摩擦角之影響 43 第五章 震動條件下模擬岩塊滑動界面之靜、動摩擦行為 56 5.1 動摩擦角變化之量測 56 5.2模擬岩塊之即時動摩擦角理論公式 57 5.3 基盤震動頻率對即時動摩擦係數之影響 58 5.3.1 基盤震動頻率4Hz 58 5.3.2 基盤震動頻率6Hz 61 5.4摩擦模式之探討 63 第六章 結論與建議 78 6.1結論 78 6.2建議 79 參考文獻 80 附錄A 擷取速率與微分法 83 附錄B 垂直向位移檢核 87 附錄C 論文口試-問題與回覆 93 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 臨界加速度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 摩擦行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 震動台 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Newmark | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | tilt test | en |
| dc.subject | frictional behavior | en |
| dc.subject | critical acceleration | en |
| dc.subject | shake table | en |
| dc.subject | Newmark | en |
| dc.title | 模擬岩塊受震滑動之動態摩擦行為初探 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A preliminary study on the dynamic friction behavior of concrete sliding under external excitation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 董家鈞,張國楨,謝佑明 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Newmark,震動台,臨界加速度,摩擦行為, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Newmark,shake table,critical acceleration,frictional behavior,tilt test, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 95 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.99 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
