請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43609
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭素芳(Suh-Fang Jeng) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chi-Hon Leng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 甯智航 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:24:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-07 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-10-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chapter 1
1. Latal B. Prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome after preterm birth. Pediatr Neurol 2009;40:413-9. 2. Allen MC. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants. Curr Opin Neurol 2008;21:123-8. 3. Sameroff AJ, Fiese BH. Transactional regulation and early intervention. 2000. 4. Wijnroks L. Early maternal stimulation and the development of cognitive competence and attention of preterm infants. Early Dev Parent 1998;7:19-30. 5. Clark GN, Seifer R. Assessment of Parents' Interactions With Their Developmentally Delayed Infatns. Mental Health Journal 1985;6:214-24. 6. Ramey CT, Bryant DM, Wasik BH, Sparling JJ, Fendt KH, LaVange LM. Infant Health and Development Program for low birth weight, premature infants: program elements, family participation, and child intelligence. Pediatrics 1992;89:454-65. 7. Forcada-Guex M, Pierrehumbert B, Borghini A, Moessinger A, Muller-Nix C. Early dyadic patterns of mother-infant interactions and outcomes of prematurity at 18 months. Pediatrics 2006;118:e107-14. 8. Eckerman CO, Hsu HC, Molitor A, Leung EH, Goldstein RF. Infant arousal in an en-face exchange with a new partner: effects of prematurity and perinatal biological risk. Dev Psychol 1999;35:282-93. 9. Minde K, Perrotta M, Marton P. Maternal caretaking and play with full-term and premature infants. J Am Acad Child Psych 1985;26:231-44. 10. Harrison MJ. A comparison of parental interactions with term and preterm infants. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:173-9. 11. Barnard K, Bee H, Hammond M. Developmental changes in maternal interactions with term and preterm infants. Infant Behav Dev 1984;7:101-13. 12. Minde K. Prematurity and serious medical conditions in infancy: Implications for development, behavior, and intervention. In: Zeanah CH, editor. Handbook of infant mental health. New York: The Guilford Press; 2000. p 176–94. 13. Strathearn L. Exploring the neurobiology of attachment. In: Mayes LC, Fonagy P, Target M, editors. Developmental science and psychoanalysis. London: Karnac Press; 2007. p 450. 14. Swain JE, Lorberbaum JP, Kose S, Strathearn L. Brain basis of early parent-infant interactions: psychology, physiology, and in vivo functional neuroimaging studies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007;48:262-87. 15. Lowe J, Erickson SJ, MacLean P. Cognitive correlates in toddlers born very low birth weight and full-term. Infant Behav Dev 2010;33:629-34. 16. Treyvaud K, Anderson VA, Howard K, Bear M, Hunt RW, Doyle LW et al. Parenting behavior is associated with the early neurobehavioral development of very preterm children. Pediatrics 2009;123:555-61. 17. Smith KE, Landry SH, Swank PR. The role of early maternal responsiveness in supporting school-aged cognitive development for children who vary in birth status. Pediatrics 2006;117:1608-17. 18. Schmidt CL, Lawson KR. Caregiver attention-focusing and children's attention-sharing behaviours as predictors of later verbal IQ in very low birthweight children. J Child Lang 2002;29:3-22. 19. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173-82. 20. Karreman A, de Haas S, van Tuijl C, van Aken MA, Dekovic M. Relations among temperament, parenting and problem behavior in young children. Infant Behav Dev 2010;33:39-49. 21. Poehlmann J, Fiese BH. Parent-infant interaction as a mediator of the relation between neonatal risk status and 12-month cognitive development. Infant Behav Dev 2001;24:171-88. 22. Brinker RP, Lewis M. Discovering the competent handicapped infant: A process approach to assessment and intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 1982;2:1-16. 23. Feldman R. Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007;48:329-54. 24. Mahoney G, Boyce G, Fewell RR, Spiker D, Wheeden CA. The relationship of parent-child interaction to the effectiveness of early intervention services for at-risk children and children with disabilities. Topics Early Child Spec Educ 1998;18:5-13. 25. Enhancing the outcomes of low-birth-weight, premature infants. A multisite, randomized trial. The Infant Health and Development Program. JAMA 1990;263:3035-42. 26. Feldman R, Eidelman AI, Sirota L, Weller A. Comparison of skin-to-skin (kangaroo) and traditional care: parenting outcomes and preterm infant development. Pediatrics 2002;110:16-26. 27. Kleberg A, Westrup B, Stjernqvist K. Developmental outcome, child behaviour and mother-child interaction at 3 years of age following Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Intervention Program (NIDCAP) intervention. Early Hum Dev 2000;60:123-35. 28. Glazebrook C, Marlow N, Israel C, Croudace T, Johnson S, White IR et al. Randomised trial of a parenting intervention during neonatal intensive care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:F438-43. 29. Johnson S, Whitelaw A, Glazebrook C, Israel C, Turner R, White IR et al. Randomized trial of a parenting intervention for very preterm infants: outcome at 2 years. J Pediatr 2009;155:488-94. 30. Newnham CA, Milgrom J, Skouteris H. Effectiveness of a modified Mother-Infant Transaction Program on outcomes for preterm infants from 3 to 24 months of age. Infant Behav Dev 2009;32:17-26. 31. Meijssen D, Wolf MJ, Koldewijn K, Houtzager BA, van Wassenaer A, Tronick E et al. The effect of the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program on mother-infant interaction after very preterm birth. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2010. 32. Koldewijn K, Wolf MJ, van Wassenaer A, Meijssen D, van Sonderen L, van Baar A et al. The Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program for very low birth weight infants at 6 months corrected age. J Pediatr 2009;154:33-8 e2. 33. Koldewijn K, van Wassenaer A, Wolf MJ, Meijssen D, Houtzager B, Beelen A et al. A neurobehavioral intervention and assessment program in very low birth weight infants: outcome at 24 months. J Pediatr 2010;156:359-65. Chapter 2 1. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008;371:261-9. 2. Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Weisglas-Kuperus N, van Goudoever JB, Oosterlaan J. Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children. Pediatrics 2009;124:717-28. 3. de Kieviet JF, Piek JP, Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Oosterlaan J. Motor development in very preterm and very low-birth-weight children from birth to adolescence: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2009;302:2235-42. 4. Caplan G, Mason EA, Kaplan DM. Four studies of crisis in parents of prematures. 1965. Community Ment Health J 2000;36:25-45. 5. Treyvaud K, Anderson VA, Howard K, Bear M, Hunt RW, Doyle LW et al. Parenting behavior is associated with the early neurobehavioral development of very preterm children. Pediatrics 2009;123:555-61. 6. Barnard K, Bee H, Hammond M. Developmental changes in maternal interactions with term and preterm infants. Infant Behav Dev 1984;7:101-13. 7. Als H, Lawhon G, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Gibes-Grossman R, Blickman JG. Individualized developmental care for the very low-birth-weight preterm infant. Medical and neurofunctional effects. JAMA 1994;272:853-8. 8. Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Rivkin MJ, Vajapeyam S, Mulkern RV et al. Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatrics 2004;113:846-57. 9. Kleberg A, Westrup B, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H. Indications of improved cognitive development at one year of age among infants born very prematurely who received care based on the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP). Early Hum Dev 2002;68:83-91. 10. Maguire CM, Walther FJ, van Zwieten PH, Le Cessie S, Wit JM, Veen S. No change in developmental outcome with incubator covers and nesting for very preterm infants in a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F92-7. 11. Ariagno RL, Thoman EB, Boeddiker MA, Kugener B, Constantinou JC, Mirmiran M et al. Developmental care does not alter sleep and development of premature infants. Pediatrics 1997;100:E9. 12. Maguire CM, Walther FJ, van Zwieten PH, Le Cessie S, Wit JM, Veen S. Follow-up outcomes at 1 and 2 years of infants born less than 32 weeks after Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program. Pediatrics 2009;123:1081-7. 13. Spittle AJ, Orton J, Doyle LW, Boyd R. Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD005495. 14. Kaaresen PI, Ronning JA, Ulvund SE, Dahl LB. A randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of an early-intervention program in reducing parenting stress after preterm birth. Pediatrics 2006;118:e9-19. 15. Melnyk BM, Feinstein NF, Alpert-Gillis L, Fairbanks E, Crean HF, Sinkin RA et al. Reducing premature infants' length of stay and improving parents' mental health outcomes with the Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE) neonatal intensive care unit program: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2006;118:e1414-27. 16. Newnham CA, Milgrom J, Skouteris H. Effectiveness of a modified Mother-Infant Transaction Program on outcomes for preterm infants from 3 to 24 months of age. Infant Behav Dev 2009;32:17-26. 17. Achenbach TM, Howell CT, Aoki MF, Rauh VA. Nine-year outcome of the Vermont intervention program for low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1993;91:45-55. 18. Nordhov SM, Ronning JA, Dahl LB, Ulvund SE, Tunby J, Kaaresen PI. Early intervention improves cognitive outcomes for preterm infants: randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2010;126:e1088-94. 19. Blair C, Ramey CT, Hardin JM. Early intervention for low birthweight, premature infants: participation and intellectual development. Am J Ment Retard 1995;99:542-54. 20. Brooks-Gunn J, Gross RT, Kraemer HC, Spiker D, Shapiro S. Enhancing the cognitive outcomes of low birth weight, premature infants: for whom is the intervention most effective? Pediatrics 1992;89:1209-15. 21. Sameroff AJ, Fiese BH. Transactional regulation and early intervention. 2000. 22. Smith KE, Landry SH, Swank PR. The role of early maternal responsiveness in supporting school-aged cognitive development for children who vary in birth status. Pediatrics 2006;117:1608-17. 23. Lowe J, Erickson SJ, MacLean P. Cognitive correlates in toddlers born very low birth weight and full-term. Infant Behav Dev 2010;33:629-34. 24. Schmidt CL, Lawson KR. Caregiver attention-focusing and children's attention-sharing behaviours as predictors of later verbal IQ in very low birthweight children. J Child Lang 2002;29:3-22. 25. Forcada-Guex M, Pierrehumbert B, Borghini A, Moessinger A, Muller-Nix C. Early dyadic patterns of mother-infant interactions and outcomes of prematurity at 18 months. Pediatrics 2006;118:e107-14. 26. Feldman R, Eidelman AI, Sirota L, Weller A. Comparison of skin-to-skin (kangaroo) and traditional care: parenting outcomes and preterm infant development. Pediatrics 2002;110:16-26. 27. Meijssen D, Wolf MJ, Koldewijn K, Houtzager BA, van Wassenaer A, Tronick E et al. The effect of the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program on mother-infant interaction after very preterm birth. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2010. 28. Kleberg A, Westrup B, Stjernqvist K. Developmental outcome, child behaviour and mother-child interaction at 3 years of age following Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Intervention Program (NIDCAP) intervention. Early Hum Dev 2000;60:123-35. 29. Glazebrook C, Marlow N, Israel C, Croudace T, Johnson S, White IR et al. Randomised trial of a parenting intervention during neonatal intensive care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:F438-43. 30. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173-82. 31. Poehlmann J, Fiese BH. Parent-infant interaction as a mediator of the relation between neonatal risk status and 12-month cognitive development. Infant Behav Dev 2001;24:171-88. 32. Karreman A, de Haas S, van Tuijl C, van Aken MA, Dekovic M. Relations among temperament, parenting and problem behavior in young children. Infant Behav Dev 2010;33:39-49. 33. Als H. A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: Framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 1986;6:3-55. 34. Ramey CT, Bryant DM, Wasik BH, Sparling JJ, Fendt KH, LaVange LM. Infant Health and Development Program for low birth weight, premature infants: program elements, family participation, and child intelligence. Pediatrics 1992;89:454-65. 35. Jeng SF, Wu YC, Hsu CH, Leng CH, Chen WJ, Chiou NC et al. Effectiveness of an early intervention for preterm infants with very low birth weight. Pediatrics (Submitted). 36. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment; 2005. 37. Cassidy J. The Ability to Negotiate the Environment: An Aspect of Infant Competence as Related to Quality of Attachment. Child Dev 1986;57:331-37. 38. Clark GN, Seifer R. Assessment of Parents' Interactions With Their Developmentally Delayed Infatns. Mental Health Journal 1985;6:214-24. 39. Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:352-6. 40. Yu YT, Wu YT, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, Chiou NC, Lee WT et al. Psychometric Study of Two Versions of Bayley Scales of Infant Development with Preterm and Term Taiwanese Infants at 6, 12 and 18 Months of Age In preparetion. 41. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. (2nd ed.). Laawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 1988. 42. Orton J, Spittle A, Doyle L, Anderson P, Boyd R. Do early intervention programmes improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants after discharge? A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009;51:851-9. 43. Williams J, Lee KJ, Anderson PJ. Prevalence of motor-skill impairment in preterm children who do not develop cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010;52:232-7. 44. Foster-Cohen S, Edgin JO, Champion PR, Woodward LJ. Early delayed language development in very preterm infants: evidence from the MacArthur-Bates CDI. J Child Lang 2007;34:655-75. 45. Enhancing the outcomes of low-birth-weight, premature infants. A multisite, randomized trial. The Infant Health and Development Program. JAMA 1990;263:3035-42. 46. Mahoney G, Boyce G, Fewell RR, Spiker D, Wheeden CA. The relationship of parent-child interaction to the effectiveness of early intervention services for at-risk children and children with disabilities. Topics Early Child Spec Educ 1998;18:5-13. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43609 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 第一章
親子互動品質可能與生理(如出生狀況)及環境因素有關(如父母的情緒),早產兒出生後由於各系統不成熟,且父母的壓力大,其親子互動中的表現是否與足月兒有異,甚而因此影響到後來的發展,相當值得深入探討。本論文的目的在回顧過去早產兒親子互動的文獻,並探討早產兒及其母親的互動行為、親子互動對於早產兒後續的發展影響、理想的親子互動模式以及提供親子互動衛教的早期介入對於早產兒發展的介入效果。綜合文獻資料顯示,早產兒的母親比足月兒的母親較常出現負面的互動行為,例如過度的控制行為、低敏感度和低反應。而且,這些負面的互動行為與早產兒的不利發展 (如認知、語言和行為表現)具有相關。至於提供親子互動衛教的早期介入研究則顯示,對於早期母親互動行為具有療效的介入方式同時也能帶來後續的發展預後提昇。總結而言,以上的資料提供重要訊息以幫助了解早產兒親子互動,未來的研究需探討何種親子互動模式的介入能為早產兒帶來更大的發展效益。 第二章 目的:本研究的目的在檢驗早期介入對於極低出生體重早產兒之親子互動和發展預後的療效,並且探討親子互動是否會影響發展預後的療效。方法:166名極低出生體重早產兒被納入此臨床隨機實驗中(門診介入組:n=55;家訪介入組:n=58;常規組:n=53),門診和家訪介入組的介入治療會由住院期開始至矯正年齡12個月。親子互動於嬰孩矯正年齡6、9和12個月時使用自由玩耍的方式來評估互動的品質,嬰兒發展則於矯正年齡24個月時使用貝萊氏嬰幼兒發展評估工具第三版以評估認知、語言和動作發展。結果:門診介入組的母親比常規組的母親較常使用高品質的互動行為(9個月:差異[95%信賴區間] = 10% [-1%至21%],p = 0.08;12個月:差異[95%信賴區間] = 10% [-1%至22%],p = 0.07)。矯正年齡24個月時,門診介入組比常規組的早產兒有明顯較高的認知分數(差異[95%信賴區間] = 6.1 [0.9至11.4],p = 0.03)和較低的動作遲緩發生率(勝算比[95%信賴區間] = 0.2 [0.04至1.1],p = 0.06)。多變項迴歸分析顯示把12個月時母親高品質互動行為放進迴歸方程式後,明顯降低了門診介入與認知發展間的相關性,但對於介入與動作遲緩的相關性則無改變。至於家訪介入組則在親子互動和發展預後方面均未呈現明顯的療效。結論:早期介入(尤其是門診介入)有利於極低出生體重早產兒於出生後兩年內的親子互動品質和認知與動作發展預後,而且早期的母親互動行為改善似能部份解釋其孩童認知發展預後的療效。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Chapter 1
The quality of mother-infant interaction in preterm infants may be associated with biological (e.g., perinatal condition) and environmental factors (e.g., parental emotion). Due to biological immaturity and high parental stress, it is crucial to elucidate whether preterm infants differ from term infants in the quality of mother-infant interaction that results in subsequent adverse developmental outcome. The purpose of this paper was therefore to review previous studies regarding parent-infant interaction associated with preterm birth, particularly focusing on the mother-infant interactive behavior in preterm and term infants, the impact of maternal interactive behavior on preterm infants’ development, the optimal model of mother-infant interaction, and the effectiveness of mother-infant interaction education on preterm infants’ developmental outcome. The results showed that negative maternal interactive behaviors, such as more controlling, less sensitivity and less response, more often occurred in preterm infants than in term infants. These negative interactive behaviors were found to associate with later adverse development (e.g. cognitive, language and behavior) in preterm infants. Several intervention studies showed positive effects on early maternal interactive behavior and later child development. In summary, the findings provide important information to help understand the mother-infant interaction associated with preterm birth. Future study needs to investigate what style of mother-infant interaction intervention will best benefit child development. Chapter 2 Objective: To examine the effectiveness of early intervention on mother-infant interaction and developmental outcome in very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants; and to investigate whether mother-infant interaction influenced the intervention effect on developmental outcome. Methods: This randomization control trial included 166 VLBW preterm infants (clinic-based intervention program [CBIP]: n=55; home-based intervention program [HBIP]: n=58; usual care program [UCP]: n=53) in the experimental and follow-up period. The CBIP and HBIP commenced in hospitalization and ended at 12 months of corrected age (CA). Mother-infant dyads were examined the quality of interaction in free play at 6, 9 and 12 months CA. Infants were assessed their cognitive, language and motor development at 24 months CA using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-3rd edition. Results: The CBIP group mothers more frequently used high-quality interactive behavior in free play than the UCP group mothers during the experimental period (9 months: difference [95% CI] = 10% [-1% to 21%], p = 0.08; 12 months: difference [95% CI] = 10% [-1% to 22%], p = 0.07). Subsequently, the CBIP group infants showed better cognitive performance (difference [95% CI] = 6.1 [0.9 to 11.4], p = 0.03) and lower incidence of motor delay (odd ratio [95% CI] = 0.2 [0.04 to 1.1], p = 0.06) than the UCP group infants at 24 months CA. Inclusion of the maternal interactive behavior at 12 months CA in the multivariate regression model had significantly attenuated the relation of intervention (CBIP) with cognitive outcome but did not influence intervention effect on motor outcome. In contrast, the maternal interactive behavior and child developmental outcomes did not vary between the HBIP and UCP groups. Conclusions: Early intervention, specifically the CBIP, was beneficial for the mother-infant interaction and cognitive/motor outcome in VLBW preterm infants during the first two years of age. Early maternal interactive behavior might mediate the intervention effect on their cognitive outcome. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:24:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98428013-1.pdf: 461815 bytes, checksum: dc9420488a09fb157e799c08a7f34d77 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 序言 iii Preface iv Contents v Chapter 1 Mother-Infant Interaction in Preterm Infants 1 Chinese Abstract 2 English Abstract 3 1.1 Introduction 4 1.2 Infant and maternal interactive behavior 5 1.3 Impact of mother-infant interaction on developmental outcomes 5 1.4 Optimal model of mother-infant interaction 7 1.5 Effectiveness of early intervention involved mother-infant interaction on developmental outcome 8 1.6 Conclusion 10 1.7 Acknowledgements 10 1.8 References 11 Tables Table 1.1 16 Cohort studies of interactive behavior in preterm and term infants, and their moths Table 1.2 17 Prospective cohort studies of the impact of mother-infant interaction on developmental outcomes in preterm infants Table 1.3 18 Studies of early intervention which providing education of mother-infant interaction – Subjects, intervention and content of intervention Table 1.4 19 Effectiveness of early intervention on maternal interactive behavior and developmental outcomes of preterm infants in five study groups Chapter 2 Intervention Effects on Mother-Infant Interaction and Developmental Outcome in Preterm Infants: A Randomization Controlled Trial 20 Chinese Abstract 21 English Abstract 22 2.1 Introduction 24 2.2 Methods 27 2.2.1 Study Sample 27 2.2.2 Usual Care and Intervention 28 2.2.3 Testing Procedure 28 2.2.4 Outcome Measures 29 2.2.4.1 Maternal Interactive Behavior 29 2.2.4.2 Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development- 3rd edition (Bayley-III) 30 2.2.5 Statistic Analysis 31 2.3 Results 32 2.3.1 Participants 32 2.3.2 Intervention Effect on Maternal Interactive Behavior 33 2.3.3 Intervention Effect on Infant Developmental Outcomes 34 2.3.4 Mediating or Moderating Role of Maternal Interactive Behavior 34 2.4 Discussion 35 2.5 Conclusions 39 2.6 Acknowledgements 40 2.7 References 41 Figure Legend 49 Tables Table 2.1 50 Infant and parent characteristics of VLBW preterm infants and term infants Table 2.2 51 Illustration of the Bayley-III composite scores and the rate of developmental delay in VLBW preterm infants and term infants at 24 months CA Table 2.3 52 Multivariate regression analysis for the relation of intervention predictor and maternal interactive behavior with cognitive and motor outcomes Figures Figure 2.1 53 Flow chart of allocation and follow-up in VLBW preterm infants and term infants Figure 2.2 54 Illustration of the proportion of high-quality maternal interactive behavior in the CBIP, HBIP, UCP and term groups at 6, 9 and 12 months CA | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 早期介入對於早產兒之親子互動與發展預後的療效: 臨床隨機實驗 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Intervention Effects on Mother-Infant Interaction and Developmental Outcome in Preterm Infants: A Randomization Controlled Trial | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝武勳(Wu-Shiun Hsieh),陳為堅(Wei J Chen),陳麗秋(Li-Chiou Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 早產,早期介入,兒童發展,親子互動, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | premature,early intervention,child development,mother-infant interaction, | en |
dc.relation.page | 54 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 450.99 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。