Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43561
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor曹承礎(Seng-Cho Chou)
dc.contributor.authorYi-Jung Jouen
dc.contributor.author周依蓉zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T02:23:26Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-19
dc.date.copyright2009-08-19
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-08-18
dc.identifier.citation一、中文部分
[1] 吳婉菱(民95)。以知識創新觀點探討數位音樂平台服務與使用者需求之相關研究,南台科技大學資訊傳播系碩士論文,台南縣。
[2] 沈建宏(民97)。企劃市公車有魅力的服務屬性之實證研究-以台中市區統聯公車為例,東海大學企業管理學系碩士論文,台中市。
[3] 周立軒(民94)。網誌的使用者與使用行為之研究,元智大學資訊傳播學系網路傳播組碩士論文,桃園市。
[4] 陳俊傑(民94)。中華民國選舉事務FMEA之研究,義守大學工業工程與管理學系碩士論文,高雄市。
[5] 陳瑋玲(民98)。部落格互動性功能之研究。北商學報,第15期,頁65-82。
[6] 資策會(民97)。服務體驗工程方法指引-實務篇。台北市:財團法人資訊工業策進會創新應用服務研究所。
[7] 資策會(民97)。新時代網路創新服務發展個案集。台北市:財團法人資訊工業策進會創新應用服務研究所。
二、英文部分
[8] Alam, I. (2002), “An Exploratory Investigation of User Involvement in New Service Development”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 250-261.
[9] Alam, I. and Perry, C. (2002), “A customer-oriented new service development process”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.16, No.6, pp. 515-534.
[10] Araujo, C.S., Benedetto-Neto, H., Campello, A.C., Segre, F.M., & Wright, I.C. (1996), “The utilization of product development methods: a survey of UK industry”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp.265-277.
[11] Barbour, R.S. (2005), “Making sense of focus groups”, Medical Education, Vol.39, Issue 7, pp. 742-750.
[12] Bitner, M.J., Booms, B.H. and Tetreault, M.S. (1990), “The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents”, The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 71-84.
[13] Bowers, M.R. (1987), “Developing new services for hospitals: a suggested model”, Journal of Health Care Marketing, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp.35-44.
[14] Bowers, M.R. (1989), “Developing New Services: Improving the Process Makes It Better”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp.15.
[15] Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G. and van der Heijden, K. (2005), “The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning”, Futures, Vol. 37, Issue 8, pp.795-812.
[16] Breiing, A. and Kunz, A. (2002), “Critical Consideration and Improvement of the FMEA” In Fuxi Gan, Ji Zhou, & Zuoyi Li (Chair), 6th International Symposium on Optical Storage, Fourth International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering-TMCE, Wuhan, China.
[17] Bullinger, H., Fähnrich, K. and Meiren, T. (2003), “Service engineering—methodical development of new service products”, International Journal Production Economics, Vol. 85, Issue 3, pp.275-287.
[18] Buttle, F. (1996), “SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 8-32.
[19] Chai, K.H., Zhang, J., and Tan, K.C. (2005), “A TRIZ-based method for new service design”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 8, No.1, pp.48-66.
[20] Cooper, R.G. and de Brentani, U. (1991), “New Industrial Financial Services: What Distinguishes the Winners”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp.75-90.
[21] Cooper, R.G., Easingwood, C.J., Edgett, C., Kieinschmidt, E.J. and Storey, C. (1994), “What Distinguish the Top Performing New Products in Financial Services”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp.281-299.
[22] Cristiano, J.J., Liker, J.K. and White, C.C. Ⅲ (2001), “Key Factors in the Successful Application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD)”, IEEE Tansactions on engineering management, Vol. 48, No. 1.
[23] Dasu, S. and Rao, J. (1999), “A Dynamic Process Model of Dissatisfaction for Unfavorable, Non-Routine Service Encounters”, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp.282-300.
[24] Edgett, S. (1996), “The New Product Development Process for Commercial Financial Service”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.25, No.6, pp.507-515.
[25] Fujita, K. and Matsuo, T. (2005, August), “Utilization of Product Development Tools and Methods: Japanese Survey and International Comparison”, Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Engineering Design -ICED 05, Melbourne, Australia, Paper Number 98.81.
[26] Gitlow, H.S. (1998), “Innovation on Demand”, Quality Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.79-89.
[27] Goudarzlou, A. and Chuan, T.K. (2008, June), “Using six sigma in new service development”, 5th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM'08), Melbourne, Australia, pp.1-6.
[28] Green, P.E. and Rao, V.R. (1971), “Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 355-363.
[29] Green, P.E. and Srinivasan, V. (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research Issues and Outlook”, Journal of consumer research, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 103.
[30] Gustafsson, A., Ekdahl, F. and Bergman, B. (1999),”Conjoint analysis: a useful tool in the design process”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 327-343.
[31] Hartline, M.D., Maxham, J.G. III and McKee, D.O. (2000), “Corridors of Influence in the Dissemination of Customer-Oriented Strategy to Customer Contact Service Employees”, The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 35-50.
[32] Herrmann, A., Huber, F. and Braunstein, C. (2000), “Market-driven product and service design: Bridging the gap between customer needs, quality management, and customer satisfaction”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 66, Issue 1, pp.77-96.
[33] Herstatt, C. and von Hippel, E. (1992), “Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a Low Tech Field”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp.213-221.
[34] Herstatt, C., Lüthje, C. and Lettl, C. (2002) Innovationsfelder mit Lead Usern erschließen, Harvard Business Manager,Vol. 24, No. 1, pp.60-68.
[35] Johne, A. and Storey, C. (1998), “New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 32, No. 3/4, pp. 184-251.
[36] Kelly, D. and Storey, C. (2000),”New Service Development: Initiation Strategy”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol.11, No.1, pp.45-62.
[37] Kim, C., Choe, S., Choi, C. and Park, Y. (2008), “A systematic approach to new mobile service creation”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.35, Issue 3, pp.762-771.
[38] Luce, R.D. and Tukey, J.W. (1964), “Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 1-27.
[39] Lüthje, C. and Herstatt, C. (2004), “The Lead User method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research”, R&D Management, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 553-568.
[40] Martin, C.R. Jr and Horne, D.A. (1995), “Level of success inputs for service innovations in the same firm”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 40-56.
[41] Matzler, K. and Hinterhuber, H.H. (1998), “How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment”, Technovation, Vol. 18, Issue 1, pp.25-38.
[42] McKenzie, B. (2006), “Retail service quality success factors in Estonia: a qualitative approach”, Baltic Journal of Management, Vol.1, No.3, pp. 352-369.
[43] McQuater, R.E., Scurr, C.H., Dale, B.G. and Hillman, P.G. (1995), “Using quality tools and techniques successfully”, The TQM Magazine, Vol.7, Number 6, pp. 37-42.
[44] Menor, L.J., Tatikonda, M.V. and Sampson, S.E. (2002), “New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration”, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 20, pp.135–157.
[45] Merton, R.K. (1987), “The Focussed Interview and Focus Groups Continuities and Discontinuities”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 51, pp. 550.
[46] Mietzner, D. and Reger, G. (2005), “Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight”, International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 220-239.
[47] Miguel, P.A.C. (2003), “The state-of-the-art of the Brazilian QFD applications at the top 500 companies”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability: Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp.74-89.
[48] Mohammed, A. (2004). Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)–a Comprehensive Quality Tool. Paper presented at the Proceedings from the 2 nd seminar on Development of Modular Products, Dalarna University, Sweden.
[49] Moskowitz, H.R., Gofman, A., Itty, B., Katz, R., Manchaiah, M. and Ma, Z. (2001), “Rapid, inexpensive, actionable concept generation and optimization: the use and promise of self-authoring conjoint analysis for the food service industry.”, Food Service Technology, Vol. 1, Issue 3, pp. 149-167.
[50] Nielsen, J. (1997), “The Use and Misuse of Focus Groups”, Software, IEEE, Vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 94-95.
[51] Nijssen, E.J. and Lieshout, K.F.M. (1995), “Awareness, use and effectiveness of models and methods for new product development”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 29 No. 10, pp. 27-44.
[52] Nijssen, E.J.and Frambach, R.T. (2000), “Determinants of the Adoption of New Product Development Tools by Industrial Firms”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp.121-131.
[53] Oke, A. (2004), “Barriers to innovation management in service companies”, Journal of Change Management, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 31-44.
[54] Parasurman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.49, pp.41-50.
[55] Postma, T.J.B.M. and Liebl, F. (2005), “How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool?”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 72, pp. 161–173.
[56] Powell, R.A. and Single, H.M. (1996), “Focus Groups”, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol.8, No. 5, pp.499-504.
[57] Pullman, M.E., Moore, W.L. and Wardell, D.G. (2002), “A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design” , The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp.354-364.
[58] Pura, M. and Gummerus, J. (2007, February) “Discovering Value Perceptions of Mobile Services with Critical Incident Technique (CIT).” Marketing Theory and Applications, American Marketing Educators’ Conference, San Diego, USA, pp.16-19.
[59] Rahman, Z. (2004), “Developing customer oriented service: a case study”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 14, Number 5, pp. 426-435.
[60] Regan, W.J. (1963), “The service revolution”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.27, pp.32-36.
[61] Scheuing, E.E. and Johnson, M.E. (1989a), “A Proposed Model for New Service Development”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.3, No.2, pp25-34.
[62] Shafti, F., van der Meer, R. and Williams, T. (2007), “An Empirical Approach to Service Classification for Productivity Management Studies”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol.27, No.6, pp.709-730.
[63] Shekar, A. (2007), “An Innovative Model of Service Development: A process guide for service managers”, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Vol. 12, No.1.
[64] Shostack, G.L. (1984). “Designing services that deliver”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.62, Issue1, pp. 133-139.
[65] Sim, J. (1998), “Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol.28, No.2, pp. 345-352.
[66] Slater, S.F. (2001), “Market orientation at the beginning of a new millennium”, Managing Service Quality, Vol.11, No. 4, pp. 230-232.
[67] Spring, M., McQuater, R., Swift, K., Dale, B. and Booer, J.D. (1998), “The use of quality tools and techniques in product introduction: an assessment methodology”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 45-50.
[68] Stauss, B. and Weinlich, B. (1997), “Process-oriented measurement of service quality applying the sequential incident technique”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 33-55.
[69] Storey, C. and Easingwood, C.J. (1996), “Determinants of New Product performance: A Study in the Financial Service Sector”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol.7, No. 1, pp. 32-55.
[70] Storey, C. and Kelly, D. (2001), “Measuring the Performance of New Service Development Activities”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol.21, No.2, pp.71-90.
[71] Tan, K.C. and Pawitra, T.A. (2001), “Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano's model into QFD for service excellence development”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 418-430.
[72] Thia, C.W., Chai, K., Bauly, J. and Xin, Y. (2005), “An exploratory study of the use of quality tools and techniques in product development”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 406-424.
[73] Tsumaki, T (2006),”Framework for matching requirements elicitation techniques to project characteristics”, Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp.505.
[74] Urban, G.L. and von Hippel, E. (1988), “Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products”, Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 569-582.
[75] van de Kar, E. and van der Duin, P. (2004), “Dealing with uncertainties in building scenarios for the development of mobile services”, development, Vol. 15, pp. 19-21.
[76] van Kleef, E., van Trijp, H.C.M. and Luning, P. (2005),”Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp.181-201.
[77] von Hippel, E. (1986), “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts”, Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 791-805.
[78] Wittink, D.R., Vriens, M. and Burhenne, W. (1994), “Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: results and critical reflections”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 11, No.1, pp.41.
[79] Xin, Y., Chai, K.H. and Bauly, J.A. (2004, October), “The Application of New Product Development Tools in Industry”, In H.K. Tang (chair), Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development, Vol.3, pp. 968- 972., ISBN 0-78030-8519-5.
[80] Yang, C. (2007), “A Systems Approach to Service Development in a Concurrent Engineering Environment”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol.27, No.5, pp.635-652.
[81] Yeh, T., Pai, F. and Yang, C. (2008), “Performance improvement in new product development with effective tools and techniques adoption for high-tech industries”, Quality and Quantity.
[82] Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A. (1993), “The Nature and Determinants of Customer Expectations of Service”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
肆、 網路部分
[83] List, D. (2005), “Market research methods for innovation development: an overview.” Retrieved May 29, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.emarketing.net.cn/upload/file/2009/02/05/161233822055976.pdf
[84] 行政院經濟建設委員會(民97)。2008台灣經濟發展歷程與策略。民97年11月12日,取自:http://www.cepd.gov.tw/dn.aspx?uid=6805
[85] 張殿文(無日期)。數位產業內容推動服務網。民98年7月14日,取自:http://proj3.moeaidb.gov.tw/nmipo/content/viewcontent.aspx?sn=5CC17879E6AB469DADF06EA907273682#Scene_1
[86] 黃麗秋(無日期)。協助服務業研究發展輔導計畫網站。民98年7月14日,取自:http://gcis.nat.gov.tw/neo-s/Express/96Express16.htm
[87] 部落格要用pixnet痞客邦的理由(民97年6月18日)。痞客邦網站。民98年7月17日,取自:http://amway6712426.pixnet.net/blog/post/18865867
[88] 創意瘋潮大賽 大家一起「開玩校」(民96年3月30日)。淡江網路新聞報。民98年7月17日,取自:http://www2.tku.edu.tw/~tknetnews/data/115.htm
[89] 數位資訊城邦、PIXNET結盟合寫部落格(民96年3月21日)。聯合新聞網。民98年7月17日,取自:http://mag.udn.com/mag/digital/printpage.jsp?f_ART_ID=93189
[90] 2005年我國家庭寬頻、行動與無線應用現況與需求調查(無日期)。資策會FIND網站。民98年7月17日,取自:http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx
[91] 陳威嘉(無日期)。部落格的使用行為分析。數位時代business next。民98年7月17日,取自:http://www.bnext.com.tw/StoreView_695
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43561-
dc.description.abstract在服務業成為最主要經濟產值的今天,新服務發展已成為維持競爭優勢所不可或缺的,而依循一定的階段與程序,正式地發展新服務有助於新服務發展的成功。在新服務發展中有許多方法可以作為新服務發展或設計的指引與輔助,這些方法能在新服務發展過程中,幫助定義問題、更瞭解顧客並使新服務發展朝正確的方向運作。
本研究主要探討數個常見的方法論,包括情境分析法、前端客戶法、焦點團體法、聯合分析法、服務機能展開(service QFD)、失效模式與效果分析法(FMEA)、關鍵事件法,及服務品質法(SERVQUAL)。首先將上述幾個方法作介紹,包括主要運用在哪一階段、操作步驟、詢問顧客的問題或方式,及應用這些方法的新服務案例研究等。這些方法常在新產品發展上被運用,有一些研究曾提出關於是否採用這些方法的背後原因,這些原因(內部因素)包括了方法本身的一些特性,因此本研究考量這些特性,再加上新服務發展中的關鍵議題、在意的關鍵資源,整理出方法的重要特性,作為方法分類與比較的基礎。
根據上述的角度歸納出特性後,進一步運用個案分析的方式,探討這些方法在網路公司新服務發展上的應用情形。由於現今網路服務已成為不可忽視的服務項目之一,其中電子商務為網路產業發展最迅速的經濟型態,而台灣電子商務成長率快速、前景頗受看好,另外,由於台灣的部落格社群網站盛行,為網路上最熱門的活動之一,因而選擇電子商務與社群網站類型的網路服務,作為本研究的研究對象。本研究試圖瞭解這些公司在關於方法特性上,是否使用這些方法及其原因,以及在使用上的關鍵考量,以期對本研究根據理論歸納出的方法之關鍵維度,作實務上的驗證或補充,並藉此嘗試作為方法實務運用上適合度的探討。
研究結果發現,根據文獻所整理出的維度在實務上確實為服務發展者所在意的,此外也發現一些額外的資訊,對於服務發展者在使用這些方法上的考量有更進一步的瞭解,並且根據各案分析,歸納出網路產業在方法選擇與使用上的可能模式及適合性。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractService industry has been the most important source of economic output value now, and new service development (NSD) has become essential for maintain advantage. Following formal stages and processes of service development is helpful for success to NSD. In NSD stages some methods can be used to direct or assist developing, which can help identifying question, better understanding of customer needs and make things have right direction.
Our research focus on some common methods, including scenario technology, lead user method, focus group, conjoint analysis, service QFD, FMEA, critical incident technique and SERVQUAL. First, we introduce for which stages these methods are used, operation procedure of methods, question for customer and literature of NSD application. Second, considering previous literature about the main reasons adopted (or not) these methods, adding to key barriers in NSD, conclude important characteristics of methods. These dimensions become the foundation of our classification schema.
After making up important characteristics of methods according to above point of view, we try to understand the situation of methods used in NSD in Taiwan by case study. Now Internet services are very significant, especially websites of electronic commerce and social network such as blog, hence we choose them as target of this research. We attempt to realize whether they adopt some methods, the reason they do and which key consideration they have with regard to some characteristics of methods. By these survey and interviews, we verify the dimensions in our research and address some other key dimensions of methods, and furthermore explore issues about appropriateness of methods.
Research results find the dimensions about characteristics we develop are the service developers concern about. Moreover, we find some other information and further insight regarding what service developers think about using these methods. Finally, we conclude the pattern and appropriateness of Internet service about using and choosing methods.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:23:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R96725012-1.pdf: 926289 bytes, checksum: e2523bf7519a9bd065c3a1abd1f5581a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 I
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
目錄 IV
表次 VI
圖次 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 章節介紹 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 服務與服務業 4
第二節 服務創新 6
第三節 新服務發展模式 8
第四節 顧客涉入(CUSTOMER INVOLVEMENT) 16
第五節 方法與工具(TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES) 19
第六節 小結 34
第三章 研究方法 36
第一節 研究流程 36
第二節 研究架構 37
第四章 資料分析 41
第一節 方法的分類 41
第二節 方法的分佈 60
第三節 方法的適用性(APPROPRIATENESS) 63
第五章 服務發展個案分析 64
第一節 花道家FLOWERDJ 64
第二節 痞客邦PIXNET 72
第六章 結論與建議 78
第一節 結論與討論 78
第二節 研究限制與未來發展 83
參考文獻 84
附錄:訪談相關資訊及問題彙整 92
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject新服務發展zh_TW
dc.subject服務工程zh_TW
dc.subject方法論zh_TW
dc.subject方法zh_TW
dc.subject方法特性zh_TW
dc.subject方法分類zh_TW
dc.subject方法比較zh_TW
dc.subjectmethodologyen
dc.subjectmethod comparisonen
dc.subjectmethod classificationen
dc.subjectmethod characteristicsen
dc.subjectmethoden
dc.subjectservice engineeringen
dc.subjectnew service developmenten
dc.title新服務發展-方法論的探討與分類zh_TW
dc.titleReview and Survey of Methods and Techniques in New Service Development Stagesen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu),許瑋元(Wei-Yuan Hsu)
dc.subject.keyword新服務發展,服務工程,方法論,方法,方法特性,方法分類,方法比較,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordnew service development,service engineering,methodology,method,method characteristics,method classification,method comparison,en
dc.relation.page92
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2009-08-18
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
904.58 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved