請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43442
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林以正(Yi-cheng Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Chuan Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 程威銓 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T02:21:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王雅鈴(2007)。「華人依附焦慮傾向與忍耐調控機制:對偶資料之多層次模式分析」(未發表之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。
王慶福、林幸台、張德榮(1996)。愛情關係發展與適應之評量工具編制。「中國測驗學會測驗年刊」,43,227-240。 利翠珊 (1995)。夫妻互動歷程之探討:以臺北地區年輕夫妻為例的一項初探性研究。「本土心理學研究」, 4, 260-321。 李怡真、林以正. (2006)。愛情關係中的情緒表達衝突之縱貫研究。「中華心理學刊」,48(1),53-67。 林以正、黃金蘭 (2006)。親密感之日常社會互動基礎:一個縱貫式的研究。「中華心理學刊」,48(1),35-52。 林以正、黃金蘭 (2011)。「中文版語文探索與字詞計算字典之建立」。第七屆華人心理學家學術研討會, 中央研究院,台北。取自http://140.112.62.214/cpc2011/index.php 孫瑋成(2006)。「現代華人的婚姻理想:以台灣地區年輕夫妻為例」。(未發表之碩士論文)。世新大學,台北 徐玉青、卓紋君(2003)。訂婚情侶衝突與因應歷程之分析。「諮商輔導文粹:高師輔導所刊」, 8, 61-89. 張妤玥、陸洛 (2007)。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關連。「中華心理衛生學刊」,20(2)。155-178。 張思嘉 (2001)。婚姻早期的適應過程:新婚夫妻之質性研究。「本土心理學研究」, 16, 91-133。 張思嘉 (2009)。婚前關係與婚後適應:一個長期性的研究。「中華心理學刊」,51(3) ,319-339。 張思嘉、周玉慧、黃宗堅(2008)。新婚夫妻的婚姻適應:概念測量與模式檢驗。「中華心理學刊」,50(4), 425-446。 陳富美 (2005)。夫妻分工:怎麽說平等或不平等?「應用心理研究」,25,18-20。 陳富美、利翠珊(2004)。不同情感組型夫妻在家事分工上的差異:對偶資料的分析。「應用心理研究」,24,95-115。 程威銓、黃金蘭、林以正、王雅鈴、鍾函君(2011)。「書寫中敘事觀點的效果分析: 人稱字詞與親密關係品質」。第七屆華人心理學家學術研討會, 中央研究院,台北。取自http://140.112.62.214/cpc2011/index.php 劉惠琴(1993)。Conflict Resolution Processes in Close Relationships。「婦女與兩性學刊」, 4,207-244。 謝文宜(2006)。為什麼結婚:國內將婚伴侶婚姻承諾考量因素之探討「中華輔導學報」,20,51-82。 Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. [Review]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1177-1196. Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. [Proceedings Paper]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 939-954. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. Belsky, J., & Rovine, M. (1990). Patterns of marital change across the transition to parenthood - pregnancy to 3 years postpartum. [Article]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(1), 5-19. Borelli, J. L., Sbarra, D. A., Mehl, M., & David, D. H. (2010). Experiential connectedness in children's attachment interviews: An examination of natural word use. Personal Relationships, no-no. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01294.x Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage - review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 3-33. Brehm, S., Miller, R. B., & Perlmam, D. (2010). Intimate Relationships (郭輝, Trans. 3 ed.). 北京: 人民電郵. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas - effects of social identity, group-size, and decision framing. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 543-549. Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. [Article]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(3), 296-309. Bucx, F., & Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2010). Romantic relationships in intra-ethnic and inter-ethnic adolescent couples in Germany: The role of attachment to parents, self-esteem, and conflict resolution skills. [Article]. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(2), 128-135. doi: 10.1177/0165025409360294 Buehlman, K., Carrere, S., & Siler, C. (2005). The oral history coding system: A measure of marital cognition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Publ. Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3-4), 295-318. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295 Buunk, A. P. (2006). Responses to a happily married other: The role of relationship satisfaction and social comparison orientation. [Article]. Personal Relationships, 13(4), 397-409. Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2001). Attachment orientations, dependence, and behavior in a stressful situation: An application of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(6), 821-843. Canevello, A., & Crocker, J. (2010). Creating Good Relationships: Responsiveness, Relationship Quality, and Interpersonal Goals. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 78-106. doi: 10.1037/a0018186 Carnelley, K. B., & Rowe, A. C. (2010). Priming a sense of security: What goes through people's minds? [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 253-261. doi: 10.1177/0265407509360901 Carrere, S., Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., Coan, J. A., & Ruckstuhl, L. (2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples. [Article]. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(1), 42-58. Covey, S. R. (2004). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Families (汪芸, Trans.). 台北: 天下文化. Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 555-575. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.555 Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 791-808. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.791 Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2003). Getting to know you: The relational self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. [Article]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 512-523. doi: 10.1177/0146197202250920 Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. [Proceedings Paper]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 399-418. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.399 Dailey, R. M., Pfiester, A., Jin, B., Beck, G., & Clark, G. (2009). On-again/off-again dating relationships: How are they different from other dating relationships? [Article]. Personal Relationships, 16(1), 23-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01208.x Epstein, E. M., Sloan, D. M., & Marx, B. P. (2005). Getting to the heart of the matter: Written disclosure, gender, and heart rate. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(3), 413-419. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000160474.82170.7b Epstein, N., Pretzer, J. L., & Fleming, B. (1987). The role of cognitive appraisal in self-reports of marital communication. [Article]. Behavior Therapy, 18(1), 51-69. Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). Cognitive-processes and conflict in close relationships - an attribution-efficacy model. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1106-1118. Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2004). Language and interpersonal cognition: Causal effects of variations in pronoun usage on perceptions of closeness. [Article]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 547-557. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262852 Fletcher, G. J. O., Fincham, F. D., Cramer, L., & Heron, N. (1987). The role of attributions in the development of dating relationships. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 481-489. Flora, J., & Segrin, C. (2000). Relationship development in dating couples: Implications for relational satisfaction and loneliness. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(6), 811-825. Flora, J., & Segrin, C. (2003). Relational well-being and perceptions of relational history in married and dating couples. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(4), 515-536. Floyd, F. J., & Markman, H. J. (1984). An economical observational measure of couple's communication skill. [Article]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52(1), 97-103. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What Do You Do When Things Go Right? The Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Benefits of Sharing Positive Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228-245. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228 Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Hochschild, L. (2002). When you and I are 'we,' you are not threatening: The role of self-expansion in social comparison. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 239-251. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.2.239 Gore, J. S., Cross, S. E., & Morris, M. L. (2006). Let's be friends: Relational self-construal and the development of intimacy. [Article]. Personal Relationships, 13(1), 83-102. Gottman, J., Swanson, C., & Murray, J. (1999). The mathematics of marital conflict: Dynamic mathematical nonlinear modeling of newlywed marital interaction. [Article]. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(1), 3-19. Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction - a longitudinal view. [Article]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47-52. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. [Article]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(3), 737-745. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2002). A two-factor model for predicting when a couple will divorce: Exploratory analyses using 14-year longitudinal data. [Article]. Family Process, 41(1), 83-96. Graham, J. M., & Christiansen, K. (2009). The reliability of romantic love: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. [Review]. Personal Relationships, 16(1), 49-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01209.x Groom, C. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2005). The language of love: Sex, sexual orientation, and language use in online personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 52(7-8), 447-461. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-3711-0 Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The Relationship Assessment Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137-142. doi: 10.1177/0265407598151009 Hojjat, M. (2000). Sex differences and perceptions of conflict in romantic relationships. [Proceedings Paper]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(4-5), 598-617. Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition - empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 730-742. Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language Style Matching in Writing: Synchrony in Essays, Correspondence, and Poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 549-571. doi: 10.1037/a0020386 Ireland, M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., Scissors, L. E., Finkel, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science. Jakubowski, S. F., Milne, E. P., Brunner, H., & Miller, R. B. (2004). A review of empirically supported marital enrichment programs. [Proceedings Paper]. Family Relations, 53(5), 528-536. Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation - devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 967-980. Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social-exchange perspectives on relationships - effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 951-969. Kluwer, E. S., Tumewu, M., & van den Bos, K. (2009). Men's and women's reactions to fair and unfair treatment in relationship conflict. Personal Relationships, 16(4), 455-474. Knee, C. R. C., Amy, Bush, A. L., & Cook, A. (2008). Relationship-contingent self-esteem and the ups and downs of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 608-627. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.608 Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., & Knudson, R. M. (2009). Marital ideals of the newly-married: A longitudinal analysis. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2-3), 249-271. doi: 10.1177/0265407509106717 Kurdek, L. A. (1991). Predictors of increases in marital distress in newlywed couples - a 3-year prospective longitudinal-study. [Article]. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 627-636. Kwang, T., Neff, L. A., & Swann, W. B. (2011). When two become one:Nature and consequences of three forms of identity merger in couples. Paper presented at the 2011 annual meeting of Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, Texas. Oral retrieved from http://www.spspmeeting.org/archive/SPSP2011_Program.pdf Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of Change in Marital Satisfaction Over the Newlywed Years. [Article]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72(5), 1171-1187. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.x Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. [Proceedings Paper]. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 37-57. Lemay, E. P., Jr., Clark, M. S., & Feeney, B. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 834-853. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.834 Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, E. R. (2006). Perceived similarity and relationship success among dating couples: An idiographic approach. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 865-880. doi: 10.1177/0264407506068267 Maisel, N. C., Gable, S. L., & Strachman, A. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad. [Article]. Personal Relationships, 15(3), 317-338. McNulty, J. K., & Fisher, T. D. (2007). Gender Differences in Response to Sexual Expectancies and Changes in Sexual Frequency: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study of Sexual Satisfaction in Newly Married Couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(2), 229-240. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9176-1 Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Bar-On, N., & Ein-Dor, T. (2010). The Pushes and Pulls of Close Relationships: Attachment Insecurities and Relational Ambivalence. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 450-468. doi: 10.1037/a0017366 Mongeau, P. A., Jacobsen, J., & Donnerstein, C. (2007). Dfining dates and first date goals - Generalizing from undergraduates to single adults. [Article]. Communication Research, 34(5), 526-547. doi: 10.1177/0093650207305235 Morry, M. M., Kito, M., & Ortiz, L. (2011). The attraction-similarity model and dating couples: Projection, perceived similarity, and psychological benefits. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 125-143. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01293.x Murray, S. L. (1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 23-34. Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. [Article]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(6), 586-604. Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2009). The Architecture of Interdependent Minds: A Motivation-Management Theory of Mutual Responsiveness. Psychological Review, 116(4), 908-928. doi: 10.1037/a0017015 Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Aloni, M., Pinkus, R. T., Derrick, J. L., & Leder, S. (2009). Commitment Insurance: Compensating for the Autonomy Costs of Interdependence in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 256-278. doi: 10.1037/a0014562 Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. [Proceedings Paper]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 79-98. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996b). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1155-1180. Murray, S. L., Leder, S., MacGregor, J. C. D., Homes, J. G., Pinkus, R. T., & Harris, B. (2009). Becoming irreplaceable: How comparisons to the partner's alternatives differentially affect low and high self-esteem people. [Article]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1180-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.001 Ogolsky, B. G. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. [Article]. Personal Relationships, 16(1), 99-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01212.x Orina, M. M., Collins, W. A., Simpson, J. A., Salvatore, J. E., & Kim, J. S. (in press). Want Lasting Love? It's Not More Commitment, but Equal Commitment That Matters. Psychological Science. Panayiotou, G. (2005). Love, commitment, and response to conflict among Cypriot dating couples: Two models, one relationship. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 108-117. doi: 10.1080/00207590444000230 Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication-networks and the development of romantic relationships - an expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. [Article]. Human Communication Research, 10(1), 55-79. Pennebaker, J. W., & Graybeal, A. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: disclosure, personality, and social integration. [Article]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3), 90-93. Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296-1312. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. [Article]. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717-731. Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. [Note]. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376. Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy, 201-225. Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Kohn, J. L., Wilson, C. L., Martin, A. M., Tran, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2011). Attachment orientations and depression: A longitudinal study of new parents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 567-586. doi: 10.1037/a0022802 Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model - the development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101-117. Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships - an interdependence analysis. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175-204. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-391. Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145059 Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships - theory and preliminary empirical-evidence. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 53-78. Rusbult, C. E., & Zembrodt, I. M. (1983). Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements - a multidimensional-scaling analysis. [Article]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(3), 274-293. Sanderson, C. A., & Karetsky, K. H. (2002). Intimacy Goals and Strategies of Conflict Resolution in Dating Relationships: A Mediational Analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(3), 317-337. doi: 10.1177/0265407502193002 Sbarra, D. A., & Hazan, C. (2008). Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and Recovery. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 141-167. doi: 10.1177/1088868308315702 Seider, B. H., Hirschberger, G., Nelson, K. L., & Levenson, R. W. (2009). We Can Work It Out: Age Differences in Relational Pronouns, Physiology, and Behavior in Marital Conflict. [Article]. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 604-613. doi: 10.1037/a0016950 Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. doi: 10.1037//1082-989x.7.4.422 Sillars, A., Shellen, W., McIntosh, A., & Pomegranate, M. (1997). Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. [Proceedings Paper]. Western Journal of Communication, 61(4), 403-422. Simmons, R. A., Gordon, P. C., & Chambless, D. L. (2005). Pronouns in marital interaction - What do 'you' and 'I' say about marital health? [Article]. Psychological Science, 16(12), 932-936. Simpson, J. A., Kim, J. S., Fillo, J., Ickes, W., Rholes, W. S., Orina, M. M., & Winterheld, H. A. (2011). Attachment and the Management of Empathic Accuracy in Relationship-Threatening Situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 242-254. doi: 10.1177/0146167210394368 Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2010). Attachment and relationships: Milestones and future directions. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 173-180. doi: 10.1177/0265407509360909 Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Winterheld, H. A. (2009). Attachment Working Models Twist Memories of Relationship Events. Psychological Science, 21(2), 252-259. doi: 10.1177/0956797609357175 Slatcher, R. B., Vazire, S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). How Americans use instant messaging. [Article]. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 407-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00207.x Slotter, E. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Where Do You End and I Begin? Evidence for Anticipatory, Motivated Self-Other Integration Between Relationship Partners. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1137-1151. doi: 10.1037/a0013882 Smith, T. W., Berg, C. A., Florsheim, P., Uchino, B. N., Pearce, G., Hawkins, M., . . . Olsen-Cemy, C. (2009). Conflict and Collaboration in Middle-Aged and Older Couples: I. Age Differences in Agency and Communion During Marital Interaction. [Article]. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 259-273. doi: 10.1037/a0015609 Sprecher, S., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. [Proceedings Paper]. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 857-877. Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217-242. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. [Article]. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135. Story, T. N., Berg, C. A., Smith, T. W., Beveridge, R., Henry, N. J. M., & Pearce, G. (2007). Age, marital satisfaction, and optimism as predictors of positive sentiment override in middle-aged and older married couples. [Article]. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 719-727. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.719 Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. [Review]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54. doi: 10.1177/0261927x09351676 Tran, S., & Simpson, J. A. (2009). Prorelationship Maintenance Behaviors: The Joint Roles of Attachment and Commitment. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 685-698. doi: 10.1037/a0016418 VanLange, P. A. M., Agnew, C. R., Harinck, F., & Steemers, G. E. M. (1997). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1330-1344. Vanlange, P. A. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). My relationship is better than - and not as bad as - yours is - the perception of superiority in close relationships. [Article]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 32-44. Veroff, J., Sutherland, L., Chadiha, L., & Ortega, R. M. (1993a). Newlyweds tell their stories - a narrative method for assessing marital experiences. [Article]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(3), 437-457. Veroff, J., Sutherland, L., Chadiha, L. A., & Ortega, R. M. (1993b). Predicting marital quality with narrative assessments of marital experience. [Article]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(2), 326-337. Wang, Y. L., Lin, Y. C., Huang, C. L., & Yeh, K. H. (under revision). Benefit from a different angle: The effect of complementary matching of psychological distance on emotion regulation Asia Journal of Social Psychology. Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Foster, C. A. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. [Article]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 942-966. Williams-Baucom, K. J., Atkins, D. C., Sevier, M., Eldridge, K. A., & Christensen, A. (2010). 'You' and 'I' need to talk about 'us': Linguistic patterns in marital interactions. [Article]. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 41-56. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43442 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 語言是個體建構世界主要的方式之一。在親密關係的研究中,許多學者相信在溝通或描述彼此過去的回憶時,個體若使用較多的「我們」字詞,將代表一種一體感,是一種利關係的表徵,個體將會更願意採積極、整合的方式解決衝突,甚或有更好的關係滿意度。然而過去研究結果對此莫衷一是。研究者認為,過去的這些研究並未將兩人關係的承諾感加入考量,本研究假設「承諾感或交往時間長短」為此現象之調節變項,在關係初期承諾感尚低時,「我們」字詞的使用可能象徵個體願意跳脫出「單身」的思考模式,以「整體」的方式來描述共享的經歷,因而有利於關係的經營與品質;然而當交往時間較長承諾感增加時,兩人已經形成緊密連結,「我們」字詞的使用已經不再象徵這樣的一體感,無法再有效預測利關係行為與關係滿意度。
本論文試圖以三個研究驗證上述假設:研究一首先藉由後設分析發現,在交往時間較短的伴侶中,「「我們」字詞」的使用與關係滿意度呈現正相關,但在交往時間較長的伴侶中關係較弱。研究二收集40位親密關係交往初期的參與者,並假設在這些參與者中,其「我們」字詞的使用與整合型的衝突管理方式呈現正相關。研究三進一步邀請47位在戀愛關係中的參與者進行戀愛中的回憶書寫,並假設「我們」字詞的使用與整合型的衝突管理方式、關係滿意度呈正相關,但僅發生在承諾感低的個體中。整體結果顯示,個體在關係初期或低承諾感時,使用較多「我們」字詞個體,面臨衝突時較能整合彼此的需求、關係滿意度也較高。這意味著「我們」字詞使用在關係初期扮演維持關係的重要角色,也消解了過去文獻的不一致,更因為本研究採用不同的方式(後設分析、想像後書寫、回憶書寫)來探討此問題,使得字詞分析的研究方法更為多元、豐富。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | People use language to construct their world. Some psychologist in intimate relationship research field argued that if individual use “we” instead of “My partner and I” describing his/her romantic relationship, which reflect some kind of “we-ness”, he/she is more satisfy with partner.
This idea have been discussed and challenged these years. Past studies had investigated into this issue, some studies support this idea, and some studies not. While facing this problem, those studies did little to find the reason of inconsistency, which warranting some moderator. This article trying to use meta analysis first find out what variable might be the moderator, and manipulate a experiment to test the hypothesis. Study 1 found that relationship length might be the moderator, such that when couples just start their relationship, we-ness or perceived connected may play an important role; as the relationship goes longer, there are more problem need to be solve. Study 2 collect 40 subjects evolving in an intimate relationship rewrite an conflict essay, and found that people write more “we” pronoun in the text also use more positive strategy to solve conflict problem, while we failed to find moderation effect of relationship length. Study 3 use commitment level as a more sensitive moderator and satisfaction as a more suitable dependent variable. Result shown that when individual in high commitment level, no matter the subject have wrote “we” words or not, there was no satisfaction difference. However, when the commitment level is low, the more “we” words using might reflect higher relationship satisfaction. These result work in concert with past studies and demonstrated that the “we” effect might generally weak but relatively stronger in some specific condition. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T02:21:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97227116-1.pdf: 1598526 bytes, checksum: 1be3f96bdf5254138e601b6ca5e49095 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
致謝................................................................i 目錄...............................................................iv 中文摘要..........................................................vii 英文摘要.........................................................viii 第一章「我們」字詞與關係滿意度的後設分析(研究一) 第一節 緒論.....................................................P.1 第二節 研究方法.................................................P.6 第三節 研究結果.................................................P.6 第四節 討論....................................................P.11 第二章「我們」與衝突管理:交往時間做為調節變項(研究二) 第一節 緒論.....................................................P.13 第二節 研究架構與假設...........................................P.21 第三節 研究工具與方法...........................................P.22 第四節 研究結果.................................................P.24 第五節 討論.....................................................P.29 第三章 承諾感作為調節變項(研究三) 第一節 緒論....................................................P.35 第二節 研究架構與假設..........................................P.40 第三節 研究工具與方法..........................................P.41 第四節 研究結果................................................P.42 第四章 綜合討論 第一節 本研究之貢獻............................................P.50 第二節 研究限制、討論與未來方向................................P.58 參考文獻.........................................................P.65 註解.............................................................P.76 附錄.............................................................P.77 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 承諾感作為「我們」字詞使用與親密關係滿意度之調節變項 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Commitment as a Moderator of “We” Pronoun and Romantic Satisfaction | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 趙淑珠(Shu-Chu Chao),張思嘉(Szu-Chia Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 承諾感,親密關係,一體感,人稱代名詞使用,衝突管理模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | commitment,close relationship,we-ness,pronoun using,conflict management strategy., | en |
dc.relation.page | 86 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-23 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.56 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。