Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA)
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43396
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor曾智揚(Chih-Yang Tseng)
dc.contributor.authorSo-Hyun Sonen
dc.contributor.author孫所賢zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T01:54:09Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-03
dc.date.copyright2009-07-03
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-06-30
dc.identifier.citationBuchholtz, A.K., Allen C. Amason, and Matthew A. Rutherford, 2005, “ The impact of board monitoring and involvement on top management team affective conflict”, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 17-4, pp. 405-422
Barber, B.B. and Lyon, J.D., 1997, “Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: the empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Finance Economics, Vol. 43, pp.341-371
Canavan Judy, Jones Blair, and Potter Mary Jo, 2004, “Board tenure: how long is too long? There are benefits and risks in lengthy director tenure, but the biggest risk lies in not being strategic in your board talent management.”,
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-137498/Board-tenure-how-long-is.html
Castaldi, R. and Wortman, M., 1984, “Boards of directors in small corporations: an untapped resource”, American Journal of Small Business, Vol.9-2. Pp. 1-10
Conger, J.A., Finegold, D and Lawler III, E.E, 1998, “Appraising Boardroom performance”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 136-148
Core, J.E., Robert W. Holthausen, David F. Larcker, 1999, “Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 51, pp. 371-406
COSO, 2004, “Enterprise Risk Management─Integrated Framework”, executive summary cat be found at:
http://www.coso.org/Publications/ERM/COSO_ERM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf
Cumming, C.M. and B.J. Hirtle, 2001, ‘The challenges of risk management in diversified financial companies’, FRBNY Economic Policy Review, March, 1-17
Fama, E.F. (1980), “Agency problems and the theory of the firm”, Jounal of Political Economy, Vol. 88-2, pp. 288-307
Fama E.F., and Jensen M.C., 1983, “Separation of ownership and control”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 301-25
Fama, E.F., and K.R. French, 1997, “Industry costs of equity”, Journal of financial economics, Vol. 43-2, pp. 153-193
Hillman, A.J. and Thomas Dalziel, 2003, “Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28-3, pp. 383-396
Hoyt, R.E., D.L. Moore, and A.P. Liebenberg, 2006, “The value of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from the U.S. Insurance Industry”, Working Paper
IMF, 2008, “Annual Report 2008: Chapter 5 Governance, Organization, and Finance”
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2008/eng/pdf/ch5.pdf
Jensen M.C., 1993, “The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, pp. 831-80.
Kothari, S. P., Warner, J., 1997, “Measuring long-horizon security price performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.43, pp. 301-339
Kotz, R., 1998, “Technology company boards: a new model”, Directors and Boards, Vol. 22-3, pp. 26-8
Lam, J., 2003, “Enterprise risk management: From incentives to controls”, Wiley Finance
Lambert, A.Richard, 2001, “Contracting theory and accounting”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 3-87
Lipton M and Lorsch J., 1992, A modest proposal for improved corporate governance, Bus Lawyer, Vol.48, pp. 59-77.
London Stock Exchange, 2003, “The Combined Code on Corporate Governance”,
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/ukla/lr_comcode2003.pdf
Meulbroek, L.K., 2002, “Integrated risk management for the firm: A senior manager’s guide”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, pp. 56-70
Monks, R. and N. Minow, 2004, Corporate governance, Malden, MA:Black-well. New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), 2003, “Final NYSE Corporate Governance Rules”, http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/finalcorpgovrules.pdf
Nørby Report (2001), Denmark Copenhagen, http://www.corporategovernance.dk
Ong,C.H. and David Wan, 2008, “ Three conceptual models of board role performance”, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Vol. 8-3, pp.317-329
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 1983, “Organizational demography”, Research in Oranizational behavior, Vol. 5, pp. 299-375
Rose Caspar, 2005, The composition of Semi-Two-Tier corporate boards and firm performance, Corporate Governance of Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Vol.13, pp. 691-701
Stoh, P.J, 2005, “Enterprise risk management at United Health Group”, Strategic Finance, Vol.87, pp. 26-37
Standard & Poor’s (S&P), 2008, “Standard & Poor’s To apply enterprise risk analysis to corporate ratings”, it is available at:
http://www.towersperrin.com/tp/getwebcachedoc?webc=HRS/USA/2008/200805/ERM4Corp.pdf
Tseng, Chih-Yang, 2007, “Internal control, enterprise risk management, and firm performance”
Vafeas Nikos, 1999, “Board meetings frequency and firm performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 53, pp. 113-142.
World Bank, 2008, “Annual Report 2008: The board of executive directors”,
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTANNREP2K8/Resources/YR03_Board_EDs.pdf
World Bank, 2008, “Internal Auditing Department FY08 Annual Report: Including overall Opinions on Governance, Risk management, and Controls for IBRD/IDA, IFC, and MIGA”, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/NEWS/Resources/IADAnnualreport.pdf
Worrell, D.L., Carol. Nemec and Wallance N. Dacidson III, 1997, “Reseach notes and communications one hat too many: key executive plurality and shareholder wealth”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 6, pp. 499-507
Zahra, S.A. and J.A. Pearce, 1989, “Board of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model”, Journal of Management, Vol. 15(2), pp. 291-334
Zajac, E.J and J.D. Westphal, 1994, “ The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 121-142
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43396-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates the effect of board monitoring on firm performance among firms that implement Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). I propose three dimensions in board monitoring: monitoring motivations, monitoring capabilities, and monitoring efforts. Both accounting-based and market-based measures are considered for firm performance. Using a sample of 68 firms implementing ERM, I find that board monitoring affects firm performance at a significant level among ERM firms. The evidence also shows that the proposed three monitoring dimensions individually may or may not explain firm performance a significant level, but these three monitoring dimensions all together will have an impact on firm performance. Besides, through an additional test I find that corporate governance is industry specific, since the empirical results are sensitive to different industries. This suggests that corporate governance rules should include industry-specific considerations when requiring board of directors’ monitoring on a firm’s risk management.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:54:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R96724078-1.pdf: 615184 bytes, checksum: 99b2075e4310a19f7c1648bac1d2aa6c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsTable of Contents

Master Thesis Certification i
Acknowledgement ii
Abstract iii
Table of Contents iv
List of Appendix and Table vi
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Literature Review 5
2.1 ERM and Firm Performance 5
2.2 Corporate Governance Rules: Risk Management and Board Monitoring 8
2.3 Board Monitoring and Firm performance 11
Chapter 3 Hypotheses Development 15
Chapter 4 Empirical Design 18
4.1 Sample 18
4.2 Data 19
4.3 Measurement of variables 19
4.3.1 Monitoring Motivations 19
4.3.2 Monitoring Capabilities 20
4.3.3 Monitoring Efforts 21
4.3.4 Firm performance 22
4.3.5 Control variables 23
4.4 Empirical Model 24
Chapter 5 Empirical Results 26
5.1 Summary Statistics 26
5.2 Main results 27
Chapter 6 Additional Tests 30
6.1 Joint Tests 30
6.2 Board’s monitoring on ROE 31
6.3 Industry Analysis (Banking Vs. Insurance) 32
Chapter 7 Conclusion 35
References 37
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject監督zh_TW
dc.subject企業風險管理zh_TW
dc.subject董事會zh_TW
dc.subjectboard of directorsen
dc.subjectEnterprise risk managementen
dc.subjectmonitoringen
dc.title企業風險管理: 董事會監督與公司績效關係之研究zh_TW
dc.titleEnterprise Risk Management:
Board Monitoring and Firm performance
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee蔡揚宗(Yang-Tzong Tsay),許文馨(Wen-Hsin Hsu)
dc.subject.keyword企業風險管理,董事會,監督,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordEnterprise risk management,board of directors,monitoring,en
dc.relation.page52
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2009-06-30
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept企業管理碩士專班zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA)

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
600.77 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved