請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43332
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林俊彬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Fang-Ju Chou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 周芳如 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:50:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-09-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | ASTM D-412–98a (2002). Standard test methods for vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers. Tension.
ASTM-F1635. Standard test method for hydrolysis test Augsburger RA, Peters DD (1990). Radiographic evaluation of extruded obturation materials. J Endod 16:492-7. Barkhordar RA, Goodis HE, Watanabe L, Koumdjian J (1990). Evaluation of temperature rise on the outer surface of teeth during root canal obturation techniques. Quint Int 21:585-588. Blum JY, Parahy E, Machtou P (1997). Warm Vertical Compaction Sequences in Relation to Gutta-Percha Temperature. J Endod 23:307-11. Bordenave L, Baquey C, Bareille R, Lefebvre F, Lauroua C, Guerin V, et al. (1993). Endothelial cell compatibility testing of three different Pellethanes. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1367-81. Boretos JW, Pierce WS (1967). Segmented polyurethane: a new elastomer for biomedical applications. Science 158:1481-2. Bruil A, Oosterom HA, Steneker I, Beugeling T, van Aken WG, Feijen J (1993). Poly(ethyleneimine) modified filters for the removal of leukocytes from blood. J Biomed Mater Res 27:1253-68. Carter JM, Sorensen SE, Johnson RR, Teitelbaum RL (1983). Punch shear testing of extracted vital and endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 16:841-8. Combe EC, Cohen BD, Cummings K (2001). Alpha- and beta-forms of gutta-percha in products for root canal filling. Int Endod J 34:447-51. Cullagh JJPM, Setchell DJ, Gulabivala K, Hussey DL, Biagioni P, Lamey PJ, et al. (2000). A comparison of thermocouple and infrared thermographic analysis of temperature rise on the root surface during the continuous wave of condensation technique. Int Endod J 33:326-32. Eldeniz AU, Erdemir A, Belli S (2005). Shear bond strength of three resin based sealers to dentin with and without the smear layer. J Endod 31:293-6. Eldeniz AU (2007). Cytotoxicity of new resin-, calcium hydroxide- and silicone-based root canal sealers on fibroblasts derived from human gingiva and L929 cell lines. Int Endod J 40:329–337 Elizabeth M.(2006). Enzymatic degradation of poly(ether urethane) and poly(carbonate urethane) by cholesterol esterase. Biomaterial 27:3920–3926 Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Rhodes BF (1992). Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater 8:265-9. Friedman CM, Sandrik JL, Heuer MA, Rapp GW (1975). Composition and mechanical properties of Gutta-percha endodontic points. J Dent Res 54: 921-5. Gesi A, Raffaelli O, Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2005). Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin. J Endod 31:809-813. Glickman GN, Gutmann JL (1992). Contemporary perspectives on canal obturation. Dent Clin North Am 36:327-341. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F (2004). The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 112:353-61. Gogos C, Economides N, Stavrianos C, Kolokouris I (2004). Adhesion of a new methacrylate resin-based sealer to human dentin. J Endod 30:238-40. Gulabivala K, Leung SF (1994). Review of a new root canal obturation technique. Dent Update 21:73-83. Gutmann JL, Witherspoon DE (1998). Obturation of the cleaned and shaped root canal system. In: Pathways of the pulp. 7th ed. Chapter 9. Cohen S, Burns RC, editors. St. Louis: Mosby, pp. 258-71. Himel VT, McSpadden JT, Goodis HE (2006). Instruments, materials and device. In: Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. Chapter 8. Cohen S, Burns RC, editors. St. Louis: Mosby, pp. 262-71. Huang B, Marios Y (1992). Cellular reaction to the Vascugraft® polyester urethane vascular prosthesis: in vivo studies in rats. Biomaterials 13:209–16. Hsieh KH, Tsai CC, Tseng SM (1990). Vapor and gas permeability of polyurethane membranes. Part I. Structure-property relationship. J Membr Sci 49: 341-50. Hsieh KH, Tsai CC, Chang DM (1991). Vapor and gas permeability of polyurethane membranes. Part II. Effect of functional group. J Membr Sci 56:279-87. Jensen SD, Fischer DJ (2004). Method for filling and sealing a root canal. US Patent 6,811,400. November 2. Jia WT, Alpert B (2003). Root canal filling material. US Patent 20030113686. June 19. Johansson BI (1980). A methodological study of the mechanical properties of endodontic gutta-percha points. J Endod 6:781-3. Johnson WT, Gutmann JL (2006). Obturation of the cleaned and shaped root canal system. In: Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. Chapter 10. Cohen S, Burns RC, editors. St. Louis: Mosby, pp. 358-75. Kazemi R, Safavi KE, Spångberg LSW (1993). Dimensional changes of endodontic sealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 76:766-71. King M, Zhang Z (1994). Quantitative analysis of the surface morphology and textile structure of the Polyurethane Vascugraft® arterial prosthesis using image and statistical analyses. Biomaterials 15:621–627. Lee KW, Williams MC, Camps JJ, Pashley DH (2002). Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha. J Endod 28:684-8. Lodiene G. (2008). Toxicity evaluation of root canal sealers in vitro. Int. Endo J, 41:72–77. Marciano J, Michailesco PM (1989). Dental gutta-percha: chemical composition X-Ray Identification, enthalpic studies and clinical implication. J Endod 15:149-53. Marciano J, Michailesco PM, Abadie MJM (1993). Stereochemical structure characterization of dental Gutta-percha. J Endod 19:31-4. Marco Donadio (2008). Cytotoxicity evaluation of Active GP and Resilon cones in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 106:e76-e79. McComb D, Smith D (1976). Comparison of physical properties of polycarboxylate- based and conventional root canal sealers. J Endod 2:228-35. Miner MR, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK (2006). A comparison of thermal properties between gutta-Percha and a synthetic polymer based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod 32:683-6. Moshonov J, Trope M, Friedman S (1994). Retreatment efficacy 3 months after obturation using glass ionomer cement, zinc oxide-eugenol, and epoxy resin sealers. J Endod 20:90-2. Möller B, Ørstavik D (1984). Chemical and energy-dispersive X-ray analyses of gutta-percha points. J Endod 10:413-16. Nikaido T, Takano Y, Sasafuchi Y, Burrow M, Tagami J (1999). Bond strength to endodontically treated teeth. Am J Dent 12:177-180. Nomoto R, Carrick TE, McCabe JF (2001). Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials. Dent Mater 17:415-21. Ørstavik D, Eriksen HM, Beyer-Olsen EM (1983). Adhesive properties and leakage of root canal sealers in vitro. Int Endod J 16:59–63. Pascon E.A., Spångberg L.S.W. (1990). In vitro cytotoxcity of root canal filling materials, Part I. gutta-percha. J Endod 16:429-34. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M (1999). The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhesive Dent 1:299–309.. Pest LB, Cavalli G, Bertani B, Gagliani M (2002). Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 18: 596-602. Peter DD (1986). Two-year in vitro solubility evaluation of four gutta-percha sealer obturation techniques. J Endod 12:139-43. Pitout E, Oberholzer TG, Blignaut E, J Molepo (2006). Coronal leakage of teeth root-filled with gutta-percha or Resilon root canal filling material. J Endod 32: 879-81. Ricucci D, Gröndahl K, Bergenholtz G (2000). Periapical status of root-filled teeth exposed to the oral environment by loss of restoration or caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 90:354-9 Roydhouse RH (1970). Punch-shear test for dental purposes. J Dent Res 49:131–6. Schafer E, Zandbiglari T (2003). Solubility of root canal sealers in water and artificial saliva. Int Endod J 36:660-9. Schilder H (1967). Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 1 1:723-44. Schollenberger C.S. and Stwart F.D.(1973). Thermoplastic polyurethane hydrolysis stability. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 29/30:413-430 Schwarze T (2002). Long-Term Cytocompatibility of Various Endodontic Sealers Using a New Root Canal Model. J Endod 28:749-753 Scotti R et all (2008). Biocompatibility of various root canal filling materials ex vivo. Int Endod J 41: 651–657. Sevimay S, Kalayci A (2005). Evaluation of apical sealing ability and adaptation to dentine of two resin-based sealers. J Oral Rehabil 32:05-10. Shipper G, Ørstavik D, Teixeira FB, Trope M (2004). An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod 30:342-7. Skidmore LJ, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK (2006). An in vitro comparison of the intraradicular dentin bond strength of Resilon and gutta-gercha. J Endod 32:963-6. Smith DC, Cooper WEG (1971). The determination of shear strength. Brit Dent J 130: 333-7. Stewart GG (1958). A comparative study of three root canal sealing agents (Part 1). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo11:1029-41. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R (1999). Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhesive Dent 1:57–67. Susanne Szep (2003). In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Medicated and Nonmedicated Gutta-percha Points in Cultures of Gingival Fibroblast. J Endod 29: 36-40 Susini G (2006). Cytotoxicity of Epiphany and Resilon with a root model. Int Endod J 39:940–944. Tagger M, Tagger E, Kfir A (1988). Release of calcium and hydroxyl ions from set endodontic sealers containing calcium hydroxide. J Endod 14:588-91. Takahara A (1991). Transactions of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials in conjunction with the International Biomaterial Symposium 14:93,15731. Tatai Lisa (2007). Thermoplastic biodegradable polyurethanes: The effect of chain extender structure on properties and in-vitro degradation. Biomaterials 28:5407–5417 TangY.W.(2003).Enzyme induced biodegradation of polycarbonate -polyurethanes:dose dependence effect of cholesterol esterase. Biomaterials 24:2003–2011 Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Pashley DH, Mak YF, et al. (2005). Ultrastructural evaluation of the apical seal in roots filled with a polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 31:514-9. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Monticelli F, Weller RN, Breschi L, Ferrari M, et al. (2005). Effectiveness of resin-coated gutta-percha cones and a dual-cured, hydrophilic methacrylate resin-based sealer in obturating root canals. J Endod 31(9):659-64. Tay FR (2005). Susceptibility of a Polycaprolactone-Based Root Canal Filling Material to Degradation. I. Alkaline Hydrolysis. J Endod 31:593-598 Tay FR (2005). Susceptibility of a Polycaprolactone-Based Root Canal Filling Material to Degradation. II. Gravimetric Evaluation of Enzymatic Hydrolysis. J Endod 31:737-741 Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson JY, Trope M (2004). Fracture resistance of roots endodonticallytreated with a new resin filling material. J Am Dent Assoc 135: 646– Teixeira FB, Trope M (2006). Advances in Endodontic Obturation. US Dent Endod 45-8. Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson J, Leinfelder KF, Trope M (2004). Dentinal bonding reaches the root canal system. J Esthet Restor Dent 16:348-54. Lisa Tatai (2007). Thermoplastic biodegradable polyurethanes: The effect of chain extender structure on properties and in-vitro degradation. Biomaterials 28:5407–5417 Ungor M, Onay EO, Orucoglu H (2006). Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany- Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha. Int Endod J 39:643-7. Walton RE, Johnson WT (1996). Obturation. 2nd ed. Chapter 14. In: Principles and practice of endodontics. Walton RE, Torabinejad M, editors. W.B. Saunders, pp. 234-59. Watanabe LG, Marshall GWJ, Marshall SJ (2000). Variables influence on shear bond strength testing to dentine. In: Proceedings of the Granada International Symposium 3–4 Dec 1999: Advanced Adhesive Dentistry pp 75-90. Weine FS (1992). A preview of the canal-filling materials of the 21st century. Com Cont Educ Dent 13:688-97. Weine FS, Wenckus CS (2004). Canal filling with semisolid materials. In: Endodontic therapy. 6th edition. Chapter 8. Weine FS, editor. Illinios: Mosby, pp. 304-12. Wennberg A, Orstavik D (1990). Adhesion of root canal sealers to bovine dentine and gutta-perch. Int Endod J 23:13-19. Werner Geurtsen (1998). Cytotoxicity of four root canal sealers in permanent 3T3 cells and primary human periodontal ligament fibroblast cultures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 85:592-597 Williams C, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2006). A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod 32:553-5. Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S (1991). The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentine. J Dent Res. 70:889–93. Xiu Y, Wang D, Hu C, Ying S, Li J (1993). Morphology-property relationship of segmented polyurethaneurea: Influences of soft-segment structure and molecular weight. J Appl Polymer Sci 48:867-9. Yen MS, Kuo SC (1996). Effects of mixing procedure on the structure and physical properties of ester-ether-type soft segment waterborne polyurethane. J Appl Polymer Sci, 61: 1639-47. Skoog 等著, 林敬二審譯 (2001). 儀器分析. 美亞書版股份有限公司. 鄭雅安 (2002). 馬來膠之熱能與晶相轉換研究. 國立台灣大學醫學院牙醫科學研究所碩士論文. 褚文煌 (1998). 人類牙本質脆性機轉之研究. 國立台灣大學醫學院牙醫科學研究所碩士論文. 李鍾怡 (2007). 研發聚胺酯根管封填材料:熱、機械性質和鍵結強度. 國立台灣大學醫學院牙醫科學研究所碩士論文. Ken-Hsuan Liao (2007). Application of Polyurethane and Dual Curing Urethane-acrylate in Root Canal Filling Material. 國立台灣大學高分子所碩士論文. Chung-Ting Tsai (2008). Application of Low Hydrolysis Polyurethane and Dual Curing Urethane-acrylate in Root Canal Filling Material. 國立台灣大學高分子所碩士論文. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43332 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 傳統根管封填材主要以馬來膠錐體搭配各類傳統封填劑,然而馬來膠錐體及各類傳統封填劑之間黏著力不足,和牙本質之黏著亦不理想,因此無法達到根管密封的目的。我研究團隊以樹酯為基底研發出聚胺酯根管封填系統,發現以PBA (polybutyleneadipate polyol)合成之聚胺酯根管封填材料在臨床操作而言有極佳的機械性質及熱性質,並且與牙本質有非常好的鍵結,可達良好密封性的目的,然而在材料接觸組織液的穩定性仍有疑慮,因此再研發以PC(polycarbonate polyol)合成之低水解聚胺酯根管封填材料。本研究目的主要在探討以PC合成之低水解封填系統材料的熱性質、機械性質及與根管牙本質間之鍵結強度,以及對聚胺酯根管封填系統材料及其他市售材料做細胞毒性及水解程度的評估。結果顯示以PC合成之聚胺酯錐體材料在熱性質方面熔點太接近體溫且稍微加熱後過於黏稠不利臨床操作;但以PC合成之胺酯壓克力樹酯封填劑在流動性是具臨床操作性的。在推離鍵結強度測試方面,以PC合成之胺酯壓克力樹酯與PBA合成之聚胺酯錐體材料的組合比其他市售材料有顯著較高的鍵結強度。在細胞毒性測試上,聚胺酯錐體在生物相容性優於馬來膠錐體,而PC合成之胺酯壓克力樹酯在完全聚合後生物相容性優於EndoREZTM,與AH plusTM相近,但PBA合成之胺酯壓克力樹酯在完全聚合後仍具細胞毒性,可能是起始劑所致。在水解程度的測試,PBA合成之聚胺酯錐體水解程度遠小於ResilonTM,而PBA及PC合成之胺酯壓克力樹酯封填劑皆有不錯的安定性。因此,依據各方面的測試,PC合成之胺酯壓克力樹酯與PBA合成之聚胺酯錐體在未來臨床根管治療的應用上深具潛力;而在PBA合成之胺酯壓克力樹酯及PC合成之聚胺酯錐體還有改善空間。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Conventional root canal materials do not have enough dentinal adhesion and can not achieve the ideal sealing properties. Our research team has developed the polyurethane root canal obturation system containing ZnO/TPU cone and dual cured urethane acrylate(UA) sealer. Although these materials has good mechanical properties and bonding strength to dentin, the cytotoxicity and hydrolytic stability are questioned. The purposes of this study was to develop the low hydrolytic polyurethane root canal obturation system by replacing the PBA polyol with PC polyol and investigate the mechanical properties、bonding strength、cytotoxicity and hydrolysis of PBA and PC-based polyurethane root canal obturation system. The results showed that the PC-based ZnO/TPU cone can not be used in humen because the low melting point, but the PC-based urethane acrylate sealer fits the clinical use. In the push-out bonding test, the results revealed that PBA-based UA sealer/ PBA-based PU cone and PC-based UA sealer/PBA-based PU cone have the higher bonding strength than other commercial products. From cytotoxicity and hydrolysis evaluations, PBA-based ZnO/TPU cones have better biocompatibility than GP cones and much lower hydrolysis than ResilonTM. The PBA-based UA sealer has good stability to hydrolysis but has high cytotoxicity even in aged specimens. We estimate the reason is that the PBA-based UA sealer does not have good interaction with the AIBN and the residual AIBN causes the cytotoxicity. The PC-based UA sealer has good stability to hydrolysis and the cytotoxicity decreased at the fresh and aged specimens. We conclude that PBA-based ZnO/TPU cones and PC-based UA sealer have high potential for clinical use, and the thermal property of PC-based ZnO/TPU cone and the initiators of PBA-based UA sealer should be improved and changed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:50:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R95422003-1.pdf: 1656376 bytes, checksum: 294f08bf9eb413a885b2e6159b8ad3e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i
中文摘要 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ii 英文摘要 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------iii 簡寫表 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ iv 目錄 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------v 圖次---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ix 表次------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x 第一章 前言 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 第二章 文獻回顧 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 2.1 理想的根管封填 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 2.2 傳統根管封填材料的發展 ---------------------------------------------------------- 5 2.2.1 根管封填錐體材料 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 5 2.2.2 根管封填劑材料 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 2.3 近代根管封填系統的發展------------------------------------------------------------ 8 2.3.1 ResilonTM / EpiphanyTM 根管封填系統----------------------------------------- 8 2.3.2 EndoREZTM根管封填系統 ------------------------------------------------------ 11 2.4 聚胺酯材料作為高分子根管封填系統的潛力 --------------------------------- 12 2.4.1 熱塑型聚胺酯 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 2.4.2 本研究團隊初步試驗結果 ----------------------------------------------------- 13 2.5 根管填充材與根管牙本質間之鍵結強度測試 --------------------------------- 14 2.5.1 評估根管封填材料與根管壁間之黏著能力 -------------------------------- 15 2.5.2 推離鍵結測試法 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 15 2.6 生物相容性之測試--------------------------------------------------------------------17 2.6.1 MTT assay ---------------------------------------------------------------------------17 2.6.2 根管錐體材料毒性測試----------------------------------------------------------17 2.6.3 根管封填劑毒性測試-------------------------------------------------------------18 2.7 水解程度測試--------------------------------------------------------------------------19 第三章 動機與目的 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 第四章 材料與方法 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 4.1 PC合成之聚胺酯封填材實驗樣本之製備-----------------------------------------23 4.1.1 根管封填錐體材料 ---------------------------------------------------------------23 4.1.2 根管封填劑材料 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 23 4.2 熱分析試驗 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 4.2.1 微差掃描熱量分析法 ----------------------------------------------------------- 24 4.3 機械性質拉力測試 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 25 4.3.1 拉力強度測試 - ------------------------------------------------------------------ 26 4.4 根管封填材與根管牙本質間之推離鍵結強度測試 --------------------------- 26 4.4.1 實驗樣本之製備 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 27 4.4.2 推離鍵結強度測試 -------------------------------------------------------------- 29 4.5 體外細胞毒性測試 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 30 4.5.1 3T3細胞培養 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 4.5.2 錐體材料之準備工作 ----------------------------------------------------------- 31 4.5.2.1 錐體材料之樣本備製--------------------------------------------------------- 31 4.5.2.2 錐體材料之萃取液備製------------------------------------------------------ 31 4.5.3 封填劑材料之準備工作 -------------------------------------------------------- 31 4.5.3.1 封填劑材料之樣本備製------------------------------------------------------ 31 4.5.3.2 封填劑材料之萃取液備製--------------------------------------------------- 33 4.5.4 MTT assay--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 33 4.5.5 統計分析--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 4.6 材料水解測試------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 4.6.1 酵素溶液之配製------------------------------------------------------------------ 34 4.6.2 實驗樣本之備製------------------------------------------------------------------ 35 4.6.3 實驗操作流程--------------------------------------------------------------------- 36 4.6.4 GPC測試---------------------------------------------------------------------------36 第五章 結果 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37 5.1 低水解聚胺酯封填錐體之測試結果 --------------------------------------------- 37 5.1.1 機械性質拉力強度測試之結果 ----------------------------------------------- 37 5.1.2 微差掃描熱量分析之結果 ----------------------------------------------------- 37 5.2 低水解胺酯壓克力樹酯封填劑之測試結果------------------------------------- 38 5.2.1 流動度測試------------------------------------------------------------------------- 38 5.2.2 硬化深度測試---------------------------------------------------------------------- 38 5.3 根管封填材與根管牙本質間之推離鍵結強度測試之結果------------------- 38 5.4 體外細胞毒性測試之結果---------------------------------------------------------- 39 5.4.1 錐體材料細胞毒性測試之結果------------------------------------------------- 39 5.4.2 封填劑材料細胞毒性測試之結果---------------------------------------------- 39 5.5 水解測試之結果---------------------------------------------------------------------- 40 第六章 討論 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 42 6.1 低水解聚胺酯封填錐體測試結果之探討-- ------------------------------------- 42 6.2 低水解胺酯壓克力樹酯封填劑測試結果之探討------------------------------- 42 6.3 根管封填材與根管牙本質間之推離鍵結強度測試之探討------------------- 43 6.4 體外細胞毒性測試之探討 --------------------------------------------------------- 43 6.4.1 錐體材料測試結果之探討------------------------------------------------------- 43 6.4.2 封填劑材料測試結果之探討 -------------------------------------------------- 45 6.5 水解測試結果之探討---------------------------------------------------------------- 46 6.5.1 水解實驗設計及評估方式之探討---------------------------------------------- 46 6.5.2 錐體材料水解程度之探討------------------------------------------------------- 47 6.5.3 封填劑材料水解程度之探討---------------------------------------------------- 49 第七章 結論 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51 第八章 未來研究方向 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 52 參考文獻 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 53 圖 次 圖一 PC合成之熱塑型聚胺酯(TPU)和氧化鋅(ZnO)無機填充料複合材料之合成 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------62圖二 PC合成之胺酯壓克力樹酯 (urethane-acrylate, UA)封填劑之合成 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------63圖三 微差熱掃描分析儀 DSC 2010, TA Instruments -------------------------------64 圖四 萬能拉力測試機 Universal Testing Instruments, RTM-IT ------------------64 圖五 高速精密切割機 Isomet 2000 ----------------------------------------------------65 圖六 馬來膠熱塑性封填系統 Warm gutta percha obturation system, E & Q Plus-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------65 圖七 根管錐體材料熱充填儀器 Element® obturation unit ------------------------66 圖八 高速鑽孔機 LT-848 ---------------------------------------------------------------66 圖九 推離鍵結強度測試法流程圖------------------------------------------------------67 圖十 錐體材料之萃取---------------------------------------------------------------------68 圖十一 封填劑材料之萃取-----------------------------------------------------------------68 圖十二 CE酵素及CE高濃度酵素溶液----------------------------------------------------69 圖十三 材料在CE溶液內進行水解測試之狀況-----------------------------------------69 圖十四 微差掃描熱量分析的結果---------------------------------------------------------70 圖十五 PBS溶液水解測試結果-------------------------------------------------------------71 圖十六 CE溶液水解測試結果--------------------------------------------------------------72 圖十七 水解樣本觀察------------------------------------------------------------------------73 表 次 表一 推離鍵結強度測試之分組---------------------------------------------------------------74 表二 錐體材料體外細胞毒性之分組-------------------------------------------------------- 74 表三 ISO 10993-5對萃取液萃取比例的規範-----------------------------------------------74 表四 封填劑材料體外細胞毒性之分組------------------------------------------------------75 表五 水解測試之分組---------------------------------------------------------------------------75 表六 PC合成之低水解錐體材料不同成分比例之機械性質-----------------------------75 表七 推離鍵結強度測試之結果---------------------------------------------------------------76 表八 錐體材料細胞毒性測試之結果---------------------------------------------------------76 表九 封填劑材料細胞毒性測試之結果------------------------------------------------------76 表十 水解樣本分子量之喪失比例------------------------------------------------------------77 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 研發低水解聚胺酯根管封填材料:機械性質、細胞毒性及水解 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Development of Low-Hydrolytic Polyurethane Root Canal Obturation Material: Mechanical Properties, Cytotoxicity and Hydrolysis | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 謝國煌 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 徐善慧 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 根管封填材料熱塑型聚胺酯,胺酯壓克力樹酯,推離鍵結強度測試,細胞毒性,水解, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Thermal polyurethane,Push-out bonding test,Cytotoxicity,Hydrolysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 77 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 牙醫專業學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床牙醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床牙醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.62 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。