請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43310完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周泰立(Tai-Li Chou) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Hui Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李姝慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:48:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-14 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 三民書局編撰委員會(1998)。「學典」。台北：三民書局。
王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、陳秀芬(2007)。低識字能力學生識字量發展之研究－馬太效應之可能表現。「特殊教育研究學刊」，32卷3期，1-16。 田慧娟(2004)。閱讀障礙學生與一般學生在視知覺上之比較研究。「台東大學教育學報」，15卷1期，33-66。 余民寧、陳嘉成(1996)。概念構圖：另一種評量法。「政大學報」，73，161-200。 吳思娜、舒華、王彧( 2004)。4-6年級小學生發展性閱讀障礙的異質性研究。「心理發展與教育」，20卷3期，46-50。 柯華葳、李俊仁(1996)。國小低年級學生語音覺識能力與認字能力的發展：一個縱貫的研究。「國立中正大學學報」，7卷1期，49-66。 洪儷瑜(2002)。國小學童漢字視知覺能力三年縱貫研究。「特殊教育研究學刊」，22期，1-26。 胡志偉、高千惠與羅明(2005)。「六百個中文字的自由聯想常模」。台北：台灣心理學會。 孫易新(2002)。「心智圖法基礎篇mind mapping：多元知識管理系統1」。台北：耶魯 國際文化事業公司。 教育部(2001)。「國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要」。台北：教育部。 曾世杰(2004)。「聲韻覺識、念名速度與中文閱讀障礙」，42-44。台北：心理出版社。 黃秀霜(1997)。兒童早期音韻覺識對其三年後中文認字能力之縱貫性研究。「台南師院學報」，7卷1期，49-66。 黃秀霜(2001)。「中文年級認字量表」。台北：心理出版社。 劉翔平、劉文理、張立娜、徐先金、張微、張秀秀、張婧喬(2006)。兒童識字能力與漢字規則意識規則研究。「中國特殊教育」， 1期，56-61。 Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2883–2901. Beck, I., & McKeown, M. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & P. D. Pearson (Eds.) Handbook of ReadingResearch, vol. 2. White Plains, NY: Longman. Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Cox, R. W., Rao, S. M., & Prieto, T. (1997). Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(1), 353-362. Bishop, D. V., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886. Blewitt, P., & Toppino, T. C. (1991). The development of taxonomic structure in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 296-319. Blumenfeld, H. K., Booth, J. R., & Burman, D. D. (2006). Differential prefrontal-temporal neural correlates of semantic processing in children. Brain and Language, 99(3), 226-235. Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2002). Modality independence of word comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 16(4), 251-261. Booth, J. R., Lu, D., Burman, D. D., Chou, T. L., Jin, Z., Peng, D. L., Zhang, L., Ding, G. S., Deng, Y., & Liu, L. (2006). Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading. Brain Research, 1071(1), 197-207. Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. I. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31-42. Brown, T. T., Lugar, H. M., Coalson, R. S., Miezin, F. M., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2005). Developmental changes in human cerebral functional organization for word generation. Cerebral Cortex, 15(3), 275-290. Cain, K. (2006). Individual differences in children’s memory and reading comprehension: An investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits. Memory, 14(5), 553–569. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Elbro, C. (2003). The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30, 681–694. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681. Cao, F., Peng, D., Liu, L., Jin, Z., Fan, N., Deng, Y., & Booth, J. R. (in press). Developmental differences of neurocognitive networks for phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading. Human Brain Mapping. Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. Miller(Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality.(pp. 264-297). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chee, M. W., O'Craven, K. M., Bergida, R., Rosen, B. R., & Savoy, R. L. (1999). Auditory and visual word processing studied with fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 7(1), 15-28. Chou, T. L., Booth, J. R., Bitan, T., Burman, D. D., Bigio, J. D., Cone, N. E., Lu, D., & Cao F. (2006a). Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 915-924. Chou, T. L., Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., Bigio, J. D., Lu, D., & Cone, N. E.(2006b). Developmental changes in the neural correlates of semantic processing. Neuroimage, 29,1141-1149. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 240-248. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G.Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. NewYork:Academic Press. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. Entwisle, D. R., Forsyth, D. F., & Muus, R. (1964). The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift in children's word associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 19-29. Fletcher, P. C., Shallice, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). 'Sculpting the response space'--an account of left prefrontal activation at encoding. Neuroimage, 12, 404-417. Fujii, T., Okuda, J., Tsukiura, T., Ohtake, H., Suzuki, M., Kawashima, R., Itoh, M., Fukuda, H., & Yamadori, A. (2002): Encoding-related brain activity during deep processing of verbal materials: a PET study. Neuroscience Research, 44(4), 429-438. Gaillard, W. D., Sachs, B. C., Whitnah, J. R., Ahmad, Z., Balsamo, L. M., Petrella, J. R., Braniecki, S. H., McKinney, C. M., Hunter, K., Xu, B., & Grandin ,C. B. (2003). Developmental aspects of language processing: fMRI of verbal fluency in children and adults. Human Brain Mapping, 18(3), 176-185. Grossman, M., Koenig, P., Glosser, G., DeVita, C., Moore, P., Rhee, J., Detre, J., Alsop, D., & Gee, J. (2003). Neural basis for semantic memory difficulty in Alzheimer's disease: an fMRI study. Brain, 126(Pt 2), 292-311. Gurd, J. M., Amunts, K., Weiss, P. H., Zafiris, O., Zilles, K., Marshall, J. C., & Fink, G. R. (2002). Posterior parietal cortex is implicated in continuous switching between verbal fluency tasks: an fMRI study with clinical implications. Brain, 125(Pt 5), 1024-1038. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720. Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92, 67–99. Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Review Neuroscience, 8, 393–402. Holland, S. K., Plante, E., Byars, A. W., Strawsburg, R. H., Schmithorst, V.J., & Ball, W. S. Jr. (2001). Normal fMRI brain activation patterns in children performing a verb generation task. Neuroimage, 14(4):837-843. Howard, D., Patterson, K., Wise, R., Brown, W. D., Friston, K., Weiller, C., & Frackowiak, R. (1992). The cortical localization of the lexicons. Positron emission tomography evidence. Brain, 115 ( Pt 6):1769-1782. Joseph, O., & Henson, R. N. (1999). Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modeling, inference, and optimization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 354, 1215-1228. Kan I. P, & Thompson-Schill S. L. (2004). Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming. Cognitive Affect Behavior Neuroscience, 4(1), 43-57. Kapur, S., Tulving, E., Cabeza, R., McIntosh, A. R., Houle, S., & Craik, F. I. (1996). The neural correlates of intentional learning of verbal materials: a PET study in humans. Cognitive Brain Research, 4(4), 243-249. Kikyo, H., Ohki, K., & Miyashita, Y. (2002). Neural correlates for feeling-of-knowing: an fMRI parametric analysis. Neuron, 36(1),177-186. Kim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: a synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 105-118. Kirchhoff, B. A., Wagner, A. D., Maril, A, & Stern, C. E. (2000). Prefrontal-temporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(16), 6173-6180. Lau, E.F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920-933. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annuual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45. Martin M. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In: Cabeza RK, A.,editor. Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press. 153-186. McClelland J. L., & Rogers T. T. (2003). The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(4), 310-322. McGregor K. K., Friedman R. M., Reilly R. M., & Newman R. M. (2002). Semantic representation and naming in young children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 332-346. McKeown, M. G. (1985). The acquisition of word meaning from context by children of high and low ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 482–496. McNeill, D. (1966). A study of word association. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 548-557. Mesulam M. M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain, 121(Pt 6), 1013-1052. Moss H. E., Ostrin R. K., Tyler L. K., Marslen-Wilson W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: evidence from priming. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 21(4), 863-883. Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1–13. Nation, K., Snowling, M. J. & Clarke, P. (2007). Dissecting the relationship between language skills and learning to read: Semantic and phonological contributions to new vocabulary learning in children with poor reading comprehension. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 131–139. Nelson, K. (1977). The syntagmatic-paradigmatic shift revisited: a review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 93-116. Palermo, D. S. (1971). Characteristics of word association responses obtained from children in grades one through four. Developmental Psychology, 5,118-123. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford Press. Petrey, S. (1977). Word associations and the development of lexical memory. Cognition, 18, 1191-1210. Petrides, M. (2005). Lateral prefrontal cortex: Architectonic and functional organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 781–795. Plaut D. C. (1995). Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor network. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 37-42. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Plaut, D., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115. Powell, D., Plaut, D. C. & Funnell, E. (2006). Does the PMSP connectionist model of single word reading learn to read in the same way as a child? Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 229–250. Price, C. J., Mummery, C. J., Moore, C. J., Frakowiak, R. S., & Friston, K. J. (1999): Delineating necessary and sufficient neural systems with functional imaging studies of neuropsychological patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(4):371-382. Pugh, K. R., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., Bronen, R. A., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Fletcher, J. M. and others. (1996). Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain, 119(Pt 4), 1221-1238. Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2006). Repetition suppression and semantic enhancement: an investigation of the neural correlates of priming. Neuropsychologia, 44(12):2284-2295. Ricketts J., Bishop, D. V., & Nation K. (2008). Investigating orthographic and semantic aspects of word learning in poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 117-135. Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235–257. Schapiro, M. B., Schmithorst, V. J., Wilke, M., Byars, A. W., Strawsburg, R. H., & Holland, S. K. (2004). BOLD fMRI signal increases with age in selected brain regions in children. Neuroreport, 15(17), 2575-2578. Schmithorst, V. J., Holland, S.K., & Plante, E. (2006). Cognitive modules utilized for narrative comprehension in children: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage, 29(1), 254-266. Seger, C.A., Desmond, J.E., Glove, G.H., & Gabrieli, J. (2000). Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for right-hemisphere involvement in processing unusual semantic relationships. Neuropsychology, 14(3), 361-369. Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., Mencl, W. E., Constable, R. T., Marchione, K. E., Fletcher, J. M., Klorman, R. and others. (2001). The functional neural architecture of components of attention in language-processing tasks. Neuroimage, 13(4), 601-612. Simos, P. G., Papanicolaou, A. C., Breier, J. I., Wheless, J. W., Constantinou, JE, Gormley, W. B., & Maggio, W. W. (1999). Localization of language-specific cortex by using magnetic source imaging and electrical stimulation mapping. Journal of Neurosurgery, 91(5), 787-796. Smith E. E. (1995). Concepts and categorization. In: Kosslyn SMO, D., editor. An invitation to cognitive science. 2 ed. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p 1-25. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407. Szaflarski, J. P., Holland, S. K., Schmithorst, V. J., & Byars, A. W. (2006a): fMRI study of language lateralization in children and adults. Human Brain Mapping, 27(3), 202-212. Szaflarski, J. P., Schmithorst, V. J., Altaye, M., Byars, A. W., Ret, J., Plante, E., & Holland, S. K. (2006b). A longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language development in children 5 to 11 years old. Annual Neurology, 59(5), 796-807. Thompson, C. K., Bonakdarpour, B., Fix, S. C., Blumenfeld, H. K., Parrish, T. B., Gitelman, D. R., & Mesulam, M. M. (2007). Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1753-1767. Thompson-Schill, S. L, D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences of USA, 94(26), 14792-14797. Thompson-Schill, S. L, D'Esposito, M., & Kan, I. P. (1999). Effects of repetition and competition on activity in left prefrontal cortex during word generation. Neuron, 23(3), 513-522. Wagner, A. D., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Clark, J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2001). Recovering meaning: left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval. Neuron, 31(2), 329-338. Whatmough, C., Chertkow, H., Murtha, S., & Hanratty, K. (2002). Dissociable brain regions process object meaning and object structure during picture naming. Neuropsychologia, 40(2), 174-186. Wible, C. G., Han, S. D., Spencer, M. H., Kubicki, M., Niznikiewicz, M. H., Jolesz, F. A., McCarley, R. W., & Nestor, P. (2006). Connectivity among semantic associates: an fMRI study of semantic priming. Brain and Language, 97(3), 294-305. Wood, A. G., Harvey, A. S., Wellard, R. M., Abbott, D. F., Anderson, V., Kean, M., Saling, M. M., & Jackson, G. D. (2004): Language cortex activation in normal children. Neurology, 63(6), 1035-1044. Wu, J. T., & Liu, I. M. (1987). Exploring the phonetic and semantic features of Chinese words. Taiwan National Science Council: Technical Report NSC75-0301-H002-024. Yin, W. G. & Weekes, B. (2003). Neuropsychological and Linguistic Framework, Reading-Related Characteristics, Screening for Dyslexia, and a Variant View. Dyslexia in Chinese: Clues from Cognitive Neuropsychology. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 255-279. Zhang, Q., Guo, C. Y., Ding, J. H. & Wang, Z. Y. (2006). Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words. Brain and Language, 96, 59-68. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43310 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的：目前探討中文識字能力的研究主要在字形處理及語音處理兩個取向，但尚未有語意處理與中文識字能力的關係的研究。因此，本研究以聽覺語意判斷作業進行三個行為實驗，探討五年級孩童及成人、五年級高/低識字能力孩童在語意處理上的差異。實驗四則透過功能性磁振造影(Functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI)探討10-21歲參與者聽覺語意處理之神經機制，以此對應實驗一至三所發現的語意處理的行為變化。方法：本實驗操弄三種語意關聯強度字對(高，低，無關語意)，要求參與者判斷中文字對是否具有語意關係。結果：實驗一至三的行為測量顯示，隨著語意關聯強度減弱，參與者的正確率都隨之下降，所需反應時間皆隨之增加。成人在高低語意判斷間的差異，較孩童在高低語意判斷間的差異來得大。高識字能力孩童較低識字能力的孩童，在高低語意判斷上都呈現較優的表現。實驗四的造影結果顯示，參與者在進行聽覺語意判斷時，對於高語意與低語意相關的字對，在左腦額下回(Inferior frontal gyrus, IFG, BA 45, 47)及左腦顳中回(Middle temporal gyrus, MTG, BA 21)有較多活化。隨著字對的語意關連強度越強，在左腦下頂葉(Inferior Parietal lobule, IPL, BA 39, 40)有較多活化。隨著字對的語意關連強度遞減，則是在左腦額下回(IFG, BA 45)有較多活化。年齡與語意相關字對在左腦顳中回(MTG, BA 21)及額下回(IFG, BA 45)的活化呈現正向相關，年齡與無語意相關字對在左腦額下回(IFG, BA 47)的活化呈現正向相關。結論：一、年齡與識字能力的差異，可以反映語意處理之間的差異，孩童較成人在搜尋和整合正確的語意特徵時，做出判斷反應上有困難。二、低識字能力孩童無法掌握字彙的字形、語音及語意的對應關係，因此在語意判斷作業的表現比高識字能力孩童差。三、參與者在處理中文語意時，透過左腦下頂葉(IPL, BA39, 40)整合相關語意特性，並透過左腦額下回(IFG, BA 45)對語意表徵進行提取及比對。四、孩童在發展的過程中，年齡愈大的孩童，會透過整合字彙的語音及語意，在語意相關的字對中的一群同音字裡選擇出正確的答案;在判斷無語意相關的字對時，則需要提取語意表徵進行語意關聯的判斷。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Although many studies have focused on the effects of vocabulary sizes on orthographic and phonological processes to Chinese characters, few studies have explored the effects of vocabulary sizes on semantic processing. Experiments 1-3 used behavioral paradigms with an auditory semantic judgment to evaluate the differences between fifth graders and adults, as well as differences between fifth graders with different vocabulary sizes. In Experiment 4, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) was used to examine the neural correlates of auditory semantic judgments to Chinese characters in a group of 10-21 year old Chinese participants. Methods: Semantic association strength was varied (stronger, weaker, and unrelated). Participants were asked to decide if two Chinese characters were semantically related. Results: In Experiments 1-3, lower accuracy and longer reaction time were found for weaker association, as compared to stronger association strength. The difference of stronger and weaker association strength was larger for adults than the difference of stronger and weaker association strength for fifth graders. Fifth graders with larger vocabulary sizes showed better performance for both stronger and weaker association strength, as compared to fifth graders with fewer vocabulary sizes. In Experiment 4, characters with stronger semantic association elicited greater activation in left inferior parietal lobule (IPL, BA 39, 40), and characters with weaker semantic association elicited activation in left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG, BA 45). Regarding developmental changes, increasing age was correlated with greater activation in left middle temporal gyrus (BA 21) and left IFG (BA 45) for related pairs, and in left IFG (BA47) for unrelated pairs. Conclusions: Effects of age and vocabulary sizes are related to semantic processing. Fifth graders show poorer search and integration of semantic features during semantic judgments as compared to adults. Fifth graders with fewer vocabulary sizes show deficient mappings among semantics, phonology, and orthography, producing poorer performance on meaning judgments as compared to fifth graders with larger vocabulary sizes. Characters with stronger semantic association elicited greater activation in left IPL(BA 39, 40) for semantic features integration, and characters with weaker semantic association elicited greater activation in left IFG (BA 45) for greater engagement of selection among homophones for Chinese characters. The developmental changes suggest greater integration of semantic and phonological processes to select the correct answer among homophones for related pairs, and demanding retrieval processes to judge unrelated pairs for older children. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:48:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R97227103-1.pdf: 1353751 bytes, checksum: cdec586100dfee1b1bc77917a5f9dc3a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 研究動機……………………………………………………………………………1
緒論………………………………………………………………………………….4 識字能力與語意處理能力的關係………………………………………………4 語意知識的發展…………………………………………………………………6 字形、語音與語意的對應關係…………………………………………………9 語意處理之神經機制.…………………………………………………………13 研究目的……………………………………………………………………………17 研究方法……………………………………………………………………………19 研究架構………………………………………………………………………19 實驗參與者篩選標準…………………………………………………………19 研究工具…...………………………………………………………………….22 行為實驗程序…………………………………………………………………27 行為實驗設計與資料處理……………………………………………………28 功能性磁振造影實驗程序……………………………………………………29 功能性磁振造影實驗參數……………………………………………………31 影像分析方法………………………...……………………………………….31 實驗結果與討論……………………………………………………………………..34 實驗一結果…………………………………………………………………..34 實驗二結果…………………………………………………………………..35 實驗三結果………………………………………………………………......37 實驗四結果……….………………………………………………………….38 討論…………………………………………………………………………………..40 識字能力與語意處理能力的關係…………………………………………..40 語意知識的發展……………………………………………………………..41 字形、語音與語意的對應關係..……………………………………………44 語意處理之神經機制 ………………………………………………………46 總結…………………………………………………………………………..49 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………..51 表……………………………………………………………………………………..61 圖……………………………………………………………………………………..71 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 語意 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 孩童 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 語音 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 語意關聯強度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 字形 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 功能性磁振造影 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | children | en |
| dc.subject | semantics | en |
| dc.subject | phonology | en |
| dc.subject | orthography | en |
| dc.subject | semantic association strength | en |
| dc.subject | fMRI | en |
| dc.title | 國小五年級孩童與成人的識字能力對中文字語意處理之效應的差異 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effects of Vocabulary Sizes on Semantic Processing to Chinese Characters between Fifth Graders and Adults | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳瑞屯(Jei-Tun Wu),李宏鎰(Horng-Yih Lee) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 語意,語音,字形,語意關聯強度,功能性磁振造影,孩童, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | semantics,phonology,orthography,semantic association strength,fMRI,children, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 82 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。