Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43239Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 胡耀恆(Yaw-Herng Hu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Wen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳諺玟 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:44:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考資料：
一、英文參考資料 Aarseth, Asbjørn, “Ibsen’s Dramatic Apprenticeship.” The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen. Ed. James Walter McFarlane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 1-11. ---. “Scenographic Patterns in Ibsen’s Twelve Last Plays”. Ibsen Research Papers. (Yibusheng Yan Jiu Lun Wen J.) Ed. Meng Shengde and Astrid Sæther. Beijing: Chinese Literature Press, 1995. 283-99. ---. “Romantic Misanthropy: An Enemy of the People.” Ibsen at the Centre for Advanced Study. 1997, 261-76. Adler, Stella. Stella Adler on Ibsen, Strindberg and Chekhov. Ed. Barry Paris. New York: Knopf, 1999. Anderson , Andrew Runni. “Ibsen and the Classic World.” The Classical Journal. Vol. 11. No. 4 (1916): 216-225. Archer, William. William Archer on Ibsen: The Major Essays, 1889-1919 . Ed.Thomas Postlewait. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 1984. Arestad, Sverre. “Ibsen’s Concept of Tragedy.” Modern Language Association.PMLA, Vol. 74, No. 3 (Jun 1959).285-297. Bentley, Eric. “The Two Traditions of Modern Drama.” The Playwright as Thinker: A Study of Drama in Modern Times. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987. 21-42. ---. “Wagner and Ibsen: A contrast.” The Playwright as Thinker : A Study of Drama in Modern Times. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987. 103-136. Bissell, Joan. “Ibsen: In High School?” The English Journal 57.3 (1968): 367-68. Brandes, Georg. Henrik Ibsen: A Critical Study. 1899. New York: Arno, 1977. ---. Breve Til Forøldrene,1872-1904. Ed. Torben Nielson. Vol. 3. Copenhagen: Det danske sprog- oglitteratureselskab/ C.A. Reitzel på grundlag af Morten Borups forarbejder, 1994. Britain, I. M. 'Bernard Shaw, Ibsen, and the Ethics of English Socialism.' Victorian Studies 21.3 (1978): 381-401. Bryan, George G. An Ibsen Companion. A Dictionary-Guide to the Life, Works and Critical Reception of Henrik Ibsen. New York: Greenwood, 1984. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press, 1983. Esslin, Martin. “ Ibsen and Modern Drama.” Ibsen and the Theatre. Ed. Errol Durbach. New York: New York UP,1980. 71-82. Finney, Gail. “Ibsen and feminism.” The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen. Ed. James McFarlane. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Flatin, Kjetil A. “Norwegian Literature.” Columbia Dictionary of Modern European Literature. Ed. Jean-Albert Edgerton Bédé, William B. Columbia University Press, 1980. Gassner, John. Introduction. Four Great Plays by Henrik Ibsen. New York : Bantam Books, 1959. 129-130. Gilman, Richard. Making of Modern Drama. New Haven: Yale UP, 1999. Goldman, Emma. The Social Significance of Modern Drama. New York: Applause Theatre, 1987. Goldman, Michael. Ibsen: The Dramaturgy of Fear. New York: Columbia UP,1999. Gray, Ronald. “ An Enemy of The People.” Ibsen─A Dissenting View: A Study of the Last Twelve Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge UP: 1997, 85-98. Haraldsson, Róbert H., Plotting against a Lie: A Reading of Ibsen’s an Enemy of the People. Reykjavik: University of Iceland Press, 2004. Haugen, Einar. Ibsen's Drama Author to Audience. U.S.A: University of Minnesota Press, 1979. Hornby, Richard. 'Ibsen Triumphant.' Hudson Review 56.4 (2004): 685-691. ---. “The Validity of the Ironic Life.” Patterns in Ibsen’s Middle Plays. London: Associated UP, 1981. 147-179. Hemmer, Bjørn, “Ibsen and the Realistic Problem Drama”. The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen Ed. James McFarlane. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press: 1994. 68-88. Hurt, James. “ The Realist Plays I.” Catiline’s Dream: An Essay on Ibsen’s Plays. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1972. 115-120. Ibsen, Henrik. An Enemy of the People. Trans. Christopher Hampton. Boston : Faber, 1997. ---. Eight Plays by Henrik Ibsen. Trans. Eva Le Gallienne. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1982. ---. “Letter to Björnstjerne Björnson” Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greeks to Grotowski. Ed. Bernard F. Dukore. New York: Holt Rinehart and Wiston, Inc,1974. 559. ---. Letters of Ibsen. Trans. By J.N. Laurivik and Mary Morison. New York: 1905. ---. “Letter to Lucie Wolf.” Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greeks to Grotowski. Ed. Bernard F. Dukore. New York: Holt Rinehart and Wiston, Inc, 1974. 560-61. ---. “Letter to Edmund Gosse.” Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greeks to Grotowski. ED. Bernard F. Dukore. New York: Holt Rinehart and Wiston, Inc,1974. 560 ---. “Letter to Hans Lien Braekstad.” Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greeks to Grotowski. ED. Bernard F. Dukore. New York: Holt Rinehart and Wiston, Inc,1974. 562 ---. An Enemy of the People. Trans. Rolf Fjelde. Cambridge: Proquest Information and Learning Company, 2002. ---.“Speech at the Festival of the Norwegian Women’s Right League, Christiana” Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greeks to Grotowski. Ed. Bernard F. Dukore. New York: Holt Rinehart and Wiston, Inc,1974. 563 Jeffers, Robinson. The Double Axe. New York: Liveright, 1977. Johnston, Brian. The Ibsen Cycle: The Design of the Plays from Pillars of Society to When We Dead Awaken. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1975. ---. To the Third Empire: Ibsen’s Early Drama. University of Minnesota Press, 1980. ---. Text and Supertext in Ibsen’s Drama . Pennsylvania State University Press, 1989. ---. ‘The Ibsen Phenomenon’, Ibsen Studies, 6/1 (2006): 6-21. ---. “The Physician and the Gadfly: An Enemy of the People.” Text and Supertext in Ibsen’s Drama. London: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1932. 165-191. ---. “Ibsen's Drama: Right Action and Tragic Joy.” Comparative Drama 31.2 (1997): 312. Kaufmann, F.W. “ Ibsen’s Conception of Truth.” Ibsen─ A Collection of Critical Essays. Rolf Fjelde Ed. New Jersey: A Spectrum Book,1965.18-28. Kierkegaard, Søren. “ The Ancient Tragical Motive as Reflected in the Modern.” Dramamtic Theory and Criticism. Ed. Bernard F. Dukore. USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, 1973.551-55. Kinkead-Weeks, Mark and Ian Gregor. William Golding: A Critical Study. London, 1961, pp. 121. Kittang, Atle. “ Ibsen, Heroism and the Uncanny.” Modern Drama. 49:3( 2006): 304 Knight, G. Wilson. Ibsen. Edinburgh And London: Oliver And Boyd Ltd, 1962. Koht, Halvdan, Life of Ibsen, trans. Elinar Haugen and A. E. Santiello. New York: Blom, 1971. Krasner, David. 'Henrik Ibsen and the Birth of Modernism: Art, Theater, Philosophy.' Theatre Journal (Assn for Theatre in Higher Education) .Baltimore, MD 59.3 (2007): 540. Kunston, Harold C. “An Enemy of the People: Ibsen’s Reluctant Comedy”. Comparative Drama, 27:2 (Summer 1993): 159-75. Lucas, F.L. The Drama of Ibsen and Strindberg. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1962. “Luke”. The Holy Bible. New international version.(NIV). International Bible Society: 2006. Mack, Maynard. 'The World of Hamlet.' Yale Review 41 (1951-52): 502-23. Marker, Frederick J. Marker and Lise-Lone. Ibsen's Lively Art：A Performance Study of the Major Plays. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989. McFarlane, James Walter,ed. The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994. ---. Ibsen and the Temper of Norwegian Literature. New York: Oxford UP, 1960. Meyer, Michael. “Ibsen: A Biographical Approach”. Ibsen and the Theatre. Ed. Errol Durbach. New York: New York UP, 1980.14-26. ---. Introduction . Plays: Two. London: Methuen Drama, 1993.109-121. ---. ed. Ibsen on File. London: Methuen, 1985. Moi, Toril. Henrik Ibsen and the Birth of Modernism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. ---. 'Ibsen, Theatre, and the Ideology of Modernism.' Theatre Survey 45.2 (2004): 247. ---. ''It Was as If He Meant Something Different from What He Said---All the Time': Language, Metaphysics, and the Everday in the Wild Duck.' New Literary History 33.4 (2002): 655. Nelson, Byron. 'Brand.' Theatre Journal 56.1 (2004): 104. Neserius, Philip George. ” Ibsen’s Political and Social Ideas.” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 19, No. 1(Feb., 1925): 25-37. Northam, John, Ibsen’s Dramatic Method: A Study of the Prose Dramas. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1971. ---. “ Ibsen’s Search For the Hero.” Ibsen: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Rolf Fjelde. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1965. 91-108. Rem, Tore. “Review: [Untitled].” The Modern Language Review 95.1 (2000): 286-89. Rhodes, Norman. “ Subjective Hegemony: An Enemy of the People, Dr. Stockmann, Socrates, and Oedipus.” Ibsen and The Greeks. Associated University Presses, 1995. 139-155. Rønning, Helge, ‘“Individualism and the Liberal Dilemma”. Notes Towards A Sociological Interpretation of An Enemy of the People by Henrik Ibsen.’ Ibsen-årbok Oslo,1975. 101-21. ---. “Ibsen and the Ambivalence of Modernity”, Proceedings: International Ibsen Conference, Grimstad July 1993 (1994), 48-63. Sandberg, Mark. “Ibsen on the Cusp of the 21st Century: Critical Perspectives.” Scandinavian Studies. 79.4 (2007): 513. Styan J.L. Modern Drama in Theory and practice. New York: Cambridge, 1981. Shaw, George Bernard. “An Enemy of the People.” The Quintesswnce of Ibsenism. New York: Hill and Wang, 1913. Shepherd-Barr, Kirsten. Ibsen and Early Modernist Theatre, 1890-1900. London: Greenwood Press, 1997. Shideler, Ross. “Ibsen and the Name-of-the-Father.” Scandinavian Studies 69.3 (1997): 277. Templeton, Joan. Ibsen's Women. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997.163-67. ---. “Ibsen and the Birth of Modernism: A Review Essay.” Scandinavian Studies Lawrence, KS. 79.3 (2007): 343. Theoharis, Theoharis Constantine. Ibsen's Drama: Right Action and Tragic Joy. New York: St. Martin's, 1996. Thomas, David. Henrik Ibsen. New York: Grove, 1983 Van Laan, Thomas F. 'Ibsen and Nietzsche.' Scandinavian Studies78.3 (2006): 255. ---. ‘Openings for Tragedy in Ibsen’s “Social Problem Plays”’, Ibsen at the Centre for Advanced Study, (1997):227-47. Weigand, Hermann J. The modern Ibsen. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co. Inc, 1960. Walker, Stanwood. “The 'Advanced Guard' in the Colonies: Ibsen's Thomas Stockmann and Conrad's Kurtz.” Conradiana 30.1 (1998): 5. Weber, Myles. “Seeking a Post-Ibsenian Playwright.” Kenyon Review 23.1 (2001): 188. Wells, Marie, “Rescuing Ibsen for Tragedy.” Proceedings: IX International Ibsen Conference, Bergen 5-10 June 2000. (2001): 249-56. 二、中文參考資料 比約恩•海默爾(Bjørn Hemmer)。《易卜生──藝術家之路》(Ibsen─ Kunstnerens Vei) 。石琴娥譯。北京：商務。2007年。 布羅凱特(Oscar G. Brockett)。《世界戲劇藝術欣賞─世界戲劇史》(History of the Theatre)。胡耀恆譯。台北：志文。1996年。 史丹(J.P. Stern)。《寫實主義論》。單德興譯。台北：文成。1979年。 米蘭•昆德拉。《生命中不可承受之輕》。韓少功、韓剛譯。台北：時報。1988年。 谷容林。〈經典現實主義戲劇理論：從易卜生到蕭伯納〉。《西方戲劇理論史》。廈門：廈門大學。2003年。頁549-79。 亞倫•布洛克(Alan Bullock)。《西方人文主義傳統》(The Humanist Tradition in the West) 。董樂山譯。台北：究竟。2000年。頁221。 易卜生(Henrik Ibsen)。《國民公敵》(An Enemy of the People)。劉森堯譯。台北：書林。2002年。 ---。《易卜生: 生平及其代表作》。林欣白譯。台北：五洲。1976年。 ---。《易卜生戲劇全集：家庭倫理篇》。呂健忠譯。台北：左岸文化。2004年。 南方朔。〈修辭詭辯VS.演說雄辯〉。中國時報。2004年8月9日。 姚一葦。《戲劇原理》。台北：書林。1992年。 紀蔚然。〈語言觀：從寫實到荒謬〉。《現代戲劇敘事觀：建構與解構》。台北：書林。2006年。頁94-96。 韋清琦。〈從《人民公敵》看易卜生的生態觀〉。《易卜生與中國──走向一種美學建構》。王寧、孫健主編。天津：天津人民出版。2004年。175-184。 高宣揚。《傅科的生存美學：西方思想的起點與終結》。台北：五南。2004年。 葛蘭特(Damian Gant)。《寫實主義》(Realism)。顏元叔譯。台北：黎明文化。1973年。 廖炳惠。《解構批評論集》。台北：東大。1985年。 鍾明德。《從寫實主義到後現代主義》。台北：書林。1995年。頁8。 三、網路資源： http://www.nb.no/baser/ibsen/english.html http://www.ibsen.net/ http://www.ibsenworldwide.info/ http://www.hf.uio.no/ibsensenteret/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43239 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 《國民公敵》的主角醫生史塔克曼一直被視為正義鬥士或是劇作家抒發理想的代言人。劇中的部分角色包括醫生自己固然如此認定，但是他的哥哥市長和那些稱他為“人民公敵”的群眾卻不以為然。這兩者的「間隙」，透過深入的分析，可以顯現史塔克曼並非絕對的正直和正義，他的理想也只是個在世界中無法實現烏托邦。
另一種意義的「間隙」存在於語言和舞台實際狀況之間。本劇的對話表面上固然接近日常語言，但是並不能吻合觀眾所看到的形象，因此本劇已經脫離寫實主義的正軌。進一步看，本劇固然從一個嚴肅的社會問題開始，但是後來牽涉到難以掌握的真相與真理的問題，因此超越了一般寫實社會問題劇的的層次或關注。總之，本論文透過以上兩種間隙，力求對本劇提出新的解讀和評價。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Dr Stockmann, the protagonist in An Enemy of the People, has been viewed by critics as a justice fighter or as the spokesman of Ibsen as an idealist. Though many characters in the play, including Dr Stockmann himself, tend to agree with this assessment, his brother, the mayor, and those who call him 'an enemy of the people” certainly have a different view. I argue that such a perception gap, when looked at in-depth, reveals that Dr Stockmann is hardly an unshakeable pillar of justice and that his ideals are only a utopia that cannot be realized in the real world.
There is another kind of “gap” in the play, between how language is thought of, and how it is actually used. Though the dialogue in the play is life-like, this does not correspond to how the situation is perceived by the audience. This is a deviation from the standard practice of realism. Furthermore, though the play starts from a serious social problem, it deepens to explore the unfathomable problems of fundamental reality and truth. The play thus transcends the concerns of social drama. To conclude, based on my analysis of the two kinds of gaps, this thesis challenges the prevailing views of the play and attempts to offer a new interpretation and a new evaluation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:44:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R94129001-1.pdf: 723699 bytes, checksum: 013d216fe31ffa5d772321b793778f38 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 頁數
第一章 易卜生與國民敵 1 第一節 被誤解的易卜生 1 第二節 被誤解的《國民公敵》 6 第二章 語言策略建立形象 9 第一節 語言形塑角色 10 第二節 角色語言攻防 17 第三節 表演性的語言─演說 27 第四節 醫生史塔克曼在劇中世界的形象與真相 36 第三章 從形象到真相 41 第一節 醫生的自我定位和想象 41 第二節 揭發社會弊端？ 48 第四章 結論 57 參考資料 60 附錄：易卜生的作品年表 69 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 在角色與觀眾的間隙之間：易卜生《國民公敵》的形象研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Gap Between Characters and Audience: An Exploration of the Imagery of Ibsen's An Enemy of the People | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何一梵(I-Fan Ho),林偉瑜(wei-yu Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 易卜生,國民公敵,易卜生研究,形象,語言,寫實主義,社會問題劇,理想主義, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Ibsen,An Enemy of the People,Ibsen Study,Image,language,Realism,Thesis Play,Idealism, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 70 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 戲劇學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2300-01-01 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 戲劇學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf Restricted Access | 706.74 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.