請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43226完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇喜 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Hu Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳國瑚 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:43:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-09-16 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-09-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
于漱、顧乃平(1998):不同年級護理人員學士學位進修班學生之護理能力比較與其改變情形。護理研究,6,121-136。 王郁智、章淑娟、朱正一(2006):升遷機會、社會支持、工作滿意度與留任意願之相關性研究。志為護理,5,90-101。 尹祚芊、楊克平、劉麗芳(2001):台灣地區醫院護理人員留任措施計畫成效之評值。護理研究,9,247-258。 行政院主計處(2009):人力資源調查統計結果。台北:行政院主計處。 行政院主計處(2000):中華民國台灣地區社會指標統計。台北:行政院主計處。 行政院衛生署(2006):台灣地區醫事人員數—按醫院評鑑等級。台北,行政院衛生署。 任維廉(2005):SEM之應用簡介。 Available at:http://140.113.119.160/Research%20methodology/2005/SEM.doc 李茂能( 2007):SEM適配度指標的潛藏問題:最佳模式難求。測驗統計年刊,16,17-30。 李選、盧瑛琪、嚴文娟、林淑琴(2004):由邁入全球化談台灣護理教育之衝擊與未來發展。護理雜誌,51,27-32。 吳明隆( 2008):結構方程模式AMOS的操作與運用。台北:五南圖書公司。 林忠正(1991):台灣勞動市場的流動率,行政院勞委會1990年代人力資源發展實用策略國際研討會論文集,行政院勞委會。 林孟彥(2007)譯:管理學 第八版(原著:Stephen P. Robbins ; Mary Coulter)。台北:華泰文化。 林清山(1984):線性結構關係(LISREL)電腦程式的理論與應用。測驗年刊。 林清山(1991):多變量分析統計法。台北:東華書局。 林瑞欽(1990):師範生任教職志之理論與實證研究。高雄,復文圖書公司。 林慧芝(2005):激勵制度對留任意願影響之探討-以內部稽核人員為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 邱皓政( 2003):結構方程模式:LISREL的理論技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊。 黃秀梨、張媚、林豔君、林瓊芳、吳翠娥(2004):碩士護理教育之現況評估與改善計畫。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。 黃芳銘( 2002):結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南圖書公司。 黃璉華(2004):從護生到護士--談新進護理人員的適應。護理雜誌,51,33-36。 崔來意(2000):高科技公司女性專業人員工作-家庭衝突、工作倦怠及離職意 願關係之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 陳國瑚、陳麗如、蘇喜(2006):護理工作認知與離職傾向之探討。台灣公共衛生雜誌,25,177-188。 陳維岳(2005):工作特性、工作滿意與組織承諾之關聯性研究。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 湯玉英(1994):如何降低護理人員的離職率。護理雜誌,41,83-87。 張紹勳( 2003):研究方法。台中:滄海書局。 葉桂珍(2002):科技研發人員之事業決策、工作認知、與工作涉入之重審視。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。 楊濱燦(2004):組織支持認知及領導者與部屬交換關係對組織公民行為影響效果之研究。台灣管理學刊,4(2),141-160。 趙婉青(2007):護理工作環境認知與離職傾向之關係--以台北縣區域教學醫院護理人員為例。國立台北護理學院醫護管理研究所碩士論文。 鞏雅郁、侯雅菁(1999):在職教育護理行政訓練課程。領導護理,3(2),34-36。 蔡素玲(2002):TQIP三週年成果回顧。台灣醫療品質指標計畫三週年成果發表研討會論文集。 蔡淑妙、盧美秀(1998):護理人員生涯發展及其與留任意願相關性的研究。護理研究,6,96-108。 盧美秀(2004):我國護理教育的現況與展望。護理雜誌,51,11-17。 鍾聿琳(2004):現今台灣技職護理教育的關鍵課題。護理雜誌,51,18-21。 蕭伃伶、盧美秀(1996):臨床護理人員之組織承諾、組織留任與專業留任的相關性研究。護理研究,4,137-150。 蕭淑貞、戎謹如、沈宴姿、楊麗齡、藍忠孚(1994):我國護理教育體制之課題與展望。護理雜誌,41,52-61。 蕭淑貞、周照芳、黃金蓮(1995):我國臨床護理業務之課題研究報告。行政院衛生署八十四年度委託研究報告。 二、英文文獻 Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 1988;103, 411-423. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA 2002; 288: 1987-1993. Aiken LH, Patrician PA. Measuring Organizational Traits of Hospitals: The Revised Nursing Work Index. Nurs Res 2000;49:146-153. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989. Carsten JM, Spector PE. Unemployment, job satisfaction and employee turnover: A meta-analysis test of the Munchinsky model. J Appl Psychol 1987;72:374-381. Cook TH, Gilmer MJ, Bess CJ. Beginning students’ definitions of nursing: an inductive framework of professional identity. J Nurs Educ 2003;42:311-317. Dalton DR, Todor WD, Krackhardt DM. Turnover overstated: The functional taxonomy. Acad Manage Rev 1982;7:117-123. Dansereau F, Graen GB, Haga W. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations. Organ Behav Hum Perform 1975;13:46-78. Eisenberger R, Fasolo PM, Davis-LaMastro V. Effects of perceived organizational support on employee diligence, innovation, and commitment. J Appl Psychol 1990;53:51-59. Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. J Appl Psychol 1986;71:500-507. Ferguson J. When quality means business. Modern Healthcare 2005;35:26-27. Gellatly IR. Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: test of a causal model. J Organ Behav 1995;16:469-485. Graen GB, Cashman J. A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. Kent OH: Kent State Univ. Press, 1975. Hackman JR, Lawler EE. Employee reactions to job characteristics. J Appl Psychol 1971;55(3):259-286. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2006. Hatcher L. A Step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 1998. Hemingway MA, Smith CS. Organizational climate and occupational stressors as predictors of withdraw behaviours and injuries in nurses. J Occup Oragn Psychol 1999;72:285-299. Heslop L, McIntyre M, Ives G. Undergraduate student nurses’ expectations and their self-reported prepareness for the graduate year role. J Adv Nurs 2001;36: 626-634. Hom P, Griffeth R. A structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis J Appl Psychol 1991;76:350-366. Hovey SR, Vanderhorst R, Yurkovich EB. Elective preceptorship: A cooperative opportunity for baccalaureate nursing education and nursing service. J Nurs Educ 1990;29:285-287. Iverson RD, Deery M. Turnover culture in the hospitality industry. Hum Resour Manage J 1997;7:71-82. Jöreskog KG., Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993. Katz R. Time and work: toward an integrative perspective. In: Staw B, Cummings L, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich: JAI Press,1980. Korman AK. Expectancies as determinants of performance. J Appl Psychol 1971;55(3): 218-222. Krausz M, Koslowsky M, Shalom N, Elyakim N. Predictors of intentions to leave the ward, the hospital, and the nursing profession: A longitudinal study. J Organ Behav 1995;16:277-288. Loehlin JC. Latent variable model: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992. Lomax R. Covariance structural analysis: Extensions and development. Advan Soc Sci Meth 1989;1:171-204. Lum L, Kervin J, Clark K, Reid F, Sirola W. Explaining nursing turnover intent: job satisfaction, pay satisfaction, or organization commitment? J Organ Behav 1998;19:305-320. MacCallum RC, Browne MW. The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues. Psychol Bull 1993;114, 533-541. Millman Z, Hartwick J. The impact of automated office systems on middle managers and their work. MIS Quarterly1987;479-491. Mueller RO. Structural equation modeling: Back to basics. SEM 1997;4:353-369. Pigott H. Facing reality: The transition from student to graduate nurse. Aust Nurs J 2001;8:24-26. Porter LW, Miles RE. Motivation and management. (Motivation and Work Behavior.) Hightstown, NJ:McGraw-Hill, 1974. Proenca EJ, Shewchuk RM. Organizational tenure and the perceived importance of retention factors in nursing homes. Health Care Manage Rev 1997;22:65-73. Sagie A, Krausz M. What aspect of the job have most effect on nurses? Hum Resour Manage J 2003;13:46-62. Seybolt JW. Dealing with premature employee turnover. California Manage Rev 1983;25:107-117. Seashore SE, Taber JD. Job satisfaction indicators and their correlation. Am Behav Sci 1975;18:333-368. Sims JR, Szilagyi AD, Keller RT. The measurement of job characteristics. Acad Manage J 1976;19(2):195 -212. Steinbrook R. Nursing in the crossfire. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1757-1765. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1996. Waldman JD, Kelly F, Arora S, Smith HL. The shocking cost of turnover in health care. Health Care Manage Rev 2004;29:2-7. Walsh K, Weeks LC. PACE A unique career development program. J Nurs Adm 1995; 25:10-11. Wayne WG, Shore LM, Liden RC. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Acad Manage J 1997;40(1):82-111. Yang KP. Relationships between nurses staffing and patient outcomes. J Nurs Res 2003;11:149-158.10. Yin JC, Yang KP. Nursing turnover in Taiwan: a meta-analysis of related factors. Int J Nurs studies 2002;39:573-581. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/43226 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的:探討:壹、基層護理人員對擔任護理現職之工作認知與其離 職傾向;貳、基層護理人員背景、職務因素、護理工作認知、其他工作機會與離職傾向的關聯,藉由結構方程式(structural equation modeling)驗證其間的關聯性;參、調查填寫問卷後六個月內已確認「真正離職」護理員工的數目,以探究以上各個因素與「確認離職」其間的關聯。
方法:本研究以台北縣內區域醫院、地區醫院和基層醫療機構非主管階級護理人員為對象,使用不記名問卷進行收樣發出2725份問卷,回收1767份,整體回收率64.84 %。資料建檔後進行基本資料分析、相關性分析、單因子變異數分析、再以結構方程式進行驗證性因素分析及路徑結構分析,探究護理人員背景因素、職務因素、護理工作認知、其他工作機會對離職傾向的影響。另以邏輯式迴歸探究以上各個因素與「確認離職」其間的關聯。 結果:壹、基層護理人員之「護理工作認知」偏低;「離職傾向」偏高。貳、「護理工作認知」為「離職傾向」的顯著負向預測因子(迴歸參數值-0.328);「其他工作機會」為「離職傾向」的顯著正向預測因子(迴歸參數值0.310)。「護理工作認知」越低或「其他工作機會」越高,則其「離職傾向」越高。護理人員背景及職務因素中,「學歷、職務類別、是否屬新進護理人員、工作單位性質」對離職傾向之影響為顯著。「高學歷(教育程度)、職務類別屬正式人員、工作單位性質為正常上班時間而不需輪夜班」者,其「離職傾向」較低;屬於新進人員其「離職傾向」較高。其他項目如護理人員年齡、性別、婚姻狀況、有無宗教信仰、所屬機構性質(公私立)、所屬機構層級(規模)、上班交通便利性並不是影響離職傾向的重要因子。參、「確認離職」模式中,離職傾向與其他工作機會為「確認離職」顯著之正向預測因子,護理工作認知是「確認離職」顯著之負向預測因子,可以有效預測與解釋確認離職,而護理人員背景及職務因素各個項目之影響則不顯著。離職傾向為「確認離職」最強的預測因子(勝算比3.1566),其次為其他工作機會(勝算比1.4493)。 結論:各個因素影響「離職傾向」以及「確認離職」是多因子、多層次的,可分為直接和間接影響。除了對「護理工作的認知」會影響「離職傾向」以及「確認離職」外,護理人員離職還會考量是否有「其他工作機會」。自覺較容易獲得其他工作機會者,「離職傾向」較高,也比較會有真正的離職行動。護理人員離職是醫療機構管理的重要課題。本研究可供護理工作和醫療管理者在研究或計畫解決此一問題時,做為參考和運用。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To explore: 1. attitudes of nursing staffs toward job perception and turnover intention; 2. the relationship among demographic factors, job factors, job perception, other job opportunities and turnover intention of nursing staffs by structural equation modeling; 3. the relationship between each factor mentioned above and identified leaving job of nursing staffs by collecting the data of really leaving job within six months from the survey of questionnaire.
Methods: Nursing staffs of regional, district hospitals and clinics in Taipei County were enrolled in the survey, in which 1,767 self-administered questionnaires had been collected, with a response rate of 64.84% (2,725 questionnaires sent out). The data was analyzed by basic descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, analysis of variance and structural equation modeling respectively, with confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis to explore the relationship among above factors and turnover intention. Logistic regression was applied to check the relationship between each factor and identified leaving job. Results: 1. Nursing staffs have a lower level of job perception and a higher level of turnover intention. 2. Job perception is a significant and negative predictor of turnover intention (coefficient β: -0.328); Other job opportunities is a significant and positive predictor of turnover intention (coefficient β: 0.310). The lower the level of job perception is; the higher the level of other job opportunities is, and the higher the level of turnover intention is. Among all demographic and job factors, education status, whether the job is formal or not, whether the staffs are rookies in the nursing profession or not, and whether the staffs have a night-shift work (instead of a daytime work) or not are significant factors in the model of turnover intention. Nursing staffs with a higher education level, with a formal job, and with a daytime work grossly have a lower level of turnover intention. Nursing staffs who are rookies in the nursing profession have a higher level of turnover intention. In contrast the other demographic and job factors including age, sex gender, marriage status, beliefs of religions, working situations (public or private hospitals), the scale of hospitals (large or small), and spending time in going to work are not important predictors to turnover intention. 3. In the model of identified leaving job, both turnover intention and other job opportunities are significant and positive predictors of identified leaving job; job perception is a significant and negative predictor of identified leaving job. However the effect of items in both demographic and job factors to identified leaving job seems insignificant. Turnover intention is the strongest predictor (Odds Ratio: 3.1566) of identified leaving job; the secondary is other job opportunities. (Odds Ratio: 1.4493) Conclusions: The mechanism for the complex effects of all factors to turnover intention and identified leaving job of nursing staffs is multi-factorial and also multi-level, including direct and indirect pathways. In addition to job perception, other job opportunities will be taken into consideration for nursing staffs in deciding to leave their jobs. Nursing staffs with a higher perception of easily obtaining other job opportunities have a higher level of turnover intention and are subject to real actions of leaving job. Leaving job of nursing staffs is an important issue to the management of health care organizations. This study may serve as a reference and utility for nursing staffs and medical managers who focus on researching or solving this problem. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:43:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-D92843002-1.pdf: 755883 bytes, checksum: 04a6f5e46ff39a4fcd00dd5aa09fc22d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………………i
誌謝………………………………………………………………………..…………….ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………..……v 目錄…………………………………………………………………………………....viii 表目錄…………………………………………………..………………………………x 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………….xii 第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………………………1 第二章 名詞解釋及文獻探討………………………………………………………5 第一節 角色認知、護理工作認知的意義及相關概念………………………….5 第二節 離職傾向定義與離職相關理論;離職傾向與其他工作機會關聯…….12 第三節 結構方程式……………………………………………………………...18 第三章 材料與方法…………………………………………..……………………….42 第一節 研究架構與研究對象…………………………………………………...42 第二節 問卷設計………………………………………………………………...43 第三節 統計分析方法……………………………………………………..……47 第四章 研究結果……………………………………………………………………..50 第一節 樣本概述………………………………………………….…………….50 第二節 基本資料及員工職務分佈….………………………………………….50 第三節 所有量表表內各項目相關分析………………………………………..51 第四節 所有量表指標項目的一般統計………………………………………..51 第五節 不同背景及職務護理人員之平均離職傾向…………………………...52 第六節 結構方程式分析………………………………………………………..59 第七節 確認離職分析………………………………………………………….109 第五章 討論(含研究限制)…………………………………………………………..113 第六章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………….118 參考文獻……………………………………..……………………………….………126 附錄一 基層護理人員工作認知與離職傾向研究問卷…………………………….134 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 離職 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 護理工作認知 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 其他工作機會 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 離職傾向 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 結構方程式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | job perception of nursing staffs | en |
| dc.subject | leaving job | en |
| dc.subject | structural equation modeling | en |
| dc.subject | turnover intention | en |
| dc.subject | other job opportunities | en |
| dc.title | 護理人員背景因素、職務因素、護理工作認知、其他工作機會與離職傾向之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Relationship among Demographic Factors, Job Factors, Job Perception, Other Job Opportunities and Turnover Intention of Nursing Staffs | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃璉華,石曜堂,洪正修,陳端容 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 護理工作認知,其他工作機會,離職傾向,結構方程式,離職, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | job perception of nursing staffs,other job opportunities,turnover intention,structural equation modeling,leaving job, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 138 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫療機構管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 738.17 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
