請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42992
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮(Chyi-Rong Chiou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Jenny Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 洪貞伶 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:31:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 上官周平,邵明安,李玉山,楊文治(2004)黃土高原森林植被對土壤水分循環過程的影響。中華水土保持學報 35(2) : 177-185。
2. 王子定、姜家華、鄭賢德(1978)柳杉林各樹冠級之根系研究。國立台灣大學農學院實驗林研究報告 121:11-40。 3. 吳正雄(1990)植生根力與坡面穩定關係之研究—台灣赤楊、山黃麻、台灣杉之根力與土壤剪力相關之研究。國立台灣大學森林研究所博士論文。 4. 沈明來(1999)試驗設計學。九州圖書文物有限公司,714頁。 5. 林信輝、陳意昌(2007)談樹木根系形態與功能—為什麼樹會產生破壞?科學月刊 38(5):366-369。 6. 林國銓、王巧萍、馬復京(2005)福山亞熱帶濶葉林細根的分布和養分含量。台灣林業科學 20(1):1-11。 7. 胥毅軍(1994)森林根系研究在生態系統研究中之重要性及主要野外方法之討論。台灣林業 20(6):15-20。 8. 胡蘇澄(1972)相思樹不同方位及坡度根系分布之研究。中華水土保持學報 4(1):205-221。 9. 陳財輝、許博行、張峻德(1999)四湖海岸木麻黃林分降水、幹流水及穿落水之養分含量與輸入。台灣林業科學 14(4) : 419-435。 10. 陳財輝、許博行、張峻德(1998)四湖海岸木麻黃林份土壤養分量調查。台灣林業科學 13(3):225-235。 11. 陳財輝、潘冠良、廖天賜(2006)不同種源山木麻黃在台灣之初期生長表現。台灣林業科學 21(4):421-431。 12. 陸象豫、黃良鑫、黃惠雪(2007)林業試驗所中埔研究中心四湖與中埔氣象站氣象資料彙整。林業叢刊第178號。行政院農業委員會林業試驗所。344頁。 13. 陸象豫、黃良鑫、傅鶴翹(1999)檳榔園水文特性之研究。台灣林業科學 14(2):211-221。106頁。 14. 章錦瑜(2007)漫談台灣的綠化災難—根害?人害?看分明。科學月刊 38(5):370-373。 15. 鹿兒陽、朱珮綺、劉育延、李治逸、許崑衍、彭靖媛、彭靖媛、李金玲(2005)台大實驗林溪頭崩塌地定殖植物之特性研究。台大實驗林研究報告 19(3):231-237。 16. 廖學誠(2001)生態水文研究之展望。林業研究專訊 8(1):7-11。 17. 鄭賢德(1977)柳杉林各樹冠級之根系硏究。國立台灣大學森林學研究所碩士論文。58頁。 18. 顏正平(2005)從植物根系之分布引領進入生態學理領域。博學 3:21-40。 19. 顏正平(2004)樹木之地下世界—植物根系分布類型之研究。博學 2:25-36。 20. 顏正平(1974)台灣木本植物根系分布深度及密度型態調查。中華水土保持學報 5(1):105-123。 21. 顏正平(1973)水土保持木本植物根系分布基本型態調查。中華水土保持學報 4(1):65-84。 22. 顏正平(1972)水土保持木本植物根系分布類型研究。中華水土保持學報 3(2):179-204。 23. Archer, N. A. L., J. N. Quinton and T. M. Hess (2002) Below-ground relationship of soil texture, roots and hydraulic conductivity in two-phase mosaic vegetation in south-east Spain. Journal of Arid Environments 52(4): 535-553. 24. Bayala, J., L. K. Heng, M. van Noordwijk and S. J. Ouedraogo (2008) Hydraulic redistribution study in two native tree species of agroforestry parklands of West African dry savanna. Acta Oecologica 34(3): 370-378. 25. Brooks, J.R., F.C. Meinzer, J.M. Warren, J.C. Domec and R. Coulombe (2006) Hydraulic redistribution in a Douglas-fir forest: lessons from system manipulations. Plant, Cell and Environment 29(1): 138-150. 26. Bond, B. (2003) Hydrology and ecology meet — and the meeting is good. Hydrological Processes 17: 2087-2089. 27. Cook, F. J. and F. M. Kelliher (2006) Determining Vertical Root and Microbial Biomass Distributions from Soil Samples. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70(3): 728 -735. 28. Ensign, K.L., E.A. Webb and F.J. Longstaffe (2006) Microenvironmental and seasonal variations in soil water content of the unsaturated zone of a sand dune system at Pinery Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada. Geoderma 136(3-4): 788-802. 29. Espeleta, J.F. and D.A. Clark (2007) Multi-scale variation in fine-root biomass in a tropical rain forest: a seven-year study. Ecological Monographs 77(3): 377-404. 30. Gale, M.R., and D.F. Grigal (1987) Vertical root distribution of northern tree species in relation to successional status. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 17:829-834. 31. Guardiola-Claramonte, M., P. A. Troch , A. D. Ziegler , T. W. Giambelluca , J. B. Vogler and M. A. Nullet (2008) Local hydrologic effects of introducing non-native vegetation in a tropical catchment. Ecohydrology 1(1): 13-22 32. Gutierrez-Jurado, H.A., E.R. Vivoni, J.B.J. Harrison and H. Guan (2006) Ecohydrology of root zone water fluxes and soil development in complex semiarid rangelands. Hydrological Processes 20(15): 3289-3316. 33. Hanah, D.M., P. J. Wood and J.P. Sadler (2004) Ecohydrology and hydroecology: A ‘New Paragiam’? Hydrological Process 18: 3439-3455. 34. Hatton, T. J., G. D. Salvucci and H. I. Wu (1997) Eagleson’s optimality theory of an ecohydrological equilibrium: quo vadis? Functional Ecology 11: 665-674. 35. Henderson, J.J., J.R. Crum, T. F. Wolff, J.N. Rogers, III (2005) Effects of particle size distribution and water content at compaction on saturated hydraulic conductivity and strength of high sand content root zone materials. Soil Science 170(5): 315-324. 36. Jackson, R.B., H.A. Mooney, and E.-D. Schulze (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94:7362-7366. 37. Johnsen, K., C. Maier, and L. Kress (2005) Quantifying root lateral distribution and turnover using pine trees with a distinct stable carbon isotope signature. Functional Ecology 19(1): 81-87. 38. Kowalchuk R.K., H. J. Keselman, J. Algina, and R. D. Wolfinger (2004) The analysis of repeated measurements with mixed-model adjusted F tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64(2):224-242. 39. Li, Y., R. Wallach and Y. Cohen (2002) The role of soil hydraulic conductivity on the spatial and temporal variation of root water uptake in drip-irrigated corn. Plant and Soil 243(2):131-142. 40. Meinzer, F.C., J.M. Warren and J.R. Brooks (2007) Species-specific partitioning of soil water resources in an old-growth Douglas-fir-western hemlock forest. Tree Physiology 27(6): 871-880. 41. Moir, W.H. and E.P. Bachelard (1969) Distribution of fine roots in three Pinus Radiata plantations near Canberra, Australia. Ecology 50(4): 658-662. 42. Mulia, R. and C. Dupraz (2005) Unusual fine root distributions of two deciduous tree species in southern France: What consequences for modelling of tree root dynamics? Plant and Soil 281(1-2): 71-85. 43. Nuttle, W. K. (2002) Is ecohydrology one idea or many? Hydrological Sciences Journal 47: 805-807. 44. Okali, D. U. U., J. B. Hall and G. W. Lawson (1973) Root distribution under a thicket clump on the Accra plains, Ghana: its relevance to clump localization and water relations. The Journal of Ecology 61 (2): 439-454. 45. Padilla, F.M. and F.I. Pugnaire (2007) Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedling survival during drought. Functional Ecology 21 (3): 489-495. 46. Pereira, J. S., C. Kurz-Besson, and M. M. Chaves (2009) Coping with Drought pp. 73-80 In J. Aronson, J. S. Pereira, and J. G. Pausas, eds. Cork Oak Woodlands on the Edge: Ecology, Adaptive Management, and Restoration. Island Press, Washington,D.C. 352pp. 47. Porporato, A. and I. Rodriguez-Iturbe (2002) Ecohydrology — a challenging multidisciplinary research perspective. Hydrological Sciences Journal 47(5): 811-822. 48. Porporato, A. P., D'Odorico, F. Laio, L. Ridolfi and I. Rodríguez-Iturbe (2002) Ecohydrology of water-controlled ecosystems. Advances in Water Resources 25(8): 1335-1348. 49. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2000) Ecohydrology: a hydrologic perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics. Water Resources Research 36(1): 3-9. 50. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., A. Porporato, L. Ridolfi, V. Isham, and D. R. Cox (1999) Probabilistic modelling of water balance at a point: The role of climate, soil and vegetation.Royal Society of London Proceedings Series A 455: 3789-3805. 51. Schenk, H. J. and R. B. Jackson (2002a) The global biogeography of roots. Ecological Monographs 72(3):311-328. 52. Schenk, H. J. and R. B. Jackson (2002b) Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground / above-ground allometries in water-limited ecosystems. The Journal of Ecology 90(3): 480-494. 53. Seyfried, M.S. and B.P. Wilcox (2006) Soil water storage and rooting depth: key factors controlling recharge on rangelands. Hydrological Processes 20(15): 3261-3275. 54. Strand, A.E., S.G. Pritchard, M.L. McCormack, M. A. Davis and R. Oren (2008) Irreconcilable differences: fine-root life spans and soil carbon persistence. Science 319: 456-458. 55. Sudmeyer, R.A., J. Speijers and B.D. Nicholas (2004) Root distribution of Pinus pinaster, P. radiata, Eucalyptus globulus and E. kochii and associated soil chemistry in agricultural land adjacent to tree lines. Tree Physiology 24 (12): 1333-1346. 56. UNESCO (2005) Proposed establishment of the European Regional Centre for ecohydrology in Lodz, Poland, under the auspices of UNESCO. Item 16 of the provisional agenda, UNESCO General Conference 33rd session, UNESCO, Paris, 19 August 2005. Retrieved March 15, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.mcepan.lodz.pl/files/agreementUNESCO_en.pdf 57. Valverde-Barrantes, O.J., J.W. Raich and A.E. Russell (2007) Fine-root mass, growth and nitrogen content for six tropical tree species. Plant and Soil 290: 357-370. 58. Xie, Y., W. Deng, and J. Wang (2007) Growth and root distribution of Vallisneria natans in heterogeneous sediment environments. Aquatic Botany 86 (1): 9-13 59. Yanagisawa, N. and N. Fujita (1999) Different distribution patterns of woody species on a slope in relation to vertical root distribution and dynamics of soil moisture profiles. Ecological Research 14(2): 165-177. 60. Zalewski, M (2002) Ecohydrology — the use of ecological and hydrological processes for sustainable management of water resources. Hydrological Sciences Journal 47(5): 825-832. 61. Zalewski, M. (2000) Ecohydrology the scientific background to use ecosystem properties as management tools toward sustainability of water resources. Ecological Engineering 16: 1-8. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42992 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 根區土壤含水率與細根生物量密度之關係是生態水文學的研究重點之一。夏季時,不僅蒸發作用強烈,蒸散作用亦相當旺盛,森林由根區獲取大量的土壤水。水力再分配是細根使土壤含水率增加的現象,會影響植物生態系的土壤含水率。由上述兩個原因,根系分布會影響森林生態系的土壤含水率;再者,土壤含水率會影響根系分布,因此討論細根生物量密度有助於對森林生態水文過程的理解。歷年來國內少有研究探討細根生物量密度與土壤含水率之關係,但細根是森林生態水文學研究的關鍵,我們應當關注細根生物量密度在森林中所扮演的角色。
自2008 年五月中至八月底,在四湖海岸人工林以30 cm 的TDR 土壤水分感測計測量十個點的土壤含水率,分別位於林內、林緣、林外三個區域的內、中、外三個位置,和林外無植被的空地。觀測期中共有8 個土壤乾燥過程。於八月底觀測結束後,在樣點取直徑8.5 cm、深度0∼30 cm 的土柱以獲得細根樣本。土壤含水率之試驗設計為重複觀測混合模式巢式設計,第一層級是林內、林緣、草地三個區域,第二層級是內、中、外三個位置。第一部分的統計分析是以SAS 的混合統計分析程序(MIXED procedure)受制最大概似法(REML)分析土壤乾燥過程第1 日至第9 日的土壤含水率初始值變異數成分(variance components),以探討土壤含水率在林內、林緣、林外之不同區域和內、中、外不同位置是否有差異。第二部分的統計分析是以單因子變異數分析檢定三個區域的細根生物量密度之平均值是否相等。第三部分的統計分析是以線性迴歸法分析細根生物量密度對土壤含水率之影響。結果顯示在夏季的土壤乾燥過程中,從地表到30 cm 深的細根生物量密度每增加1 kg m-3,土壤含水率減少0.02。水力再分配現象在午夜至清晨之間發生,最多使土壤含水率在15 分鐘內增加0.002。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The relationship between the soil moisture content in the root zone and fine-root biomass density is one of the most important parts of the research in Ecohydrology. Not only the evaporation rate but also the transpiration rate is significant in summer. Therefore, forest uptakes large amount of soil moisture through the fine root. Hydraulic redistribution affects the distribution of soil moisture content in plant ecosystem by fine roots. As a result, the root distribution affects the soil moisture content in forest. Moreover, soil moisture contents can influence root distributions. Thus, a discussion on the fine-root biomass density may give us a clear understanding of the process of forest ecohydrology. In Taiwan, there has been little research on the relationship between fine-root biomass densities and soil moisture contents. However, understanding the tree root is the key to forest ecohydrology research. We must focus on the role of fine-root biomass density in forest.
The experiment used 30 cm TDR sensors to measure soil moisture contents at 10 sites in Szehu coastal plantation. There were TDR sensors in each site (Internal, Middle, and External) in each of the 3 areas (Forest, Forest Edge, and Grassland). There was only one TDR sensor on the vacant land. There were 8 soil drying processes of soil moisture from middle May to the end of August 2008. Fine root samples were from the uppermost 30 cm layer soil which were collected by 8.5-diameter-soil-core samplers at these sites at the end of August 2008. The experimental design of soil moisture contents was a repeated nested mixed model. The first class was the area (Forest, Forest Edge, and Grassland), and the second class was the site (Internal, Middle, and External). There were total of 3 kinds of statistical analyses in this investigation. The first part of the statistical analyses, which analysed the variance components of initial values of the soil moisture content of the 1st days up to the 9th days of soil drying processes, were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) methodology. The first part of the statistical analyses showed whether the soil moisture contents were different not only among the 3 areas, but also among 3 sites. The second part of the statistical analyses, which aimed to know whether the mean fine-root biomass densities among the 3 areas were the same or not, was a one-way ANOVA. The third part of the statistical analyses were linear regressions which aimed to test whether and how fine-root biomass densities were related to soil moisture contents. From this investigation, 1 kg m-3 more fine–root biomass density, 0.02 less soil moisture content in the soil drying processes in summer. Hydraulic redistribution happened between midnight and dawn, and the maximum increase of the soil moisture content in 15 minutes was 0.002. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:31:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96625003-1.pdf: 1408748 bytes, checksum: efaf28ac6ab61d079d3aa756e5ab1e53 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 IV
Abstract V 目錄 VII 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XII 壹、前言 1 貳、前人研究 2 一、 生態水文學契機 2 二、 生態水文學之定義 3 三、 影響林木根系分布的因子 5 四、 森林根系之調查方法 7 五、 林木根系分布型 7 六、 不同生長環境的林木細根分布 9 (一) 農林間作和純林條件下之林木細根分布 10 (二) 施肥和未施肥條件下之林木細根分布 10 (三) 底土為不同土壤質地之林木細根分布 11 七、 林木根系之生態水文學意義 11 八、 不同環境下的根區土壤含水率 14 (一) 混合林之根區土壤含水率 14 (二) 海岸人工林之根區土壤含水率 17 (三) 砂土坡面之根區土壤含水率 17 (四) 沙丘系統之根區土壤含水率 20 (五) 熱帶雨林的殘積土台地和河階地之根區土壤含水率 20 九、 細根與土壤含水率之關係 22 參、材料與方法 24 一、試驗地概況 24 二、調查方法 27 (一) 試驗設計 27 (二) 林內降雨與土壤乾燥過程 29 (三) 水力再分配 29 (四) 細根生物量密度 30 三、統計分析 30 (一) 土壤含水率 30 (二) 林內、林緣和林外的細根生物量密度 31 (三) 細根生物量密度與土壤含水率 32 肆、結果 32 一、 林內降雨 32 二、 土壤含水率 33 三、 水力再分配 35 (一) 第一個土壤乾燥過程的第三天(六月8日) 36 (二) 第二個土壤乾燥過程的第六天(六月22日) 36 (三) 第七個土壤乾燥過程的第二天(八月8日) 36 (四) 第七個土壤乾燥過程的第三天(八月9日) 37 (五) 第七個土壤乾燥過程的第五天(八月11日) 37 (六) 第七個土壤乾燥過程的第十天(八月16日) 38 (七) 第七個土壤乾燥過程的第十二天(八月18日) 39 四、 土壤乾燥過程中的土壤含水率 39 (一) 土壤乾燥過程第1日的土壤含水率初始值 40 (二) 土壤乾燥過程第2日的土壤含水率初始值 40 (三) 土壤乾燥過程第3日的土壤含水率初始值 40 (四) 土壤乾燥過程第4日的土壤含水率初始值 40 (五) 土壤乾燥過程第5日的土壤含水率初始值 40 (六) 土壤乾燥過程第6日的土壤含水率初始值 41 (七) 土壤乾燥過程第7日的土壤含水率初始值 41 (八) 土壤乾燥過程第8日的土壤含水率初始值 41 (九) 土壤乾燥過程第9日的土壤含水率初始值 41 五、 細根生物量密度 41 六、 細根生物量密度與土壤含水率 42 (一) 林地細根生物量密度與土壤含水率 43 (二) 草地細根生物量密度與土壤含水率 50 伍、討論 56 一、 林內降雨 56 二、 水力再分配 56 三、 土壤含水率 57 (一) 不同區域的土壤含水率 57 (二) 不同位置的土壤含水率 58 (三) 林地和草地的土壤含水率 58 四、 細根生物量密度 60 五、 細根生物量密度與土壤含水率 61 (一) 林地細根生物量密度與土壤含水率 61 (二) 草地細根生物量密度與土壤含水率 62 (三) 林地和草地細根生物量密度與土壤含水率 63 六、 不同土地利用之細根有無對土壤含水率的影響 65 陸、結論 69 柒、引用文獻 70 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 細根與土壤含水率關係之探討:以四湖海岸人工林為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship between Fine Roots and Soil Moisture Contents: The Analysis of Szehu Coastal Plantation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳信雄,陳財輝 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 生態水文學,土壤含水率,細根,水力再分配,混合模式,巢式設計,迴歸模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Ecohydrology,Soil moisture content,Fine roots,Hydraulic redistribution,Mixed model,Nested design,Regression model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 75 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。