Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 外國語文學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42747
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張小虹
dc.contributor.authorShang-yu Shengen
dc.contributor.author沈尚玉zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T01:21:48Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-29
dc.date.copyright2009-07-29
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-07-24
dc.identifier.citationAddison, Joseph. Spectator. Vol. III. Ed. Danald F. Bond. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1965.
Bohls, Elizabeth. Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics, 1719-1818. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995.
Bromwich, David. “Wollstonecraft as a Critic of Burke.” Political Theory 23.4 (1995): 617-34.
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. 1757. Ed. Adam Philips. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1990.
Conniff, James. “Edmund Burke and his Critics: the Case of Mary Wollstonecraft.” Journal of the History of Ideas 60.2 (1999): 299-318.
Dart, Gregory. Rousseau, Robespierre and English Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.
Dennis, John. “The Grounds of Criticism in Poetry” (1704). The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-century Aesthetic Theory. Ed. Andrew Ashfield and Peter de Bolla. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 35-39.
Derrida, Jacques. The Truth in Painting. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Ian McLeod. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987.
Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Paul Rabinow. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Sussex: The Harvester P, 1982.
Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1990.
Ferry, Luc. Homo Aestheticus: The Invention of Taste in the Democratic Age. Trans. Robert de Loaiza. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge, 2002.
---. “Govermentality.” The Foucault Effect. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991. 87-104.
Furguson, Frances. Solitude and the Sublime: Romanticism and the Aesthetics of Individuation. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Furniss, Tom. “Gender in Revolution: Edmund Burke and Mary Wollstonecraft.” Revolution in Writing: British Literary Responses to the French Revolution. Ed. Kelvin Everest. Buckingham: Open UP, 1991. 65-100.
Gordon, Colin. “Governmental Rationality: An Introduction.” The Foucault Effect. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991. 1-52.
Hertz, Neil. The End of the Line: Essays on Psychoanalysis and the Sublime. New York: Columbia UP, 1985.
Holmes, Richard. “Introduction.” Mary Wollstonecraft: A Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, and William Godwin, Memoirs of the Author of “The Rights of Woman.” Ed. Richard Holmes. London: Penguin, 1987. 9-55.
Hope Nicolson, Marjorie. Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1959.
Hust, Karen. “Facing the Maternal Sublime: Mary Wollstonecraft in Sweden.” Mary Wollstonecraft’s Journey to Scandinavia: Essays. Ed. Anka Ryall and Catherine Sanbach-Dahlström. Stockholm: Amqvist and Wiksell International, 2003. 139-63.
Jay, Martin. Songs of Experience. Berkeley: U of California P, 2005.
Johnson, Claudia J. “Introduction.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Claudia J. Johnson. Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 2002. 1-6.
Jones, Angela D. “Romantic Women Travel Writers and the Representation of Everyday Experience.” Women’s Studies 26 (1997): 497-521.
Jones, Robert W. Gender and the Formation of Taste in Eighteenth-Century Britain: the Analysis of Beauty. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Longinus. “On Sublimity.” Classical Literary Criticism. Ed. D.A. Russell and M. Winterbottom. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1989. 143-87.
Lovejoy, Arthur O. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1948.
Lyotard, Jean-François. “Answering the Question: What is Postmodernism?” The Postmodern Condition. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. U of Minnesota Press, 1984. 71-82.
Mellor, Anne K. Romanticism and Gender. New York: Routledge, 1993.
Mills, Sara. “Written on the Landscape: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark.” Romantic Geographies: Discourse of Travel, 1775-1844. Ed. Amanda Gilroy. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2000. 19-34.
Monk, Samuel H. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England. 1935. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1960.
Moskal, Jeanne. “The Picturesque and the Affectionate in Wollstonecraft’s Letters from Norway.” Modern Language Quarterly 52.3 (1991): 263-94.
Paulson, Ronald. “Burke, Paine, and Wollstonecraft: the Sublime and the Beautiful.” Representations of Revolution, 1789-1820. New Haven: Yale UP, 1983. 57-87.
Poovey, Mary. The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984.
Porter, Roy. Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World. London: Penguin Books, 2000.
Ray, William. The Logic of Culture: Authority and Identity in the Modern Era. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
Ryall, Anka, and Catherine Sanbach-Dahlström, eds. Mary Wollstonecraft’s Journey to Scandinavia: Essays. “Introduction.” Stockholm: Amqvist and Wiksell International, 2003.
Sapiro, Virginia. A Vindication of Political Virtue: the Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.
Schiller, Friedrich. Essays. Ed. Walter Hinderer and Daniel Dahlstrom. New York: Continuum, 1988.
Shaw, Philip. The Sublime. London: Routledge, 2006.
Strauss, Leo. Natural Right and History. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1953.
Swaab, Peter. “Romantic Self-Representation: The Example of Mary Wollstonecraft’s Letters in Sweden.” Mortal Pages, Literary Lives: Studies in Nineteenth-Century Autobiography. Ed. Vincent Newey and Philip Shaw. Brookfield, VT: Scolar P, 1996. 13-30.
Taylor, Charles. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke UP, 2004.
Tester, Keith. Civil Society. London: Routledge, 1992.
Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. 1976. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1986.
Williams, Raymond. Keywords. London: Fontana P, 1988.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft. Ed. Janet Todd and Marilyn Butler. 7 vols. New York: New York UP, 1989.
Wood, Neil. “The Aesthetic Dimension of Burke’s Political Thought.” The Journal of British Studies 4.1 (1964): 41-64.
Yaeger, Patricia. “Toward a Female Sublime.” Gender and Theory: Dialogues on Feminist Criticism. Ed. Linda Kauffman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989. 191-212.
Zaw, Susan Khin. “‘Appealing to the head and heart’: Wollstonecraft and Burke on taste, morals and human nature.” Femininity and Masculinity in Eighteenth-Century Art and Culture. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1994. 123-41.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42747-
dc.description.abstract本論文探究Mary Wollstonecraft如何使用「崇高」(the sublime) 與「美」(the beautiful) 此兩種美學詞彙,並分析其社會指涉及意涵,特別強調現代性 (modernity) 誕生於十八世紀歐洲的歷史脈絡,以及於此之際美學 (aesthetics) 作為一種現代論述的發展。本論文主要所處理的文本是《寫自瑞典、挪威、與丹麥的書信》,認為「崇高」代表的是個人化的力量,而「美」所代表的則是整合化的力量。本論文同時也分析比較Wollstonecraft與Edmund Burke兩者對於相同美學詞彙之不同運用,尤其是此間差異與兩人不同之社會政治觀念的關係。本論文另外關注《寫自瑞典、挪威、與丹麥的書信》文本中焦慮不安、遲疑不決的氛圍,最後認定其在情感上的濃度和修辭上的遲疑,乃是現代個體 (modern individual) 在面對一個理性化的現代世界時,為了在情感和感知上自我調節而產生。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThrough foregrounding the emergence of modernity in the eighteenth century as well as the rise of aesthetics as a specifically modern form of discourse, this thesis aims to elucidate the social significance of Mary Wollstonecraft's use of the aesthetic terms 'the sublime' and 'the beautiful' in her _Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark_ (_Letters_). It argues that the sublime aesthetic represents a propensity to individuation, while the beautiful aesthetic represents a propensity to integration. It further examines the differentiation between Wollstonecraft and Edmund Burke's use of the same aesthetic terms, especially with regard to the two writers' respective socio-political visions. Lastly, it addresses the circuitous and equivocal use of aesthetic language in _Letters_, taking the text's emotional intensity and rhetorical hesitancy as exempla of a modern individual’s struggle towards self-attunement in the face of a rationalized modernity.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:21:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R94122008-1.pdf: 462492 bytes, checksum: 67ce4deacfd59334eb21e50c0d2738ae (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgments Abstract in Chinese
Abstract in English
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Between the 'Feminist' and the 'Aesthetician' 5
1.2 The Traditional/Egoistic Sublime vs. the Feminist Sublime 9
1.3 The Rise of Aesthetics as a Modern Form of Discourse 14
1.4 Methodology and Structure 18
2 The Sublime Aesthetic: A Propensity to Individuation 21
2.1 Power and the Sublime: A Brief History History 24
2.2 The Sublime and Political Modernity 35
2.3 The Sublime as Extra-ordinary Experience: a Propensity to Individuation 41
3 Complementing the Sublime: the Beautiful Aesthetic 47
3.1 Sexual Politics and Beyond 52
3.2 The Sublime and the Beautiful in Cooperation: Burke as Example 58
3.3 The Beautiful Aesthetic as a Propensity to Integration 67
4 Conclusion 82
Works Cited 89
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject現代性zh_TW
dc.subject美zh_TW
dc.subject崇高zh_TW
dc.subject柏克zh_TW
dc.subject沃爾斯考夫特zh_TW
dc.subject美學zh_TW
dc.subject法國大革命在英國之辯論zh_TW
dc.subjectaestheticsen
dc.subjectmodernityen
dc.subjectthe beautifulen
dc.subjectthe sublimeen
dc.subjectEdmund Burkeen
dc.subjectMary Wollstonecraften
dc.subjectthe French Revolution debate in Britainen
dc.title美學與現代性:Mary Wollstonecraft《寫自瑞典、挪威、與丹麥的書信》zh_TW
dc.titleAesthetics and Modernity: Reading Mary Wollstonecraft’s _Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark_en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee吳雅鳳,田偉文
dc.subject.keyword沃爾斯考夫特,柏克,崇高,美,現代性,美學,法國大革命在英國之辯論,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMary Wollstonecraft,Edmund Burke,the sublime,the beautiful,modernity,aesthetics,the French Revolution debate in Britain,en
dc.relation.page93
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2009-07-24
dc.contributor.author-college文學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept外國語文學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:外國語文學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
451.65 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved