Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42709
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳鴻基
dc.contributor.authorShu-Jyuan Linen
dc.contributor.author林淑娟zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T01:20:28Z-
dc.date.available2013-08-31
dc.date.copyright2011-08-20
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.submitted2011-08-16
dc.identifier.citation中文文獻
1. 行政院主計處,「政府機構資訊系統委外管理實務」調查報告,2009年9月。
2. 吳琮璠,資訊管理個案研究方法,資訊管理學報,第四卷第一期,頁 7-17,1997。
英文文獻
1. Avital, M., & Vandenbosch, B. (2002 , Winter). Ownership Interaction: A key Ingredient of Information Technology Performance. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments, Systems and Organizations (2).
2. Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (1993). Toward an assessment of software development risk. Journal of Management Information Systems , 10 (2), pp. 203–225.
3. Beleve, G. C. (1990, May). Minimizing Risk in High Technology Programs. AACE Transaction , pp. 61-67.
4. Boehm, B. W. (1989). Software Risk Management. IEEE Computer Society Press .
5. Boehm, B. W. (1991). Software risk management: principles and practices. IEEE Software , 8 (1), pp. 32-41.
6. Bonoma, V. T. (1985). Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process. Journal of Marketing Research , 22 (2), pp. 199-208.
7. Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (1998, Sep). Public Sector Information Technology Initiatives-Implications for Programs of Public Administration. Administration & Society , 30 (4), pp. 421-442.
8. Cilek, P., Fanko, W., Koch, S., Mild, A., & Taudes, A. (2004). A hedonic wage model-based methodology for evaluating the benefits of IT investments in public-sector organisations. Journal of Enterprise Information Management , 17 (4), pp. 269-275.
9. Collins, T. (2000, May 11). No one is brought to book in latest public sector debacle. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www.computerweekly.com/Aritcles/2000/05/11/176470/no-one-is-brought to-book-in-latest-public-sector-debacle.htm
10. Coombs, C. R., Doherty, N., & Loan-Clarke, J. (2001). The Importance of User Ownership and Positive User Attitudes in the Successful Adoption of Community Information Systems. Journal of End User Computing , 13 (4), pp. 5-16.
11. Cooper, D. R., & William, E. C. (1995). Business Research Methods. Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
12. Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005). E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal , 11 (5), pp. 589-611.
13. Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic Manaeement: A Stakeholder Approach,. Pitman.
14. Holland, C. P., & Light, B. (1999). A Critical Success Factors Model For ERP Implementation. IEEE Software .
15. Keil, M., Tiwana, A., & Bush, A. (2002). Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study. Information Systems Journal , 12, pp. 103–11.
16. Kline, G., & Jiang, J. J. (2001). Seeking Consonance in Information System. Journal of Software and System , 56, pp. 195-22.
17. Leavitt, H. J. (1964). Applied Organization Change in Industry: Structureal, Technical, and HumanApproaches. New perspectives in Organization Research , pp. 55-71.
18. Liu, S., Zhang, J., Keil, M., & Chen, T. (2010). Comparing senior executive and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Chinese Delphi study. Information Systems Journal , 20 (4), pp. 319-355.
19. Lowrance, W. W. (1976). Of Acceptable Risk. Los Altos, California: William Kaufmann.
20. Lyons, S. T., Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (2006, July | August). A Comparison of the Values and Commintment of Private Sector, Public Sector, and Parapublic Sector Employees. Public Administration Review , pp. 605-618.
21. Lyytinen, K., Mathiassen, L., & Ropponen, J. (1998, Sep). Attention Shaping and Software Risk- A Categorical Analysis of Four Classical Risk Management Approaches. Information Systems Research , 9 (3), pp. 233-255.
22. Moynihan, T. (1997, May/June). How experienced project managers assess risk. IEEE Software .
23. Mursu, A., Lyytinen, K., Soriyan, H., & Korpela, M. (2003). Identifying software project risks in nigeria: an international comparative study. European Journal of Information Systems (12), pp. 182-194.
24. Muscatello, J. R., & Parente, D. H. (2006). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): A Post Implementation Cross-Case Analysis. Information Resources Management Journal , 19 (3), pp. 61–80.
25. PMBOK Guide. (2008). A Guide to Project Management Body ofKnowledge (fourth edition ed.).
26. Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
27. Rocheleau, B., & Wu, L. (2002, December). Public Versus Private Information Systems: Do they Differ in Important Ways? A Review and Empirical Test. The American Review of Public Administration , 32 (4), pp. 379-397.
28. Rosacker, K. M., & Olson, D. L. (2008). Public sector information system critical success factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy , 2 (1).
29. Rowe, W. D. (1988). An Anatomy of Risk. Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger.
30. Sathish, S., Pan, S., & Raman, K. (2004). Using Stakeholder Theory to Analyze Knowledge Sharing During Enterprise Systems Implementations. PACIS 2004 Proceedings, (pp. 336-349).
31. Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., & Cule, P. (2001, Spring). Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study. Journal of Management Information Systems , 17 (4), pp. 5–36.
32. Standish Group. (2009, April 23). CHAOS 2009. (Standish Group International) Retrieved from Standish Newsroom: http://www1.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php
33. Vaidya, K., Sajeev, A. S., & Callender, G. (2006). critical factors that influence e-procurement implementation success in the public sector. journal of public procurement (6), pp. 70-99.
34. Wagner, W., & Antonucci, Y. L. (2009). The ImaginePA Project: The First Large-Scale, Public Sector ERP Implementation. Information Systems Management , 26, pp. 275–284.
35. Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rail, A. (2004). Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis. Information & Management , 42 (1), pp. 115–125.
36. Watson, E., Vaught, S., Gutierrez, D., & Rinks, D. (2003). ERP Implementation in State Government. Annals of Cases on Information Technology .
37. Weber, Max(1968). Economy and Society. Edited Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. New York: Bedminister.
38. Willcocks, L. (1994, Spring). Managing Information Systems In Uk Public Administration: Issues And Prospect. Public Administration , 71, pp. 13-32.
39. Willcocksa, L., Lacity, M., & Kernc, T. (1999). Risk mitigation in IT outsourcing strategy revisited: longitudinal case research at LISA. Journal of Strategic Information Systems , 8, pp. 285–314.
40. Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: CA: SAGE and Publications.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42709-
dc.description.abstract在過去研究及調查資料中顯示,資訊系統專案的失敗率一直居高不下,這是由於資訊系統開發過程中潛藏著許多不確定性的因素,加上專案本身所牽涉的層面相當廣泛,使得專案常面臨許多的風險。尤其在與私部門有著相當不同的體制與環境特性的公部門中,其資訊系統專案的成功率也不高。因此,為了降低這些不確定因素所可能帶來的損害,在專案中進行風險管理是相當重要的。然而,過去風險管理的文獻卻多著墨於私部門,因此,本研究希望能探討公部門導入大型資訊系統時,其相關利益關係人的風險認知。
在本研究中,我們透過個案研究法,針對「財政部賦稅資訊系統整合再造整體規劃專案—國稅部份」之營業稅查審輔助系統及綜所稅高階決策資訊系統之利益關係人進行訪談,企圖從中了解使用者、專案管理者及系統開發者在大型資訊系統的建置專案裡,存有什麼樣的風險認知。並且使用社會科技變革模型做為風險的分類架構,提供一個系統性的整理方式。
從研究結果中,我們除了瞭解使用者、專案管理者及系統開發者對於風險認知的共識及差異所在外,也找出個案中影響較為廣泛的風險,系統建置順序的不適當,以及使用者的需求不明確。此外,我們也發現在此個案中,發現公部門所特有的特性像是,重視階段性短期效益的呈現、常態性的人員輪調政策使得專案人員流動、及權責劃分明確使得組織架構平行的單位難分其從屬關係與組織協調分工不易。最後,本研究也發現了幾個不同於過往文獻所提出的風險,有專案管理者的統籌不足、系統建置順序的不適當、專案管理者與系統開發者的需求確認基準點不同。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIt has been reported that many IT project deployments had experienced budget overrun and schedule delay. It is common that few IT projects implementation are able to complete within the budget and schedule limit. Such delays have not only incurred cost increase but also caused mishandlings of business opportunities and misfits of competence and strategies. In fact, the process of IT implementation and deployment often encounters various risks due to the uncertainty existed within the development process and the grey area between different stakeholders. To further control and facilitate the deployment process, it is crucial to examine the possible risk factors along the development process. Although the literature has paid attention on the IT project risk issues, the research done on the public sector IT project management are hardly found. Especially, under the rigorous concerns of the institution and environment issues in the public sectors, the IT system implementation and deployments might incur a different set of issues. In this study, we examine the risk perception on different stakeholders - users, project managers and outsourcing vendors in a large-scale government information system development.
We applied the case study methodology to investigate the stakeholder’s risk perceptions in a government reform taxation system project, entitled “The Implementation Project of the Reform of the Taxation Information System” by interviewing users, project managers and outsourcing vendors. We also applied the socio-technical change model to classify the risk perception of these stakeholders. We explored the concordance and discordance between users, project managers and outsourcing vendors’ risk perspectives. The result showed that improper step of system development and user requirements ambiguities were the major risks in the project. Furthermore, we found that the public sector concerns more on short-term IS benefits which means a quick return on any IT installation. Normal rotation policy resulted in project team member turnover frequently and rigid delegation of responsibility caused inter-organization coordination inefficiently. Moreover, we also found the risk of improper development sequence existed in public sector IS deployment which may be due to the short-term perspectives of IS policy.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:20:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-100-R98725012-1.pdf: 786596 bytes, checksum: 05575c69fb26af61b772690d97988cf8 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 II
論文摘要 III
THESIS ABSTRACT IV
目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
圖目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 風險管理 5
2.1.1 風險的定義 5
2.1.2 專案的風險管理 6
2.1.3 風險因子辨識 8
2.1.4 社會科技變革模型Socio-technical change model 9
第二節 公私部門的差異 14
2.2.1 公部門之特質 14
2.2.2 私部門的特質 15
2.2.3 公私部門之差異 16
2.2.4 公私部門的風險 17
第三節 不同利益關係人的觀點 19
第三章 研究架構與方法 20
第一節 研究架構 20
第二節 研究方法 21
第三節 個案介紹 23
3.3.1 賦稅資訊系統整合再造更新計畫簡介 23
3.3.2 營業稅查審輔助系統簡介 26
3.3.3 綜所稅高階主管決策資訊系統 28
3.3.4 系統上線期程 30
3.3.5 利益關係人之角色與互動 31
第四章 資料分析與討論 34
第一節 利益關係人對營業稅查審輔助系統的風險認知分析 34
第二節 營業稅查審輔助系統風險認知小結 55
第三節 利益關係人對綜所稅高階主管資訊系統的風險認知分析 58
第四節 綜所稅高階主管決策資訊系統風險分析小結 78
第五節 風險認知分析小結 80
第五章 結論 89
第一節 研究結果 89
第二節 研究貢獻 93
第三節 未來研究方向建議 93
第四節 研究限制 94
參考文獻 95
附錄一 99
附錄二 101
表目錄
表2-1 過去文獻之風險因子之社會科技變革模型分類 11
表2-2 公私部門特性比較 16
表2-3 公部門與私部門的風險. 18
表3-1 受訪對象 22
表3-2 賦稅資訊系統計畫歷程 24
表3-3 賦稅資訊系統專案時程表 25
表3-4 高階主管決策資訊系統之系統功能說明表 30
表4-1 營業稅查審輔助系統之利益關係人風險認知 34
表4-2 綜所稅高階主管決策資訊系統之利益關係人風險認知 58
表4-3 BBI與EIS共有的風險 81
表4-4 BBI系統的風險 85
表4-5 EIS系統的風險 86
圖目錄
圖2-1 Boehm所提出之風險管理步驟 7
圖2-2 社會科技變革模型 10
圖3-1 研究架構 20
圖3-2 研究流程 22
圖3-3 系統上線期程 30
圖3-4 整體專案利益關係人之互動 31
圖3-5 營業稅查審輔助系統利益關係人之互動 32
圖3-6 綜所稅高階主管資訊系統利益關係人之互動 33
圖4-1 營業稅查審輔助系統之利益關係人風險認知差異 55
圖4-2 系統建置順序不適當相關風險示意圖 57
圖4-3 綜所稅高階主管決策資訊系統之利益關係人風險認知差異 78
圖4-4 使用者需求不明確相關風險示意圖 80
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject社會科技變革模型zh_TW
dc.subject公部門zh_TW
dc.subject風險辨識zh_TW
dc.subject風險認知zh_TW
dc.subject風險管理zh_TW
dc.subjectSocio-Technical Change Modelen
dc.subjectPublic Sectoren
dc.subjectRisk Identificationen
dc.subjectRisk Perspectiveen
dc.subjectRisk Managementen
dc.title探討利益關係人對於大型資訊系統導入之風險認知—以賦稅再造資訊系統為例zh_TW
dc.titleA Study of the Stakeholders' Risk in a Large Scale Information System—A Case Study of the Taxation Reform Information Systemsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor吳玲玲
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee游佳萍,黃莉君
dc.subject.keyword公部門,風險辨識,風險認知,風險管理,社會科技變革模型,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordPublic Sector,Risk Identification,Risk Perspective,Risk Management,Socio-Technical Change Model,en
dc.relation.page101
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2011-08-16
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept資訊管理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:資訊管理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-100-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
768.16 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved