請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42686
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許添本(Tien-Pen Hsu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Luen Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡育倫 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:19:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Andersson, P. G. and Gibrand, M. (2008), Litteratursammanställning över kollektivtrafiksystem: som finns på världsmarknaden och är i bruk, Trivector Traffic, Sweden.
APTA website (2005), http://www.apta.com/media/releases/050916gas_concerns.cfm APTA (2008), 2008 Public Transportation Fact Book, American Public Transportation Association. Black, W. R. (1996), “Sustainable transportation: a US perspective,” Journal of transport geography, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 151-159. Bonczek, R. H., Holsapple, C. W., and Whinston, A. B. (1980), “The Evolving Roles of Models in Decision Support Systems”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2. Brems, H. (1980), “Light Rail Transit: Cost and Output”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 20-30. Calgary Transit Website, “LRT Technical Data,” http://www.calgarytransit.com/html/technical_information.html California Energy Commission (CA Energy) and Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) (2000), “Demonstration of Caterpillar C-10 Dual-Fuel Engines in MCI 102DL3 Commuter Buses,” Subcontractor Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Chan, C. J. (1994), Urban Mass Transit: Systems and Applications, 建築情報雜誌社, Taiwan. Chang, Y. H. (1987), 都市大眾運輸:系統與技術, Hwa Tai Publishing, Taiwan. Chang, Y. H. and Wey, W. M. (1992), “都會區應用專家決策支援系統選擇大眾捷運技術之研究-以台南都會區為例”, Road News Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 3-18. Chang, Y. H. (2006), “Contemporary Transportation Policy,” Hwa Tai Publishing. Charter of European Cities and Towns towards Sustainability (‘Aalborg Charter’) (1994) Signed by 80 cities and towns, 27 May 1994 in Aalborg, Denmark. Chen, J. F. (1989), “折衷權重多準則評估法”, M. S. Thesis, Institute of Traffic and Transportation, National Chiao Tung University. Chen, S. J. and Hwang, C. L. (1992), Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Velag, Berlin Heidelberg. Chu, A. T. W., Kalaba, R. E., and Springarn, K. (1979),“A Comparison of Two Methods for Determining the Weights of Belonging to Fuzzy Sets”, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 531-538. Chu, C. T., (2008), “Development of Entropy Conflict Parameter for Pedestrian Flow”, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. Currie, G. (2006), “Bus Transit Oriented Development-Strengths and Challenges Relative to Rail”, Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 1-20. Daimler Research Centre Berlin (2008), “Influences of operational issues on the operational cost of BRT buses and BRT systems,” Operational Issues and Operation Cost of BRT systems – Pretoria Conference. Defra (2007), “Guidelines to Defra’s GHG conversion factors for company reporting,” Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. Delucchi, M. (2006), “Emissions of Criteria Pollutants, Toxic Air Pollutants, and Greenhouse Gases, from the Use of Alternative Transportation Modes and Fuels,” Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, UCD-ITS-RR-96-12. Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS), Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan) Website: http://www.dgbas.gov.tw Downs A. (1992), “Stuck in Traffic,” Brooking Institute, Washington DC. ECX Website (2009), “ECX EUA Future Contract: Historic Data”, http://www.ecx.eu/EUA-Futures Feng, C. M. (1988), “質化與量化多準則評估方法之改進與應用”, 都市與計劃, Vol. 15, pp. 31-47. Feng, C. M. and Chiou, Y. C. (2004), Research Methods, Chien-Tu Publisher, Hsinchu, Taiwan. FHWA (2002), “Highway Economic Requirements System-State Version”, Technical Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. FTA (2006), Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Office of Planning and Environment, Federal Transit Administration, FTA-VA-90-1003-06. Greene, D. L., Wegener, M. (1997), “Sustainable Transport”, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 177-190. Hanson, C. E. et al. (2006), “Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment,” Office of Planning and Environment, Federal Transit Administration. Hensher D. A. and Button K. J. (2003), Handbook of Transport and the Environment, Elsevier. Hsu, L. R. and Wu, J.W. (2008), “A Fleet Size Model for Light Rail and Bus Rapid Transit Systems”, TRB 2008 Annual Meeting CD-ROM. Hsu, T. P., Liu, C. Y. (2004), “The Most Sustainable Transport Modal Split Ratio of Metropolitan Area,” Urban Traffic Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 3-18. Huang, S. L. (1996), “台北市都市永續發展指標與策略研擬之研究,” Department of Urban Development, Taipei City Government. Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York. INE, (2008), “The Benefits and Costs of a Bus Rapid Transit System in Mexico City”, Final Report, Instituto Nacional de Ecologia. Jensen S. S. et al. (2008), “Evaluation of Exposure Factors Applied in Marginal External Cost Analysis of Transportation Related Air Pollution,” Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 13, pp. 255-273. Jobson E. (2008), “Carbon Footprint for Bus,” Volvo Buses Environments Blog, http://212.181.8.238/webbplatser/vbeb/archive/2008/05.aspx Keen, P. G. W. and Morton, M. S. S. (1978), Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective, Addison-Wesley Series on Decision Support. Keen P. G. W. (1980), “Adaptive Decision for Decision Support Systems”, Data Base, Vol. 12, Nos. 1 and 2. Kenworthy, J. R. (2003), “Transportation Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases in Urban Passenger Transport Systems: A Study of 84 Global Cities,” Proceedings of the International Third Conference of the Regional Government Network for Sustainable Development, North Dame University, Fremantle, Western Australia. Kühn, F. (2002), “Bus Rapid or Light Rail Transit for Intermediate Cities?” INRETS, Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité, Arcueil, France. http://www.inrets.fr/ur/ltn/publications/publis-kuhn/transp-surf/pdf-metro-leger/3a-BRT-LRT-Eng.pdf Lane, T. (2007), “Talent O-Train Fuel Consumption and Emissions”, http://www.friendsoftheotrain.org/node/101 Linster, M. (1990), “Background facts and figures,” Transport Policy and the environment, pp. 9-45. Litman, T., Burwell, D. (2006), “Issues in Sustainable Transportation,” International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 331-347. Litman, T. (2007), “Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis: Techniques, Estimates and Implications,” Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Litman T. (2008), “Evaluating Accessibility for Transportation Planning,” Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Little, J. D. C. (1970), “Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus”, Management Science, Vol. 16, No. 8. Liu, C. Y. (2001), “永續運輸目標下都會區最適運具比例研究,” Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. Mackie, P. J. et al. (2003), “Values of Travel Time Saving s in the UK”, Report to Department for Transport, University of Leeds, White Rose Consortium ePrints Repository. Mackinger, G. (2006), “Trolleybuses-transport of the future”, International Trolleymotion Group. McBrayer, D. B. (2003), “Blurring the Light Rail Transit-Bus Rapid Transit Boundaries: Rapid Light Transit”, Proceedings of 9th National Light Rail Transit Conference, Portland, Oregon, TRB Transportation Research Circular E-C058, pp. 135-147. Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) Website: http://www.motc.gov.tw/mocwebGIP/wSite/lp?ctNode=329&xq_xCat=5 Ministry of Transportation and Communications (1998), “A Feasibility Study on the Use of Light Rail Transit System in Taiwan Area”, Final Report, Institute of Transportation, Taiwan. Moore, J. H. and Chang, M. G. (1980), “Design of Decision Support Systems”, Data Base, Vol. 12, Nos. 1 and 2. Nylund, N.-O., Erkkilä, K. ,Lappi, M., Ikonen, M. (2004), “Transit Bus Emission Study: Comparison of Emissions from Diesel and Natural Gas Buses”, Research Report, VTT Processes. O’Sullivan, S. and Morrall, J. (1996), “Walking Distances to and from Light-Rail Transit Stations”, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1538, pp. 19-26. Puchalsky, C. M. (2005), “Comparison of Emissions from Light Rail Transit and Bus Rapid Transit”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1927, No. 4, pp. 31-37. Saaty, T. L. (1977), “A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 234-281. SBS (2007), SBS Transit Ltd Annual Report 07, http://www.sbstransit.com.sg/download/SBST_AnnualReport07.pdf Scott Morton, M. S. (1971), “Management Decision Systems: Computer Based Support for Decision Making”, Division of Research, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Siemens Website, “Combino - Low Floor Light Rail Vehicles Tests, Trials and Tangible Results”, http://w1.siemens.com/Daten/siecom/HQ/TS/Internet/Transportation_Systems/WORKAREA/reinhold/templatedata/English/file/binary/20661combino_tests_20661.pdf Sislak, K. G. (2000), “Bus Rapid Transit as a Substitute for Light Rail Transit: A Tale of Two Cities”, Proceedings of Light Rail: Investment for the Future, 8th Joint Conference on Light Rail Transit, Dallas, Texas, K-32, pp. 1-15. Smiler (2001), S. P. (2001), “Bus Priority Systems: Special Feature on Kerb Guided Buses (O-Bahn),” http://www.citytransport.info/OBahn.htm SMRT Singapore (2007), SMRT Singapore 2007 Annual Report, http://www.smrt.com.sg/investors/annual_reports.asp Spencer, A. H. and Wang, A. (1996), “Light Rail or Busway? A Comparative Evaluation for a Corridor in Beijing”, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 239-251. Sprague, R. H. and Carlson E. D. (1982), Building Effective Decision Support Systems, Prentice-Hall, USA. Steg, L., Gifford, R. (2005), “Sustainable Transportation and Quality of Life”, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 59-69. Strickland, J. (2009), “Energy Efficiency of Different Modes of Transportation”, http://strickland.ca/efficiency.html Sustainable Transportation Indicators Subcommittee (2008), “Sustainable Transportation Indicators: A Recommended Program to Define a Standard Set of Indicators for Sustainable Transportation Planning”, Sustainable Transportation Indicators Subcommittee (ADD40 [1]), Transportation Research Board (www.trb.org). T2000BC (1994), “BC Transit Vancouver Operating Statistics,” Transport 2000 BC, http://bc.transport2000.ca/learning/vancouver/operating_stats.html Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation (TRTC) (2007), Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation ’07 Annual Report, http://www.trtc.com.tw/img/all/A61/report2007.pdf Taipower Website, http:/www.taipower.com.tw/indexE.htm Tao, C. C. and Liu, W. L. (2008), “Evaluation of Wireless Communication Network Alternatives for Urban Traffic Devices by Using Multi-Attribute Evaluation Methods”, Transportation Planning Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 39-78. The World Bank (1996), Sustainable Transport-Priorities for Policy Reform, The World Bank, Washington, D. C., USA. Turban, E., Aronson, J. E., and Liang, T. P. (2005), Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems (Seven Edition), Pearson Prentice Hall. UK (1999), “A Better Quality of Life: a Strategy for Sustainable Development for the United Kingdom,” HMSO United Kingdom London. Vincent, W. and Jerram L. C. (2006), “The Potential for Bus Rapid Transit to Reduce Transportation-Related CO2 Emissions”, Journal of Public Transportation, 2006 BRT Special Edition, pp. 219-237. Voogd, H. (1982), “Multicriteria Evaluation with Mixed Qualitative and Quantitative Data”, Environment and Planning B, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 221-236. Vuchic, V. R. (1981), Urban Public Transportation: Systems and Technology, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Vuchic, V. R. (2007), Urban Public Transportation: Systems and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J. Wang R. (2008), “Environmental and Safety Costs of Urban Passenger Transport Modes in China,” TRB 2008 Annual Meeting CD-ROM. Wardman M. (2004), “Public Transport Values of Time,” Transport Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 363-377. Whitelegg, J. (1993), Transport for a Sustainable Future-the Case for Europe, Belhaven Press London and New York. Whitney, D. (2006), The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2005, Oregon Department of Transportation: Economic & Policy Analysis Unit. World Nuclear Association (WNA) (2008), “Energy Balances and CO2 Implications,” http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf100.html World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42686 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 為了控制因都市快速成長所造成之交通擁擠、社會不公平,以及環境汙染等問題,許多地區紛紛轉為以大眾運輸為導向來滿足其運輸需求。大眾捷運系統(MRT)已廣用於世界各大城市,然而,其建設經費之龐大,是許多地區無法負荷的,加上這些地區的乘客需求量往往不需要使用大眾捷運,因此,為了提升大眾運輸服務,這類型的城市所需要的是一個運量高於公車並且所需經費低於大眾捷運系統的合適大眾運輸系統,中運量大眾運輸系統如公車捷運系統(BRT)、輕軌運輸系統(LRT)、導軌運輸系統(Guided Bus)、自動導軌系統(AGT)與輕軌捷運系統(LRRT or ALRT)可符合此要求。而這些運輸系統各有其優缺點,因此本研究希望能建立一個決策支援系統,以上述之中運量大眾運輸系統為方案,幫助運輸規劃者選擇一個最適合該地區之方案,另外,「維持使用公車」亦為一選擇方案。
在過去的研究中,常僅以一個(通常是成本)準則做大眾運輸系統之比較,即便是使用多個準則做比較也往往是各準則分開比較。為了能夠選擇合適的中運量大眾運輸系統,本研究希望能同時考慮多項準則,其中包括質化與量化準則。在本研究中,評估運輸系統之目標為「兼具良好績效與永續性」,因此評估準則須包含「績效」與「永續」這兩個部分,在分析與了解初步的績效與永續相關因素後,選出三個做為技術可行性評估之準則,以及十二個做為方案系統比較之準則。 透過一連串合理的與有組織的研究過程後,本研究改進質化與量化多準則評估法(MEQQD)並且運用加權最小平方法(Weighted Least-Squares Method)發展出一個能整合所有系統準則之方法來協助一地區選擇合適之中運量大眾運輸系統。為了方便大眾運輸規劃者運用此方法做系統選擇,本研究進一步地使用C#程式語言建立一個易於使用之決策支援系統。最後,在系統之建立完成後,帶入「淡水捷運延伸線」計畫之資料示範此決策支援系統之使用方式與功能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The rapid growth in many urban areas has resulted in traffic congestion, social inequity, and environmental problems. To control these problems, many cities have turned to urban transit systems to serve travel demand. The mass rapid rail transit (MRT) system has been implemented in many metropolitan areas. However, many cities do not have either the financial resources to afford a MRT system or the passenger demand to justify it. To improve public transport services, what is needed for such cities is an appropriate transit system which has higher capacity than a regular bus (RB) system and cheaper than the MRT. There are several medium-capacity transit systems that can meet this requirement. Such systems include Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Light Rapid Transit (LRT), Guided Bus, Automated Guideway Transit (AGT) and Automated Light Rapid Transit (ALRT). Clearly, in the selection of an appropriate medium-capacity transit systems for a study area, the option of retaining the existing transit system (usually RB) should also be considered as an alternative.
In the past, studies that dealt with the evaluation of alternative transit systems have been largely based on either a single factor (often cost), or on a few factors but with the alternatives compared on each factor individually. To select a suitable public transit system, one has to simultaneously consider and compare several system attributes some of which are quantitative while others are qualitative. In this research, the evaluation shall include both performance and sustainability attributes. After examining a set of preliminary performance and sustainability factors, three attributes are selected for testing the technical feasibility of each transit system alternatives and twelve attributes are used for comparing these alternative systems. A methodology is developed in this study to integrate these decision factors (i.e., system attributes) in the selection of an appropriate medium-capacity transit system for a given area in a rational and organized manner. The method is an improved version of the MEQQD method and uses the Weighted Least-Squares Method in its evaluation of the alternatives. To facilitate the use of the developed methodology by transit planners, it is implemented in the form of an easy-to-use Decision Support System (DSS). Such systems are a specific class of computerized information system that supports specific fields to do organizational decision-making activities. The C# language is used for building a DSS interface. A case study of the extension line of Damsui rapid transit system is also included to demonstrate the application of the DSS. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:19:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96521509-1.pdf: 3892191 bytes, checksum: ba085d22d578261ad23878810e83940b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
ABSTRACT II TABLE OF CONTENTS IV LIST OF FIGURES VI LIST OF TABLES VIII LIST OF SYMBOLS XI CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Problem Identification 1 1.2 Objectives and Scope 3 1.3 Design of the Study 6 1.4 Organization of this Report 7 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 9 2.1 Classification of Urban Public Transport 9 2.2 Comparative Studies for Medium-Capacity Transit Systems 12 2.3 Research on Selection of System Attributes 15 2.4 Studies on Research Methodologies 21 2.5 Decision Support System 28 2.6 Conclusion 30 CHAPTER 3 CHARACTERISTICS OF SELECTED ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT SYSTEMS 33 3.1 Do-Nothing Alternative 33 3.2 BRT 36 3.3 Guided Bus (Dual-Mode Bus) 41 3.4 LRT 45 3.5 LRRT and AGT 49 CHAPTER 4 STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 53 4.1 Definitions of Selected System Attributes 54 4.2 Study Methodology 90 CHAPTER 5 DEVELOPMENT OF THE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM 96 5.1 The MEQQD Method 97 5.2 Development of the DSS 100 5.3 Summary 125 CHAPTER 6 APPLICATION OF THE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM 126 6.1 Development of the DSS Interface 126 6.2 The Extension Line of Damsui Rapid Transit System 127 6.3 Application of DSS Using the Damsui Case 131 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 142 7.1 Conclusions 143 7.2 Recommendations for Further Study 146 Reference 149 Appendix A Information from Review of Literature and Cases 157 Appendix B Input Data of Damsui Case Study 182 Appendix C User Manual of the DSS 199 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 建立中運量大眾運具選擇之決策支援系統 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Decision Support System for the Choice of Medium-Capacity Transit System | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 葉名山(Ming-Shan Yeh),蕭再安(Tzay-An Shiau) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 中運量大眾運輸系統,永續,質化與量化多準則評估法,決策支援系統, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Medium-Capacity Transit System,Sustainability,MEQQD,DSS, | en |
dc.relation.page | 221 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.8 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。