請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42400
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林以正 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Tse Chu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 邱文澤 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:13:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-11 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王飛雪、山岸俊男(1999)。信任的中、日、美比較研究。「社會學研究」,2,67-82。
李美枝(2003)。我群與他群的分化:從生物層次到人的層次。「本土心理學研究」,20,3-38。 肖崇好(2005a)。自我監控理論評價。「心理科學」,28,1010-1013。 肖崇好(2005b)。自我監控概念的重構。「心理科學進展」,13,186-193。 肖崇好(2007)。自我監控量表的探索性和驗證性因素分析。「韓山師範學院學報」,28,96-100。 張建新(2000)。殊化信任與泛化信任在人際信任行為路徑模型中的作用。「心理學報」,32,311-316。 楊中芳(2001)。有關關係與人情構念化之綜述。見楊中芳(主編):「中國人的人際關係、情感與信任:一個人際交往的觀點」,3-25。台北:遠流。 Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books. Bem, S. L. (1974). Measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B. Brewer & B. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences, 345-360. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal-attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 12-24. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. Cook, K. S. (2001). Trust in society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1989). Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture: 2 case-study - A computational theory of social-exchange. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 51-97. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and Suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 79-265. Deutsch, M. (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13, 123-139. Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. Yale University Press. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. Ebenhoh, E., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2008). Agent behavior between maximization and cooperation. Rationality and Society, 20, 227-252. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and creation of prosperity. London: Penguin. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Garske, J. D. (1975). Interpersonal trust and construct complexity for positively and negatively evaluated persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 19-616. Garske, J. P. (1976). Personality and generalized expectancies for interpersonal-trust. Psychological Reports, 39, 649-650. Goleman, G. (2006). Social intelligence. New York: Bantam Books. Gurtman, M. B., & Lion, C. (1982). Interpersonal-trust and perceptual vigilance for trustworthiness descriptors. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 108-117. Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Hayashi, N., Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control: A cross-societal study. Rationality and Society, 11, 27-46. Hearn, F. (1997). Moral order and social disorder: The american search for civil society. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. Hiraishi, K., Ando, J., & Ono Y. (2004). General trust and individual differences on the wason selection task with sharing-rule. Psychologia, 47, 226-237. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behavior, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340. Johnsongeorge, C., & Swap, W. C. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal-trust-construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306-1317. Kelley, H. H., & Stahelsk.A.(1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators and competitors beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66-&. Kiyonari, T., Tanida, S., & Yamagishi, T. (2000). Social exchange and reciprocity: Confusion or a heuristic? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(6), 411-427. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Island Press. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. London: Pitman. Lennox, R. D., & Wolfe, R. N. (1984). Revision of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349-1364. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social-reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985. Lu, L., Gilmour, R., Kao, S. F., Weng, T. H., Hu, C. H., Chern, J. G., et al. (2001). Two ways to achieve happiness: when the East meets the West. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1161-1174. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self-implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. Masako, K., Watanabe, Y., & Yamagishi, T. (1997). Judgment accuracy of others’ trustworthiness and general trust: An experimental study. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 23-36. Ostrom, E. (2004). Trust and Reciprocity. New York: Russel Sage Foundation. Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility - a new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 88-101. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95-112. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Rotter, J. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665. Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1-7. Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social exchange and behavioral interdependence. In R. L. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93. Schlenker, B. R., Helm, B., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1973). The effects of personality and situational variables on behavioral trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 419-427. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537. The Chinese Culture Connection(1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 18, 143-164. Takahashi, C., Yamagishi, T., Liu, J. H., Wang, F., Lin, Y., & Yu, S. (2008). The intercultural trust paradigm: Studying joint cultural interaction and social exchange in real time over the Internet. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 215-228. Taylor, J. A. (1953). A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 285-290. Thorndike, R. L. (1936). Factor analysis of social and abstract intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 231-233. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). Psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms - interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412. Wu, C., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259-1268. Yamagishi, T. (2001). Trust as a form of social intelligence. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 145-161. Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116-132. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166. Yang, K. S., & Cheng, P. S. (1989). Confucianized values, individual modernity, and organizational behavior: An empirical test of a post-Confucian hypothesis. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, 64, 1-49. Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship- and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 48-62. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42400 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 信任是多數文化中所強調的一種美德,也是在許多學科中受到重視的研究議題之一。Yamagishi(2001)指出,信任此一概念雖然根基於社會不確定性上,但仍應進一步定義為一種信念而非特殊情境下的行動,並且可以在不同的層次下被加以研究。因此,當信任作為一種特質時,高信任者可能在大部分的情況下願意信任陌生他人,而低信任者則採取不信任以及敵對的態度(Rotter, 1967)。可見這種信任的個體差異,會表現在個體對於他人的印象形成上(Schlenker, Helm, & Tedeschi, 1973),並且影響我們在不同情境中的人際行為。而本文的研究目的,即在於不同一般信任者在信任與合作情境中的行為表現,並且進一步探討信任與社會智商間的關係。在研究一中,我們使用實地研究資料,除了收集個體在團體中的他評指標外,且編製了人際彈性量表並檢視一般信任與人際彈性間的關係,以驗證高低一般信任者在人際管理能力上的差異。另外,本研究也編製了兩種不同的情境故事,以測量高低一般信任者在高風險情境中對於「他人可信任線索」的敏感性,以及其在低風險情境中的合作策略差異。接著在研究二中,我們發展出跨國間信任遊戲以進行實驗研究,並測量研究參與者在面對不同團體對象時的信任行為與合作行為差異。本研究預期,高一般信任者應對於可信任線索較為敏感,並且採用擴張式的合作策略,因此得以發展出良好的社會智商。反之,低一般信任者對於他人可信任線索較不敏感,且其合作行為往往侷限於較狹小的關係中,因此較難發展出良好的社會智商。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Trust, a virtue in most cultures, is one of the most important research issues in many disciplines. Yamagishi (2001) considered that although trust is a concept based on social uncertainties, we should define it as a belief that could be studied under different levels rather than an action exhibited in a specific situation. Thus, if we regard trust as a trait, high trusters are more willing to trust strangers but low trusters are not (Rotter, 1967). It seems that the individual differences of trust could be revealed by the impressions we made on others and would influence our behaviors in different contexts(Schlenker, Helm, & Tedeschi, 1973). The present study investigates the behaviors of people with different levels of general trust in trust and cooperative situations; moreover, explores the relations between general trust and social intelligence. In study one, we did a field study to inspect the relationship between interpersonal flexibility and general trust, group members’ appreciations on them, and the differences of interpersonal relationship management abilities between them. In addition, we composed two stories with different contexts to measure the sensitivities to『other's trustworthiness cues』of high and low trusters and investigate the strategies they adopted in different situations. In study two, we use 『trust games』to survey the diversities between trust behaviors and cooperative behaviors that the subjects expressed when they contacted with people of different groups. We found that people with high general trust are more sensitive to trustworthiness cues and are willing to adopt an expanding cooperation strategy, leading them to develop better social intelligence. On the contrary, low general trusters are not sensitive to trustworthiness cues and their cooperative behaviors are restrict to specific group; therefore, it is difficult for them to develop good social intelligence. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:13:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96227123-1.pdf: 951082 bytes, checksum: f5f2bc42da95e8b270075a79c65369fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 信任的基本概念 1 第二節 信任作為一種人際信念 3 第三節 行為測量與一般信任 5 第四節 信任與輕信 7 第五節 表徵於一般信任中的社會智商 10 第六節 研究目的與預期 15 第二章 研究一(a) 17 第一節 前言 17 第二節 研究預期 17 第三節 研究方法 17 第四節 研究結果 20 第三章 研究一(b) 23 第一節 情境測量前言 23 第二節 研究預期 23 第三節 研究方法 23 第四節 研究結果 25 第四章 研究一(c) 28 第一節 實地研究前言 28 第二節 研究預期 28 第三節 研究方法 29 第四節 研究結果 30 第五節 討論 31 第三章 研究二 36 第一節 實驗研究前言 36 第二節 研究預期 38 第三節 研究方法 40 第四節 研究結果 43 第五節 討論 48 第四章 綜合討論 53 參考文獻 62 附錄 68 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 一般信任與信任及合作行為的關連-社會智商之展現 | zh_TW |
dc.title | General Trust effect in Trust and Cooperation Behaviors–the shaping of Social Intelligence | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王叢桂,周麗芳 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 一般信任,人際彈性,社會智商,互惠,囚犯困境,內團體偏私, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | general trust,interpersonal flexibility,social intelligence,reciprocity,prisoner dilemma,ingroup favoritism, | en |
dc.relation.page | 77 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 928.79 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。