請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42395完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張顯達(Hintat Cheung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Fen Yao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 姚郁芬 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:13:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Akhtar, N. & Tomasello, M. (2000). The social nature of word and word learning. In Golinkoff, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bloom, L., Smith, L., Woodward, A., Akthtar, N., Tomasello, M., Hollich, G. 2000 (Eds), Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. (pp. 115-135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Science, 7, 173-221. Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. (2001). Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Master’s thesis. Cambridge, USA. Brown, R. & Camille, H. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Lust, B. C. & Foley, C. (Eds.), First language acquisition (pp. 155-173). Blackwell Press. Cheung, H. 張顯達 (1995)。《平均語句長度(MLU)在中文的應用》。國科會專題研究計劃報告。 Cheung, S. L. (1992). The acquisition of locative constructions by Cantonese children. Doctorial dissertation. Stanford University, USA. Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chen, C. Y. (1978). Aspectual features of the verb and the relative positions of the locatives. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 6, 76-103. Chu, C. C. (2000). A Cognitive-functional Grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: Crane. Chung, Y. S. (2007). Aspect encoding in L1 Chinese children. Master’s thesis. National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan. Clark, E. (1990). The pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417-431. ----- (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Clark, E. V., & Grossman, J. G. (1998). Pragmatic directions and children word learning. Journal of Child Language, 25, 1－18. Doherty, M. J. (2000). Children’s understanding of homonymy: metalinguistic awareness and false belief. Journal of Child Language 27, 367–392. -----(2004). Children’s difficulty in learning homonyms. Journal of Child Language 31, 203–214. Ge Y. S. (1988). Chinese children’s verb acquisition. Master’s thesis. Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan. Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S.A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language, thought and culture, Language development, (pp. 301-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K. M. & Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14, 23-46. Huang, W. M. 黃婉梅. (2002)。《表處所的“在+NP”的語意分析》。安徽教育學院學報，第20卷第4期。 Huang, W. M. 黃婉梅 (2003)。《“在”字句研究補述》。東山師範學院學報，第18卷第5期。 Li, C. N. (1975) Synchrony vs. Diachrony in Language Structure. Language, 51, 873-886. Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. Li, P. (1988). Acquisition of Spatial Reference in Chinese. In Peter Jordens and Josine Lalleman (Eds.), Language Development, (pp. 83-99). Foris: Dordrecht. ----- (1993). The Acquisition of the zai and ba Constructions in Mandarin Chinese, in J. C. P. Liang and R. P. E. Sybesma (Eds.), From Classical Fü to ‘Three Inches High’:Studies on Chinese in Honor of Erik Zürcher, (pp.103-120) Garant Publishers, Leuven/Apeldoorn. Li, P. & Bowerman, M. (1998). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect in Chinese. First Language, 18, 311-350. Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Lin, H. J. (1986). A development study of the acquisition aspect markers in Chinese children. Master’s thesis. Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan. Liu, F.H. (2007). Auxiliary Selection in Chinese. In Raul Aranovich (Ed.), Split Auxiliary Systems: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, (pp. 181-205). John Benjamins Publishers. MacWhinney, B. (1988). Competition and teachability. In R. Schiefelbusch & M. Rice (Eds.), The teachability of language, (pp. 63-104). New York: Cambridge University Press. ----- (1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In R. Corrigan & F. Eckman & M. Noonan (Eds.), Linguistic categorization, (pp. 195-242). Philadelphia: Benjamins. MacWhinney, B. J., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. L. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255-277. Maratsos, M. (1982) ‘The child’s construction of grammatical categories’, in: E.Wanner and L.R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: the state of the art, (pp. 240-266), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -----(2000). More overregularizations after all: new data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen & Xu. Journal of Child Language, 27, 183-212. Maratsos, M., Fox, D., Becker, J., & Charlkley, M. A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition, 19,167-191. Mazzocco, M. M. M. (1997). Children’s interpretations of homonyms: a developmental study. Journal of Child Language 24, 441–467. -----(1999). Developmental changes in indicators that literal interpretations of homonyms are associated with conflict. Journal of Child Language 26, 393–417. -----(2003). Possible explanations for children’s literal interpretations of homonyms. Journal of Child Language 30, 879–904. Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17, 357-374. ----- (1996). The use of multiple frames in verb learning via syntactic bootstrapping. Cognition, 58,221-251. Naigles, L. & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1995). Input to verb learning: evidence for the plausibility of syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology, 31, 827-37. Naigles, L. & Kako, E. (1993). First contact in verb acquisition: defining a role for syntax. Child Development, 64, 1665-1687. Pinker, S. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 7, 217-283. -----(1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press. Qi, H. Y. 齊滬楊 (1998)。《動作“在”字句的語意、句法、語用分析》。上海師範大學學報 (社會科學版)，第27卷第二期。 Sandhofer, C. M., Smith, L. B., & Luo, J. (2000). Counting nouns and verbs in the input: Differential frequencies, different kinds of learning? Journal of Child Language, 27, 561–585. Shao, H. L. & Guo, W. G. 紹洪亮，郭文國 (2001)。《“在+L+VP”結構中“在”的分化》。台州師範學報，第23卷第5期。 Shui, C. X. 稅昌錫 (2005)。《“N1+在+NPL+V+N2”歧義格式解析》。濟南大學華文學院學報，第二期。 Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Spelke, E. (1979). Perceiving bimodally specified events in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 15, 626-636. Shu, K. L. (2004). The Acquisition of Aspect Markers by Mandarin-Speaking Children. Doctorial dissertation. Boston University, USA. Tardif, T. Z. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: evidence from Mandarin speakers' early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 492-504. Tardif, T. Z., Shatz, M., & Naigles, L. (1997). Caregiver speech and children’s use of nouns versus verbs: A comparison of English, Italian, and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language, 24, 535-566. Tardif, T. Z., Gelman, S.,& Xu, F. (1999). Putting the “noun bias” in context: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development, 70, 620-635. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press. Tomasello, M., Akhtar, N. (1995). Two-year-olds use pragmatic cues to differentiate reference to objects and actions. Cognition Development, 10, 201-224. Sandhofer, C. M., Smith, L. B., & Luo, J. (2000). Counting nouns and verbs in the input: Differential frequencies, different kinds of learning? Journal of Child Language, 27, 561-585. Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Reivew, 143-160. Wang, F. M. (2002). From a motion verb to an aspect marker: A study of Guo in Mandarin Chinese. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 28.2: 57-84. Yang, J. 楊金 (2006)。《“在”字句句式的語義分析》。陝西教育學院學報。第22卷第1期。 Zhu, D. X. 朱德熙 (1980)。《現代漢語語法研究》。北京：商務印書館。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42395 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討兒童對於中文字「在」的語言發展歷程，本篇歸納四種「在」的使用功能，分別為（1）動詞、（2）進行貌、（3）次要動詞、（4）位置標記。這些功能對幼兒而言可視為一種特殊的同音多義詞，因此，本研究欲探討幼兒對於「在」的四種不同功能所呈現的發展順序以及階段。以上四種功能中，我們假設「在」使用作為動詞以及進行貌的兩種功能習得較早，基於以下兩種原因：較簡易的句型結構以及成人的使用頻率。「在」使用作為動詞的句型結構為「在（動詞）＋名詞（地點）」；而「在」使用作進行貌的句型結構為「在（進行貌）＋動詞（動作）」。依據以上兩種功能，幼兒對於「在」的語言發展歷程可能出現兩種假設：幼兒在早期可能將這兩種功能視為同一種結構，產生交替使用的現象；反之，幼兒在早期獨立發展「在」的兩種功能，呈現互補的現象。本研究採取兩種研究方法進行更深一層的探討，分別是兒童口語語料分析以及IPL理解作業，兒童口語語料主要探究兒童對於「在」的四種功能表現，而IPL理解作業主要測試兩歲半前的幼兒對於「在」為動詞以及進行貌的理解程度，口語語料分析的結果發現「在」使用作為動詞以及進行貌的確較早習得，兩者皆在幼兒一歲九個月時發現，其次是「在」使用作為次要動詞，發現使用於兩歲，「在」使用作為位置標記發展最晚，在兩歲一個月時才在語料中發現，因此，口語語料分析進一步證實「在」使用作為動詞以及進行貌的兩種功能的顯著性以及重要性；此外，語料中並未找到這兩種功能的交替使用，這更進一步說明「在」使用作為動詞以及進行貌是獨立發展。在IPL理解作業結果中發現幼兒對於「在」使用作為進行貌的功能有較大反應，對於相對應的螢幕注視較久，反映出在影片觀看過程中，進行貌的功能較吸引幼兒，即便如此，「在」為動詞以及進行貌的兩種功能依舊對於幼兒而言擁有極高的顯著性。此兩種研究方式的結果更進一步說明幼兒在兩歲左右，已經對於「在」為動詞以及進行貌的兩種功能有著相當程度的口說以及理解能力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to investigate children’s developmental path in the uses of four types of zai4 as: (1) a verb, (2) a progressive aspect marker, (3) a secondary verb, and (4) a locative marker. Since these functions of zai4 can be viewed as special kind of polysemies or homonyms, we want to examine in what order do Mandarin-speaking children acquire these four different types of zai4. Among the four varieties of zai4, the use of the main verb zai4 and the progressive aspect marker zai4 may be acquired earlier than the others, according to the consideration of structural complexity and frequency. The main verb zai4 is constructed in the form [zai4(V) + N(location)] while the progressive aspect marker zai4 [zai4(progressive aspect marker) + V(action)]. Two hypothetical developmental paths are examined: (1) Overlapping Distribution－there is initially only one zai4 in children’s language system, and they interchangeably use zai4 as a verb and as a progressive aspect marker at the early stage. (2) Complementary distribution－there are initially two types of zai4, and children use zai4 as a verb and as a progressive aspect marker. For the purpose of unveiling the developmental path of zai4 in Mandarin-speaking children, two methods are used in this study: (1) analysis of children’s spontaneous speech, and (2) comprehension of zai4 by using Intermodal Preferential Looking. The result in the language sample shows supports that the main verb zai4 and the progressive aspect marker zai4 are first produced at the age of 1; 9, which is earlier than the secondary verb zai4 at the age of 2;0 and the locative marker zai4 at the age of 2;1. The synchronic development of these two functions suggested that both should be equally salient for children to capture at the same time. In addition, the main verb zai4 and the progressive zai4 are used in separate linguistic contexts and are found no overlapping in the use of these two functions by children. Results of the comprehension test on children at age two show that the function associated with progressive zai4 is slightly more salient, as reflected by a longer fixation time in the test conditions of zai4 used as a progressive aspect marker. Despite the minute advantage of progressive zai4 in the experimental tasks, zai4 as a main verb and as a progressive aspect marker show equal footing in children’s production and comprehension at around two years old. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:13:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R94142010-1.pdf: 1011371 bytes, checksum: 0d79b7e039a4bf25440f1331ad7fa2d9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | List of Figures…………………………………………………………v
List of Tables………………………………………………………vi Chapter 1 Introduction………………………………………………1 1.1 Rationale……………………………………………………………1 1.2 Acquisition of Verbs and Progressive Aspect Marker……10 1.3 Research Question and Analytical Procedure………………15 1.4 Organization………………………………………………………20 Chapter 2 Analyses of Spontaneous Language Samples…………21 2.1 The Revised Types of zai4 Examined in this Study………21 2.2 Children’s Uses of zai4 in Spontaneous Speech…………24 2.2.1 Background Information of Language Samples Analyzed.24 2.2.2 Type I: Children’s Use of zai4 as a Main Verb………25 2.2.3 Type II: Children’s Use of zai4 as a Progressive Aspect Marker…………………………………………………………28 2.2.4 Type III: Children’s Use of zai4 as a Secondary Verb………………………………………………………………………31 2.2.5 Type IV: Children’s Use of zai4 as a Locative Marker……………………………………………………………………32 2.2.6 Children’s Errors in the Use of zai4…………………34 2.2.7 Analytical Tools and General Data Analysis……………43 2.3 Adults’ Use of zai4 and Its Correlation with Children’s Use…………………………………………………………………49 2.4 Summary and Discussion…………………………………………52 Chapter 3 Experiment－Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL)……………………………………………………………………………55 3.1 Method………………………………………………………………55 3.2 Design………………………………………………………………56 3.2.1 Apparatus………………………………………………………57 3.2.2 Material…………………………………………………………57 3.3 Participants and procedure……………………………………65 3.3.1 Participants……………………………………………………65 3.3.2 Procedure………………………………………………………67 3.3.3 Coding……………………………………………………………68 3.4 Analysis and Result……………………………………………69 3.4.1 The Rate of Visual Fixation Time…………………………69 3.4.2 The Rate of Visual Fixation Time in Different Groups……………………………………………………………………71 3.4.3 Subject-Based Analysis………………………………………73 3.5 Summary and Discussion…………………………………………75 Chapter 4 General Discussion and Conclusion…………………79 4.1 General Discussion of the Findings…………………………79 4.2 Limitations and Implications…………………………………84 4.3 Conclusion…………………………………………………………84 Reference………………………………………………………………86 Appendices………………………………………………………………91 Appendix 1: IPL Experiment Design………………………………91 Appendix 2: Coding Sheet……………………………………………95 Appendix 3: Subjects’ Performance Patterns…………………96 List of Tables Table 2.1. Summary of Four Revised Types of zai4……………23 Table 2.2. Information of Eight Language Examples…………24 Table 2.3. Children’s Errors in the Use of zai4 as a Main Verb………………………………………………………………………35 Table 2.4. Children’s Errors in the Use of zai4 as a Progressive Aspect Marker…………………………………………37 Table 2.5. Children’s Errors in the Use of zai4 as a Secondary Verb…………………………………………………………39 Table 2.6. Children’s Errors in the Use of zai4 as a Locative Marker………………………………………………………41 Table 2.7. The Production of zai4 and Children’s Number from Age 1;9 to 4;3…………………………………………………44 Table 2.8. First Use and Tokens of zai4 in Children’s Production………………………………………………………………45 Table 2.9. Individual Contribution to Four Types of zai4 from age 1;9 to 2;6…………………………………………………48 Table 2.10. Adults’ Input versus Children’s Output……………………………………………………………………50 Table 3.1. The Experimental Arrangement in Four Blocks……………………………………………………………………58 Table 3.2. Arrangement of IPL Experimental Trials in Block 1…………………………………………………………………………64 Table 3.3. Details of Each Participant’s Information……………………………………………………………66 Table 3.4. Subjects’ Information in Two Groups……………………………………………………………………71 Table 3.5. The Mean Percentage of Fixation Time in Two Groups……………………………………………………………………72 Table 3.6. Overall Subjects’ performance in each test block……………………………………………………………………74 List of Figures Figure 2.1. Percentage in Four Types of zai4 Based on Children’s MLU………………………………………………………47 Figure 2.2. Adults’ Input and Children’s Output in the Use of Main Verb zai4………………………………………………51 Figure 2.3. Adults’ Input and Children’s Output in the Use of Progressive zai4……………………………………………51 Figure 2.4. Adults’ Input and Children’s Output in the Use of Secondary Verb zai4…………………………………………51 Figure 2.5. Adults’ Input and Children’s Output in the Use of Locative Marker zai4………………………………………51 Figure 3.1. Stimuli Films in IPL Design……………………………………………………………………62 Figure 3.2. The Percentage of Fixation Time to the Correct Scenes……………………………………………………………………69 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | IPL理解作業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 語言習得 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 學習機制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 動詞習得 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 時貌 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 同音字 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 位置結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | locative constructions | en |
| dc.subject | language acquisition | en |
| dc.subject | IPL experiment | en |
| dc.subject | homonyms | en |
| dc.subject | learning mechanism | en |
| dc.subject | acquisition of verbs | en |
| dc.subject | aspect marker | en |
| dc.title | 「在」的語言發展歷程研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Early Development of zai4 in Mandarin-Speaking Children | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝妙玲(miao-Ling Hsieh),蘇宜青(Yi-Ching Su) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 位置結構,時貌,動詞習得,學習機制,同音字,IPL理解作業,語言習得, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | locative constructions,aspect marker,acquisition of verbs,learning mechanism,homonyms,IPL experiment,language acquisition, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 96 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 語言學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 987.67 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。