請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42376完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 賴爾柔(Erh-Rou Lai) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Lin Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王巍霖 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T01:12:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Averett, S. L., & Burton, M. L. (1996). College Attendance and the College Wage Premium: Differences by Gender. Economics of Education Review, 15(1), 37-49.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. New York: Columbia University Press. Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal, 75, 493-517 Becker, G. S. (1975). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press. Blau, P., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction. Paper presented at the Power and Ideology in Education, New York. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books. Brand, J. E., & Halaby, C. N. (2006). Regression and Matching Estimates of the Effects of Elite College Attendance on Educational and Career Achievement. Social Science Research, 35(3), 749-770. Brand, J. E., & Xie, Y. (2010). Who Benefits Most from College? American Sociological Review, 75(2), 273-302. Brewer, D. J., Eide, E. R., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). Does It Pay to Attend an Elite Private College? Cross-Cohort Evidence on the Effects of College Type on Earnings. The Journal of Human Resources, 34(1), 104-123. Bryk, A., Lee, V., & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic Schools and the Common Good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Card, D., & Lemieux, T. (2001). Can Falling Supply Explain the Rising Return to College for Younger Men? A Cohort-Based Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 705-746. Carneiro, P., Hansen, K., & Heckman, J. J. (2003). Estimating Distributions of Treatment Effects with an Application to the Returns to Schooling and Measurement of the Effects of Uncertainty on College Choice. International Economic Review, 44, 361-422. Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC.: National Center for Educational Statistics. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. Collins, R. (1979). The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: John Wiley. Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school : progressivism in american education, 1876-1957. New York: Vintage Books. Dahrendorf, R. (1958). Toward a Theory of Social Conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(2), 170-183. Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some Principles of Stratification. American Sociological Review, 10(2), 242-249. Durkheim, E. (1964[1893]). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press. Farrell, J. P., & Schiefelbein, E. (1985). Education and Status Attainment in Chile: A Comparative Challenge to the Wisconsin Model of Status Attainment. Comparative Education Review, 29(4), 490-506. Fleisher, B. M., & Kniesner, T. J. (1984). Labor Economics: Theory, Evidence and Policy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Gindling, T. H., Goldfarb, M., & Chang, C.-C. (1995). Changing returns to education in Taiwan: 1978 -1991. World Development, 23(2), 343-356 Hanoch, G. (1967). An Economic Analysis of Earnings and Schooling. The Journal of Human Resources, 2(3), 310-329. Hansen, W. L. (1963). Total and Private Rates of Return to Investment in Schooling. Journal of Political Economy, 71(2), 128-140. Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools. Journal of Economic Literature 24(3), 1141-1177. Hout, M. (1988). More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 93(6), 1358-1400. Hout, M., & DiPrete, T. A. (2006). What We Have Learned: RC28's Contributions to Knowledge about Social Stratification. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24, 1-20. Huaco, G. A. (1966). The Functionalist Theory of Stratification: Two Decades of Controversy. Inquiry, 9(3), 215-240. James, E., Alsalam, N., Conaty, J. C., & To, D.-L. (1989). College Quality and Future Earnings: Where Should You Send Your Child to College? The American Economic Review, 79(2), 247-252. Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The Academic Revolution. New York: Doubleday. Levine, D. (1971). Introduction. Paper presented at the Georg Simmel: Individual and Social Forms., Chicago. Marx, K. (1970[1867]). Capital, Volume I. Moscow: Progress Publishers. McLaughlin, P. (2001). What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Meyer, J. W. (1977). The Effects of Education as an Institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55-77. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. Human Behavior & Social Institutions No. 2. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Monks, J. (2000). The Returns to Individual and College Characteristics: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Economics of Education Review, 19(3), 279-289. Parsons, T. (1940). An Analytical Approach to the Theory of Social Stratification. American Journal of Sociology, 45(6), 841-862. Psacharopoulos, G. (1973). Returns to Education: An International Comparison. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Psacharopoulos, G. (1981). Returns to Education: an Updated International Comparison. Comparative Education, 17(3), 321-341. Psacharopoulos, G. (1985). Returns to Education: A Further International Update and Implications. The Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 583-604. Riesman, D. (1958). Constraint and Variety in American Education. New York: John Wiley. Roy, A. D. (1951). Some Thoughts on the Distribution of Earnings. Oxford Economic Papers, 3(2), 135-146. Schultz, T. W. (1960). Capital Formation by Education. Journal of Political Economy, 68(6), 571-583. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17. Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). The Educational and Early Occupational Attainment Process. American Sociological Review, 34, 82-92. Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). Education, Occupation, and Earnings: Achievement in the Early Career. New York: Academic Press. Smelser, N. J., & Lipset, S. M. (1966). Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development. Chicago Aldine. Smith, M. R. (1990). What is New in 'New Structuralist' Analyses of Earnings? American Sociological Review, 55(6), 827-841. Tabboni, S. (1995). The Stranger and Modernity: From Equality of Rights To Recognition of Difference. Thesis Eleven, 43(1), 17-27. Torpey, E. M. (2008). The class of 1993: Earning and occupations by college major, 1 and 10 years after graduation. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 52(2), 15-25. Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press. Tsai, S.-L., & Xie, Y. (2008). Changes in Earnings Returns to Higher Education in Taiwan since the 1990s. Population Review, 47, 1-20. Tumin, M. M. (1953). Some Principles of Stratification: A Critical Analysis. American Sociological Review, 18(4), 387-394. Willis, R. J. (1986). Wage Determinants: a Survey and Reinterpretation of Human Capital Earnings Functions. Paper presented at the Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam. Willis, R. J., & Rosen, S. (1979). Education and Self-Selection. Journal of Political Economy, 87, S7-36. Wright, E. O. (1979). Class Structure and Income Determination. New York: Academic Press. 羊憶容（1999）教育。見王振寰等編，社會學與臺灣社會，頁323-354，台北： 巨流。 荀玉蓉（1992）臺灣地區大學教育投資社會報酬率之估算。台北：東吳大學經濟 研究所碩士論文。 孫清山、黃毅志（1994）社會資源、文化資本與職業取得。東海學報，35，127-150。 符碧真（1996）教育投資報酬率長期變化之剖析—以我國教育發展個案為例。教 育研究資訊，4(1)，82-99。 章英華、薛承泰、黃毅志（1996）教育分流與社會經濟地位。臺北市：行政院教 育改革審議委員會。 章英華、伊慶春（2001）家庭、學校與補習。青少年生命歷程與生活調適研討會。 台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。 黃毅志（1994）社經背景與地位取得過程之結構機制：教育，社會資源及文化資 本。台中：東海大學社會學研究所博士論文。 黃毅志（2000）文化資本、社會網絡與階層認同、階級界限。國立政治大學社會 學報，30，1-42。 黃天中（1996）生涯規劃概論—生涯與生活篇。台北：桂冠文化。 楊瑩（1988）臺灣地區教育擴展過程中，不同家庭背景子女受教機會差異之研究。 台北：國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士學位論文。 廖茂榮（2003）教育投資與薪資所得之實證模型驗證。台北：東吳大學經濟研究 所碩士論文。 蔡淑鈴（1998）社會地位取得：山地、閩客、及外省之比較。見楊國樞、瞿海源 編，變遷中的臺灣社會，頁1-44，台北：巨流。 蔡淑鈴（2004）高等教育的擴展對教育機會分配的影響。臺灣社會學，7，47-88。 劉曉芬（2006）全球在地化視野下的高職轉型政策。教育資料集刊，31，225-241。 劉源俊（2001）。科學精神、人文精神與大學教育。 2001年11月27日，取自：http://vschool.scu.edu.tw/pro/pro22.htm 駱明慶（2001）教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊，29(2)，117-152。 駱明慶（2002）誰是台大學生？性別、省籍和城鄉差異。經濟論文叢刊，30(1)， 113-147。 薛承泰（1994）影響學位取得的家庭因素─中美跨國比較之研究。國立臺灣大學 社會學刊，23，217-252。 薛承泰（1996）影響國初中後教育分流的實證分析：性別、省籍、與家庭背景的 差異。臺灣社會學刊，20，49-84。 謝小岑（1998）性別與教育期望。婦女與兩性學刊，9，205-231。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42376 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究使用臺灣高等教育整合資料庫計畫之92學年大一新生調查與95學年畢業後一年調查之串聯資料進行分析，檢驗大學畢業生之初職薪資與高等教育內涵與成長地區之城鄉背景的關係並探究高中－大學時期的移動經驗對於初薪的影響。使用多階層線性模型，控制個人層次之家庭背景因素後，分析成長地區背景與高等教育內涵在初職薪資表現上的交互作用，其發現為：（1）高等教育內涵對初職薪資有顯著影響，且影響力大於家庭背景。（2）個人成長地區背景的都市化程度會造成高等教育內涵取得之差異，都市化程度越低者越傾向於就讀公立、技職與科技學門。（3）成長地區背景之都市化程度正向影響初職薪資，並與高等教育內涵之公私立類型學校有正向交互作用關係，表示成長於都市地區者在工作起薪高於鄉村者，且由公立大學教育內涵的薪資獲益較大。（4）高中－大學的城鄉移動經驗，對非都市地區學生未來的初薪表現有正向效果，其效果隨都市化程度越高而降低，亦即越是鄉村地區背景的學生，其薪資受到城鄉移動的正向影響力越大。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper uses the Taiwan Integrated Postsecondary Education Database to examine the relationships among the wage of the first job, higher education and the difference in effect between growing up in the rural environment and the urban environment. The study also explores the influence of moving experience when high school students enter in the university on the wage of the first job. Two waves of data were merged; the first wave occurred in 2003 questioning freshmen students and the second wave occurred in 2006 questioning graduate students a year after they graduated. After controlling the factors of different family socioeconomic status at the individual level, the hierarchical linear model is used to identify the impact of having a higher education and the difference in background between growing up in the rural environment and the urban environment.
The major findings are as follows: A. Higher education has significant effects on first job wage, and it is more influential than the family socioeconomic status. B. The urbanization of growth region results in the difference of attaining higher education. Therefore, students from less-urbanization regions tend to enter in public schools, vocational schools and technological department. C. The urbanization of growth region has a positive impact on the first job wage, and it also has positive interaction with higher education school type. This means that the wage of urban students are higher than the wage of rural students. Additionally, students who graduate from public schools earn more money than those from private schools. The gap of wage gets larger due to urbanization. D. The moving experience from rural to urban when high students enter in the university is positive for non-urban students’ first job wage. This means that moving experience is more positive for students from less-urbanization regions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T01:12:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R94630005-1.pdf: 3900901 bytes, checksum: 54db12f133ca6904cdd48a55854f1260 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....i
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..ii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….iii 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..1 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………………………………………………………...1 第二節 研究重要性…………………………………………………………………………………………………....7 第三節 研究範圍………………………………………………………………………………………………………....8 第二章 文獻與研究假設………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 第一節 結構功能論對薪資的詮釋………………………………………………………………………………..9 第二節 人力資本的教育投資觀點……………………………………………………………………………….10 2.1 大學類型：公�私立大學與薪資的關係………………………………………………………….12 2.2 大學之教育導向：一般�技職類型學校與薪資的關係…………………………………16 2.3 大學教育專業領域：科系與薪資關係…………………………………………………………….19 第三節 衝突理論的批判……………………………………………………………………………………………..21 3.1 家庭背景與教育………………………………………………………………………………………….....22 3.2 個人成長地區之城鄉背景與教育…………………………………………………………………...23 3.3 “正向選擇”與”負向選擇”……………………………………………………………………….....25 3.4 城鄉經驗的交互作用－都市中的「陌生人」………………………………………………….26 第三章 研究設計……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..29 第一節 資料來源………………………………………………………………………………………………………....29 第二節 樣本篩選、加權與分析對象的處理…………………………………………………………………30 第三節 研究架構圖…………………………………………………………………………………………………....34 第四節 變項說明………………………………………………………………………………………………………....35 4.1 依變項：初職薪資收入－工資………………………………………………………………………...35 4.2 自變項（含中介變項）…………………………………………………………………………………....36 4.2.1 高等教育的內涵………………………………………………………………………………….......36 4.2.2 個人成長之城鄉背景特質…………………………………………………………………….....39 4.3 控制變項…………………………………………………………………………………………………….......41 4.3.1 個人特質與能力………………………………………………………………………………….......42 4.3.2 家庭社經背景……………………………………………………………………………………….......46 第五節 統計方法與假設驗證……………………………………………………………………………………...46 5.1 分析方法之回顧與選擇…………………………………………………………………………………....46 5.1.1 職業地位取得模型………………………………………………………………………………......46 5.1.2 薪資研究－計量經濟模型…………………………………………………………………….....47 5.2 分析模式………………………………………………………………………………………………........48 第六節 小結…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....59 第四章 分析結果……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..60 第一節 高等教育內涵對薪資的影響…………………………………………………………………………..60 第二節 個人成長地區背景對高等教育內涵取得之影響與其造成薪資表現差異…67 第三節 個人成長地區背景與高等教育內涵之交互作用對薪資的影響…………………75 第四節 城鄉移動經驗與薪資的關係…………………………………………………………………………..80 第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………………………………………………..86 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....86 第二節 討論…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....89 第三節 建議…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….....91 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....92 附錄一：城鄉分級表……………………………………………………………………………………………………...97 附錄二：加權公式與範例……………………………………………………………………………………………….100 附錄三：臺灣新職業聲望與社經地位量表………………………………………………………………….101 附錄四：模型三、四地區層次分層詳細表………………………………………………………………….103 附錄五：問卷………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...106 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 多階層線性模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 初職薪資 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高等教育 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 個人成長地區背景 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 城鄉移動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | first job wage | en |
| dc.subject | multilevel hierarchical linear model | en |
| dc.subject | the moving experience from rural to urban | en |
| dc.subject | growth regional effect | en |
| dc.subject | higher education | en |
| dc.title | 大學畢業生初職薪資研究－探討地區背景與高等教育內涵的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Estimating the effect of urban/rural background and higher education on first job wage of university graduates. | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 蕭崑杉(Kun-Sun Shiao) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王麗雲(Li-Yun Wang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 初職薪資,高等教育,個人成長地區背景,城鄉移動,多階層線性模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | first job wage,higher education,growth regional effect,the moving experience from rural to urban,multilevel hierarchical linear model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 132 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.81 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。