請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42290完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 朱雲漢(Yunhan Chu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nuan-Ting Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃暖婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:57:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-08-04 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-08-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aportela, F. (2001). Firms' Financing Costs: The Role of Development Banks in Mexico. Paper presented at the Conference on Financial Markets in Mexico. from http://scid.stanford.edu/pdf/credpr113.pdf (Retrived July 19, 2008)
Arner, D. W. (1996). The Mexican Peso Crisis : Implications for the Regulation of Financial Markets London: International Financial & Tax Law Unit, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary & Westfield College, University of London, in cooperation with the London Centre for International Banking Studies and The London Institute of International Banking, finance & Development Law. Auerbach, N. N. (1994). The Politics of Mexican Financial Policy: Financial Liberalization and State Autonomy. Yale University, New Haven. Auerbach, N. N. (2001). States, Banks, and Markets : Mexico's Path to Financial Liberalization in Comparative Perspective Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. Barth, J. R., Caprio, G. J., & Levine, R. (2006). Rethinking Bank Regulation : Till Angels Govern. Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press. Bennett, D., & Sharpe, K. (1980). The State as Banker and Entrepreneur: The Last-Resort Character of the Mexican State's Economic Invervention, 1917-76. Comparative Politics, 12(2), pp. 165-189. Camp, R. A. (1985). The Political Technocrat in Mexico and the Survival of the Political System. Latin American Research Review, 20(1), pp. 97-118. Centeno, M. A., & Maxfield, S. (1992). The Marriage of Finance and Order: Changes in the Mexican Political Elite. Journal of Latin American Studies, 24(1), pp. 57-85. Chang, H.-J., Park, H.-J., & Yoo, C. G. (1998). Interpreting the Korean Crisis: Financial Liberalisation, Industrial Policy and Corporate Governance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22, pp. 735-746. Cho, Y. J. (2002). Financial Repression, Liberalization, Crisis and Restructuring: Lessons of Korea's Financial Sector Policies, (Vol. ADB Institute Research Paper Series No. 47, Available from http://adbi.adb.org/files/2002.11.rp47.korea.financial.sector.pdf (Retrived July 19, 2008) Choi, B.-S. (1993). Financial Policy and Big Business in Korea: The Perils of Financial Regulation. In S. Haggard, C. H. Lee & S. Maxfield (Eds.), The Politics of Finance in Developing Countries Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Choi, J.-W. (2002). Regulatory Forbearance and Financial Crisis in South Korea. Asian Survey, 42(2), 251-275. Cockcroft, J. D. (1998). Mexico's Hope: An Encounter with Politics and History. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press. Cypher, J. M. (1990). State and Capital in Mexico : Development Policy since 1940 Boulder: Westview Press. Cypher, J. M. (1996). Mexico: Financial Fragility or Structural Crisis? Journal of Economic Issues, 30(2), 451-461. Delhaise, P. F. (1998). Asia in Crisis: The Implosion of the Banking and Finance Systems. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd. Desmet, K. (2000). Accounting for the Mexican Banking Crisis. Emerging Markets Review, 1, 165-181. Euh, Y.-D., & Baker, J. C. (1990). The Korean Banking System and Foreign Influence. London/New York: Routledge. Haber, S. (2005). Mexico's Experiments with Bank Privatization and Liberalization, 1991-2003. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, pp. 2325-2353. Haber, S., Maurer, N., & Razo, A. (2002). Sustaining Economic Performance under Political Instability: Political Integration in Revolutionary Mexico. In S. Haber (Ed.), Crony Capitalism and Economic Growth in Latin America: Theory and Evidence. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press. Hahm, J.-H. (2001). The Financial Structure in Transition: Financial Liberalization and Economic Crisis in Korea. Paper presented at the 2001 APEC Economic Outlook Symposium. Retrieved May 21, 2005, from http://cis.yonsei.ac.kr/DEXTUpload/Financial%20Structure%20in%20Transition.pdf Hamilton, N., & Kim, E. M. (1993). Economic and Political Liberalisation in South Korea and Mexico. Third World Quarterly, 14(1), pp. 109-136. Helleiner, E. (1995). Explaining the Globalization of Financial Markets: Bringing States Back In. Review of International Political Economy, 2(2), pp. 315-341. Jwa, S.-H. (2001). A New Paradigm for Korea's Economic Development New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Kessler, T. P. (1998). Political Capital: Mexican Financial Policy under Salinas. World Politics, 51, 36-66. Kwack, S. Y., & Chung, U. C. (1986). The Role of Financial Policies and Institutions in Korea's Economic Development Process. In H.-S. Cheng (Ed.), Financial Policy and Reform in Pacific Basin Countries. Washington D.C./Lexington, Massachusetts/Toronto: Lexington Books. Lee, Y.-h. (2000). The Failure of the Weak State in Economic Liberalization: Liberalization, Democratization and the Financial Crisis in South Korea. The Pacific Review, 13(1), pp. 115-131. Levy, D. C., Bruhn, K., & Zebadúa, E. (2001). Mexico: The Struggle for Democratic Development. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA/London: University of California Press. Loriaux, M. (1997). The End of Credit Activism in Interventionist States. In M. Loriaux, M. Woo-Cumings, K. E. Calder, S. Maxfield & S. A. Perez (Eds.), Capital Ungoverned : Liberalizing Finance in Interventionist States Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Marichal, C. (2002). The Construction of Credibility: Financial Market Reform and the Renegotiation of Mexico's External Debt in the 1880s. In J. L. Bortz & S. Haber (Eds.), The Mexican Economy, 1870-1930. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Maurer, N., & Haber, S. (2002). Institutional Change and Economic Growth: Banks, Financial Markets, and Mexican Industrialization, 1878-1913. In J. L. Bortz & S. Haber (Eds.), The Mexican Economy, 1870-1930. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Maxfield, S. (1990). Governing Capital : International Finance and Mexican Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Maxfield, S. (1993). The Politics of Financial Policy in Mexico. In S. Haggard, C. H. Lee & S. Maxfield (Eds.), The Politics of Finance in Developing Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Maxfield, S. (1997). Capital Mobility and Mexican Financial Liberalization. In M. Loriaux, M. Woo-Cumings, K. E. Calder, S. Maxfield & S. A. Perez (Eds.), Capital Ungoverned : Liberalizing Finance in Interventionist States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. McKinnon, R. I. (1980). Financial Policies. In J. Cody, H. Hughes & D. Wall (Eds.), Policies for Industrial Progress in Developing Countries. New York Published for the World Bank [by] Oxford University Press. Minushkin, S. (2002). Banqueros and Bolseros: Structural Change and Financial Market Liberalization in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 34, pp. 915-944. Park, Y. C. (1986). Foreign Debt, Balance of Payments, and Growth Prospects: The Case of the Republic of Korea, 1965-88. World Development, 14(8), pp. 1019-1058. Park, Y. C. (1994). Korea: Development and Structural Change of the Financial System. In H. T. Patrick & Y. C. Park (Eds.), The Financial Development of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. New York: Oxford University Press. Park, Y. C., & Kim, D. W. (1994). Korea: Development and Structural Change of the Banking System. In H. T. Patrick & Y. C. Park (Eds.), The Financial Development of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. New York: Oxford University Press. Pirie, I. (2008). The Korean Developmental State: From Dirigisme to Neo-liberalism. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Quiroz, O. S. (2001). The Political Economy of Mexico's Financial Reform. Aldershot; Burllington, USA: Ashgate. Ramirez, M. D. (1989). Mexico's Economic Crisis: Its Origins and Consequences. New York: Praeger. Shim, Y. (2000). Korean Bank Regulation and Supervision: Crisis and Reform. The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International. Slover, T. W. (1998). Tequila Sunrise : Mexico Emerges from the Darkness of Financial Crisis. London: London Institute of International Banking, Finance & Development Law in cooperation with The International Financial Law Unit, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary & Westfield College, University of London, and The SMU Institute of International Banking and Finance. Strange, S. (1997). Casino Capitalism Manchester; New York Manchester University Press, distributed exclusively in the USA by St. Martin's Press. Teichman, J. A. (1988). Policymaking in Mexico: from boom to crisis. London: Allen & Unwin, Inc. Teichman, J. A. (2001). The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and Mexico. Chapel Hill, NC/London: The University of North Carolina Press. Thacker, S. C. (2000). Big Business, the State, and Free Trade: Constructing Coalitions in Mexico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Thelen, K. (2003). How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press. Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics : historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press. Unal, H., & Navarro, M. (1999). The Technical Process of Bank Privatization in Mexico. The Wharton Financial Institutions Center. Villalpando-Benitez, M. (2000). The Political Economy of Banking Regulation: The Case of Mexico, 1940-1978. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Illinois. Wikipedia. Ernesto Zedillo. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernesto_Zedillo Woo-Cumings, M. (1997). Slouching toward the Market: The Politics of Financial Liberalization in South Korea. In M. Loriaux, M. Woo-Cumings, K. E. Calder, S. Maxfield & S. A. Perez (Eds.), Capital Ungoverned : Liberalizing Finance in Interventionist States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Zhang, X. (2003). The Changing Politics of Finance in Korea and Thailand : from Deregulation to Debacle New York, NY: Routledge. 王政東與吳美華 (編). (2002). 經濟金融危機的防範與因應：各國經驗. 台北市: 台灣金融研訓院. 王鶴松. (2005). 金融危機與金融改革. 台北: 財團法人台灣金融研訓院. 朱立熙. (2003). 韓國史：悲劇的循環與宿命. 台北: 三民書局. 江時學. (2004). 金融全球化與發展中國家的經濟安全—拉美國家的經驗教訓. 北京: 社會科學文獻出版社. 何國世. (2003). 墨西哥史 : 仙人掌王國. 臺北: 三民書局. 吳家興. (2005). 韓國的經濟發展與政策. 台北市: 台灣商務印書館. 徐世澄. (2004). 墨西哥政治經濟改革及模式轉換. 北京: 世界知識出版社. 徐滇慶、于宗先、王金利. (2000). 泡沫經濟與金融危機. 北京: 中國人民大學出版社. 莊秀媛、潘隆政、鄭明慧、范以端、邱民芳. (2002). 南韓經濟金融改革執行情形考察報告. 台北: 財政部金融局、中央存款保險公司. 陳光彥. (2004). 南韓金融體系的發展：制度、危機與轉型. 東海大學社會學研究所, 台中. 景學成 (編). (2004). 亞洲金融危機風雲錄. 北京: 中國金融出版社. 黃仁德、林進煌. (2007). 國際金融危機的經驗與啟示. 台北市: 聯經出版社. 黃志龍. (2005). 墨西哥銀行私有化的背景、程序與成效. 拉丁美洲研究, 88(1), pp. 57-63. 蔡東杰. (2002). 台灣與墨西哥民主化之比較. 台北市: 風雲論壇出版社. 蔡增家. (2005). 南韓轉型 : 政黨輪替與政經體制的轉變. (1993-2003). 台北: 巨流出版社. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42290 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 1970年代後期開始，在英美兩國的帶領之下，金融自由化的風潮興起，大量資金在全球流動，使得新興工業化國家為吸引外來資金，爭相放鬆金融管制之時，比以前更加迅速的資本流動也在新興工業化國家帶來「經濟榮景未必直接與實質經濟部門的發展相關」的副作用，而同樣兼具幣值危機、銀行業危機與外債危機性質的1994年墨西哥披索危機和1997年波及南韓的東亞金融風暴，就是最好的見證。
由於國家經濟問題上的結構性缺陷通常源於制度，而制度能否改變，又深受一國政治經濟發展過程中，普遍模式與因緣際會事件的影響力大小和箇中關聯所影響。因此，透過文獻分析，以「歷史制度論（historical institutionalism）」解釋墨西哥與南韓金融政策演變，並將「路徑依賴（path dependency）」理論從屬於歷史制度論之下，觀察墨西哥與南韓金融體系從管制到自由化的過程，吾人可發現無論是墨西哥政府還是南韓政府，在創造制度時與大財團合作或是扶植財霸的作法，都同時塑造了政府後來想改革制度時，無法逃脫大財團影響的宿命。儘管1980年代墨西哥與南韓嚴重的外債問題都為兩國金融體系的改革帶來了轉變的契機，但是路徑依賴中的「鎖定效應（lock-in effect）」卻經常讓政策改革大打折扣，以致1980年代兩國的金融自由化事實上都是「寡占的自由化」，在政府逐漸把金融體系的控制權讓給私人，卻未能進行「再管制（re-regulation）」，建立徵信、風險評估與成本考量的概念與模式的情況下，大財團與財霸可以肆無忌憚的進行風險甚高的借貸行為，終究累積了大量外債，以致於當投機性攻擊來臨時，墨西哥與南韓都無法倖免於金融危機的後果，但1990年代的金融危機也為兩國金融體系的改革帶來另一個轉捩點。 雖然金融風暴逼使墨西哥與南韓都為了得到IMF的援助，而必須依照IMF的藥方進行經濟改革，可是危機是否會為制度改革帶來機會，端賴於行為者對危機原因的認知。儘管墨西哥的銀行壞帳問題確實相當嚴重，但是IMF認為問題的重點並不在銀行層面，而長期政商勾結的「鎖定效應」也使得墨西哥解決不良資產的方式複雜又緩慢，並不像南韓在IMF的外來壓力、總統對經濟問題的認知，以及國內長期詬病財霸問題的聲浪之下，認為要解決問題，就必須直接改革企業與金融機構，使得兩國儘管都執行了經濟改革，但改革後兩國的經濟體質卻是天差地遠。因此，1980年代的金融自由化並不是造成金融危機的原因，而僅僅是揭露國家金融體系上既有結構性缺陷的媒介；真正的自由金融市場，必須在足夠的管制監理措施下運作，方能維護投資人的權益，而不淪為為私人利益服務的工具。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | From the latter half of 1970s, a huge amount of capital flows globally with the emergence of financial liberalization, which makes newly-industrialized countries loosen their financial regulations in order to attract capital flow in. However, such capital inflow often creates prosperous illusions yet hardly contributes to real sector development, and the financial crises in 1994 and 1997 reveal the structural backwardness in Mexican and South Korean economies under financial liberalization.
Since the economic structural backwardness usually originates from institutional arrangement, and the constant causes and historical contingencies in national political and economic development deeply influence structural change, hence to explain and compare the financial evolution of Mexico and South Korea with historical institutionalism and path dependency is a way to find those problems embedded in their financial institutions. From various literatures we can see the conglomerates in both countries lock themselves into the financial institutions when cooperating with the governments and then become essential actors to affect the results of financial reform. Therefore, the financial liberalization in Mexico and South Korea only catalyzes their financial crises and unveil those existing problems. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:57:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R91322011-1.pdf: 1967296 bytes, checksum: fe7b57971916dcd825e5062f695e3f49 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………i
誌謝…………………………………………………………… iii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………v 英文摘要………………………………………………………vii 第一章 緒論........................................1 第一節 研究動機....................................1 第二節 文獻回顧：理論與案例........................2 第三節 研究途徑...................................15 第四節 研究架構...................................17 第五節 研究方法與限制.............................18 第二章 從引導到負擔：自由化之前，金融體系的形成與轉變..19 第一節 墨西哥：搖擺於左右之間..........................19 第二節 南韓：成就之原因，問題之所在....................38 第三節 兩國比較：有目的而乏規範的金融監理制度..........48 第三章 寡占的金融自由化：原因、制度設計與結果..........54 第一節 墨西哥：快步跑向自由化..........................54 第二節 南韓：自由化的漸進與加速........................68 第三節 兩國比較：結構面的異同..........................80 第四章 金融風暴的引發與後續處理：墨西哥與南韓..........84 第一節 墨西哥：不徹底的金融改革........................84 第二節 南韓：金大中救經濟..............................90 第三節 兩國比較：危機，豈是轉機？......................95 第五章 結論－金融風暴背後，難以改變的命運..............97 參考文獻...............................................99 附表：墨西哥與南韓歷任總統............................107 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 金融自由化導致金融危機？—墨西哥與南韓金融改革政策比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Does Financial Liberalization Cause Financial Crisis? A
Comparison of Financial Reforms in Mexico and South Korea | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 秦宗春(Chun-Tsung Chin),左正東(Chen-Dong Tso) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 金融自由化,金融管制,歷史制度論,路徑依賴,金融體系,結構性缺陷,鎖定效應, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | financial liberalization,financial regulation,financial institution,economic structural backwardness,historical institutionalism,path dependency,financial crisis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-08-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.92 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。