Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42256
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor許明仁(Ming-Jen Sheu)
dc.contributor.authorPin-Kuang Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳品光zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T00:55:47Z-
dc.date.available2008-08-08
dc.date.copyright2008-08-08
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2008-08-04
dc.identifier.citation中華民國財政部關稅總局 2007 我國進出口貨物數量與價值查詢表 http://web.customs.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
方祖達、張康榮 1982 天然果汁檢驗標準之研究四、天然果汁中有機酸類型之分析 臺灣大學農學院研究報告 22: 1
方祖達、蔡榮哲 1993 楊桃果汁檢驗標準之研究 台大農學院研究報告 33(3): 151-162
王峻禧、魏玉萍、吳瑞碧 1998 蒸發濃縮及沈澱處理以降低酸味種楊桃汁草酸含量之研究 食品科學 25(4): 490-496
王偉杰、王武彰、閻立平、溫銘 1997 品系與成熟度對醃漬楊桃果汁品質之影響 提升果樹產業競爭力研討會專集 Ⅰ: 207-221
行政院農委會 2007 95年度農業統計年報 http://agr.pdaf.gov.tw/list.htm
余淑蓮 2001 白布帆的楊桃酒 鄉間小路 29(12): 42-49
李世滄 2002 楊桃五稜呼五斂 農業世界雜誌 229: 44-47
周淑豔 2004 鎘添加處理對作物根圈土壤低分子量有機酸的影響 碩士論文 農業化學研究所 國立臺灣大學
侯宗榮、蔣見美、陳漢欽、陳桂英、陳捷槐、黃德美 1978 品種及成熟度對果汁成分影響之研究 楊桃汁、木瓜汁及百香果汁 中國農業化學會誌 16: 14-23.
徐源泰、許輔 1996 楊桃汁發酵過程中胺基甲酸乙酯生成之探討 中國園藝 42(4): 303-311
許明仁 2005 臺灣農家要覽 貳、農產品處理與加工 二、農產品製造與加工 (二)園藝產品(果汁類) 行政院農委會 臺北
陳發興、劉星輝、陳立松 2005 果實有機酸代謝研究進展 果樹學報 22(5): 526-531
陳進德 2001 間接吸收度毛細管電泳法定量果汁中的有機酸 碩士論文 食品科技學硏究所 國立臺灣大學
陳碧子 2002 土壤重金屬對小米根圈之低分子量有機酸的影響 碩士論文 農業化學研究所 國立臺灣大學
曾美芳 2004 甜味種楊桃醃漬發酵過程中醃漬液菌相及成分變化之研究 碩士論文 園藝學研究所 國立臺灣大學
游若篍、王武彰 1987 楊桃汁品質成分與加工利用之研究 中華農業研究 36(2): 196-206
黃玉馨 2002 楊桃生產成本與收益分析 農業世界雜誌 229: 26-47
楊淑惠、王惠亮 1996 酸楊桃接菌式發酵之研究 中華農業研究 45(4): 393-400
楊淑惠、王惠亮、王武彰 1995 酸味種楊桃醃漬過程中有機酸及糖類變化之研究 中華農業研究 44(2): 135-146
劉詩文 2005 利用分子標誌區分楊桃鹽醃發酵過程中酵母菌之菌相 碩士論文 園藝學研究所 國立臺灣大學
劉碧鵑 1999 栽培楊桃的新選擇-馬來西亞種 豐年 49: 22-23
劉碧鵑 2001 台灣楊桃的生產與主要栽培品種 農業世界雜誌 211: 17-23
劉碧鵑 2005 臺灣農家要覽 壹、果樹 二、常綠果樹 (十八)楊桃 行政院農委會 臺北
劉碧鵑、王子慶 2005 台灣楊桃的外銷現況 農業世界雜誌 262: 60-65
劉碧鵑、王德男 2006 台灣楊桃產業問題及發展方向之探討 農產運銷半年刊 134: 59-64
劉碧鵑、王德男、劉政道 2003 楊桃新品種台農二號-正港 中華農業研究 52: 207-217
劉碧鵑、翁瑞亨 2002 台灣楊桃的產業現況及其永續經營 農業世界雜誌 229: 10-18
劉碧鵑、楊世華 2007 台灣楊桃的外銷現況及分析 農產運銷半年刊 135: 27-34
劉慧瑛、黃淵輝 1991 臺灣水果維他命C之測定 中華農業研究 40(3): 280-290
蔡榮哲 1995 傳統式楊桃汁加工醃漬過程中品質與化學成分及菌相之硏究 博士論文 園藝學研究所 國立臺灣大學
魏玉萍 1996 以濃縮及冷凍-解凍方法降低酸味種楊桃汁草酸含量之研究 碩士論文 食品科技研究所 國立臺灣大學
Sanchez, A. H., Castro, A. de, Rejano, L. and Montano, A. 2000 Comparative study on chemical changes in olive juice and brine during green olive fermentation J. Agric. Food Chem. 48: 5975-5980
AOAC. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
Cesar Pereira A., Luis Fertonani F., de Oliverira Neto G., Tatsuo Kubota L., Yamanaka H. 2001. Reagentless biosensor for isocitrate using one step modified Pt-Ir microelectrode. Talanta 53: 801-806.
Blau, K. and Halke, J. M. 1993. Handbook of derivatives for chromatography, 2nd ed. Wiley.
Tassou C. C., Panagou E. Z. and Katsaboxakis K. Z. 2002. Microbiological and physicochemical changes of naturally black olives fermented at different temperatures and NaCl levels in the brines. Food Microbiology 19: 605-615.
Campbell, C. K., KE. 1989. Sugar acid composition and development of sweet and tart carambola fruit. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114(3): 455-457
Cunha, S. C., Fernandes, J. O., and Ferreira, I. M. P. L. V. O. 2002. HPLC/UV determination of organic acids in fruit juices and nectars. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 214: 67–71.
Blanco Gomis, Moran Gutierrez, M. J., Gutierrez Alvarez, M. D., Mangas Alonso, J. J. 1988. Application of HPLC to characterization and control of individual acids in apple extracts and ciders. Chromatographia 25: 1054-1058.
Docherty, K. S., Ziemann, P. J. 2001. On-line, inlet-based trimethylsilyl derivatization for gas chromatography of mono- and diorganic acids. J. Chromatogr. A 921: 265-275.
Enik¨o Tat´ar, Victor G. Mihucz, Bogl´arka Kmethy, Gyula Z´aray, Ferenc Fodor 2000. Determination of organic acids and their role in nickel transport within cucumber plants. Microchemical Journal 67: 73-81.
Grases F., Costa-Bauza A. and March J.G. 1991. Determination of citric acid based on inhibition of the crystal growyh of calcium fluoride. Analyst 116: 59-63.
Noonan, G.O., Begley, T.H., Diachenko, G.W. 2007. Rapid quantitative and qualitative confirmatory method for the determination of monofluoroacetic acid in foods by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1139: 271–278.
Gardner, W. H. 1966. Food Acidulants., Allied Chemical corporation, NY.
Gomis, D. B. 2000. Food Analysis by HPLC, Ch. 11, HPLC Analysis of Organic Acids, Leo M.L. Nollet (Ed.), Marcel Dekker, NY.
Green, J. G. 1987. Carambola production in Malaysia and Taiwan. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 100: 275-278.
Cen Haiyan, Bao Yidan, He Yong, Sun Da-Wen 2007. Visible and near infrared spectroscopy for rapid detection of citric and tartaric acids in orange juice. J. food Eng. 82: 253–260.
Miwa H. and Yamamoto M. 1996. Determination of mono-, poly- and hydroxy-carboxylic acid profiles of beverages as their 2-nitrophenylhydrazides by reversed-phase ion-pair chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 721: 261-268.
Miwa H., Yamamoto M., Kan K., Futata T., Asano T. 1996. High-performance liquid chromatographic measurements of urinary hydroxycarboxylic acids as an index of the metabolic control in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J. Chromatogr. B 679: 1-6.
Daood H. G., Biacs P. A., Dakar M. A., Hajdu F. 1994. Ion-pair chromatography and photodiode-array detection of vitamin C and organic acids. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 32: 481-487.
Berregi I., Campo G., Caracena R., Ignacio Miranda J. 2007. Quantitative determination of formic acid in apple juices by H1 NMR spectrometry. Talanta 72: 1049-1053.
Mato I., Suarez-Luque S., Huidobro J. F. 2007. Simple determination of main organic acids in grape juice and wine by using capillary zone electrophoresis with direct UV detection. Food Chem. 102: 104-112.
Mangas J. J., Moreno J., Suarez B., Picinelli A., Blanco D. 1998. Liquid chromatographic analysis of non-volatile strawberry compounds. Chromatographia 47: 197-202.
Chen J.Y., Zhang H., and Matsunaga R. 2006. Rapid determination of the main organic acid composition of raw Japanese apricot fruit juices using near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54: 9652-9657.
Kotani, A., Miyaguchi, Y., Tomita, E., Takamura, K., and Kusu, F. 2004. Determination of organic acids by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection during wine brewing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52: 1440–1444.
Kim Kyoung R., Hahn Mi K., Zlatkis Albert, Horning Evan C., Middleditch Brian S. 1989. Simultaneous gas chromatography of volatile and non-volatile carboxylic acids as tert.-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives. J. Chromatogr. 468: 289-301.
Saavedra L., Ruperez F. J., and Barbas C. 2001. Capillary Electrophoresis for Evaluating orange juice authenticity: a study on Spanish oranges. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49: 9-13.
Ng L.K., Lafontaine P., Harnois J. 2000. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of acids and phenols in distilled alcohol beverages Application of anion-exchange disk extraction combined with in-vial elution and silylation. J. Chromatogra. A 873: 29-38.
Romero Rodriguez M. A., Vazquez Oderiz M. Lopez Hernandez L. J., Simal Lozano J. 1992. Determination of Vitamin C and organic acids in various fruits by HPLC. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 30: 433-437.
Llorente M., Villarroya B., Gomez-Cordoves C. 1991. Reverse-phase HPLC of organic acids in musts. Chromatographia 32: 555-558.
Merck. 2006. The Merck Index. 14th ed. Whitehouse Station, NJ.
Miwa, H. 2000. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of mono-, poly- and hydroxycarboxylic acids in foods and beverages as their 2-nitrophenylhydrazides. J. Chromatogr. A 881: 365-385.
Morton, J. F. 1987. Fruits of warm climates. Miami, FL.
Nisperos-Carriedo M.O., Buslig B. S., Shaw P. E. 1992. Simultaneous detection of dehydroascorbic, ascorbic, and some organic acids in fruits and vegetables by HPLC. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40: 1127-1130.
Marconi O., Floridi S., Montanari L. 2007. Organic acids profile in tomato juice by HPLC with UV detection. J. food Qual. 30: 253-266.
Badoud R., Pratz G. 1986. Improved high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of some carboxylic acids in food and beverages as their p-nitrobenzyl esters. J. Chromatogr. 360: 119-136.
Marce R. M., Calull M., Manchobas R. M., Borrull F., Rius F. X. 1990. An optimized direct method for the determination carboxylic acids in beverages by HPLC. Chromatographia 29: 54-58.
Sua´rez-Luque S., Mato I., Huidobro Jose´ F., Simal-Lozano Jesu´s 2002. Solid-phase extraction procedure to remove organic acids from honey. J. Chromatogr. B 770: 77–82.
Szmigielska, A. M., Van Ress K. C. J., Cieslinski G., and Huang P. M. 1997. Comparison of liquid and gas chromatography for analysis of low molecular weight organic acid in rhizosphere soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 28: 99-111.
Barden T. J., Croft M. Y., Murby E. J., Wells R. J. 1997. Gas chromatographic determination of organic acids from fruit juices by combined resin mediated methylation and extraction in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Chromatogra. A 785: 251-261.
Vines HM, Grierson W. 1966. Handling and physiological studies with the carambola. Proc. annu. meet. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 79: 350-355.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42256-
dc.description.abstract本論文之研究目的在以自然發酵條件下,探討鹽醃發酵甜味種楊桃汁於發酵過程中有機酸含量的變化,作為研究發酵行為之依據。
本研究針對鹽醃發酵楊桃中可能含有之八種有機酸:醋酸、乳酸、琥珀酸、蘋果酸、草酸、胡延索酸、酒石酸及檸檬酸進行分析,並建立定性及定量之分析方法。
實驗以7%鹽度醃漬馬來西亞種及紅龍種兩品種之甜味種楊桃,各發酵六十二天,於發酵期間取樣二十次測定有機酸含量。
楊桃富含草酸,其pKa值極低,選用99% pH 2.70之移動相組成,1%甲醇,整體分離時間約12分鐘。利用此方法於不經萃取的實際樣品檢測,於UV 210 nm時基質效應明顯,影響部分波峰純度,以此法無法偵測酒石酸、乳酸、醋酸、檸檬酸、琥珀酸。抗壞血酸於醃漬楊桃汁中含量亦高,且滯留時間與乳酸相近,進而遮蓋乳酸訊號。
經此法鑑定醃漬甜楊桃汁發酵過程中有機酸的變化,馬來西亞種之草酸、蘋果酸、抗壞血酸及胡延索酸於醃漬第1天為1598 ppm、1249 ppm、87 ppm、6 ppm,於第20天達到最高,為10301 ppm、3800 ppm、678 ppm、26 ppm。之後慢慢下降至第62天為8580 ppm、2912 ppm、630 ppm、18 ppm。紅龍種之草酸、蘋果酸、抗壞血酸及胡延索酸於醃漬第1天為1813 ppm、1197 ppm、95 ppm、3 ppm,於第20天達到最高,為8149 ppm、4771 ppm、408 ppm、29 ppm。之後慢慢下降至第62天為8132 ppm、3969 ppm、366 ppm、28 ppm。
使用離子配對法改善波峰的分離,以期進一步分離酒石酸、乳酸、醋酸、檸檬酸、琥珀酸。以內含有機相10%(ACN:MeOH = 1:1),pH 7.00的移動相,加入對偶離子TBA 0.005 M,以UV 210 nm偵測,可增進有機酸的分離效果。但實際樣品分析條件仍需進一步測試。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWe set up a qualification and quantification analytical method to test 8 organic acid in sweet carambola pickling brines, including acetic, lactic, succinic, malic, oxalic, fumaric, tartaric and citric acids.
Malaysia and Red Dragon sweet carambola were pickled with 7% salt for 62 days; the exudates were taken and analyzed 20 times during the pickled process.
The results showed that carambola has high content of oxalic acid,the pKa value is extremely low. The optimum analytical method of HPLC was 99% pH 2.70 phosphorus buffers as mobile phase and 1% methanol, and the analytical time was 12 min. We analyze real sample without purification found that strong matrix effect at UV210 nm, affect plurality of some peaks so we cannot detect tartaric, lactic, acetic, citric and succinic acids. Ascorbic acid also has high content in sweet carambola pickling brines; the retention time closed to lactic acid and covered the signal of lactic acid.
After analyzed the organic acid in sweet carambola pickling brines during the pickled process; oxalic, malic, ascorbic and fumaric acids content of Malaysia carambola in the first day respectively is 1598 ppm, 1249 ppm, 87 ppm, 6 ppm. The highest content of organic acids in the 12th day respectively is 10301 ppm, 3800 ppm, 678 ppm, 26 ppm. The organic acids content decreased slowly to the 62th day respectively is 8580 ppm, 2912 ppm, 630 ppm, 18 ppm. Oxalic, malic, ascorbic and fumaric acids content of Red Dragon carambola in the first day respectively is 1813 ppm, 1197 ppm, 95 ppm, 3 ppm,. The highest content of organic acids in the 12th day respectively is 8149 ppm, 4771 ppm, 408 ppm, 29 ppm. The organic acids content decreased slowly to the 62th day respectively is 8132 ppm, 3969 ppm, 366 ppm, 28 ppm.
We try to improve separation of tartaric, lactic, acetic, citric and succinic acid peaks by ion-pair method. The HPLC analytical method of ion-pair was 90% pH 7.00 phosphorus buffers as mobile phase and 10% organic phase (ACN : MeOH = 1 : 1), with 0.005 M TBA as counter ion. Detected organic acid at UV 210 nm, separation of acid peaks was improved by the ion-pair method. The proper ion-pair method in real sample needed the advanced testing.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:55:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-R95628212-1.pdf: 2172524 bytes, checksum: fb8704c15300cfa71295d82242bfe119 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 Ⅰ
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
目錄 V
圖目錄 IX
表目錄 XII
壹、前言 1
貳、文獻整理 3
ㄧ、楊桃概說 3
(一)台灣楊桃栽種品種簡介 3
(二)新鮮楊桃之一般成分及有機酸含量 8
二、楊桃汁加工過程及組成分變化 15
(一)鹽醃發酵楊桃汁之加工方法 15
(二)發酵過程中楊桃汁一般成分及有機酸之變化 11
三、果汁中有機酸的分析方法 19
(一)有機酸之特性 19
(二)本研究分析之有機酸性質 20
(三)有機酸樣品前處理 26
(四)高效能液相層析High performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) 27
(五)氣相層析串聯質譜儀Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry(GC-MS) 28
(六)毛細管電泳Capillary electrophoresis(CE) 29
(七)其他分析方式 30
(八)分析方法比較 30
四、以液相層析分析果汁中的有機酸 32
参、材料與方法 35
一、材料與設備 35
(一)植物材料 35
(二)試藥 35
(三)儀器設備 38
二、樣品製備 38
(一)發酵甜楊桃汁醃漬方法 38
(二)醃漬過程之取樣 38
(三)分析前樣品保存 39
(四)進樣前樣品處理 39
三、可滴定酸度測定 39
四、配製方法 39
(一)配製10000 ppm有機酸之stock solution 39
(二)配製檢量線標準溶液 40
五、HPLC定性及定量之判斷依據 40
(一)定性判斷之依據 40
(二)定量判斷之依據 41
六、實驗方法 41
(一)以逆相層析分析有機酸 41
(二)以逆相層析搭配離子配對條件分析有機酸 42
肆、結果與討論 43
一、以逆相層析分析有機酸 43
(一)建立定性分析條件 48
(二)定量之結果 57
(三)真實樣品分析 63
二、以逆相層析搭配離子配對條件分析有機酸 78
(一)建立定性分析條件 78
(二)真實樣品分析 84
伍、結論 88
陸、參考文獻 89
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject逆相高效液相層析zh_TW
dc.subject醃漬zh_TW
dc.subject甜味種楊桃zh_TW
dc.subject有機酸zh_TW
dc.subjectOrganic aciden
dc.subjectRPHPLCen
dc.subjectSweet Carambolaen
dc.subjectPicklingen
dc.title以逆相高效液相層析法分析甜味種楊桃鹽醃發酵過程中醃漬液所含有機酸之變化zh_TW
dc.titleOrganic Acid Analyses of Sweet Carambola Pickling Brines by Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatographyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor陳開憲(Kai-Hsien Chen)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳信君(Hsin-Chun Chen)
dc.subject.keyword有機酸,逆相高效液相層析,甜味種楊桃,醃漬,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordOrganic acid,RPHPLC,Sweet Carambola,Pickling,en
dc.relation.page95
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2008-08-05
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.12 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved