請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42178
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳忠仁 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsu-Wei Chien | en |
dc.contributor.author | 簡旭偉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:51:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-02 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-09-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. 2001. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 197-220.
Argote, L. 1999. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120. Barney, J. B. 2001. Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 41-56. Bassett-Jones, N. 2005. The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Diversity Management, Creativity, and Innovation: 14: 169-175. Becker, G. S. 1964. Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press. Boeker, W. 1997. Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 231-236. Bogner, W. C., & Bansal, P. 2007. Knowledge management as the basis of sustained high performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44: 165-188. Bower, D. J., & Keogh, W. 1996. Changing patterns of innovations in a process dominated industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 12: 209-220. Brown, J. S., & Duguid P. 2001. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12: 198-213. Christensen, C. M. 2003. The Innovator’s Dilemma. New York: Harper Business.x Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. 2006. Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23: 269-291. Darrow, A. L., & Kahl, D. R. 1982. A comparison of moderated regression techniques considering strength of effect. Journal of Management, 8(2): 35-47. Day, G. 1994. Continuous learning about markets. California Management Review, 36: 9-22. DeVanna, M. A., & Tichy, N. 1990. Creating the competitive organization of the 21st century: The boundaryless corporation. Human Resource Management, 29: 445-471. Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3): 147-162. Felin, T., & Hesterly W. S. 2007. The knowledge-based view nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32: 195-218. Glaser, R. 1984. Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2): 93-104. Grant, R. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 109-122. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 97-104. Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 192-206 Hamdouch, A., & Moulaert, F. 2006. Knowledge infrastructure, innovation dynamics, and knowledge generation/diffusion/accumulation processes: A comparative institutional perspective. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Journal, 19(1): 25-50. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1994. Competing For the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Hedberg, B. 1981. How organizations learn and unlearn. In: Nystrom, P.C., Starbuck, W.H. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, pp. 3-27. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. 2000-2001. Perceptions of best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the Situational Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2): 171-184. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. 1990. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regressions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Kimberly, J., & Evanisko, M. 1981. Organization innovation: The influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24: 689-713. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397. Kusunoki, K. 1997. Incapability of technological capability: A case study on product innovation in Japanese facsimile industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4: 368-382. Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111-125. Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellspring of Knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. 2004. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 735-746. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management review, 23: 242-266. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5: 14-37. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press. Nonaka, I., Toyoma, R., & Byosiere, P. A. 2001. Theory of organizational knowledge creation: understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In: Dierkes, M., et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 491-518. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28: 89-106. Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. 2004. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 541-562. Schoonhoven, C. B. 1981. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency ‘theory’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3): 349. Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. 1981. Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3): 291-300. Simon, H. A. 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization science, 2: 125-134. Sinkula, J. M. 2002. Market-based success, organizational routines, and unlearning. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 17: 253-269. Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. 2005. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 346-357. Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13: 339-352. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42178 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 知識被認為是產生新的價值創造與競爭優勢的主要原因。因此,對於公司和個人來說,知識創造變得愈來愈重要。由於知識被認為是存在於個人,而且所有的組織學習是發生在個人的腦中,所以個人的知識創造是一個重要且值得深入研究的議題。
本研究的目的是提供一個探討知識存量與知識創造的實證研究,試著找出其知識存量與知識創造的關係。除此之外,本研究同時將這些結果與組織特徵與助理教授制度限制的關係進行連結,其中組織特徵包括了組織大小與種類;另外,本研究也確認研究資源與知識創造的關係,並且證實組織特徵與制度限制的調和作用。 結果顯示,知識存量和知識創造的關係並不只是一般所認為的直線,反而呈現倒U的關係,這表示對於知識創造來說,似乎有一個最適程度的知識存量;組織特徵會產生負向調和作用,不管是組織大小或是組織種類都會適度地調和知識存量和知識創造的關係,除此之外研究資源同樣會適度地產生負向調和效果。對於研究資源來說,與知識創造的關係是正向的;組織特徵與制度限制也會對該研究資源與知識創造造成負向調和的結果。這些結果從個人觀點提供實證,而且研究結果建議知識創造不僅僅受到組織層次的因素所影響,同時也會受到制度的影響層面。另外的管理意涵是,對於想要刺激知識創造的個人與組織來說,提供充足的研究資源是必要的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Knowledge is regarded as a primary source underlying new value creation and competitive advantage. Therefore, knowledge creation is more and more important for firms and for individuals. Since knowledge is viewed as residing within the individual and all organizational learning takes place inside human heads, knowledge creation of individuals is an important issue and deserves further investigate.
The purpose of this research is to offer an empirical study that to find the relationship between knowledge stock and knowledge creation. Besides, the study also examines knowledge creation related to organizational characteristics, which include organizational size and type, and institutional constraint of assistant professorship. The study clarifies the relationship between research resource and knowledge creation and testifies the moderating effects of organizational characteristics and institutional constraint as well. The results show that the relationship between knowledge stock and knowledge creation is more than linear as assumed but inversed U-shaped, which means that there would be an optimal degree of knowledge stock for knowledge creation. Organizational characteristics are negative moderators that both organizational size and type modestly moderate the relationship. Moreover, the institutional constraint of assistant professorship negatively moderates the relationship between knowledge stock and knowledge creation modestly. For research resource, there is a positive relation between research resource and knowledge creation. Organizational characteristics and institutional constraint negatively moderate the relationship between research resource and knowledge creation as well. The results provide empirical evidences of knowledge creation from individual perspective, and it is recommended that knowledge creation could not only be affected by factors at organizational level but also at institution level. Another implication for those who try hard to stimulate knowledge creation is that it is inevitable to provide enough resource for knowledge creation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:51:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95741057-1.pdf: 356063 bytes, checksum: c39f12bc3cac2fbffd80244090f0b248 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CHAPTER 1 1
INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Purpose 4 1.3 Research Procedure 5 1.3.1 The organization of this research 5 1.3.2 Research flow 6 CHAPTER 2 7 LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESES 7 2.1 Literature Background 7 2.1.1 Knowledge creation 7 2.1.2 Individual or collective perspective 9 2.2 Hypotheses Development 13 2.2.1 Knowledge stock and knowledge creation 13 2.2.2 Research resource and knowledge creation 15 2.2.3 The moderating effect of organizational characteristics 15 2.2.3 The moderating effect of institutional constraint 20 CHAPTER 3 23 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 23 3.1 Research Framework 24 3.2 Research Hypotheses 25 3.3 Construct Measurement 27 3.3.1 Knowledge stock 27 3.3.2 Research resource 27 3.3.3 Knowledge creation 27 3.3.4 Organizational characteristics 28 3.3.5 Institutional constraint 28 3.3.6 Control variables 29 3.4 Data Collection and Sampling 31 3.5 Statistical Analysis 32 3.5.1 Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis 32 3.5.2 Negative binomial regression analysis and moderated hierarchical regression analysis 32 3.5.3 Draw the diagram of interaction effect 33 CHAPTER 4 34 RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND RESULT 34 4.1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis 34 4.2 Regression Results 36 4.2.1 Regression result between control variable and knowledge creation 37 4.2.2 Regression result between knowledge stock and knowledge creation 37 4.2.3 Regression result between research resource and knowledge creation 37 4.2.4 The moderating effect of organizational characteristics between knowledge stock and knowledge creation 38 4.2.5 The moderating effect of organizational characteristics between research resource and knowledge creation 38 4.2.6 The moderating effect of institutional constraint between knowledge stock and knowledge creation 39 4.2.7 The moderating effect of institutional constraint between research resource and knowledge creation 40 4.3 Draw the Diagram of Interaction Effect 43 4.3.1 The three-dimension diagrams of the moderating effects on the relationship between knowledge stock and knowledge creation 43 4.3.2 The three-dimension diagrams of the moderating effects on the relationship between knowledge stock and knowledge creation 44 CHAPTER 5 48 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSSIONS 48 5.1 Discussion and Implications 48 5.2 Limitation and Future Research 49 Reference 51 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 知識存量、研究資源及知識創造:組織特徵及制度限制之調和作用 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Knowledge Stock, Research Resource, and Knowledge Creation:
The Moderating Effects of Organizational Characteristics and Institutional Constraint | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 郭瑞祥 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張紹基,林博文,張時中 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 知識存量,知識創造,研究資源,組織特徵,制度限制, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Knowledge stock,Knowledge creation,Research resource,Organizational characteristics,Institutional constraint, | en |
dc.relation.page | 54 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 347.72 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。