Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42140
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林修葳
dc.contributor.authorChiang Fuen
dc.contributor.author傅強zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T00:48:56Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-02
dc.date.copyright2008-09-02
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2008-08-20
dc.identifier.citation1. Allen, D. E., and H. Mizuno (1989), “The Determinants of Corporate Capital
Structure: Japanese Evidence,” Applied Economics, 21(5), pp.569-585.
2. Barclay, M. J., C. W. Smith, and R. L. Watts (1995), “The Determinants of
Corporate Leverage and Dividend Policies,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,
Winter, pp.4-19.
3. Barnea, A., R. A. Haugen and L. W. Senbet (1985), “A Rationale for Debt Maturity
Structure and Call Provision in the Agency Theoretical Framework,” Journal of Finance, December, pp.1223-1234.
4. Baskin, J. (1989), “An Empirical Investigation of the Pecking Order Hypothesis,”
Financial Management, 18(1), Spring, pp.26-35.
5. Baxter, N. (1967), “Leverage, Risk of Ruin and the Cost of Capital,” Journal of
Finance, September, pp.395-403.
6. Bowen, R. M., L. Daley, and C. Huber (1982), “Evidence on the Existence and
Determinants of Inter-Industry Differences in Leverage,” Finance Management,
11(4), Winter, pp.10-20.
7 . Bradley, M., G. Jarrell, and E. H. Kim (1984), “On the Existence of Optimal
Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Finance, 39(3), July,
pp.857-870.
8. Brealey, R. and S. Myers (1984), Principles of Corporate Finance, New
York:McGraw-Hill.
9 . Crutchley, C. E. and R. S. Hansen (1989), “A Test of the Agency Theory of
Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage and Corporate Dividends”, Financial
Management, 18(4), Winter, pp.36-46.
10.Diamond, D. (1989), “Reputation Acquisition in Debt Markets,” Journal of
Political Economy, 88, pp.288-307.
11.Donaldson, G, (1961), “Corporate Debt Capacity,” Division of Research, Graduate
School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
12.Durand, David (1952), “Cost of Debt and Equity Funds for Business: Trends and
Problems of Measurement,” Conference on Research in Business Finance,
National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, pp.215-247.
13. Ferri, M. G., and W, H, Jones (1979), “Determinants of Financial Structure:A
New Methodological Approach,” Journal of Finance, 34(3), July, pp.631-651.
14.Kim, E. H. (1978), “A Mean-Variance Theory of Optimal Capital Structure and
Corporate Debt Capacity,” Journal of Finance, 33(1), pp.45-64.
15.Kim, W. S. and E. H. Sorensen (1986), “Evidence on the Impact of the Agency
Cost of Debt on Corporate Debt Policy,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative
Analysis, 21(2), June, pp.131-144.
16.Kraus, A. and R. H. Litzenberger (1973), “A State Preference Model of Optimal
Financial Leverage,” Journal of Finance, 28(4), September, pp.911-922.
17.Marsh, P. (1982), “The Choice Between Equity and Debt : An Empirical Study,”
Journal of Finance, 37(1), March, pp.121-144.
18.Miller, M. H.(1977), “Debt and Taxes,” Journal of Finance, 33(2), pp.261-275.
19.Modigliani, F. and M. Miller (1958), “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment,” American Economic Review, 48, pp.261-297.
20.Modigliani, F. and M. Miller (1961),“Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation
of Shares,” Journal of Business,34, pp.411-433.
21.Modigliani, F. and M. Miller (1963), “The Taxes and the Cost of Capital,” American Economic Review, 53, pp.433-443.
22.Myers, S. C. (1977), “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing,” Journal of Financial
Economics, 5, pp.147-175.
23.Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf. (1984), “Corporate Financing and Investment
Decisions when Firms have Information that Investors do not have,” Journal of
Financial Economics, 13(2), pp.187-221.
24.Schwartz, E. and J. R. Aronson (1967), “Some Surrogate Evidence in Support of
the Concept of Optimal Financial Structure,” Journal of Finance, March, pp.10-18.
25.Scott, D. F. (1972), “Evidence on the Importance of Financial Structure,” Financial
Management, Summer, pp.45-50.
26.Scott, D. F. and J. D. Martin (1975), “Industry Influence on Financial Structure,” Financial Management, 4(1), p.67.
27.Smith, C. W. (1977), “Alternative Methods For Raising Capital Rights Versus
Underwritten Offerings,” Journal of Financial and Economics, May, pp.273-307.
29.Smith, C. W. and J. B. Warner (1979), “On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of
30.Titman S. (1984), “The Effect of Capital Structure on a Firm’s Liquidation
Decision,” Journal of Financial Economics, 13, pp.137-151.
31.Titman, S. and R. Wessels (1988), “The Determinants of Capital Structure
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42140-
dc.description.abstract財務理論下資本結構最佳化的探討重點在於公司管理當局能否在既定的成長、市占率,獲利能力下找到最適的財務指標來調整公司的資本結構,使公司未來的成長性及股東的財富極大化。然而在實務上個別公司欲找出最適資本結構並非易事。由於近來高科技業成長趨緩,以台積電為例,過去三年的盈收成長小於15%,其主要大股東飛利浦亦宣佈全面出清台積電的持股。此外,2008年員工分紅費用化及2009年促進產業升級條例取消,將使得台積電的營運成本增加且公司所得稅率上升。為提昇經營績效和維持股東權益報酬率,台積電管理階層面臨資本重置及資本結構的最佳化的問題,進而激發了本研究之動機形成。
因此本研究從傳統資本結構理論出發,以加權資金成本(Rwacc)、市價帳面價值比P/B ratio (market to book value ratio) 及成長機會現值PVGO(Present Value Growth Opportunity) 為公司的價值指標推導出PVGO資本結構模型(PVGO model),並證明在PVGO極大化的情況下,個別公司應存在一最適資本結構,而且其最適資產負債比與市場無風險利率、公司的風險溢酬、舉債的資金成本率、未舉債的貝他值及盈餘保留再投資比例等決策變數相關。實務上,本研究使用此PVGO資本結構模型並且以蒙地卡羅實際模擬台積電之最適資本結構,同時探討台積電之資本結構及公司價值之關係。
依據本研究之模擬結果,現行台積電之最適財務槓桿與本模型之蒙地卡羅模擬結果一致,可見此模式對時況的描述具相當程度之適用性。面對未來員工分紅費用化及促進產業升級條例取消,將使得台積電的營運成本增加且公司所得稅率上升。本研究進一步預測台積電未來三年的財務模型,並依據本模型之蒙地卡羅模擬之結論為:台積電未來應當提高資產負債比以提昇公司價值,並建議台積電除了用保留盈餘來買回庫藏股外,應當融資並買回庫藏股,如此可以在公司總資產減少的情況下,調整最適資本結構。
最後,並希望藉本文之結論提供企業管理者調整資本結構及股權政策之參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn financial theories, the focus of Optimal Capital Structure is to examine whether the corporate management, subject to the existing growth rate, market share, and profitability, can identify the most appropriate financial indicators to adjust company’s capital structure so as to maximize the company’s future growth and the wealth of its shareholders. In practice, however, it is not an easy task for any organization to make out the most appropriate capital structure. Lately, high technology industries experienced a slowdown in growth rate. Take TSMC for example. The profit growth rate for the past 3 years has been lesser than 15%; its major shareholder, Philip, also cleared all the TSMC’s shares it held. Along with the implementation of employees’ bonus recognized as costs in 2008 and the cancellation of Statute for Upgrading Industries in 2009, all these factors will result in the increase of the operating cost and income tax of TSMC. To bolster business performance and maintain the return rate of common shareholders’ equity, TSMC is facing with the challenges of capital replacement and structuring. This has inspired me to probe into the problems of related studies.
Based upon traditional capital structure theory, I use Rwacc, Market to book value ratio, and PVGO as the company’s value indexes to obtain the PVGO model of the capital structure. I also prove that when PVGO is maximized, a company should have a capital structure to fit itself the most, and the most appropriate Asset to Liability ratio is correlated with the decision variables such as market risk-free ratio, company’s risk premium, capital cost of leverage, unlevered Beta value, and the ratio of retained capital for investment. In practice, this research applies PVGO capital structure model and Monte Carlo Method to simulate the most appropriate capital structure for TSMC, and at the same time to explore the relation between the capital structure and the company value.
According to the result of this study, I found TSMC’s existing Optimal Financial Leverage is consistent with the result of Monte Carlo Simulation, which testifies the feasibility of this model describing the present status. With the implementation of employees’ bonus recognized as costs in 2008 and the cancellation of Statute for Upgrading Industries in 2009, TSMC will have to face the impacts of increased operating costs and income tax. This study also speculates the financial model of TSMC in upcoming 3 years. Based upon Monte Carlo Simulation of this model, the conclusion of this study is as follows: In the future, TSMC should increase Asset to Liability Ratio so as to upgrade the company’s value. It is also proposed that in addition to retained earnings, TSMC should also finance funds to purchase treasury stocks. By reducing the company’s total asset, TSMC would come to the most appropriate capital structure.
Finally, I hope this paper would serve as a reference for the management when adjusting capital structure and equity policy.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:48:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-P94746015-1.pdf: 559688 bytes, checksum: 75702b548e56e1c7079f564360555d35 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 v
目錄 vi
圖目錄 xiii
表目錄 ix
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………1
第三節 研究流程與方法……………………………………………………2
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………………4
第一節 傳統資本結構理論……………………………………………4
第二節 M&M理論及M&M修正理論……………………………………4
第三節 權衡理論…………………………………………………………4
(一) 考慮破產成本………………………………………………… 4
(二) 考慮代理成本……………………………………………………5
第四節 融資順位理論…………………………………………………5
第五節 其他發表文獻………………………………………………6
(一) 公司規模……………………………………………………… 6
(二) 成長機會…………………………………………………………6
(三) 獲利能力…………………………………………………………6
(四) 股利政策………………………………………………………7
第三章 PVGO資本結構評價模式………………………………………………8
第一節 加權資金成本(Rwacc)模型之最適資本結構…………………11
第二節 P/B ratio 模型之最適資本結構…………………………………12
第三節 PVGO模型之最適資本結構…………………………………………15
第四章 PVGO資本結構模型與發表文獻比較…………………………………17
第一節 資本結構之變數定義………………………………………………17
第二節 Rwacc及P/B ration模型之分析結果………………………………19
第三節 PVGO模型資本結構模擬結果……………………………………22
第四節 PVGO模型結果與發表文獻比較…………………………………24
第五章 PVGO資本結構模型與台積電實証討論………………………………27
第一節 台積電資本重置案例………………………………………………27
第二節 PVGO模型模擬台積電最適資產負債比及建議…………………29
第六章 結論……………………………………………………………………31
第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………31
第二節 建議…………………………………………………………………32
第三節 研究限制……………………………………32
參考文獻…………………………33
圖目錄
圖1 Rwacc對資產負債比(D/E ratio)圖…………………………………………8
圖2 P/B ratio對資產負債比(D/E ratio)圖………………………………………9
圖3 PVGO對資產負債比(D/E ratio)圖………………………………………10
圖4 Rwacc模擬曲線附圖……………………………………………………20
圖5 P/B ratio 模擬曲線圖………………………………………………………21
圖6-A,B,C PVGO模擬曲線圖…………………………………………………23
圖6-D,E PVGO模擬曲線圖……………………………………………………24
圖7 Rwacc&PVGO模擬資產負債比(D/E ratio)………………………………29
圖8 蒙地卡羅模擬PVGO之模擬曲線圖………………………………………30

表目錄
表1 研究流程…………………………………………………………………3
表2 實証研究結果………………………………………………………………7
表3 Rwacc模型參數變化表………………………………………………19
表4 P/B ratio模型參數變化表……………………………………………… 20
表5 PVGO模型參數變化表………………………………………………22
表6 實証研究結果與本研究研究結果之比較表…………………………26
表7 台積電財報(2008-2010)…………………………………………………28
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject成長機會現值zh_TW
dc.subject市價帳面價值比zh_TW
dc.subject加權資金成本zh_TW
dc.subjectPresent Value Growth Opportunityen
dc.subjectRwaccen
dc.subjectMarket to book value ratioen
dc.title資本結構最佳化理論:台積電個案研究zh_TW
dc.titleThe Thesis of Optimal Capital Structure:A Case Study of tsmcen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee柯承恩,陳思寬
dc.subject.keyword加權資金成本,成長機會現值,市價帳面價值比,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordRwacc,Market to book value ratio,Present Value Growth Opportunity,en
dc.relation.page45
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2008-08-20
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
546.57 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved