Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42119
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃崇興(Chung-Hsing Huang)
dc.contributor.authorCheng-Lung Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳正榮zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T00:47:47Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-02
dc.date.copyright2008-09-02
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2008-08-22
dc.identifier.citation中文參考文獻
工研院電子所企業策略規劃部,1991,1991 半導體工業年鑑:IC工業篇,工研院電子所。
工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心,1999,1999 半導體工業年鑑,工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心。
工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心,2002,2002 電子零組件工業年鑑,工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心。
工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心,2007,2007 半導體工業年鑑,工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心。
王之杰a,2007,台灣IC 設計業的發展與挑戰,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
王之杰b,2007,類比IC 異軍突起,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
王文科,1998,四版,教育研究法,台北市:五南。
白錦門,1994,個案法之研究,教育研究方法論文集,台北市:台灣書店。
石克強,王之杰,楊淑慧,2007,IC 設計服務變身虛擬整合大廠,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
台灣半導體產業協會(TSIA),2008,TSIA 2007 全年度台灣IC 產業營運成果總體分析,新聞稿,台灣半導體產業協會。
台灣經濟研究院,1992,92'資訊電子工業年鑑,全華科技圖書公司。
李永健,楊淑慧,2007,IC 設計挑戰M 型產業限制,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
李吉仁,2004,國際企業經營策略,上課教材。
李明軒,邱如美譯,1999,競爭優勢,天下文化。Porter, Michael E. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York, Free Press.
李明譯,2004,成長力:持續獲利的策略,天下文化。Charan, Ram 2004. Profitable growth is everyone’s business: 100 tools you can use Monday morning. Crown.
李雅明,2000,半導體的故事,新新聞文化事業。
汪貫中,張凌嘉,2003,台積電與晶圓代工產業,台灣大學國際企業研究所未出版之教學個案。
吳田玉,2008,New Dynamics in the Semiconductor World: What you Need to Know,田長霖講座,玉山科技月刊79 期。
吳金榮,2007,全球IC 設計大趨勢,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
吳重雨,王之杰,2007,國際IC 設計業的核心競爭力,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
吳凱琳譯,2007,創新的兩難,台北:商週出版。Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. TheInnovator’s Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
吳誠文,2008,台灣IC 設計的十字路口,簡報資料,工研院系統晶片技術中心。
周旭華譯,1998,競爭策略,天下文化。Porter, Michael E. 1980. Competitive Strategy.New York, Free Press.
孟鈞祥,2007,中國IC 設計急起直追,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
尚榮安譯,2001,個案研究,台北市:弘智文化。Robert K. Yin, 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publication.
拓墣產業研究所半導體研究中心a,2007,加速起飛的中國IC 設計產業,拓墣產業研究所。
拓墣產業研究所半導體研究中心b,2007,類比IC: 台灣半導體明日之星,拓墣產業研究所。
拓墣產業研究所半導體研究中心c,2007,舊產品新籃海-IC 設計趨勢大剖析,拓墣產業研究所。
范珍輝,龍冠海主編,1971,雲五社會科學大辭典(第一冊):社會學,台北:臺灣商務印書館。
哈佛商業評論,2000,成長策略,台北市:天下遠見出版。
宣明智,2004,管理的樂章,天下文化。
真如譯,1996,基業長青,智庫文化。Collins, Jim, & Porras, Jerry I., 1994. Built to Last.Harper。
財訊編輯部a,2007,IC 設計七大流程,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
財訊編輯部b,2007,千變萬化只有三種名字,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
財訊編輯部c,2007,個人電腦孕育台灣IC 設計產業,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
財訊編輯部d,2007,從零開始的IC 設計業,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
財訊編輯部e,2007,數位電視晶片開創新商機,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
財訊編輯部f,2007,點矽成金的財富特快車,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
張芬芬譯,2005,質性研究資料分析,雙葉書廊有限公司。Miles, B. Matthew & Huberman, A. Michael 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publication.
張順教,2003,高科技產業經濟分析:半導體、通訊、網路經濟學,雙葉書廊。
張瓊文,2007,國際IC 設計大廠風雲榜,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
陳建宏,2004,台灣IC 設計產業經營模式探討,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳致榮,2001,個案研究法,輔仁大學圖書資訊學系碩士班,研究方法課程報告。
陳雪玉,1987,個案法之研究,載於臺北市教師研習中心編,教育研究法之介紹,臺北:臺北市教師研習中心。
黃光雄,簡茂發,1996,修訂版四版,教育研究法,台北市:師大書苑。
黃德歡,2002,改變世界的納米技術,瀛舟出版社。
湯明哲,2003,策略精論:基礎篇,天下文化。
新電子科技雜誌,2005,2005 電子工業市場年鑑,城邦文化。
電子時報網站,http://member.digitimes.com.tw/。
電子時報,2001,半導體趨勢圖示,大椽股份有限公司。
電子時報,2002,矽導新勢力:半導體與零組件產業趨勢,大椽股份有限公司。
葉重新,2001,初版,教育研究法,台北市:心理。
趙碧華、朱美貞編譯,2000,研究方法,學富文化事業有限公司。Ribin, Allen, & Babbie, Earl. 1995. Research Methods for Social Work.. Brooks Cole.
劉常勇,2002,創業管理的十二堂課,台北:天下遠見。
劉常勇,2004,科技創新管理,高雄:國立中山大學。
劉常勇,2005,創新管理,高雄:國立中山大學。
數位時代,2006,蔡明介如何打造第三個S,數位時代,
http://www.bnext.com.tw/LocalityView_862。
蔡明介,林宏文整理,2001,競爭力的探求:IC 設計、高科技產業實戰策略與觀察,財訊。
蔡明介,2007,王宏文,IC 設計業的四個致勝要素,收錄於IC 設計產業版圖,台北,財訊出版社。
鄭吉峰,文馨瑩,2005,IC 設計產業,台灣大學國際企業研究所未出版之教學個案。
謝凱宇、林舒柔譯,2004,現代策略管理:觀念、技巧、應用,科大文化事業股份有限公司。Grant, Robert M. 2004. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts,
techniques, applications. 4th ed. Wiley-Blackwell.
簡志勝,2007,蛻變中的IC 設計業經營探討,工研院產業經濟與資訊服務中心。
Reference
12 Management Website. http://www.12manage.com/methods_greiner.html
Antle, R., & Fellingham, J. 1990. Resource rationing and organizational slack in a two-period model. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1): 1-24
Baden-Fuller, C., & Stopford, J. M. 1992. Rejuvernating the mature business.London, Routledge.
Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10): 1231-1241.
Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, xx(x): 99-120.
Betz, F. 1993. Strategic Technology Management. New York, McGraw Hill.
Bourgeois, L.J. III 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6: 29-39.
Burgelman, R. A. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major form. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223-244.
Child, J. 1972. Organizational structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(01): 2-22.
Christensen, J. F., & Foss, N. J. 1997. Competence-based Strategic Management. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series, 4(16 ): 386-405.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1988. The influence of organizational structure on the utility of the entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of management Studies, 25: 217-234.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 75-87.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1991a. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 16: 7-25.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. 1991b, Entrepreneurial versus conservative firms: A comparison of strategies and performance , Journal of Management Studies, 28: 439-462.
Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
D’Aveni, R. 1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York, Free Press: 217-218
Delbecq, A. L., & Mills, P. K. 1985. Managerial practices that enhance innovation. Organizational Dynamics, Sum, 14(1): 24-34.
Deming, W. E. 1982. Out of crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Assets stock accumulation and sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35(12): 1504-1511.
Drucker, P. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York, Harper & Row.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1105-1121.
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. 2004. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 909-928.
Freeman, 1987. Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London, Pinter press.
Garvin, D. A., & Levesque, L. C. 2006. Meeting the challenge of corporate entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review (Oct.).
Geiger, S. W., & Makri, M. 2006. Exploration and exploitation innovation processes: The role of organizational slack in R & D intensive firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(1): 97-108.
Gorman, P., Thomas, H., & Sanchez, R. 1996. Industry dynamics in competence-based competition. In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, and H. Thomas (eds.), Dynamics of competence-based competition: theory and practice in the new strategic management. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, Elservier Science Ltd. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. 1996. Value creation by firms. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceeding, : 41-45.
Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. 2005. Building breakthrough businesses within established organizations. Harvard Business Review (May).
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3): 114-135.
Greiner, L. E. 1972. Evolution and Revolution as Organization Grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4): 37-46.
Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83-103.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1989. Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review, 67(3): 63-76.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1993. Strategy: as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2): 75-84.
Hampden-Turner, C. 1990. Charting the corporate Mind. Blackwell, New York, Oxford and Free Press.
Helfat, C. E. 2000. The evolution of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10): 955-959.
Iansiti, M. 2004. The Semiconductor Industry 2002. Harvard Business School.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
Kim, D.J., & Kogut, B. 1996. Technological platforms and diversification. Organization Science, 7(3): 283-301.
Kim, W.C., & Mauborgne, R. 1997. Value innovation: The strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Reviews, (Jan.-Feb.):103-112.
Leibenstein, H. 1969. Organizational or frictional equilibria, X-efficiency, and the rate of innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, (83): 600-625
Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development, Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111-125.
Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. 1982. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 2418-2438.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G, 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21: 135-172.
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5): 363-380.
Majumdar, S. K., & Venkataraman, S. 1993. New technology adoption in US telecommunications: The role of competitive pressures and firm-level inducements. Research Policy, 22(5-6): 521-536.
Myers, S.C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5: 147-175.
Miller, D. 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three type of firms. Management Science, 29: 770-791.
Morita, A. 1986. Made in Japan. New York, Dutton. Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. 1993. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2): 137-153.
Nohria, N. and Gulati, R. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy ofManagement Journal, 39: 1245-1264.
Palmer, T. B., & Wiseman, R. M. 1999. Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal, 20(11): 1037-1062.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York, NY: John Wiley, & Sons.
Peterraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantages: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179-191.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3): 79-91.
Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. 1990. Cause ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 88-102.
Rouse, M. J., & Daellenbach, U. S. 1999. Rethinking research methods for the resource-based perspective: Isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 487-494.
Rumelt, R. P. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. B. Lamb(Eds.), Competitive Strategic Management, New York, NY: Prentice-Hall Inc: 556-570.
Sanchez, R., Heene, A. & Thomas, H. 1996. Introduction: Towards the theory and practice of competence-based competition, In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, and H. Thomas (eds.), Dynamics of competence-based competition: theory and practice in the new strategic management,: 1-35. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, Elservier Science Ltd.
Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. 1996. A systems view of competence-based competition, In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, and H. Thomas (eds.), Dynamics of competence-based competition: theory and practice in the new strategic management,: 40-61. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, Elservier Science Ltd.
Sanchez, R., & Thomas, H. 1996. Strategic goals, In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, and H. Thomas (eds.), Dynamics of competence-based competition: theory and practice in the new strategic managemen,: 63-82. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, Elservier Science Ltd.
Sanchez, R. 1996. “Quick-Connect' technologies for product creation: implications for competence-based competition, In R. Sanchez, A. Heene, and H. Thomas (eds.), Dynamics of competence-based competition: theory and practice in the new strategic management,: 299-318. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, Elservier Science Ltd.
Schumpeter J. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. A. 1936. The theory of economy development. U.K., Cambridge University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1950. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (3rd edn..). New York, Harper & Row.
Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. 1990. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 11: 17-27.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research, Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217-226.
Singh, J. V. 1983. Performance, slack and risk taking in strategic decisions: Test of a structural equations model. Doctoral dissertation. Stanford University.
Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, (29): 562-585.
Singh, J.V. 1986. Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562-585.
Stalk, G. Jr., & Hout, T. 1990. Competing against time. New York, Free press. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, & A. Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7): 509-533.
Wernerfelt, B., 1984, A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-180.
Wikipedia Website. http://www.wikipedia.com.tw/
Williamson O. E. 1963. A model of rational managerial behavior. In R. M.. Cyert & J. G. March (Eds.), A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall,: 237-252
Williamson O. E. 1964. The economics of discretionary behavior: Managerial objectives in a theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
Williamson, O. E. 1991, Strategizing, economizing, and economic Organization. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 75-94.
Williamson, O. E. 1999, Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 20(12): 1087-1180.
Yin, R.K., 1994. Case Study Research :Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
Zahra, S. A. 1991. Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4): 259-285.
Zahra, S. A., 1993. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financialperformance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of business Venturing, 8: 319-340.
Zajac, E. J., Golden, B. R., & Shortell, S. M. 1991. New organizational forms for enahncing innovation: The case of internal corporate joint ventures. Management Sciences, 37(2): 170-184.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/42119-
dc.description.abstract永續經營是企業追求的終極目標,而保持不斷地成長便是達成永續經營的基石。然而,身處在競爭的商業環境,如何持續成長,卻是企業經營者每天最常面對與最需克服的挑戰。本論文試圖透過一個深度個案的研究,探討企業在快速變動環境中,如何能夠掌握能耐發展的軌跡,達成事業成長的目的,同時,觀察解析影響能耐發展軌跡的管理因素。
本研究選擇IC設計公司為研究系絡,主要著眼於IC設計公司的成長常有「一代拳王」的現象,亦即IC設計公司的經營績效,常常在明星產品生命週期結束、銷售下滑後,便無以為繼,甚至落入經營困難的窘境。透過個案公司詳細的事業成長軌跡的探索,本研究可以對於上述現象提出深入的解析。
本研究發現,中小型IC設計公司由於資源有限,因此採用利基市場策略,並選擇性的投入創新與產品開發。利基型IC設計公司發展的初期,針對單一利基市場投入創新與產品開發,當順利站穩市場之後,則在該市場中繼續尋找新的產品機會,擴大其產品版圖,同時也開始建構技術平台,著手延伸不同的產品線,並重複既有發展策略。利基型IC設計公司,運用以電腦基礎與設計基礎的快速連接的技術,快速延伸既有能耐,迎合市場需求。同時,採用多元機會追尋的產品發展策略,結合對既有能耐與組織剩餘之良好管理,在組織制度的配合下,持續產品的開發,來啟發創新,建構能耐。面對多元的機會,在能耐基礎競爭的運作架構下,持續建構與延伸能耐,掌握利基市場,形成利基型IC設計公司的多元利基策略。多元利基作為IC設計公司的成長策略,從個案研究中,發現多元利基策略為企業所帶來的成長速度,雖然緩慢,但是相對穩健,當利基市場有機會順利發展成為主流市場,利基型IC設計公司便順勢成長。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPursuing long term growth is a central goal for every business. However, to sustain growth firms have to face and conquer all sorts of challenge from both internal
and external environment. Based on an in-depth case study, the present research attempts to explore the issue of how an entrepreneurial company manages its trajectory of competence development along the growth path so that successful business expansion can be achieved. In addition, through such research exploration, we intend to
untangle critical managerial factors affecting the trajectory of competence development. This case-base research chooses the growth processes of a medium size IC design company located in Taiwan as empirical context. The growth of IC design companies has been criticized as being frequently encountered a short life expectancy, so called
“short life of boxer champion” phenomenon. In short, the sustainability of product innovation of an IC design firm is hard to maintain in a competitive environment. Based
on a longitudinal observation on the growth of case firm, our study could provide insights to the growth sustainability issue. Our study found that small and medium size IC design companies adopt niche market strategy and conduct innovation and product development selectively. In the early stage of a niche-type IC design company, it focused on a single niche market by product development and innovation. After entering the supply chain successfully, the
company continues to look for another new product opportunity in the same product field and try to enlarge the product mix in this product field. Meanwhile, the company starts to build up multiple product lines and tries to create technical platforms to leverage the existing competence. The niche-type IC design company adopts computer-based and design-based, quick-connect technology to leverage the existing competence and meet the market needs. With the organization system and proper management of the existing competence and organizational slack, the company adopts market diversification strategy to guide the new product development activities, initiate innovation, and build up new competence. Facing market opportunities, the company follows competence-based
competition model with continuously building and leveraging competences, and catches the niche market by using diversified niche strategy. For an IC design firm, diversified niche strategy could be a viable growth strategy although it might expand slowly as the niche market turns into volume market. Implications to the existing theory and suggestions for companies struggling for growth are discussed.
Keywords:IC Design Company, Growth Strategy, Competence-Based Competition, Organization Slack, Diversified-Niche Strategy
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:47:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-R92741016-1.pdf: 1901125 bytes, checksum: b5fe09c2e163baa959f6423b91be8139 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書………………………………………………… i
誌謝辭……………………………………………………………… iii
中文摘要…………………………………………………………… v
ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………… vii
目錄………………………………………………………………… ix
圖目錄……………………………………………………………… xi
表目錄……………………………………………………………… xiii
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究動機與研究背景…………………………………… 1
第二節 研究問題與研究目的…………………………………… 7
第三節 研究方法與研究設計…………………………………… 10
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………… 15
第一節 組織與資源基礎觀點理論……………………………… 15
第二節 能耐基礎競爭理論……………………………………… 25
第三節 組織成長與成長策略…………………………………… 38
第四節 創新、興業精神與企業興業精神……………………… 43
第五節 組織餘裕與創新………………………………………… 52
第三章 研究方法與研究設計…………………………………… 57
第一節 質性研究法與研究法的選擇…………………………… 57
第二節 個案研究法……………………………………………… 59
第三節 個案研究法的優缺點…………………………………… 61
第四節 個案研究的步驟………………………………………… 64
第五節 研究品質的控制………………………………………… 68
第六節 研究設計………………………………………………… 69
第七節 個案公司選擇的考量因素……………………………… 71
第八節 研究範圍與研究限制…………………………………… 72
第四章 半導體產業與IC設計產業簡介………………………… 75
第一節 產業的現況……………………………………………… 75
第二節 產業結構………………………………………………… 79
第三節 IC設計產業的特性與挑戰……………………………… 87
第五章 個案公司介紹…………………………………………… 91
第一節 個案公司的歷史演進…………………………………… 91
第二節 個案公司的技術軌跡與產品發展………………………112
第六章 個案公司成長策略分析…………………………………127
第一節 快速連接技術與能耐基礎競爭…………………………127
第二節 能耐基礎競爭理論與成長策略…………………………141
第三節 組織餘裕的運用與能耐建構……………………………146
第四節 多元市場機會與能耐建構………………………………153
第五節 多元利基策略……………………………………………160
第六節 與其他IC設計公司之比較………………………………164
第七章 結論與建議………………………………………………171
第二節 結論………………………………………………………171
第三節 後續建議…………………………………………………174
附錄 半導體產業與IC設計產業…………………………………177
第一節 全球與台灣半導體產業的發展…………………………177
第二節 半導體產業的產業結構…………………………………193
第三節 半導體產品………………………………………………200
第四節 半導體產業的特性………………………………………206
第五節 半導體產業的現況、趨勢與挑戰………………………208
第六節 全球與台灣IC設計產業發展……………………………213
第七節 IC設計產業的產業結構…………………………………219
第八節 IC設計產業的特性………………………………………222
第九節 IC設計產業的應用領域…………………………………226
第十節 IC設計產業的現況、趨勢與挑戰………………………233
中文參考文獻 ……………………………………………………241
Reference (English) …………………………………………245
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject基策&#63862zh_TW
dc.subjectIC 設計公司zh_TW
dc.subject成長策&#63862zh_TW
dc.subject能耐基礎競爭zh_TW
dc.subject組織剩餘zh_TW
dc.subject多元&#63965zh_TW
dc.subjectOrganization Slacken
dc.subjectDiversified-Niche Strategyen
dc.subjectIC Design Companyen
dc.subjectGrowth Strategyen
dc.subjectCompetence-Based Competitionen
dc.title利基型IC 設計公司成長策略之個案研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Case Study on the Growth Strategy of a Niche IC Design Companyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉恆逸(Heng-Yih Liu)
dc.subject.keywordIC 設計公司,成長策&#63862,能耐基礎競爭,組織剩餘,多元&#63965,基策&#63862,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordIC Design Company,Growth Strategy,Competence-Based Competition,Organization Slack,Diversified-Niche Strategy,en
dc.relation.page250
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2008-08-25
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.86 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved