請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41984
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 余玉眉(Yu ChaoYu-Mei) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shu-Ling Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳淑齡 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:40:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-12-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-12-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-09-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
丁志音(1999)•田野方法與參與觀察:在衛生教育的運用與價值.於余玉眉、田聖芳、蔣欣欣編著,質性研究:田野研究法於護理學之應用 (pp.185-213)•台北:巨流。 王秀雲(2000)•有關西方女傳教士與中國個案的幾個歷史問題:從文獻談起• 近代中國個案史研究,8,237-252。 石中英(2004)•行動研究本體論假設的再思考•教師教育研究,16(4),71-75。 衣若蘭(1999)•從「三姑六婆」看明代父女與社會•未發表碩士論文,台北:師大歷史研究所。 成令方(2000)•當女人與婦產科醫師相遇•台灣2000性別與醫療工作坊會意論文˙新竹:國立清華大學歷史所科技史組。 成令方(2002)•醫用關係的身體、知識與權力•台灣社會學,3,11-71。 李貞德(1999)•漢唐之間的女性醫療照顧者•台大歷史學報,23,123-156。 李怡娟(1997)•行動研究在護理上的應用•護理研究,5(5),463-468。 李憶微(2004)•菩薩行中的我與場域:一個女性學佛者在宗教社會服務的行動探究˙應用心理研究,23,105-130。 李瑞全(2005)•基本的道德原則•摘自中央大學哲學系網路教學http://www.ncu.edu.tw/~phi/teachers/lee_shui_chuen/teaching_refer.html 林文斌(2001)•性、女體、手術刀•台北:天下遠見。 侯本昕(2003)•生命中的第一次: 婦女第一次接受骨盆腔檢查的經驗•未發表碩士論文,台北:台灣大學護理學研究所。 許純琪(2002)•醫病關係中的告知後同意•未發表碩士論文,台北:台大法律學研究所。 許玉雲、陳彰惠(1999)•身體心像概念分析•護理雜誌,46(6),103-109。 黃彥莉(2001)•「遊戲間」還是支配場域?--診療室的醫病互動關係•未發表碩士論文,台北:台大社會學研究所。 黃志中、王秀紅(2003)•女性與醫療環境•護理雜誌,50(5),16-21。 黃達夫(1999)•用心聆聽—黃達夫改寫醫病關係•台北:天下遠見。 陳宛辰(1998)•探討婦女子宮頸抹片檢查行為—以質性內容分析法論述之•未發表碩士論文,台北:台灣大學公共衛生學研究所。 陳玟秀(2003)•身體心像,於余玉眉總校閱,婦女健康(初版,311-336頁)•台北:華杏。 葉海煙(2006)•護理關懷的哲學反思及其意義向度•護理雜誌,53(3),27-33。 陶蕃瀛(2004)•行動研究:一種增強權能的助人工作方法•應用心理研究,23,33-48。 張秀如、余玉眉(2007)•身體觀點--體現與身體心像•護理雜誌,54(3),77-81。 張芬芬(2001)•研究者必須中立客觀嗎:行動研究的知識論與幾個關鍵問題•於中國民國課程與教學學會主編,行動研究與課程教學革新 (一版,1-32頁)•台北:揚智。 詹文凱(1998)•隱私權之研究•未發表博士論文,台北:台大法律學研究所。 蔣欣欣、張碧芬、余玉眉(2001)•從護理人員角色的創造探討護理倫理的實踐• 哲學雜誌,37,88-103。 蔣欣欣、余玉眉(2001)•護病間的互為主體性•國立政治大學哲學學報,7, 307-322。 蔣欣欣(2001)•由性加害者的照顧反思護理倫理議題•護理雜誌,48(2),33-36。 蔡甫昌(2000)•生命倫理四原則方法•醫學教育,4(2),140-154。 蔡甫昌(2003)•生診療室中的道德議題之ㄧ~從醫病關係談起•台北市醫師公 會會刊,47(3),43-47。 蔡甫昌、謝博生(2003)•醫師專業精神與醫療組織倫理•台灣醫學, 7(4), 587-601。 潘世尊(2005)•教育行動研究—理論、實踐與反省•台北:心理。 鄭麗寶(1990)•醫療過程中人際互動的社會學分析•未發表碩士論文,台北: 國立台灣大學社會學研究所。 戴玉慈(2003).科學誠正指引(第二版).台北:台灣護理學會。 Fetterman, D. M. (2000)•民俗誌學(賴文福譯)•台北:弘智。(原著出版於1989) Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993)•行動研究方法導論(夏林清譯)•台北:遠流。(原著出版於1997) 英文部分 Altman, I. (1976). Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment Behavior, 8, 7-29. Anderberg, P., Lepp, M., Berglund, A.L., & Segesten, K. (2007). Preserving dignity in caring for older adults: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59(6), 635-43. Anderson, L., & Wilson, S. (1997). Critical incident technique. In D.L. Whetze & G.R. Wheaton (Eds.), Applied Measurement Methods in Industrial Psychology (pp. 89-112). Bäck, E., & Wikblad, K. (1998). Privacy in hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(5), 940-945. Beach, M. C., Roter, D. L., Wang, N. Y., Duggan, P. S., & Cooper, L. A. (2006). Are physicians' attitudes of respect accurately perceived by patients and associated with more positive communication behaviors? Patient Education and Counseling, 62(3), 347-354. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics(5th ed.). New York: Oxford University. Beech, P., & Norman, I. J. (1995). Patients' perceptions of the quality of psychiatric nursing care: Findings from a small-scale descriptive study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 4(2), 117-23. Bensing, J. (1991). Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 32(11), 3201-3210. Birkett, M. (1995). Is audit action research. Physiotherapy, 81(4), 190-194. Björklund, M., & Fridlund, B. (1999). Cancer patients' experiences of nurses' behaviour and health promotion activities: A critical incident analysis. European Journal of Cancer Care, 8(4), 204-12. Bottorff, J. L., & Morse, J. M. (1994). Identifying types of attending: Patterns of nurses' work. Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 26(1), 53-60. Broström, A., Strömberg, A., Dahlström, U., & Fridlund, B. (2003). Congestive heart failure, spouses' support and the couple's sleep situation: A critical incident technique analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(2), 223-233. Browne, A. (1993). A conceptual clarification of respect. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(2), 211-217. Buber, M. (1975). Distance and relation. Psychiatry, 20, 97-104. Carper, B. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1(1), 13-23. Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky, T. (1990). Body Image: Development, deviance, and change. New York: Guilford Press. Chandler, P. J., Chandler, C., & Dabbs, M. L. (2000). Provider gender preference in obstetrics and gynecology: A military population. Military Medicine, 165(12), 938-940. Cissna, L., & Sieburg, E. (1981). Patterns of international confirmation and disconfirmation. In C. Wilder-Mott & J. H. Weakland (Eds.), Rigor & imagination: Essays from legacy of Gregory Bateson (pp. 253-82). New York: Praeger Publishbers. Clouser, K. D. (1995). Common morality as an alternative to principlism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5(3), 219-236. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(2), 1667-1676. Cox, K., Bergen, A., & Norman, I. J. (1993). Exploring consumer views of care provided by the Macmillan nurse using the critical incident technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(3), 408-15. Cullen, C. (1993). Patients and healers in late imperial China: Evidence from the Jinpingmei. History of Science, 31, 99-149. Debrovner, CH., & Shubin-Stein, R. (1975). Psychological aspects of vaginal examination. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 9, 163-164. Donegan, J. B. (1978). cited in Wertz, R. W., & Wertz, D. C. (1977). Lying-in: A history of childbirth in America. New Haven: Yale University. Domar, A. D. (1986) Psychological aspects of the pelvic exam: Individual needs and physician involvement. Women and Health, 10, 75-90. Drew, N. (1986). Exclusion and confirmation: A phenomenology of patient’s experiences with caregivers. Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 18(2), 39-42. Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. The journal of the American Medical Association, 267(16), 2221-6. Engelhardt, H. T. (1996). The foundations of bioethics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Eriksson, U., & Svedlund, M. (2007). Struggling for confirmation--patients' experiences of dissatisfaction with hospital care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(3), 438-46. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Buletinl, 51(4), 327–58. Fetters, M. D., Masuda, Y., & Sano, K. (2003). Japanese women's perspectives on pelvic examinations in the United States. Looking behind a cultural curtain. The Journal of reproductive medicine, 48(3), 194-200. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books. Freidson, E. (1970). Professionalism: The doctors’ dilemma. Social Policy, 1(5), 35-40. Garvin, B. J., & Kennedy, C. W. (1988). Confirming communication of nurses in interaction with physicians. Journal of Nursing Education, 27, 161-166. Glen, S., & Jownally, S. (1995). Privacy: A key nursing concept. British Journal of Nursing, 4(2), 69-72. Greenwood, J. (1984). ‘Nursing research: A position paper.’ Journal of Advanced Nursing, 9(1), 77-82. Guiffre, P. A., & Williams, C. (2000). Not just Bodies: Strategies for desexualizing the physical examination of patients. Gender & Society, 14(3), 457-482. Gupta, S., Hogan, R., & Kirkman, R. J. (2001). Experience of the first pelvic examination. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 6(1), 34-8. Hennigen, L., Kollar, L. M., & Rosenthal, S. L. (2000). Methods for managing pelvic examination anxiety: Individual differences and relaxation techniques. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 14(1), 9-12. Hart, E. (1996). Action research as a professionalizing strategy: Issues and dilemmas. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(3), 454-61 Henslin, J. M., & Biggs, M. A. (1985). The sociology of the vaginal examination. In J. M. Henslin, Down to earth sociology (pp.128-140). New York: The Free Press. Hilden, M., Sidenius, K., Langhoff-Roos, J., Wijma, B., & Schei, B. (2003). Women's experiences of the gynecologic examination: Factors associated with discomfort. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 82, 1030–1036. Holter, I. M., & Schwartz-Barcott, D. (1993). Action research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(2), 298-304. Hope, K. W., & Waterman, H. A. (2003). Praiseworthy pragmatism? Validity and action research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(2), 120-7. Inness, J. C. (1992). Privacy, intimacy, and isolation. New York: Oxford University Press. Keatinge, D. (2002). Versatility and flexibility: Attributes of the critical incident technique in nursing research. Nursing & Health Sciences, 4(1-2), 33-39. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N.K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567-605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kemppainen, J. K. (2000). The critical incident technique and nursing care quality research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(5), 1264-1271. Kleinman, A. (1980). Patients and healers in the context of culture: An exploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine, and psychiatry. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. Larsen, M., Oldeide, C. C., & Malterud, K. (1997). Not so bad after all…Women’s experiences of pelvic examinations. Family Practice, 14(2), 148-152. Larsen, S. B., & Kragstrup, J. (1995). Experiences of the first pelvic examination in a random sample of Danish teenagers. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 74, 137-141. Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 23-46. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Liao, C. C., Wang, H. Y., Lin, R. S., Hsieh, C. Y., & Sung, F. C. (2006). Addressing Taiwan's high incidence of cervical cancer: Factors associated with the Nation's low compliance with Papanicolaou screening in Taiwan. Public Health, 120(12), 1170-1176. Ludwig, H. (1999). Thoughts on the patient–doctor relationship in obstetrics and gynecology. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 85(1), 85-91. Mairis, E. D. (1994). Concept clarification in professional practice--dignity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(5), 947-53 McCarthy, V. (1997). The first pelvic examination. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 11(5), 247-249. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2004).Action research: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge/Falmer. McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need know about action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (2003). You and your action research project (2nd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer. McQueen, A. (2006). Commentary on Wright D, Fenwick J, Stephenson P & Monterosso L (2005) Speculum 'self insertion': a pilot study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(6), 794-797. Meigs, C. D. (1854). cited in Sandelowski, M. (2000). This Most Dangerous Instrument: Propriety, Power, and the Vaginal Speculum. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 29(1), 73-92. Meyer, J. E. (1993). New paradigm research in practice: The trials and tribulations of action research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(7), 1066-72. Michael, J. R. (1994). Privacy and human rights : An international and comparative study, with special reference to developments in information technology. Brookfield, Vt.: Dartmouth Pub. Misher, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Mulcahy, V.E. (1995). Women’s experiences with pelvic examinations: A phenomenological study. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Toronto, Canada. Nåden, D., & Sæteren, B. (2006). Cancer patients' perception of being or not being confirmed. Nursing Ethics, 13(3), 222-235. Norman, I. J., Redfern, S. J., Tomalin, D. A., & Oliver, S. (1992). Developing Flanagan's critical incident technique to elicit indicators of high and low quality nursing care from patients and their nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(5), 590-600. Oakeshott, P., & Hay, P. (2006). Best practice in primary care. British Medical Journal, 333 (7560), 173-4. Ong, L. M., de Haes, J. C., Hoos, A. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995). Doctor–patient communication: A review of the literature, Social Science & Medicine, 40(7), 903–918. Oscarsson, M., &. Benzein, E. (2002). Women's experiences of pelvic examination: An interview study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 23(1), 17-25. Oscarsson, M.G., Benzein, E.G., & Wijma, B.E. (2007). The first pelvic examination. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetric & Gynecology, 28(1), 7-12. Osofsky, H. J. (1967). Women’s reactions to pelvic examination. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 30(1), 146-151. Parrott, R., Burgoon, J. K., Burgoon, M., & LePoire, B. A. (1989). Privacy between physicians and patients: More than a matter of confidentiality. Social Science & Medicine, 29(12), 1381-1385. Parsons, T. (1951). The social structure and dynamic process: The case of modern medicine. In T. Parsons (Ed.), The social system (pp. 428-479). Glencoe, lll.: Free Press. Perry, L. (1997). Critical incidents, crucial issues: Insights into the working lives of registered nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 6(2), 131-7. Polit, D., & Hungler, B. P. (2004). Nursing research, principles and methods, 7th ed. Philadelphia: IB Lippincott. Pullman, D. (1999). The ethics of autonomy and dignity in long-term care. Canadian Journal of Aging, 18, 26-46. Rawnsley, M. M. (1980). The concept of privacy. Advances in Nursing Science, 2 (2), 25-31. Reason, P. (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. London: Sage. Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participatory inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.324-339). New York: SAGE. Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (1981). Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Reddy, D. M., & Wasserman, S. A. (1997). Patient anxiety during gynecologic examinations. Behavioral indicators. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 42(10), 631-636. Ricciardi, R. (2000). First pelvic examination in the adolescent. Nurse Practitioner Forum, 11(3), 161-9. Rizk, D. E., El-Zubeir, M. A., Al-Dhaheri, A. M., Al-Mansouri, F. R., & Al-Jenaibi, H. S. (2005). Determinants of women's choice of their obstetrician and gynecologist provider in the UAE. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 84(1), 48-53. Rosenal, L. (1995). Exploring the learner's world: Critical incident methodology. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 26(3), 115-8. Rous, B., & McCormack, K. (2006). ‘Critical incident technique: A valuable research tool for early intervention’. Retrieved from http://www.ihdi.uky.edu/nectc/Documents/researchSpotlight/NECTCSpotlight2.pdf on 18 November 2007. Rubin, R. (1984). The self and body image. In Reva R (Ed). Maternal identity and maternal experience (pp. 12-24). New York: Springer. Rundqvist, E. M., & Severinsson, E. (1999). Caring relationships with patients suffering from dementia--An interview study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(4), 800-807. Salander, P., & Henriksson, R. (2005). Severely diseased lung cancer patients narrate the importance of being included in a helping relationship. Lung Cancer, 50(2), 155-162. Sandelowski, M. (2000). This most dangerous instrument: Propriety, power, and the vaginal speculum. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 29(1), 73-92. Schilder, P. (1970). The body & appearance of human body. New York: International Universities. Schluter, J., Seaton, P., & Chaboyer, W. (2008). Critical incident technique: A user's guide for nurse researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61(1), 107-14. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Seehusen, D. A., Johnson, D. R., Earwood, J. S., Sethuraman, S. N., Cornali, J., Gillespie K, et al. (2006). Improving women's experience during speculum examinations at routine gynaecological visits: Randomised clinical trial. British Medical Journal, 333(7560), 171-173. Severinsson, E. I. (2001). Confirmation, meaning and self-awareness as core concepts of the nursing supervision model. Nursing Ethics, 8(1), 36-44. Sharoff, L. (2007). Critical incident technique utilization in research on holistic nurses. Holistic Nursing Practice, 21(5), 254-62. Suchman, A. L., Markakis, K., Beckman, H. B., & Frankel, R. (1997). A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(8), 678-682. Switzerland, H. (1980). The doctor-patient dialogue in gynecology and obstetrics. In S. Sakamoto, S. Tojo., & T. Nakayama, eds. Gynecology and Obstetrics (pp. 1251-1256). Proceedings of the IX World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tokyo, October 25-31, 1979. Szasz, T., & Hollender, W. (1956). A contribution to the philosophy of medicine: The basic model of doctor-patient relationship. Archive of Internal Medicine, 97, 585-92. Titchen, A. (1995). Issues of validity in action research. Nurse Researcher, 2(3), 38-48. Titchen, A., & Binnie, A. (1994). Action research: A strategy for theory generation and testing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 31(1), 1-12. Twelker, P.A. (2003). ‘The critical incident technique: A manual for its planning and implementation’. Retrieved from http://www.tiu.edu/psychology/Twelker/critical_incident_technique.htm on 18 November 2007. Urquhart, C., Light, A., Thomas, R., Barker, A., Yeoman, A., Cooper, J. et al. (2003). Critical incident technique and explicitation interviewing in studies of information behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 25(1), 63-88. Walsh, K., & Kowanko, I. (2002). Nurses' and patients' perceptions of dignity. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 8, 143-151. Wang, H.Y. (2003). Stranger bodies: Women, gender, and missionary medicine in China, 1870S-1930S. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Warrington, J. (1854). cited in Wertz, R. W., & Wertz, D. C. (1977). Lying-in: A history of childbirth in America. New Haven: Yale University. Waterman, H. (1998). Embracing ambiguities and valuing ourselves: Issues of validity in action research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(1), 101-5. Waterman, H., Harker, R., MacDonald, H., McLaughlan, R., & Waterman, C. (2005a). Advancing ophthalmic nursing practice through action research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(3), 281-90. Waterman, H., Harker, R., MacDonald, H., McLaughlan, R., & Waterman, C. (2005b). Evaluation of an action research project in ophthalmic nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(4), 389-98. Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & de Koning, K. (2001). Action research: A systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technology Assessment, 5(23), iii-157. Wendt, E., Fridlund, B., & Lidell, E. (2004). Trust and confirmation in a gynecologic examination situation: A critical incident technique analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavic, 83(12), 1208-1215. Wertz, R. W., & Wertz, D. C. (1977). Lying-in: A history of childbirth in America. New Haven: Yale University. Wijma, B., Gullberg, M., & Kjessler, B. (1998). Attitudes towards pelvic examination in a random sample of Swedish women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 77(4), 422-8. Wijma, B., & Siwe, K. (2004). Examiner's unique possibilities to catalyze women's empowerment during a pelvic examination. Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinativca, 83, 1102–1103. Woogara, J. (2001). Human rights and patients’ privacy in UK hospitals. Nursing Ethics, 8(3), 234-246. Woogara, J. (2005). Patients' rights to privacy and dignity in the NHS. Nursing Standard, 19(18), 33-7. Woolsey, L. K. (1986). The critical incident technique: An innovative qualitative method of research. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 20, 242-254. Zaidman-Zait, A. (2007). Parenting a child with a cochlear implant: A critical incident study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(2), 221-41. Zuckerman, M., Navizedeh, N., Feldman, J., McCalla, S., & Minkoff, H. (2002). Determinants of women's choice of obstetrician/gynecologist. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-based Medicine, 11(2), 175-80. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41984 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 【背景與目的】
骨盆腔檢查是許多女人的共同經驗:在陌生的醫療診間,面對陌生的器械與醫護人員,赤身裸露,雙腿跨於內診台支架上,承受侵入性檢查。有許多文獻指出負向評價或經驗,如暴露隱私的困窘、害怕、焦慮,以及身體的不舒適或疼痛、感到低微且赤裸、無防衛性、易受傷害等,或醫師或檢查者所呈現的態度是否輕視態度、譴責、願意溝通、解釋、提供資訊皆影響她們的感受。然而婦女病患骨盆腔檢查的正負向經驗,很多範圍是與醫護人員的行為有關。至今,國內很少有研究在探討醫護人員行為對婦女病患骨盆腔檢查經驗的影響,加上在目前此種「唯我」、「獨尊」、「理所當然」父權體制的意識下所建構的醫療體制,女性身體在醫療環境中的遭遇經驗是ㄧ種「無權力與被控制」的處境。因此本研究目的分兩部份,第一部份是從婦女病患觀點,瞭解她們在經歷骨盆腔檢查過程中所關注的醫護人員行為。第二部份是根據這些事實的發現,哪些醫護人員的行為使婦女病患產生負向經驗,透過行動研究,研究者與醫護人員(實踐者)是平等夥伴關係、共同討論,互相學習之下,使醫護人員的行為朝向婦女病患所期望的骨盆腔檢查之醫護病互動,並塑造「以婦女病患為尊」及親善的婦產科門診環境。 【方法】 本研究分兩部份進行資料收集,第一部份採立意取樣,於中部某醫學中心、區域醫院與地區醫院婦產科門診,以重要事件技巧(CIT)為方法,進行資料收集,將訪談的32位婦女病患資料,並使用Atlas.ti 5.0版軟體進行分析。第二部份以行動研究的四階段:事實的問題(確認問題)、計劃、行動,和評值為研究方法,根據第一部分婦女病患的負向經驗為事實的問題,延攬地區與區域醫院的醫護人員參與行動研究,擬定三個行動目標,透過婦女病患的問卷與訪談的評值,瞭解醫護人員執行骨盆腔檢查的情形,共執行三次行動研究,反覆回饋與修正的過程,改善醫護病互動,以符合婦女病患的需求。問卷資料使用SPSS 10.0版統計套裝軟體,採百分比方式進行資料分析,也將訪談婦女病患和醫護人員的資料轉成逐字稿,並整理與分析。 【結果】 第一部分研究結果歸納出醫護人員執行骨盆腔檢查的行為,使婦女病患產生的正/負向經驗,有44種行為、4個次類別、2個類別和1主題。兩類別為:一、被瞭解為人的個體,包含被尊重/不被尊重、被關注與投入/被忽略需求。二、產生信心,包含掌控情境/不確定感、被支持/未被支持。從這些不同事件所組成的行為敘述,其背後隱藏著婦女病患的需求—期望醫護人員能秉持有一種助人關係的內涵與原則。 第二部分透過行動研究過程,研究者與醫護人員在彼此平等關係下,共同討論與分享,行動中隨時反思,藉由婦女病患三次的反覆評值,以瞭解醫師行為的調整、護人員行為的改變及環境改善的狀況:1.醫師行為的調整,彰顯了尊重婦女病患的具體操作:(1) 從詢問「我現在要幫妳做檢查」至嚐試詢問「我現在要幫妳做檢查,妳準備好了嗎?」,讓婦女病患覺得很有安全感,有被重視感覺與尊重、有機會提問並與醫師互動。(2)有的醫師可以接受無小布簾,檢查時能與婦女病患面對面互動。(3)會徵求婦女病患同意,允許其他醫師進入內診間見習。2. 護理人員行為的改善上,婦女病患感受到從沒有提供身體披覆到重視身體隱私的維護;張貼內診流程圖,讓她們清楚流程,減少對流程的不確定感;對初次檢查者會先解釋內診流程,使其先有心理準備;護理人員會介紹內診環境及引導上下內診台,若是有檢查經驗者,至少會詢問是否需要幫忙;會馬上清除內診台上前位婦女病患所遺留下的污物;會詢問是否使用內診台上小布簾,使其有自主權。若是醫師無法接受不圍布簾者,則告知婦女病患「我現在要幫妳圍起」,與婦女病患有互動機會;請婦女病患腳平放於內診台等待醫師檢查,減少尷尬與不舒適。3. 環境的改善上,鴨嘴污物桶從無蓋到有蓋桶子,減少婦女病患看到大量鸭嘴的緊張與不安;內診環境的圍簾從不緊密缺乏隱私至緊密有隱私感。 【結論】 本研究結果顯示從婦女病患的角度瞭解醫護人員的哪些行為使她們產生正負向的經驗,瞭解其負向經驗後,透過行動研究在實際的臨床婦產科情境中進行醫護病互動的改善,也可做為醫護人員執行最佳實務—骨盆腔檢查的指引,及婦產科醫師實習前必讀與熟稔的素材,促使婦女病患有正向經驗與避免負向經驗的產生,除可適用於臨床實務與教學的參考外,可推廣行動研究於臨床實務者,增加實務者自主獨立的研究,以改善實務,朝向以婦女病患為中心的照護。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | 【Background and purpose】
The pelvic examination (PE) is a common experience facing with the majority of women. Women patients’ positive and negative experiences in connection with the PE are, to a large extent, connected to the physicians’ and nurses’ behaviors and attitudes. Nowadays, few studies focus on exploring this area. In addition, Taiwanese medical system is primarily dominated with paternalistic physician-patient relationships, indicating that the physician has centrality, superiority and authority. Thus, this study was divided into two parts. The first part of the study was to understand their experiences concerning physicians’/nurses’ behavior in the situation of the PE from women patients’ perspective ; the second part of the study was to improve physician-nurse-patient interaction and increase quality of care in PE through action research based on women patients’ negative experiences, 【Subjects and methods】 The qualitative approach was used in the first part of the study. Thirty-two women were asked to describe their positive and negative experiences while receiving the PE and what they perceived as critical for the PE procedures. Data were analyzed with the critical incident technique (CIT). The second part of the study used the four phases of this action research project, including fact-finding, planning, action, and evaluation. According to the fact-finding about women patients’ negative experiences, the researcher, physicians and nurses discuss the action objective together, leading to the consensus objectives. Also, an action research group was established in the local, the region hospital. Then an action research was formed with participants and collaborative physicians and nurses. Research adopted 3 cyclical processes and revised action aimed to improve physician-nurses-woman patient interaction and meet women patients’ need. Questionnaire data was analyzed using SPSS 10.0 and descriptive interviews were transcribed verbatim for analysis. 【Results】 The results of the first part of the study consisted of 44 categories of behaviors, four subcategories, two categories [acknowledged as a person and created confidence], and one main theme [a helping relationship]. Women patients perceived positive experiences, including being respected, being in control, being engaged, and being supported. On the contrary, women patients also described negative experiences, including not being respected, feeling uncertain, needs being neglected, and not being supported. Through understanding the meaning behind women patients’ experiences indicated that the women were to expect physicians/nurses hold a helping relationship of connotation and principle. The result of the second part of the action research emphases the involvement of the researcher and participants [physicians and nurses] in the process of involvement, collaboration, and reflection in action. Through 3 cyclical processes to evaluate changes or adjust in physicians’ and nurses’ behaviors, and change environment in the obstetric and gynecological outpatient department. First, the physicians’ behaviors were changed or adjusted, including (1) physicians were willing to once again ask for permission by saying, “Are you ready?” This made women patients feel respected, relaxed their body, and increased interaction with physicians. (2) Physicians also could choose not using a curtain, and (3) ask whether to permit the other physicians to come into the examination room to learn PE skills. Second, concerning the nurses’ behaviors was changed, including, nurses assessed whether a woman understood a PE procedure and asked whether to she preferred a curtain or not; Nurse needed to clean examination table right now when woman patient finish a pelvis exam; If the physician was used to utilize a curtain, a nurse told “I will utilize the curtain for you.” and interacted with the woman patient; If women patient was waiting for the physician for a long time, the nurse needed to put her legs on the examination table or sit on the side of examination table; Nurses also designed a PE procedure protocol to increase women patients’ awareness of the procedure. Third, an examination room was changed to increase privacy and added a cover so that speculums would not be seen in the garbage can in order to decrease women patients’ tension. 【Conclusions】 The conclusion of the first part of the study showed that these women patients had positive experiences when their physicians acknowledged them as persons and facilitated the procedure to create confidence. When physicians/nurses hold a helping relationship with women patients, women patients were more likely to be acknowledged as a person and created their confidence. If physicians and nurses followed the above suggestions, then they could create women-friendly clinics. The conclusion of the second part of the study was to promote physician-nurse-woman patient interaction and to decrease women patients’ discomfort in the PE procedure. These findings can be incorporated into medical and nursing education and used as a valuable reference for those training to become obstetric and gynecological physicians or nurse. The results were also regarded as best practice guidelines in an obstetric and gynecological outpatient department. We also suggested nurses or physicians to expand action research to practice, enhancing the focus of woman patient-oriented practice Keywords: pelvic examination, women patients, experience, physician-nurse-patient interaction, qualitative study, action research, a helping relationship | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:40:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-D90426003-1.pdf: 12963102 bytes, checksum: d2e69b29f3cd7c953b4ba1ba523fc734 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書
誌謝…………………………………………………………………… I 中文摘要………………………………………………………………. III 英文摘要………………………………………………………………. VI 目錄……………………………………….........................…………... IX 表目錄………………………………………………………………… XIV 圖目錄………………………………………………………………… XV 第一章 緒論. 第一節 研究背景與重要性…………………………………………... 1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………. 3 第三節 名詞定義……………………………………………………. 4 第二章 文獻查證. 第一節 骨盆腔檢查的歷史回顧……………………………………… 5 一、西方骨盆腔檢查醫病互動的歷史演進………………………. 8 二、我國骨盆腔檢查醫病互動的歷史演進……………………… 11 第二節 醫病關係的歷史演變………………………………………... 13 一、醫病關係的沿革…………………………………………… 13 二、醫病溝通的研究…………………………………………… 14 三、骨盆腔檢查醫護病互動的過程…………………………… 15 第三節 「身體心像」概念於骨盆腔檢查的應用……………………… 21 一、身體心像 (body image)……………………………………. 21 二、身體界限 (body boundary) ………………………………… 22 三、骨盆腔檢查其身體心像改變 (body image change)的過程.......... 23 第四節 骨盆腔檢查的相關研究……………………………................ 26 一、骨盆腔檢查相關文獻回顧………………………………….. 26 二、影響骨盆腔檢查的因素…………………………………….. 27 第五節 倫理的內涵…………………………………......................... 29 一、倫理的本質……………………………………………….. 29 二、重視人存在的相關研究…..................................................... 30 三、生命倫理 (bioethics)……………………………………….. 31 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究方法論…………………………………………………. 33 一、田野研究 (field research)…………………………………… 33 二、行動研究 (action research)…………………………………. 33 (一) 行動研究的本體論…………………………………….... 34 (二) 行動研究的知識論……………………………………… 35 (三) 行動研究的信度與效度………………………………….. 36 第二節 研究設計……………………………………………………. 38 第三節 研究對象……………………………………………………. 41 第四節 研究倫理………………………………………………......... 42 第五節 研究資料的收集……….......................................................... 44 一、質性研究資料的收集………………………………………. 44 (一) 資料來源與收集方式……………………………………. 44 (二) 資料收集過程…………………………………………... 44 二、行動研究資料的收集………………………………………. 44 (一) 資料來源與收集方式……………………………………. 44 (二) 資料收集過程…………………………………………... 45 第六節 資料分析……………………………………………………. 46 一、質性資料分析……………………………………………… 46 (一) 重要事件技巧 (critical incident technique; CIT)…………… 46 (二) 資料收集與分析的嚴謹度 (rigor)………………………... 46 二、行動研究資料分析…………………………………………. 49 (一) 資料分析……………………………………………….. 49 (二) 行動研究的信度與效度………………………………….. 49 第四章 研究結果 第一節 質性研究分析結果…………………………………………... 50 一、質性研究對象基本資料…………………………………… 50 二、質性研究結果……………………………………………. 52 助人關係……………………………………………….. 52 1. 被瞭解為人的個體………………………………….. 52 1.1 被尊重…………………………………………… 52 1.2 不被尊重………………………………………… 57 1.3 被關注與投入…………………………………….. 65 1.4 被忽略需求………………………………………. 69 2. 產生信心…………………………………………… 78 2.1 掌控情境……………………………………….... 78 2.2 不確定感……………………………………….... 81 2.3 被支持…………………………………………… 88 2.4 不被支持……………………………………….... 89 第二節 行動研究的過程與結果……………………………………… 93 ㄧ、階段一:確認問題(Problem identification)或事實發現(fact-finding) ……………………………………… 95 (一) 地區與區域醫院醫護人員對婦女病患正/負向經驗的回應…. 95 (二) 先收集資料擬定行動研究評估的基準(baseline assessment data) …………………………………………………… 100 1. 地區醫院評估的基準…………………………………... 100 2. 區域醫院評估的基準…………………………………... 110 二、階段二:計畫(Planning)…..……………………………….. 123 (一) 延攬行動研究小組………................................................ 123 (二) 與行動研究小組一起發展教育計畫(develop education program) ………………………………………………. 125 三、階段三: 行動(Action)…………………………..………… 127 (一) 目標ㄧ:為婦產科門診的醫護人員安排教育課程………… 127 (二) 目標二:發展醫護之間一致認可的骨盆腔檢查流程………. 138 (三) 目標三:為婦女病患發展骨盆腔檢查流程圖……………… 150 四、階段四: 評值(Evaluation)………………………………… 152 (一) 第一次行動研究結果的評值……………………………... 152 1. 地區醫院結果的評值…………………………………... 152 2. 區域醫院結果的評值…………………………………... 159 (二) 第二次行動研究結果的評值…………………………….. 166 1. 地區醫院結果的評值…………………………………... 166 2. 區域醫院結果的評值…………………………………... 175 (三) 第三次行動研究結果的評值…………………………….. 183 1. 地區醫院結果的評值…………………………………... 183 2. 區域醫院結果的評值…………………………………... 197 第五章 討論 第一節 助人關係:被瞭解為人的個體與產生信心…………………… 227 一、研究結果的討論…………………………………………… 228 (一) 被瞭解為人的個體……………………………………… 228 (二) 產生信心………………………………………………. 230 二、內診台上小布簾對婦女病患的意義………………………… 231 三、護理人員於骨盆腔檢查的角色功能………………………… 232 四、醫護病互動--婦女病患正/負向經驗圖—以骨盆腔檢查為例… 235 第二節 行動研究過程與結果的討論…………………………………. 236 一、透過行動研究,醫護人員的省思與行為調整……………….. 236 二、行動者的反思…………………………………………….. 240 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論………………………………………………………... 245 第二節 應用………………………………………………………... 248 第三節 研究限制與建議…………………………………………….. 252 參考文獻 中文部份…………………………………………………………….... 255 英文部份…………………………………………………………….... 258 附錄 附錄一 醫學中心、區域醫院和地區醫院研究倫理委員會同意書…….. 270 附錄二 骨盆腔檢查婦女病患所關注的醫護人員行為問卷…………… 273 表目錄 頁數 表1 骨盆腔檢查流程:醫師與護理人員的角色………………………. 18 表2 內診過程婦女病患身體心像改變的內容與適切的護理措施………. 24 表3 婦女病患基本資料(N=32) ……………………………………… 51 表4 醫護人員行為使婦女病患產生正/負向經驗—以骨盆腔檢查為例…. 91 表5 地區醫院行動研究前婦女病患基本資料(N=30)………………….. 101 表6 區域醫院行動研究前婦女病患基本資料(N=30)………………….. 111 表7 地區醫院參與行動研究醫護人員的基本資料…………………….. 123 表8 區域醫院參與行動研究醫護人員的基本資料…………………….. 124 表9 地區與區域醫院婦產科醫護人員參與行動研究的時間表……….... 126 表10 地區醫院第一次行動研究評值其婦女病患的基本資料(N=30)…….. 153 表11 區域醫院第一次行動研究評值其婦女病患的基本資料(N=30)…….. 160 表12 地區醫院第二次行動研究評值其婦女病患的基本資料(N=30)…….. 167 表13 區域醫院第二次行動研究評值其婦女病患的基本資料(N=35)…….. 176 表14 地區醫院第三次行動研究評值其婦女病患的基本資料(N=32)…….. 184 表15 地區醫院醫師於行動研究前的想法與行動研究後執行的現象……. 194 表16 地區醫院護理人員於行動研究前與行動研究後的改變…………... 196 表17 區域醫院第三次行動研究評值其婦女病患的基本資料(N=35)…….. 198 表18 區域醫院醫師於行動研究前的想法與行動研究後執行的現象……. 212 表19 區域醫院護理人員於行動研究前與行動研究後的改變………........ 214 表20 地區醫院行動研究前和三次行動研究後婦女病患評值醫護人員的 結果…………………………………………………………... 215 表21 區域醫院行動研究前和三次行動研究後婦女病患評值醫護人員的 結果…………………………………………………………... 221 圖目錄 頁數 圖1-1 This famous illustration of “the touch” in a gynecological examination is from a nineteenth-century French text frequently used in America. Note the avoidance of eye contract between doctor and patient and drapery shielding the woman’s body from view. (Adapted from Wertz & Wertz, 1977, P. 78) ……………............ 10 圖1-2 This nineteenth-century drawing illustrates another technique for preserving the patient’s modesty: the doctor conducting a gynecological examination looks directly into the woman’s eyes to assure her that her private parts are safe from the gaze. (Adapted from Wertz & Wertz, 1977, P. 84.) …………………..... 10 圖2 以行動研究促進骨盆腔檢查之醫護病互動的循環圖………………. 94 圖3-1 地區醫院於行動研究前鴨嘴污物桶為無蓋桶子…………………… 109 圖3-2 地區醫院於行動研究後鴨嘴污物桶為有蓋桶子…………………… 109 圖3-3 地區醫院於行動研究前內診室缺乏隱私………………………….. 173 圖3-4 地區醫院於行動研究後內診室增添魔術貼,提供隱私環境………… 173 圖3-5 地區醫院於行動研究前護理人員只站於醫師後方的位置….………. 174 圖3-6 地區醫院於行動研究後護理人員所站位置可兼顧病人與協助醫師…. 174 圖3-7 地區醫院婦產科門診於行動研究後候診室張貼內診流程圖………... 188 圖3-8 地區醫院婦產科門診於行動研究後問診室張貼內診流程圖………... 188 圖3-9 地區醫院婦產科門診於行動研究後婦一診張貼內診流程圖………... 189 圖4-1 地區醫院婦產科門診於行動研究後婦二診張貼內診流程圖………... 189 圖4-2 區域醫院婦產科門診於行動研究前以文字方式呈現內診流程圖........ 202 圖4-3 區域醫院婦產科門診於行動研究前內診流程圖的呈現...................... 202 圖4-4 區域醫院婦產科門診於行動研究後候診室提供內診流程圖…........... 203 圖4-5 區域醫院婦產科門診於行動研究後內診室張貼內診流程圖………... 203 圖4-6 區域醫院於行動研究後內診室張貼內診流程圖…………………… 204 圖4-7 區域醫院於行動研究後內診室環境清楚標示衣物擺放位置………... 204 圖5 醫護病互動--婦女病患正/負向經驗圖—以骨盆腔檢查為例………. 235 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 透視骨盆腔檢查的醫護病互動--第一部份:從婦女病患的角度探討骨盆腔檢查的經驗;第二部份:以行動研究促進骨盆腔檢查的醫護病互動 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Seeing Through Physician-Nurse-Patient Interaction in Pelvic Examination--Part 1 Exploring Women Patients’Experience in Pelvic Examination;Part 2 Improving Physician-Nurse-Patient Interaction in Pelvic Examination through Action Research Approach | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 胡文郁(We-Yu Hu),蔡甫昌(Fu-Chang Tasi),楊育正,戴正德 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 骨盆腔檢查,婦女病患,經驗,醫護病互動,質性研究,行動研究,助人關係, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | pelvic examination,women patients,experience,physician-nurse-patient interaction,qualitative study,action research,a helping relationship, | en |
dc.relation.page | 280 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-09-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 護理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 護理學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 12.66 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。