Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41805
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳忠仁(Chung-Jen Chen)
dc.contributor.authorTzu-Yao Linen
dc.contributor.author林子堯zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T00:32:23Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-03
dc.date.copyright2009-02-03
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.submitted2009-01-15
dc.identifier.citationAgrawal, A. and Nagarjan, N. J. (1990) “Corporate Structure, Agency Costs, and Ownership Control: the Case of All-Equity Firms,” Journal of Finance, 45, 1325–1331.
Anderson, R. C. and Reeb, D. M. (2003) “Founding Family Ownership and Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500,” Journal of Finance, 58, 1301– 1327.
Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T. and Schone, P. (2005) “Family Ownership and Productivity: the Role of Owner-Management,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 107– 127.
Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., and Turk, T.A. (1991) “Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy,” Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205–214.
Boyd, B. (1990) “Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model,” Strategic Management Journal, 11, 419–430.
Chiang, M. H. and Lin, J. H. (2007) “The Relationship between Corporate Governance and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Taiwan’s Manufacturing Firms.” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 768-779
Cohen, W. M and Levinthal, D. A. (1990) “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
Daily, C. and Dalton, D. (1993) “Board of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 65–81.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., and Johnson, J.L. (1998) “Meta-analytic Review of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269–290
David, P., Hitt, M. H. and Gimeno, J. (2001) “The Influence of Activism by Institutional Investors on R&D,” Academy of Management Journal, 44, 144–158.
David, F., George, S. B., and David, H. (2007) “Corporate Boards and Company Performance: Review of Research in Light of Recent Reforms,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 865–878
Darrow, A.L. & Kahl, D.R. (1982) “A Comparison of Moderated Regression Techniques Considering Strength of Effect,” Journal of Management, 8(2), 35-47
Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. H. (1991) “Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns,” Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49–64.
Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. H. (1994) “Boards and Company Performance – Research Challenges the Conventional Wisdom,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2, 151–160
De andres, P., Azofra, V. and Lopez, F. (2005) “Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning, and Effectiveness,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 197–210.
Diane, K. D. and John, J. M. (2003) “International Corporate Governance,” Journal Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1)
Dulewicz, V. and Herbert, P. (2004) “Does the Composition and Practice of Boards and Directors Bear Any Relationship to the Performance of the Their Companies?” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 263–280.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74.
Fried, V., Bruton, G. D. and Hisrich, R. D. (1998) “Strategy and the Board of Directors in Venture Capital-Backed Firms,” Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 493–503.
Gallo, M. A. and Vilaseca, A. (1996) “Finance in Family Business,” Family Business Review, 9, 387–401.
Gavin, J. N. and Geoffrey, C. K. (2007) “Can Directors Impact Performance? A Case-based Test of Three Theories of Corporate Governance,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 585–608
Golden, B. R. and Zajac, E. J. (2001) “When Will Boards Influence Strategy? Inclination × Power = Strategic Change,” Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1087–1111.
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998) “Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link?” Journal of Marketing, 62, 30–45.
Hillman, A. J. and Dalziel, T. (2003) “Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives,” Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.
James, H. S. (1999) “Owner as Manager, Extended Horizons and the Family Firm,” International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6, 41-56
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976) “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kesner, I. (1987) “Directors’ Stock Ownership and Organizational Performance: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies,” Journal of Management, 13(3), 499–507.
Kosnik, D. R. (1990) “Effects of Board Demography and Directors’ Incentives on Corporate Greenmail Decisions,” Academy of Management Journal, 33, 129–150.
Lins, K. V. (2003) “Equity Ownership and Firm Value in Emerging Markets,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 159–184.
Luan, C. J. and Tang, M. J. (2007) “Where is Independent Director Efficacy?” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 636-643.
Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R. and Hillman, A. J. (2003) “Board Composition from Adolescence to Maturity: A Multitheoretic View,” Academy of Management Review, 28, 416–431.
Mansfield, E. (1968) “Industrial Research and Technological Innovation,” New York: Norton
McConaughy, D. L., Walker, M. C., Henderson, G. V. and Mishra, C. S. (1998) “Founding Family Controlled Firms: Efficiency and Value,” Review of Financial Economics, 7, 1 –19.
Mehran, H. (1995) “Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership and Firm Performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163-184.
Narasimhan, O., Rajiv, S. and Dutta, S. (2006). “Absorptive Capacity of Firms in High Technology Markets: The Competitive Advantage of the Haves,” Marketing Science, 25 (5), 510-524
Pearce, J. A., II and Zahra, S. A. (1992) “Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective,” Journal of Management Studies, 29, 411–438.
Peng, M. W. (2004) “Outside Directors and Firm Performance during Institutional Transitions,” Strategic Management Journal, 25, 453–471.
Pfeffer, J. (1972) “Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 218–228.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978) “The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective,” New York, NY, Harper and Row
Pfeffer, J. (1983) “Organizational Demography,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299–357.
Pollack, R.A. (1985) “A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households,” Journal of Economic Literature, 23, 581–608.
Rhoades, D. L., Rechner, P. L. and Sundaramurthy, C. (2000) “Board Composition and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis of the Influence of Outside Directors,” Journal of Managerial Issues, 12, 76–91.
Schoonhoven, C.B. (1981) “Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden within the Language of Contingency “Theory”,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 349-377.
Sharma, S., Durand, R. M. and Gur-Arie, O. (1981) “Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291-300
Sheu, H. J. and Yang, C. Y. (2005) “Insider Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: a Productivity Perspective Study in Taiwan's Electronics Industry,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 326-337
Shleifier, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1997) “A Survey of Corporate Governance,” Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783.
Stein, J. (1989) “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 655-669
Thomsen, S. and Pedersen, T. (2000) “Ownership Structure and Economic Performance in the Largest European Companies,” Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705.
Wiwattanakantang, Y. (2001) “Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Value: evidence from Thailand,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9, 323–362.
Zahra, S. A. and Pearce, J. A., II (1989) “Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model,” Journal of Management, 15, 291–334.
Zald, M. N. (1969) “The Power and the Functions of Boards of Directors: A Theoretical Synthesis,” American Journal of Sociology, 75, 97–111.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41805-
dc.description.abstract本篇研究將探究外部董監比率、家族董監比率以及家族持股比率對於公司績效的關連性進行分析。根據研究結果,外部董監比率與公司績效的關係將呈現倒U形,而吸收能力在此關係中將扮演一個調節作用的腳色。另一方面,家族董監比率與公司績效之間存在一個反向的直線關係;而家族持股與公司績效之間則是有一個正向的直線關係,本篇研究認為家族大股東願意讓出董事會的席次給予有足夠專業學識與背景的經理人,是造成此結果的一大主因。
本篇研究將以台灣上市電子公司為樣本,並利用台灣經濟新報所提供的次級資料進行迴歸分析。結論部份會提供本篇研究的管理意涵、研究限制與未來研究方向的建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the effects of outside directors, family ownership and absorptive capacity on corporate performance. From the research results, this study suggests an inverse U-shaped relationship between the proportion of outside directors and corporate performance. When adding two types of absorptive capacity- R&D intensity and marketing intensity- as moderators, the relationship between outside director percentage and corporate performance becomes strengthened or attenuated respectively. In addition, this study proposes that the proportion of family directors is negatively associated with the corporate performance; while the proportion of the family equity ownership is positively associated with the corporate performance. Comprehensive secondary data on all the electronic companies listed in the Taiwan Stock Exchange supports the prediction. This article also discusses the managerial implications and highlights future research directions in the end.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:32:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-97-R95741041-1.pdf: 344163 bytes, checksum: 0b6c5fecb24bc49cb766f77a8c4d906b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2008
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background and Objective 1
1.2 Research Procedure 5
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESIS 6
2.1 The Mechanism of Corporate Govenance 6
2.2 Theoretical Perspectives on Outside Directors 7
2.2.1 Agency Theory 7
2.2.2 Stewardship Theory 8
2.2.3 Resource Dependence Theory 9
2.3 Outside Directors and Corporate Performance 10
2.4 Family Ownership and Corporate Performance 11
2.5 The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity 14
2.5.1 R&D Intensity 14
2.5.2 Resource Dependence Theory 15
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 17
3.1 Data Collection and Sample 17
3.2 Research Framework and Variables Measurement 18
3.2.1 Research Framework 18
3.2.2 Independent Variables 19
3.2.3 Moderating Variables 20
3.2.4 Dependent Variables 20
3.2.5 Control variables 21
3.3 Statistical Method 22
3.3.1 Descriptive Statistics Analysis 22
3.3.2 Correlation Analysis 22
3.3.3 Moderated Hierarchical Regression Analysis 22
CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH RESULTS 24
4.1 Descriptive Analysis 24
4.2 Correlation Analysis 25
4.3 Regression Analysis 27
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 32
5.1 Research Conclusions 32
5.2 Research Contributions 34
5.3 Research Limitations and Recommendation for Future Studies 35
REFERENCE 36
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject家族持股zh_TW
dc.subject公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject外部董監zh_TW
dc.subject家族董監zh_TW
dc.subjectFamily Directoren
dc.subjectOutside Directoren
dc.subjectCorporate Governanceen
dc.subjectFamily Ownershipen
dc.title外部董監與家族持股對公司績效的影響 ─ 以台灣電子產業為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impacts of Outside Directors and Family Ownership
on Firm Performance - The Case of Electronic Industry in Taiwan
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor郭瑞祥(Ruey-Shan Guo)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林博文(Bou-Wen Lin),張紹基(Shao-Chi Chang),林舒柔
dc.subject.keyword公司治理,外部董監,家族董監,家族持股,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCorporate Governance,Outside Director,Family Director,Family Ownership,en
dc.relation.page41
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2009-01-15
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-97-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
336.1 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved