請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41509完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Yi Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳敬誼 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:21:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159-170.
Allen, B. (1991). Topic Knowledge and Online Catalog Search Formulation. Library Quarterly, 61(2), 188-213. Barjak, F. (2006). Research productivity in the internet era. Scientometrics, 68(3), 343-360. Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (1993). A Keyword Classification Scheme for Is Research Literature - an Update. Mis Quarterly, 17(2), 209-226. Barry, C. L. (1994). User-Defined Relevance Criteria - an Exploratory-Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 149-159. Bertin, P. (2008). A three-phase model proposal for the evolution of scientific communication: from first print periodicals to current electronic communication system. Transinformacao, 20(1), 17-28. Brucks, M. (1985). The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16. Camacho-Minano, M. D. M., & Nunez-Nickel, M. (2009). The Multilayered Nature of Reference Selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 754-777. Carmel, E., Crawford, S., & Chen, H. C. (1992). Browsing in Hypertext - a Cognitive Study. Ieee Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 22(5), 865-884. Chen, Y. C., Shang, R. A., & Kao, C. Y. (2009). The effects of information overload on consumers' subjective state towards buying decision in the internet shopping environment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(1), 48-58. Conkling, T. W., Harwell, K. R., McCallips, C., Nyana, S. A., & Osif, B. A. (2010). Research Material Selection in the pre-web and post-web Environments: An Interdisciplinary Study of Bibliographic Citations in Doctoral Dissertations. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 20-31. Costa, S., & Meadows, J. (2000). The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists. Journal of Information Science, 26(4), 255-262. Downing, R. E., Moore, J. L., & Brown, S. W. (2005). The effects and interaction of spatial visualization and domain expertise on information seeking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(2), 195-209. Drabenstott, K. M. (2003). Do nondomain experts enlist the strategies of domain experts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 836-854. Ellis, D. (1989). A Behavioral-Approach to Information-Retrieval System-Design. Journal of Documentation, 45(3), 171-212. Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Information Society, 20(5), 325-344. Evans, J. A. (2008). Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science, 321(5887), 395-399. Hart, M. A. (2007). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(3), 274-276. Hjorland, B. (2010). The Foundation of the Concept of Relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 217-237. Hong, J. W., & Sternthal, B. (2010). The Effects of Consumer Prior Knowledge and Processing Strategies on Judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 301-311. Hsiehyee, I. (1993). Effects of Search Experience and Subject Knowledge on the Search Tactics of Novice and Experienced Searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(3), 161-174. Jenkins, C., Corritore, C. L., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). Patterns of Information Seeking on the Web: A Qualitative Study of Domain Expertise and Web Expertise. IT& Society, 1(3), 64-89. Ju, B. (2007). Does domain knowledge matter: Mapping users' expertise to their information interactions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2007-2020. Kurata, K., Matsubayashi, M., Mine, S., Muranushi, T., & Ueda, S. (2007). Electronic journals and their unbundled functions in scholarly communication: Views and utilization by scientific, technological and medical researchers in Japan. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1402-1415. Lariviere, V., Archambault, E., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagne, E. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 997-1004. Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2009). The Decline in the Concentration of Citations, 1900-2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858-862. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521-521. Li, K.-Y. (2010). Examining The Impact of Online Availability on Information System Researches’Interdisciplinary Knowledge- Flows: A Long-Term Reference-Based Analysis. [Unpublished master thesis]. Liu, Z. M. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment - Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712. Mack, T., Manoff, M., Miller, T. J., & Smith, A. D. (2004). Designing for experts: How scholars approach an academic library Web site. Information Technology and Libraries, 23(1), 16-22. Maglaughlin, K. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2002). User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(5), 327-342. Mahe, A. (2004). Beyond usage: understanding the use of electronic journals on the basis of information activity analysis. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal, 9(4). Marks, L. J. O., Jerry C. . (1981). Toward a Cognitive Structure Conceptualization of Product Familiarity. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 5. Meho, L. I., & Tibbo, H. R. (2003). Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 570-587. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., & Tenopir, C. (2006). Finding information in (very large) digital libraries: A deep log approach to determining differences in use according to method of access. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 119-126. Olle, C., & Borrego, A. (2010). A qualitative study of the impact of electronic journals on scholarly information behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 32(3), 221-228. Park, T. K. (1993). The Nature of Relevance in Information-Retrieval - an Empirical-Study. Library Quarterly, 63(3), 318-351. Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 253-264. Rowlands, I. (2007). Electronic journals and user behavior: A review of recent research. Library & Information Science Research, 29(3), 369-396. Shanteau, J. ( 1995). Expert Judgment and Financial Decision Making. Risky Business: Risk Behavior and Risk Management. Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. Mis Quarterly, 32(3), 467-482. Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Edwards, S., & Wu, L. (2009). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings, 61(1), 5-32. Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2004). Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years? Population and Development Review, 30(3), 489-+. Vibert, N., Ros, C., Le Bigot, L., Ramond, M., Gatefin, J., & Rouet, J. F. (2009). Effects of Domain Knowledge on Reference Search With the PubMed Database: An Experimental Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1423-1447. Wallace, M. L., Lariviere, V., & Gingras, Y. (2009). Modeling a century of citation distributions. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 296-303. Wang, P. L., & Soergel, D. (1998). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. Document selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2), 115-133. Wang, P. L., & White, M. D. (1999). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 98-114. Wildemuth, B. M. (2004). The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 246-258. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41509 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去研究發現網際網路對學者的資訊搜尋行為會造成莫大改變。網際網路興起後,參考文獻的引用集中程度逐年下降;表示在網際網路的幫助下,學者們能夠找到更多先前較不容易被注意到的文章,而不會只注意那些少數高被引、較熱門的文章。此現象即支持長尾理論。然而,引用集中程度的下降可能只是網際網路後文章出版量大幅增加造成的結果。因此本研究欲探討網際網路是否會影響學者的資訊搜尋,幫助他們資訊搜尋的範圍變得更為廣泛,且找到更多先前較不易被注意到的文章。除了網際網路的影響外,領域知識也會對學者的資訊搜尋造成影響。因此,本研究另一目的即是探討領域知識造成的影響,且更進一步調查是否網際網路的效果對於領域知識高低不同的學者,會有不一樣的影響。本研究採用次集資料分析的方式,且結果顯示網際網路所造成的效果是顯著的。在網際網路之後,學者們會引用更多較不容易被注意到的文章。然而,領域知識的影響並不如預期中的明顯,領域知識僅會影響學者相關參考文獻的數量以及期刊的選擇。網際網路與領域知識的交互作用是顯著的,代表網際網路對領域知識高低不同的學者,會有不一樣的效果。對於領域知識高的學者而言,網際網路最大的影響在於幫助他們找到更多先前不易被注意到的文章。而對領域知識低的學者而言,網際網路最大的影響則是在於幫助他們找到更多主題相關的參考文獻。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The Internet has brought extreme changes to academic researchers’ information seeking behavior. After occurrence of the Internet, the concentration of citations declined year by year, which may indicate that with the help of the Internet, researchers can find more previously unnoticed documents, and they would not focus only on those highly-cited documents. This point of view supported the “long-tail” theory. However, the decline in concentration may be the result of increased publication volume after the Internet. So the present study aimed at investigating whether the Internet would affect information seeking of researchers so that they can search information more extensively, and find more previously unnoticed documents. Besides the impact of the Internet, this study also examined the impact of domain knowledge, and further determined whether the impact of the Internet would be different for researchers with different levels of domain knowledge.
By applying secondary-data analysis, this study found that the impact of the Internet is significant. After occurrence of the Internet, researchers found documents from less-noticed sources. The impact of domain knowledge, however, is only reflected in the number of relevant references and the journals selected by researchers. The interaction effect between the Internet and domain knowledge was found to be significant, which indicated that the impact of the Internet would be different for researchers with different levels of domain knowledge. For high knowledge researchers, the greatest impact of the Internet is to help them find documents from less-noticed sources. For low knowledge researchers, the greatest impact of the Internet is to help them find more relevant documents. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:21:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98725018-1.pdf: 836978 bytes, checksum: 497d3ce7fc5ab6c059536edc6bf13dff (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1. 1 Research Background 1 1. 2 Research Motivation 3 1. 3 Research Purpose 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2. 1 Effects of the Internet on Academic Researchers 7 2. 2 Winner-take-all vs. Long-tail 9 2. 3 Effects of Domain Knowledge on Information Evaluation 12 2. 4 Effects of Domain Knowledge on Search Strategies and Performance 13 2. 5 Research Hypotheses 16 Chapter 3 Methodology 23 3. 1 Data Collection 23 3. 1. 1. Subject Selection 23 3. 1. 2. Keywords Definition 25 3. 1. 3. Determining Time Periods and Domain Knowledge 28 3. 1. 4. Retrieving Data of Cited Reference 31 3. 2 Measurement of Document Characteristics 35 Chapter 4 Results 38 4. 1 Background Information 38 4. 2 Research Topic 42 4. 3 Author Status 44 4. 4 Journal Status 49 4. 5 Recencys 51 4. 6 Other Characteristics 54 4. 7 Discussion 56 Chapter 5 Conclusion 60 5. 1 Conclusion 60 5. 2 Limitations and Future Work 61 References 65 Appendix 70 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 引用文獻分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊搜尋 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 長尾理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網際網路 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 領域知識 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Long-tail Theory | en |
| dc.subject | Information Seeking | en |
| dc.subject | Citation Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Domain Knowledge | en |
| dc.subject | the Internet | en |
| dc.title | 網際網路與領域知識對學者資訊搜尋能力造成的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Examining the Impact of the Internet and Domain Knowledge on Information Seeking Ability of Academic Researchers | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 黃慕萱 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 唐牧群 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊搜尋,長尾理論,網際網路,領域知識,引用文獻分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Information Seeking,Long-tail Theory,the Internet,Domain Knowledge,Citation Analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 74 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 817.36 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
